« first day (1005 days earlier)      last day (3711 days later) » 

12:16 AM
Hey all!
So I was wondering if anyone knew what (株) means
after a company name, is it like the little tm?
 
Anonymous
@silvermaple 株式会社。
 
oh
huh
that makes sense
 
Like Inc.
I guess
 
Anonymous
There's even a unicode character for it: ㊑
 
yeah, that makes more sense then tm
 
Anonymous
12:19 AM
 
Anonymous
㍿!
 
えっ
 
Anonymous
Too small for me to read!
 
Anonymous
Well, I can read it, but if I didn't already know what it said, I probably couldn't :-)
 
Yeah, that's crazy
I wonder how common that is to do for 4 character set words
 
Anonymous
12:21 AM
I don't know of any others in Unicode
 
I need to start working on my "reading fatigue", so I'm going to start to try to read blogs I guess, which is where I found that
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
@silvermaple Is that where you read until your brain turns off, and then you're like "meh! M-E-H meh!"
 
Yeah, pretty much
All you can see is squiggles
Oh, that link is actually pretty interesting
 
I don't think it's necessary to have a Unicode slot for kg, etc.
 
Anonymous
12:26 AM
There are lots of things in Unicode that are probably unnecessary... :-) And yet, some stuff is missing (hentaigana?)
 
It'll look much better typeset as two letters (unless the one symbol does exactly that)
 
yeah, just because it's not necessary doesn't mean someone hasn't taken the time to do it! hah
 
Do you know of a decent font that has all Japanese radicals?
 
Anonymous
I bet Dono does.
 
They have Unicode slots.
 
Anonymous
12:27 AM
He seems very 詳しい about Unicode.
 
Yes, I bet he knows.
He's always checking the review queues.
 
Anonymous
Maybe you could leave a comment asking :-)
 
Anonymous
On one of his answers where he talks about Unicode
 
I might do that actually.
(That's such a strange expression.)
 
Anonymous
 
12:34 AM
I just found that site today
did you see the reddit thread?
 
Anonymous
No, I don't read reddit
 
Anonymous
I did about fifty in Japanese. I got them all right! Yay :-)
 
nice
 
Anonymous
I did English too. And American!
 
Anonymous
It's funny that American is a separate language.
 
Anonymous
12:39 AM
They either need a better microphone, or they need to teach people how to use them.
 
Anonymous
The audio in several of the languages is often distorted. They should move back, away from the microphone.
 
Anonymous
American is less distorted than English.
 
that's good, because I only speak american
Gah, I can't help myself, I don't know if it's more helpful practice to try and read the whole thing at once, or read it sentence by sentence
 
Anonymous
I did English, American, Japanese, and now I'm doing Spanish. French is next!
 
Anonymous
Then I'm going to run out of languages I know words in :-)
 
12:44 AM
Hah
 
Does this run out?
 
Anonymous
It's got like 1500 words.
 
Anonymous
Not all of them are super common, but I don't think any are especially rare. Not that I saw, anyway.
 
Anonymous
I had to guess at plaster in UK English.
 
You did all 1500 in Japanese correctly?
 
Anonymous
12:47 AM
Oh, no!
 
Anonymous
I only did 50 in each language before moving on :-)
 
All the Japanese ones are just katakana...
 
Anonymous
Well, or kana.
 
I know plaster because of the New Zealand show "tribes"
 
Anonymous
It does prevent you from cheating by looking at the kanji :-)
 
12:48 AM
or "the tribe"
That's it
 
Anonymous
But it's got a lot of 外来語, which let you cheat in a different fashion.
 
I know, that got frusterating
 
Anonymous
I'm apparently not very good at Spanish vocabulary. :-)
 
Anonymous
I'm getting more than half right, but part of that's just from cognates with English and French.
 
1:07 AM
Ok! Have to kick myself in the butt this month and do intense reading practice
 
Anonymous
Just make sure you practice every day!
 
Anonymous
That's the key :-)
 
Yeah, every day is the way to do it
I've been slacking this month, but even so I've managed to do at least something every day
except one day I missed, in the past 2 months
Now I just need to up the difficulty on myself
 
Anonymous
頑張って!^^
 
I'm reading my first manga.
ブッダ. I like it very much.
 
Anonymous
1:18 AM
@Earthliŋ Oh! You've never read manga before!! :-)
 
Anonymous
Congratulations!
 
Anonymous
On your first manga.
 
Anonymous
Yay?
 
Anonymous
Not yay? :-)
 
1:19 AM
Yes, thank you.
I thought it was congratulations on not reading manga until now.
 
Anonymous
Oh, no!
 
Anonymous
That would be silly. Manga is fun.
 
Anonymous
I started playing the Ba Ba Dum Japanese thing again. I got one I didn't know (セイウチ) but I guessed right.
 
Any recommendations for manga?
 
Anonymous
What sorts of things do you like?
 
Anonymous
1:23 AM
Do you watch any anime? A lot of anime series have corresponding manga or ranobe. Like 進撃の巨人 was based on a popular manga series.
 
I like good stories.
 
Anonymous
I like 名探偵コナン ^^
 
I don't really care for sci-fi.
Oh, I read Conan before. I'm not too keen on it.
 
Anonymous
Aw! Okay.
 
It's a cheap story. I read a lot of books like that as a teenager.
 
Anonymous
1:24 AM
I don't know. I don't read a whole lot of comics, so I'm not sure what to recommend.
 
Oh, well. I'll keep looking.
Have you seen ブッダ?
 
Anonymous
I have not
 
I like Dragonball, too.
 
Anonymous
Oh! I read a little of that
 
I tried reading 西遊記, but it's harder to read ;)
 
Anonymous
1:28 AM
I remember Akira Toriyama made a one-volume graphic novel called カジカ about a decade ago or so
 
Dragonball contains a lot of extra stuff, though, that makes it a bit boring at times. Long fight scenes etc.
 
Anonymous
It was kind of Dragon Ball-ish except with a short self-contained story
 
Anonymous
@Earthliŋ I felt like Dragon Ball ran out of story after about one volume :-)
 
Anonymous
Somehow it goes on for 42 volumes.
 
Anonymous
But I haven't read most of it so I don't know what he does.
 
1:29 AM
I love the big story, going into Dragonball Z
The depiction of the afterlife
 
Anonymous
But growing up I had friends that loved Dragon Ball, so I ended up reading the first few volumes. I have volumes 1-5
 
I wish it were a bit shorter.
 
Anonymous
I originally thought it wouldn't be very interesting, because I'd seen little bits of the cartoon, and that seemed boring, but when I started reading the manga little Gokuu was surprisingly cute
 
Anonymous
And it was pretty amusing. :-)
 
I guess women read it differently than men =)
 
Anonymous
1:31 AM
I remember that 牛魔王 and チチ had accents that were difficult for me. 東北弁?
 
Anonymous
With 〜だべ and such
 
Definitely Northern, yeah.
I lived in Gunma for a while, where it's だんべ, so it can't be too far =)
I read bits and pieces of One Piece as well. It was fun, but it's a bit scary that there are already 73 volumes out (as of next week), with no end in sight.
I also tried to read むしし, but it seems to be a collection of short stories, with no story line that goes beyond 20 pages.
I guess ブッダ isn't my very first manga, then. But the first I want to keep reading =)
 
Anonymous
Like, the first one you identify with as "hey, this is my manga!"? :-)
 
I actually thought that was my comment at first ;)
Do you speak Spanish?
 
Anonymous
1:53 AM
Technically, I took Spanish in school, and of course I have some exposure to Spanish living in the US, but I've never put much effort into learning it, so I would say no, I can't really speak it, unless I'm called upon to say something very simple :-)
 
Anonymous
I don't usually mention Spanish if people ask what languages I know
 
Do you live in the South?
 
Anonymous
I live in California.
 
Anonymous
Even where I grew up in Illinois I had some exposure to Spanish, though.
 
Anonymous
@Earthliŋ Yay! That is helpful.
 
Anonymous
1:58 AM
Ahh, I went back to that Ba Ba Dum game, and I got another one I didn't know, but I was able to guess pretty easily. It was やまたかぼう, and there was only one hat among the four pictures :-)
 
Anonymous
I got to 100 points! Hooray
 
Anonymous
I feel accomplished.
 
Good job?
That doesn't sound convincing enough.
Good job!
 
Anonymous
Thank you!
 
Anonymous
I feel convinced.
 
2:02 AM
@snailplane 花園明朝 is free as well.
 
Anonymous
Oh no! I got one wrong when I got to 100 :-(
 
Anonymous
I missed ざる.
 
Oh no!
Oh no!
 
Anonymous
Oh, no!
 
Server issues: I only said "Oh, no!" once actually, not counting this one.
 
Anonymous
2:12 AM
@Earthliŋ Oh, no! :-)
 
Hi all. I noticed my name come up a bit so decided to stop by.
 
2:27 AM
Hello, thank you for your comment.
 
@Earthliŋ I hope that you were able to get what you needed from it.
I'm a member of the Unicode Consortium, though rather inactive for the last few years.
 
I did. I have been looking for fonts that were relatively complete with respect to all sorts of Unicode features for Japanese (like radicals).
 
That site had pages similar to that for each Unicode font range.
had -> has.
 
I'm still to find a Japanese font, which has a nice Latin alphabet, though.
 
Agreed. But it is not ideal to use a single font for multiple scripts. Rather, specific fonts actually designed for your script and usage.
Japanese fonts are more concerned about 全角 versions of latin script. For most western cultures, this is hardly acceptable.
 
2:35 AM
Many documents I have seen, though, don't line up properly, even with 全角 Latin letters.
 
SIL has some really good Latin fonts with numerous diacritics.
Doulos and Gentium come to mind.
 
I like Gentium (for its IPA), but I can't figure out what Japanese font would go well with it.
 
For Japanese fonts, I typically use the ones available in Windows. Though the constant problem for me is rare kanji characters that are not supported. So I sometimes switch to more dedicated fonts in those cases. Then save in PDF when I need to send to a colleague as they often don't have these special fonts.
Hence, I prioritize supported character / glyphs over elegance when it comes to Japanese.
 
I see. Doulos I haven't seen before.
 
Windows doesn't automatically fallback to another font when it can't find the glyph?
 
2:45 AM
@DariusJahandarie Some applications do a better job at it than others.
 
Do you use Adobe software (e.g. InDesign) for typesetting?
@Dono We were talking about how quite a few users (like yourself) haven't been answering questions any more.
Somewhere you mentioned that you have your own private corpus of Classical Japanese.
 
3:05 AM
No, I don't use InDesign.
Hmm, I have mixed feelings about the direction that this site has been going lately. I want to talk about linguistic matters, ideally historical linguistics. But it seems that others expect this to be a "beginners Japanese learner" site.
Also, I have rather displeased with the answers lately. Rather than explaining the rules, often it comes down to "I am a native speaker and we don't say that" and that seems to count as an answer. I suppose I'm not the one asking the question so if others are satisfied with that, then so be it, I guess.
 
Well, it is a beginners Japanese learner's site as long as we have only beginners Japanese learner's questions...
And I guess that beginners Japanese learners are very much satisfied with a native's opinion.
 
I have no problem with beginners. Everyone needs to start somewhere. While I was answering questions, I tried to answer such questions in a way so as to push them in a direction from which they could grow or learn how to answer such questions in the future with relevant resources.
 
I guess that "satisfied" is also relative to how many different answers one gets.
 
One example which really discouraged me was here: japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/11519/… . Somehow this is "very misleading", and yet it is the only answer citing a common reference that any learner, especially beginners, could benefit from.
 
3:22 AM
Well, you're not alone standing discouraged =)
(I actually own the book, after you mentioned it in one of your answers.)
 
Anonymous
@Dono Oh . . . I appreciated that answer! I upvoted it :-)
 
Anonymous
@Earthliŋ I have that book now because it's included on the 電子辞書 I bought.
 
3:40 AM
@snailplane Thanks. I'm sure that I'm not alone, but after being bitten a few too many times I'm a little hesitant in providing further answers.
 
That's a shame.
 
Anonymous
Oh, the chat system seems to be having problems again.
 
Whatever =)
 
3:56 AM
I stopped by a used book store yesterday and found a good book: 『室町時代言語の絵研究』 by 湯澤吉郎. Only 200 yen, too. It covers the major grammatical categories with examples from major texts of the period. Similar in style to the famous 奈良朝文法史 and 平安朝文法史 books by 山田孝雄.
Oops. That should be 『室町時代言語の研究』.
 
@Dono Not 200 yen on amazon, though.
 
Oh, 8,400 yen there. I got a good deal :) Though it is used, but quite readable.
 
I really wish I could read Japanese better. Right now I'm very limited in the material I have for learning about classical Japanese because I can't read well.
 
@Dono May I ask you how you maintain your corpus of Classical Japanese?
 
@DariusJahandarie Force yourself to read it. Look up the words & kanji that you don't know. It'll take time, but you will be able to read it eventually.
@Earthliŋ Rather than classical, it is focused on Old Japanese, my primary interest.
 
4:02 AM
OK, of Old Japanese, then.
 
(Old Japanese being 奈良時代?)
 
It's an SQL Server database. Various tables defined words with citations etc. Also texts for full-text searching.
Yes. Though there is a lack of texts, so some early Heian stuff is sometimes included for supplimental information.
 
@Dono Did you enter the readings yourself?
 
For the most part. The major difficulty was in how to store / indicates 甲乙 details.
 
That sounds like it was (is?) a lot of work.
 
4:08 AM
I update when I find new citations or mistakes etc.
A lot of work spread out over years, so it's not too bad. I'm still updating it now.
 
I've been wanting to ask this question ever you answered this question:
http://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/6650/%E7%88%B6%E3%81%A1%E3%81%A1-vs-%E4%B9%B3%E3%81%A1%E3%81%A1-%E2%80%94-father-vs-breast
That's not an answer one knows off the top of one's head, but I couldn't figure out how one would go about searching for it either...
 
It's a pity that comparative historical linguistics has not been able to show a genetic relationship with another language. Only being able to go back to the 8th century, and sometimes a bit further with internal evidence, is quite limiting in etymological studies.
This is unlike the state of western languages and PIE.
Which is extremely well researched and documented.
 
Do you believe in a link with Turkish?
 
Turkish has a very similar grammar, but essentially no related vocabulary.
Korean too has a very similar grammar, and even some words seem to be related. But the evidence indicates that these are mostly foreign loan words.
I strongly recommend reading "Koreo-Japnica: A Re-evaluation of a Common Genetic Origin" by Alexander Vovin.
It is a real eye opener.
 
4:28 AM
I don't know any Korean.
Yet =)
@Dono Nor am I a linguist. Is this only for linguists?
 
Anonymous
I started learning Korean a long time ago, but I've never put a lot of time into it, so I'm still a beginner. I always figured I should try to get okay at Japanese first :-)
 
Anonymous
Trying to learn the sounds of Korean was harder for me than Japanese.
 
@Earthliŋ Having a background in linguistics, historical Japanese and Korean would help. But if you are interested in these fields and are willing to put in some effort, I think it is quite readable.
 
Anonymous
Although I still never learned to make the uvular nasal.
 
 
4:38 AM
Thanks, I will add it to my reading list, somewhere near the bottom.
What do you have in mind when you say "background in historical Japanese"?
 
@Earthliŋ I mean have a general idea of how sounds have changed over the centuries. You don't necessarily need to be able to read passages in classical Japanese. Relevant words will include English glosses.
 
I'm getting the feeling that I should just go read everything Vovin has ever published.
 
@Earthliŋ If you are concerned, then read "A History of the Japanese Language" by Bjarke Frellesvig. This will give you a very solid foundation of the topics from which to grow from.
 
@Dono That goes on the list near the top. Thank you.
 
 
5:02 AM
It seems like many books about Japanese linguistics are in English. Is that indeed the norm, or am I just ignorant of Japanese linguistics in Japanese?
 
Japan primarily focuses on 国語学 and 国文学 (language arts?) rather than 言語学 (linguistics). There is a large body of Japanese resources, but few are rigorous in linguistic concepts. At least that is my opinion.
 
I guess linguistics, as a science, is not a Japanese science.
 
5:44 AM
I have to go. Thank you for all your comments/suggestions, @Dono, and hope to see you around.
 
 
2 hours later…
ssb
8:06 AM
It's always painful to me to see new users get frustrated by how this site tends to operate..
 
Anonymous
8:32 AM
It can be rough getting downvotes.
 
Anonymous
However, being a native speaker doesn't make one's answers automatically correct or helpful . . .
 
Anonymous
I've seen a lot of native speakers of English say things about English that are flat-out wrong, too vague to be useful, or simply opinion stated as fact
 
Anonymous
The truth is, describing language in a useful way is hard!
 
Anonymous
It's easier for me to say this about English, because I'm a native speaker of English and have spent some time trying to understand the linguistics of modern English.
 
Anonymous
(Even then, it's hard for me to answer a lot of questions about English! It's hard!)
 
Anonymous
8:39 AM
When it comes to Japanese, I feel embarrassed trying to make this point, because I know my Japanese isn't all that good.
 
Anonymous
And native speakers do have a pretty big advantage over learners like me.
 
ssb
absolutely. I don't refer specifically to the current answer in question, more in general, but this one certainly is part of it. trying my best to encourage more thoughtful answers but i imagine some people might get immediately defensive if they have poor response initially.
Of course I'm not saying that the negative response is necessarily a bad thing. Poor answers should get the response that they merit!
 
Anonymous
@ssb One strategy is to try to give comments explaining what could be improved instead of downvoting. I saw that you were leaving comments, and I upvoted the comments :-)
 
ssb
right, I think it's probably more important to leave feedback with downvotes if a person is new to the site
 
Anonymous
On ELL, if I see something I want to downvote, I often leave a comment instead, and only downvote if it seems like they're not going to fix the problem.
 
Anonymous
8:46 AM
Here I haven't done that as much, although I've downvoted less on this site
 
ssb
i very rarely downvote
 
Anonymous
Well, I've downvoted more over there, but have like 2000 more upvotes than downvotes :-)
 
ssb
Philosophically at least for the same reason as you
Right, on ELL it would be easier for us to identify patently wrong answers
so I can understand being more prone to downvoting there
 
Anonymous
They say your votes shouldn't be based on what the current number is.
 
Anonymous
But I think there's an element of psychology to the number, more than the individual upvotes or downvotes.
 
Anonymous
8:49 AM
When you write an answer and it has 5 upvotes but 1 downvote, it's a lot easier to react rationally than . . .
 
Anonymous
. . . when you get 0 upvotes and 1 downvote, and now your answer's in the negatives!
 
ssb
One hypothesis I have is that an answer is much more likely to get a higher number of upvotes if it's perceived to be better than the accepted answer
Slightly unrelated.
 
Anonymous
Negatives hurt more, I think. So sometimes I won't downvote if I see something's already at 0
 
Anonymous
(Or lower)
 
ssb
yeah there's an element of overkill
 
Anonymous
8:51 AM
@ssb I think that might be true. It's because people vote to correct a perceived injustice.
 
ssb
someone making their first post doesn't need a -12 score with no comments for improvement
 
Anonymous
If they see something at -1 and don't think it deserves to be that low, they might pity upvote it to 0.
 
Anonymous
Even though they don't think it deserves to be really highly upvoted.
 
Anonymous
Or if they see a highly upvoted answer they think is wrong, they'll hammer it with a downvote! "This doesn't deserve to be at +12!"
 
Anonymous
And if they see an accepted answer that seems to be the wrong accepted answer, they might upvote the other one if it seems like the right one :-)
 
Anonymous
8:52 AM
That's the "perceived injustice" theory of voting! I think people vote that way a lot.
 
Anonymous
I have an observation about voting: I think some people don't look at questions with accepted answers
 
Anonymous
I think if you wait to accept an answer, the question and answer both tend to get more votes.
 
Anonymous
But if you accept an answer right away, you're cutting off a supply of votes for the answerer.
 
ssb
i have noticed that as well
Since that realization I try to keep questions open for a few days at least, even if I get good answers!
 
Anonymous
People suggest waiting a little bit anyway before accepting an answer, in case someone else writes a better one, so I like to wait :-)
 
Anonymous
8:54 AM
Yeah!
 
12:53 PM
Hello guys! That's an interesting conversation you've got here, as a new user and Japanese learner myself I really feel that down-votes are necessary, they can be harsh at times but motivation aside, not knowing is one thing but believing what you know to be correct when it's not is alarming, making you the first one to benefit from a down-voting and for the same reason you don't want to be responsible for the asker seriously considering your answer.
 
 
5 hours later…
5:27 PM
Wow, sudden influx of new users
 

« first day (1005 days earlier)      last day (3711 days later) »