« first day (1033 days earlier)      last day (3890 days later) » 

5:13 PM
@Cerberus any time!
 
Was it difficult, getting home without your mind?
I'll give it back, here.
scratching sound
 
oh dear god! It's in backwards
squelchy turning noise
 
Ahh that was it.
 
Can I borrow that for a mo?
 
Can you factorise 78963451496851?
(Just testing whether your mind has been correctly reattached.)
 
5:19 PM
no!
@KitFox sure
 
Thanks. squelching noises
 
New painting by Van Gogh discovered.
You can inspect the details if you hover over the image.
Detail view takes a while to load.
 
looks very yellow, blue and green
 
Haha it does!
I like how the light has an epicentre.
Everything is lighter as you get closer to that point in the centre-right.
 
5:29 PM
:D I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't said
 
That's just where he'd started cleaning the dust.
 
Haha.
Hey @davidwallace, I have an hilarious story for you.
We have this right-wing populist party whose main bullet point is "we hate Islam".
One of their elected representatives has recently left the party (but remained in office) and converted to Islam.
Now he has founded a new party based on Islamic values.
 
5:48 PM
Hello
 
Hi @Monica.
 
I wanted to ask some questions regarding future forms
it has been discused so many times so I am afraid my question on the forum would get closed if I asked
 
You mean, on the main site? Probably. Depends on the question.
Maybe I can help?
 
Thanks, KitFox. I was wondering which of these questions is more common. Will you listen to me! Said his mother angrily/are you going to listen to me/aren't you going to listen to me. I chose the first question.
 
(Strictly speaking, those are (rhetorical) questions, so you would use a question mark.)
 
6:02 PM
yes, I don't know why they didn't put it in the test
 
When you're angry, you can pronounce those rhetorical questions as if they had an exclamation mark, so I guess it's not entirely "wrong".
 
but it's still a question
 
I would say "listen to me!".
@Monica Yes...but some people are less strict with punctuation marks.
"Aren't you going to listen to me?" is a bit different from the other two, it is less forceful.
 
@Cerberus I, know, I, am.
 
"Will you listen to me" is probably slightly old fashioned.
 
6:05 PM
does 'will you listen to me' underline the woman's irritation more than other questions?
 
@Monica Probably just as much as "are you going to listen to me".
@MετάEd You. Me. Fight.
 
"He has set numerous goals for himself, but one of the most important one is to..."
Is that right or should it be "...important ones is..." ??
 
so only 'are you going to listen to me' suggests that the woman is angry?
ah, you said as much as 'will you listen to me'
 
@TheGuyWhoCouldn'tTalkToTheGirl Should be ones.
 
6:10 PM
None of them is stronger in meaning?
 
You can't have "one goal of the most important goal": you have "one goal of the most important goals".
@Monica I would say the first to mean she's definitely and openly angry; the third one ("aren't you going...") is a bit more passive-aggressive.
But it all depends on context.
 
and 'are you going'?
would it be a good question if I asked it on the main site?
 
Oops, I meant "the first two mean".
Maybe you should ask on ELL?
 
You meant these two-Will you listen to me! Said his mother angrily/are you going to listen to me
 
Yes.
If you print those with exclamation marks, they seem equally angry to me, but of course everything depends on context.
I don't see how you could print "aren't you going to" with an exclamation mark: that would seem weird.
 
6:17 PM
It was written so in the test
but you didn't say anything about this sentence; 'aren't you going' :(
 
6 mins ago, by Cerberus
@Monica I would say the first to mean she's definitely and openly angry; the third one ("aren't you going...") is a bit more passive-aggressive.
14 mins ago, by Cerberus
"Aren't you going to listen to me?" is a bit different from the other two, it is less forceful.
 
oh, sorry
I missed it. Thanks.
 
Hehe.
It's OK.
So I think your test question would be very hard to answer.
Why not ask on ELL?
 
I didn't know about that site
can I log into ELL with my stackexchange nickname and password
?
 
Sure!
It is part of the Stack-Exchange network just like this site.
 
6:24 PM
@Monica Yes.
Sorry, meeting with boss earlier.
And a good meeting it was.
 
It says no account with this email found
I am always having technical issues while logging
I will try once again...
 
You need to use your email for your username.
The one you use for StackExchange.
 
I always have trouble logging into SE sites too.
I recently had to switch to the SE "open ID", and it seems to be working well.
 
Yes, but it still says there is no user with this email
 
@Monica The one I can see is your YahooID.
 
6:30 PM
Are there any rules regarding using numbers vs spelling them out?
Like "4-year" vs "four-year" ?
 
It is monica.monic44.@yahoo.com
 
@TheGuyWhoCouldn'tTalkToTheGirl We have lots of that question. Let me find you one.
Generally, under ten is spelled out.
 
strange.....
 
@Monica You've got a period in there.
 
yes
 
6:31 PM
44.@
 
and I put it there while logging
maybe it's 43? I will check it out
 
Is that period right?
It looks...odd.
 
yes, it is
 
OK.
 
9
Q: "Nine out of 10"

I. J. KennedyMost style guides call for spelling out numbers less than 10, and using numerals for those 10 and over. While reading a magazine today, I saw the phrase nine out of 10, and it struck me as wrong even though it technically adheres to the standard. It seems like an exception is called for in this c...

 
@Monica That period is not there in your login.
 
no?
oh
I will try to log in without putting it
 
Haha.
 
:D
Thank you, KitFox
 
It's working?
 
6:33 PM
Did it work?
 
no :(
I removoed the period
but it still didn't work
 
Are you sure this is the same period? There are two periods in your e-mail.
2 mins ago, by Cerberus
44.@
 
Want me to copy-paste what I can see?
 
Yes, thanks
 
monica.monic44@yahoo.com
 
6:35 PM
there is no second period in my yahoo ID
yes, that's what I have typed there
 
Try copy-pasting against typos.
 
Where are you entering it?
 
I am typing it into the window under 'Sign in with your account'
if it's called 'a window'. I forgot how it's called.
I will sign up with a new email address
 
Can you paste the link to the sign in page?
 
6:39 PM
And you clicked on the YahooID one?
 
Oh. Try the "sign in with Yahoo!"
 
the first link was a wrong one
yes, I did
I will try to sign in with my yahoo ID
I am there! :)
 
Yay!
I'm glad that worked.
 
:)
 
user87637
6:41 PM
Good, good.
 
do questions get closed there too?
if they are too broad, not helpful, etc
 
Sometimes. Their rules are more suitable for people who are learning English.
 
Yay I have 30,000 reps!
4
 
Congrats.
 
Congratulations :)
 
user87637
6:45 PM
@Cerberus I have 1,000 reps!
 
I received a badge yesterday for being talkative :)
 
@Jasper That's a nicer number!
 
is my new account linked to stackexchange account?
 
@Monica Haha.
@KitFox Thanks.
 
so sometimes it's good to be talkative :D
 
6:46 PM
@Monica I don't think so, but if you go to your profile, you can add another login and create a StackExchange login.
 
@Cerberus woohoo!
 
But how can I find it once the window is closed?
:O
 
Do you know how to get to your profile?
 
user87637
Open the window, and let the wind in, lol.
 
@MattЭллен Yeah!
 
6:48 PM
Very funny, Jasper
 
SE log-in has always been confusing.
 
very confusing
 
user87637
@Monica Are you the Nina that called yourself Monica?
 
yes, I know how to get to my stackexchange profile, but not to my new one:(
Yes, Jasper
 
I wonder why the largest computer-oriented network on the planet can't create a log-in system that is easier to understand!
 
user87637
6:49 PM
@Cerberus Because it doesn't take a genius, only an asshole, lol.
 
@Monica OK, can you paste a link to your StackExchange profile?
 
@Cerberus Because they let you log in with almost anything.
 
user87637
@KitFox Is your ear alright now?
 
And you the user who used to change nicknames often, Jasper?
 
6:50 PM
@Monica If you scroll down a bit, you'll see your accounts. You can click the link to go to the new site.
@Jasper Seems to be.
 
user87637
@Monica Si, si.
 
Also, right under the banner near the top is "my logins"and that's where you can click to add a new login, like SE or Google if you want.
 
Thank you, KitFox. I don't think I would be able to find it myself :(
 
@MattЭллен Bai!
 
user87637
6:51 PM
It's easiest to use google to log in, never fails.
 
user87637
I have a lot to say about the different IDs to log in, but the space in this chat is too narrow.
 
@KitFox That is nice, but it is very intransparent, and it doesn't always work well.
 
Yeah. Well. You asked why.
So I told you.
 
I already have 101
reputations
on the new site
 
You never know whether you're logged in or not, nor on which SE site(s) you're logged in: there is apparently a meta-SE site specially for logging into the network, but it took me Noscript to find the site, go to the address, and log out of there.
@KitFox I don't believe that's why. It is the way SE's log-in system is organised.
 
6:53 PM
@Monica Yes, the association bonus. You get 100 rep automatically because you have 100+ on another SE site.
 
ah, nice. I love bonuses
 
Banker.
 
@Cerberus And it is organized that way to provide a thousand login options.
 
No, I don't believe that is related.
 
Well, but what would you know about it?
 
6:55 PM
Okay, end of discussion.
 
Already there.
 
Why do you do this?
 
What, point out your irrationality?
 
You are a moderator now.
 
I have been for over a year. It's true.
 
6:57 PM
Don't enter into a discussion with me if you hate it. This way, the atmosphere is spoiled every time.
 
@Cerberus duh...that's 179357 * 440258543
 
@KitFox How do you think it makes me feel if you keep telling me how stupid and worthless I am?
 
@Cerberus I wasn't entering a discussion with you. You asked, I answered, you said "Nah, that's not it." Whatever. You think you know something more than me. You don't want to know the answer, don't ask the question.
I have never once said that you are stupid and worthless.
 
I am asking you to stop making personal insults.
 
I am not making personal insults.
 
6:59 PM
"Irrational" is close enough to "stupid". It makes me feel sad.
 
"People, People, why can't we all just get along" said the guy beating the hornet's nest with a bat.
 
Irrational is a description of a state of being in which a person is failing to apply logic. It does not mean stupid.
 
Have I ever called you anything like that, attacked your character?
 
I'm not attacking your character. I'm observing that you are not applying logic to the situation.
 
@Mitch Yeah, I'll end the conversation.
@KitFox Well, if you make a personal remark, that's what it feels like to me. I am asking you to take that into account and stop doing it. Surely you will agree it is not constructive?
 
7:01 PM
I think we can all get away from controversy if we just stick with numbers.
 
I didn't say you weren't capable of applying logic. It annoys me because you don't.
 
It is a personal remark. It is unnecessary and unconstructive.
 
Kit, just leave it...you're not helping.
 
I'm just asking you to consider my feelings, independent of whether you're right or wrong in the discussion.
 
Anyway, back to numbers... Cerb you should commend me on my factorization abilities.
 
7:03 PM
@Cerberus You mystify me.
 
I think I must leave this room now.
 
KitFox, and Cerberus let's chat as we always do in a very friendly atmosphere.
 
also...Cerb...what is your first initial?
 
No, don't leave.
 
WTF? Am I being punked or something?
 
7:05 PM
I know! I don't people fighting! For that I can go see my family!
@KitFox No, I think Cerb took you seriously and .. by seriously I mean...oh holy crap the hornets!
No really. no fighting in chat.
I mean unless it's about other people.
who are not here.
at the time.
 
should I avoid 'thanks' and 'hello' in my questions? And 'could you tell me',' I would be grateful if you', etc. I am posting my first question on that new site.
Users who don't do that on another site like stackexchange are usually frowned at.
 
@Monica Yes, avoid 'thanks' and 'hello'. You could say something like "I was wondering about..." or "could you explain why..." kinds of things though.
 
@Monica Are you talking about a Stack Exchange site, or the internet in general?
 
@Monica Yeah, don't add thanks or hello in questions. They're questions, not emails.
 
Generally, SE sites like people to get to the point.
 
7:10 PM
Could you explain and such requests were removed by moderators
 
@KitFox I have posted a few lines for you on Chatzy.
 
@Monica They might be removed there too, but no worries.
@Cerberus I know, I read it.
 
Now I need to make reservations and other stuff.
Bye.
 
The extra stuff like Hello and Thanks, is extraneous (useless to the situation).
 
I meant Englishforums.com and English learners.com
Bye, Cerberus
My question:Are these sentences the same in meaning?

Will you listen to me? said his mother angrily.
Are you going to listen to me? Said his mother angrily.
Aren't you going to listen to me? Said his mother angrily.
I think I will add 'could you explain to me if these sentences mean the same'
 
7:15 PM
@Monica Yes. And no. Pin down what you mean by meaning.
 
I think my question sounds rude
I am asking if they convey the same idea
 
@Monica That and context would help.
 
there is no contexy
 
Suggested question: Could you please tell me what the differences between these sentences are?
 
There must be some kind of context.
 
7:16 PM
it's taken from a test, I found online
 
And the test just asks if they are the same?
 
No, it asks to choose the right answer
 
Right answer for what?
 
The right tense choice in that small question
it was taken from here
I don't remember which question it was
I will use, TRiG's suggestion
I am posting it..
So I don't put anything at the end of the question, right?
 
Well, there's not really anything to answer...are they the same? It depends on the context. There is no context, just a tense question. They are all valid tenses.
 
7:22 PM
@KitFox She's asking for something taken out of context, so she really wants to know, what context do these differ. That is, if the answer is 'It depends' just give what the dependencies are. But Monica, that does make it harder to answer.
 
@Mitch OK, I think that makes sense, but then maybe make it clear that you want the different contexts rather than asking if they mean the same thing.
So something like:
 
I think 'Are you ' and 'Aren't you' though literally different, kind of mean the same thing but then there's another level where there's some presumption going on that's different.
 
My question:Differences in meaning for future tenses?

Will you listen to me? said his mother angrily.
Are you going to listen to me? Said his mother angrily.
Aren't you going to listen to me? Said his mother angrily.
 
'Will you' is slightly more formal.
 
What are the differences in connotation between these three sentences?
@Mitch Yes, 'aren't you' presumes that you should.
 
7:25 PM
'Aren't you' sounds a little more passive (not in tense or mood, just more accepting of the reality that listening is not going on currently.
 
Yeah.
 
@KitFox But 'Are you' almost sounds like 'You better listen to me or else'
 
'Are you going to' sounds more like 'are you planning to' and 'will you' sounds more like 'are you able or willing to'
 
I thought 'aren't you' means that, Mitch
 
'Aren't you' means you should, but doesn't mean you will.
And also assumes that you are not.
 
7:27 PM
I was trying to find out if all the three sentences express the woman's feelings equally
 
Well, yes. In the sense that they all say "angrily".
That pretty much overrides the subtlety.
Um, but let's see.
 
'angrily'-all the three in the same way
 
1. Will you? Settle down, I need to tell you something.
2. Are you going to? Are you planning to follow my advice or just ignore my concern?
3. Aren't you? I am frustrated that you are planning to ignore my advice.
Roughly.
 
That's exactly what I needed. Actually my sister.
Thank you, KitFox.
 
nods
 
user87637
7:38 PM
Oh, looks like I missed a pseudo-quarrel, lol.
 
user87637
It's good to lol to lighten up the atmosphere a bit.
 
7:53 PM
Goodbye all
 
user87637
@Monica Bye!
 
@Jasper It looked like that to me too, until I re-read it.
 
user87637
@MετάEd It is like that, no doubt, lol.
 
8:16 PM
@KitFox that's a good summary, understanding of the pragmatics.
@Monica what Kit said.
Also, your sister should listen to your mother. It seems not listening to her makes her upset.
@MετάEd Words are weird. When you're listening in the moment it can seem like one thing, then reading later another. and then reading later more closely something else entirely. Or not. Stupid words.
 
@Mitch The implication being that a person should avoid doing (or not doing) something if doing (or not doing) it will upset another person.
 
But also, sometimes you have no control over what is upsetting, that is it is not your own words necessarily. That's upsetting.
Also, everything is. in case it wasn't obvious.
 
Reminds me of Thor's comment on Wiley's dictionary.
The entry was "Annoy (v.t.)". The comment was, "You have a duplication here. You covered this under Exist".
 
8:37 PM
I see the @Reg has given up on the notion of a prisoner-exchange.
 
Moon Phobos partially eclipses the sun as viewed by Curiosity on Mars.
In the second half of the video, you can see how the landscape becomes darker during the eclipse.
 
Did you notice that you can't spell Google Translate without the letters N, S, and A?
Nice try, NSA. Nice try.
Too bad Der Spiegel actually did their own translation.
 
8:55 PM
@RegDwighт Uhh wtf.
That is so weird.
Why doesn't Google try simpler algorithms for a change? These mistakes seem so totally arbitrary.
 
@RegDwighт Former? You mean they fired him after giving him asylum? What a dick move.
 
The actual event is funny enough btw: Under orders from Germany's domestic intelligence agency, a federal police helicopter conducted a flyover of the US Consulate in Frankfurt, the government in Berlin has confirmed. Officials were apparently searching for surveillance equipment.
 
@Robusto it's called "cover", I think. I think.
 
I mean, what purpose does that serve?
It's just trying to intimidate the Americans.
 
0
A: How to refer to people of mixed race?

RyeBreadPeople. Pretty sure about 99.9% of all people are mixed to some extent. If you find someone who is really mixed - like me - then I would use mutt. You are referring to their skin color not race, because if a person had a black dad and white mom but appeared white the question may never come up...

 
8:57 PM
@Cerberus We are beyond intimidation, beyond shame, beyond even recognizing that others think differently from us.
 
Good times.
 
@Robusto I guess...but, really, the German and Dutch governments really like spying, too...
 
Yes. They are governments too.
 
Although placing backdoors in software used by millions? I would not expect my government to do that.
 
If we could just get the anarchists and nihilists to form a governing coalition we could solve all our problems.
 
9:07 PM
Spying on American diplomats in NATO buildings in Brussels? I don't know, it seems unlikely that we should dare do that.
@Robusto And the communists, don't forget the communists.
 
@Cerberus Or make porn an opt-in thing? Think of the hardship! @MattЭллен had to go for days without a wank, IIRC.
 
because of Cameron's anti-porn wall? It hasn't affected me :D
 
@Cerberus What if this is all about finding out the very best porn sites? Like there are some very serious jerkoffs running the spy show, and they are burned out on all the tame stuff they've seen. It's an addiction.
 
@Robusto they'd just cut off your Johnson with a ferret.
 
@MattЭллен Where there's a willy there's a way.
 
9:09 PM
quite
 
@RegDwighт All the Dude ever wanted was to get his rug back.
 
It tied the room together.Understandable.
 
So . . . we can't talk about the latest episode of BB.
 
But I must be off again as we've reached Season 4.
Weird jinx.
 
@Robusto That is indeed one of the most extreme things ever.
 
9:11 PM
yeah four days is much
 
As mentioned, I will be seeing yesterday's episode tomorrow.
Right now it's marathon with wife.
 
@RegDwighт TMI.
 
@Robusto Sure, they like to e-mail each other images/videos of random people they caught in the act...
 
> I think Robusto's comment offers as good an answer as any.
Heheheh. Hehehe. Heh.
 
Well, well.
 
9:21 PM
@RegDwighт Que?
@Cerberus I can't even remember when I had 30K reps.
Speaking of which, has Barrie eclipsed me yet? I sure wish he'd get moving on that. I'm tired of being the biggest loser around here.
 
And soon you won't be able to remember what it was like to have the most reps on ELU.
 
27 secs ago, by Robusto
Speaking of which, has Barrie eclipsed me yet? I sure wish he'd get moving on that. I'm tired of being the biggest loser around here.
Don't you know how to read?
 
You ninja'd me, not fair.
They should make the Atlantic smaller. And increase the speed of electrons too, ktxbai.
 
9:59 PM
@terdon, it is my understanding that the expected tip of 15% in the US is unusually high, but you are quite wrong to say that the US is the only country where you are expected to tip. The amount of tipping that is expected varies with different countries according to how and how much servers are generally paid; here in the UK (for just one example) not leaving a tip would be regarded as abnormal except as a response to markedly poor service. — Hammerite 4 mins ago
This question is turning into a forum on tipping practices.
 

« first day (1033 days earlier)      last day (3890 days later) »