« first day (746 days earlier)      last day (3491 days later) » 

07:53
The sound quality of those FISO telecons reveals that some participants actually are in space! The one hour format is dictated by the sound studio orbits out of radio contact then.
R2D2 has joined them too.
 
6 hours later…
13:34
posted on August 02, 2015

The International Space Station, with a crew of six onboard, is seen in silhouette as it transits the moon at roughly five miles per second, Sunday, Aug. 2, 2015, Woodford, VA.

 
6 hours later…
19:43
@LocalFluff hey, that's a great resource Local. i didn't know about those.
 
1 hour later…
21:11
>
We specifically invite real-time dial-in telephone access to space professionals to increase discussion quality. We don't have listen-only phone lines, however, and when we get lots of people on the line the quality degrades, mostly because of background noise. Yes, we've done more than 200 of these telecons, and we've got it figured out. More than 50 or so people on the line, and things can get messy. So, when we have that many people on the line, and we hear excess static, or talking, or music, or dogs barking in the background, we politely ask "Hey, could someone please turn down the n
(yeah, not from space. but still.)
@briligg You didn't know about FISO? Oh! Well that explains why you seem not so well updated on the topics discussed here... :-D))
i'm really not well updated, actually. i have had to set that aside again and again.
my new love, mine for only $1699
It is really hard to find a new brand name or url these days. You never know who came up with the same idea before. So I'll post the link again, to help avoid confusion: futureinspaceoperations.com
@LocalFluff this one's PDF spirit.as.utexas.edu/~fiso/telecon/Griffin_7-29-15 on pages 25-27 basically shows what I was thinking in my answer to your suitport on station / spacecraft question
I imagine the mp3 also discusses why there's the need for the suitlock area
I didn't listen to about last 3-4 months worth of them, so plenty to go through still
similar for The Space Show, I only listened to a couple of them live
BTW who did I talk here that I should bring to notice that Mars 2020 rover landing site selection workshop that I scheduled?
It ought to be a swell one :)
21:27
i can not have such things playing in the background. i have to either be actively listening, or turn them off so i can work.
some are worth taking a few days off work tho :)
FISO is a great resource. The link I gave @briligg was just making the joke that something completely different has exactly the same name. Who here would've guessed?
yeah, if the people who do that all spontaneously exploded i would not be very sad.
@briligg I don't think they know about each other.
the FISO people didn't quite renew their domain name quite on time, and somebody snatched it up to post crappy ads and generally be annoying for personal profit.
i'm sure they could get it back if they were willing to pay a fee they just might be able to stomach.
21:32
I don't get it. What else is FISO?
@TildalWave Some kind of skin surgeon who does "in-space" operations, of the future. Hence the url futureinspaceoperations.com which is what FISO stands for: "Futire In Space Operations".
oh ah ahahaha
also, dear lord
people pay for that?
Last post was in 2012, so I think not much anymore , for some reason...
Old clients die.
somehow, I doubt it's the lack of decadence :)
maybe all those Russian plastic surgeries in the nearest seaport near you run them out of business LOL
no, no - it's a toad thing. really, it's what i said above.
someone grabbed the site name to post totally unrelated crap.
it's a thing.
21:38
Apollo astronauts seem to live longer than average. Maybe that surgeon was fishing to get them as clients?
@briligg toads don't spontaneously explode, you have to light them a cigarette first
well, at any rate, i don't know who comes up with these ideas. a bunch of mini kim dotcoms. curse him for sharing my name.
@TildalWave Suitports are external per definition. But couldn't a pretty simple cover protect them from micrometeorites? Actually, the suits themselves should be protected against them.
@LocalFluff suits are protected by the brain wearing it not wanting to go where it might hurt :P
@LocalFluff gotta ask, was that all tongue in cheek to joke about the site squatting? i can't tell.
21:43
otherwise yes, like I asserted there, suitports used in open space would have to be additionally covered... not as big of an area as proper airlocks, and all of it could be highly simplified, but still it would need a suitlock like they named it there
damn you keyboard!
actually even on Mars et al. you'd need some sort of a cover for them, likely an extendable / retractable tunnel, which I assert in another answer here LOL
9
A: Why are the EVA suits in the suitport (concept) exposed to the environment?

TildalWaveYou have to consider that this is a concept that is still under development. If the suitports will really be used (and I don't see why not, it solves many problems at the same time) on Mars, or anywhere else where dusty environment is a bigger concern than during testing on Earth, they would like...

@briligg It's getting crowded in the URL space. I'm joking about that it is a fact. You can't even talk about future in space operations without being associated with some medical condition these days.
don't mind @geoffc's answer, it's upvoted a bit more because he uses fancy image wizardry
:)
@LocalFluff that's why I totally support the new TLDs and I'd like to see some more in the future ... perhaps even .stackexchange ... at least it would solve their problem with certificates once and for all
Cybersquatting (also known as domain squatting), according to the United States federal law known as the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, is registering, trafficking in, or using an Internet domain name with bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price. The term is derived from "squatting", which is the act of occupying an abandoned or unoccupied space or building that the squatter does not own, rent, or...
if that is at all interesting to you... i'd hate to think you are walking around underestimating how diabolical people can be.
i mean, that could be dangerous!
I just ban all people, problem solved
so far i haven't managed to train my dogs to answer when i talk to them. so i still need a few people around.
21:55
FISO is anyway a great resource. I just found it the other week myself, that's why I'm excited about it.
it is indeed :)
What do you think about the now popular humans to Phobos idea?
Be right back
^ that's what they should write in big letters on its surface :)
I personally think that there's no point in going to Phobos alone as a separate mission ... if you're there, it should be really painful to see Mars that close and know you're not landing on it
yet it took you so long to get there ...
and even more to get back home
it would be an interesting strategic point for orbital station tho, so send stuff up there, explore with robots, set up a base and see if you can make some propellant up there, then send people with intention to also land on Mars
but we'd have to practice that first on the Moon
agreed. with all such missions, i'd say better to wait until it can be set up to be run remotely or automatically.
and i don't think any human mission beyond the moon makes sense until we've perfected long-term human missions on the moon.
Yeah. But if that "evolutionary" program can do it in 2033 without waiting for the tooth fairy, I say go for it. It would be more like going around the Moon with Orion. Phobos mission doesn't require landing anywhere. Save alot of costs and risks.
22:03
that would be a requirement on Mars anyway... what I don't get is where are all those 20 something missions that have to happen before we land anyone there?
or maybe in very large orbital stations.
@LocalFluff i have a feeling you are going to be introduced to that tooth fairy relatively soon.
Why aren't we sending self-assembling habitats and ISRU experiments to these points already? They want to land humans on Mars in 2030's? Who are they kidding? The way we're engaged with it, it won't happen in the next century.
We better start having one substantial mission per year, better two
which is why the success of spacex reusability is so, so, so important.
NASA and everyone in "big space" are completely uninterested in any lander or any simulated gravity. They seem to count on humans going to Mars in microgravity. And it seems logical, "politically" and economically to do Phobos and Deimos on the first mission.
on top of a couple that will assemble things in orbit that can wait or can later be replaced
@LocalFluff well I've seen many calls for centrifuge experiments within NASA too ... but there's a huge divide between the "official policy" and what most people at NASA think it's reasonable
22:07
the spider-bot assembly project - is that the right name? - on FISO has that in mind.
anyone still remembers how many missions it took to assemble ISS?
well, ISS is nothing compared to going to mars
in fact, ISS is peanuts in comparison
funny that there already were plans for a centrifuge on ISS
84 uncrewed missions to the ISS, including the proton that launched the first segment. I remember, because only 4 of them have failed. The first one in 2011, the other three in less than one year. Three different launchers with three very different malfunctions.
What do we make of that?
Baseball statistics?
nothing happened tho, we've now sent one of twins for a year up there to see what we already know ... you can't have anyone for 9 or more months in microgravity and expect them to get physical on another planet
@LocalFluff Why not? It's not like we can do any other statistics. So baseball is all we have :)
I said it before, and I'll say it again. If you wanna go to Mars, you don't anchor on the Potomac.
@TildalWave are we really sure we aren't just not properly loading them when they exercise?
@TildalWave Finally we'll have a true answer to the common popular question of whether a twin in orbit ages differently than the one at home. (Hmm, talking about that FI-SO surgeon who makes old people look younger, there's maybe a connection anyway...)
22:13
@briligg No, but does it matter? It's a publicity stunt anyway.
i've never asked on the site because i've never seen any indication the question can really be answered
@TildalWave ah.
it's the "we wanna go to Mars and this is where we start" kind of a thing
it has nothing to do with going to Mars of course, but psst don't tell that to the taxpayer
what good it really does is that there's one more American up there that won't need a Russian ride for a year
People will soon go to Mars. Without government, without caring about the fact that almost no one else cares. Those who want to go to Mars will soon do so anyway.
No stopping it.
exactly
Maybe not in 2033 though.
22:17
no, but in the 40's it's so far reasonable
assuming no major show stoppers
like Amero and such LOL
2040, that's 25 years into the future. Going backwards it's like 1990, before Hubble.
yes, about that much
in 10 years from now, I expect announcement of a SpaceX - Khrunichev built 1M lbf engine
if that is the timeline, and one figures the price could come down in another 10 years, say, that makes me 85 years old when tickets might be in my reach - to the moon that is...
Exploration is about not knowing. Humans don't know why they go to Mars. They'll find out, that's why they will go. It wouldn't even be exploration otherwise.
Is that compelling for the doubters?
Khrunichev? why do you think they will be in on it?
22:22
@briligg because Angara
is angara on a development path to reusability? because i don't think anything that isn't is going to matter in 10 years.
well what do you know...
NASA is the only organization that has soft landed successfully on Mars, sent anything at all to the outer planets, only one to send humans beyond LEO. Russia sent two probes to Venus 31 years ago. The rest of it is rocket engines and stations in LEO. They are good at that, but they just don't really do planetary science or HSF beyond LEO or reusability.
of course, there's also this:
note the "US-based production"
22:27
yes, that i had seen. tee hee.
I just searched for it in the transcript here, I posted it before
the more this becomes a business endeavor, the less it matters what nation is providing the launchers. the russians, and the ukrainians, could really grow.
not if the Republicans can help it :)
fortunately, i don't think they can :P
Have you listened to any recent senate / house hearings? They're going full r*
22:30
dear me, i don't have time even for things much more interesting than that
but just watch what happens when a foreign venture capital fund starts throwing billions of dollars directly at space development :D
this is going to be fun...
oh it's already happening
but mostly on yet another spaceport which hopes to make a profit on parking fees and rent from macDonalds. Isn't that so?
If that was the case, then I doubt US legislators would be slowly realizing they don't have any reach that far and might have to find ways of ruining it for everyone
$0.1bn invested in SETI research, the other week, as you know. WOW! Would any scientist say. Except the astronomer who would complain: "That would won't get you anywhere. I'm used to more. I need JWST kind of money."
Much like medieval astrologer actually, from the point of view of the king politician who didn't and doesn't know what he was and is paying for, but it seems very important. Figuring out the origin and destiny of us all...
no, if a fuel depot or space-based solar is funded, that takes everything up a notch. that is the project i had in mind.
hell, if things move out of the US, i'm all for it.
@briligg you know it would be interesting to know why no thin-film PV is space certified
at NASA that is, for all I know, it might be with everyone else
that sounds like the makings of an excellent question :)
NASA seems to favor heavy triple junction PVs
sure, better performance ... but hold on mr. ... how about the weight?
surely there is no way to do it at adequate scale anyhow unless you manage to base manufacturing on the moon. i have started reading about it in the last couple of weeks and have had to stop a couple of times.
22:48
it's perfectly possible to get 1 kW/kg energy density with PVs, and I haven't a clue how much they're getting with 3J but it wouldn't be even ballpark close
but the number of launches... come on, you have to do this from the moon.
that could all be telerobotics for now
or forget about profitability, and just do it in support of a grand space station project or something
I'd even sign up as an operator if they'd want me to... better than playing minecraft
yeah, with the ball rolling, seems reasonable to me :)
it was mentioned to me that in some recent speech elon changed his tune about the moon
22:53
he has indeed
this guy saw it on youtube. but he didn't tell me in which video
oh, can you recommend an example?
check the last couple of ones over at shitelonsays
I think
anyway, it makes perfect sense
if he wants to get to Mars he has to build a commercial interest for it
yeah, given how up to the eyeballs he is in space, i figured eventually maybe the mars thing was largely him just playing the tune that seemed most effective at the time.
that's his goal... goals are boring once you achieve them
the trick is enjoying getting there
I like Elon a lot. He's a bit like me. He also needs a woman to tell him when to shut up LOL
he seems like a good guy from afar. a woman to tell him when to shut up? i haven't run across that.
btw searching youtube for shitelonsays gets me nothing : /
yeah, looked at that and doesn't seem to have much moon stuff
searching the page for moon gets 2 hits
@TildalWave trying to subtly signal to hubby in public when he has been talking too long has so far not worked very well for me. he has a couple of times said, why didn't you tell me? and i say, i tried.
hmmm I think some of it is in the MIT Aero-Astro Centennial
@briligg hehehe looks like I'd like your husband too
he has specifically charged me with the task of stopping him from doing that. after i made clear to him that it isn't to his advantage. but in mexican polite society that is a challenge
i'd go on about that, but i have to go ;)
@briligg I meant that Shotwell doesn't really like that Musk is so openly discussing what went wrong and so on. She also took over all the hearings, for the better really. Elon simply isn't cut to deal with those reptilians.
One thing you never do in hearings is tell more than you absolutely have to unless it's repeating your company's name and its successes.

« first day (746 days earlier)      last day (3491 days later) »