They have an interesting way of calculating the value of physics research. It either grossly underestimates it, or grossly overestimates it, depending on how you think about it.
@ThomasKlimpel me super stressed with writing the damn calculations and interpreting what they mean with other stuff as well. Would u be okay having a look at the idea (its 6 pages) and I need to show the prof on the 15th of Nov? Me in desperate situation :/ .... Not sure if I'm over interpreting or under interpreting stuff. I need someone to brainstorm with. Would u be interested?
@MoreAnonymous If you post a link, I would read it. Whether my feedback will help you with your brainstorming, or whether it will just demotivate you, this is very hard to predict.
@ThomasKlimpel - Is the blog legible? (Does what I am saying make sense? My brother's comment on early posts was that I skip past 90% of my thinking to the bits I find interesting, trying to atomize a little better)
Granted that early posts aren't very consistent with later ones, as I am still trying to figure out the ideas. Which seems a bit weird, as they're "my" ideas, except they feel more like they're dropped into my brain that originating in it. Some part of my mind understands this nonsense way better than the part that has to play translator.
@Adirian Don't worry, I know that communicating ideas is hard. Even for perfectly clear and easy ideas, it is still hard.
The About part of one of my public profiles just says: "Understanding feels simple when it is there, but it is often challenging to communicate it. Practical experience is less simple and often unexpected, but surprisingly simple to communicate and quite helpful also to others."
theory salon
theory salon