« first day (2760 days earlier)      last day (643 days later) » 

1:48 PM
Hi all, i'm lookoing at page 13 of the paper: K theory and TC of Henselian pair, https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~matthew.morrow/Clausen,%20Mathew,%20Morrow,%20K-theory%20and%20TC%20of%20Henselian%20pairs.pdf, by Clausen, Mathew, Morrow.


I'm confused how the inductive step works in showing that TC^r(X;p) commutes with all colimits in the second to last paragraph.

All I could understand is that the base cae when r=1 (i.e. forgetful functor commtues). There seems to be an F map which comes into play and not addressed in equatioin (3).
 
2:34 PM
I could not edit my post up there - but i meant the following version of the paper : arxiv.org/pdf/1803.10897.pdf when i refer to page 13
 
3:32 PM
Hi Bryan, there's an implication underlying commutes with colimits => TR^n commutes with colimits => TC^n commutes with colimits. Which => is your concern?
 

« first day (2760 days earlier)      last day (643 days later) »