8:54 PM
search posts Posts with \diam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/972953/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1094683/…
search posts Posts with \diam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1174329/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1174524/…
I have edited two answers: math.stackexchange.com/posts/2641824/revisions math.stackexchange.com/posts/569430/revisions
search comments Comments with \diam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1094685/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1174328/…
search comments Comments with \diam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1094685/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1174328/…
search comments Comments with \diam: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1066863/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1066865/…
Your attempted proof only handles uniqueness of $a$, not existence. The uniqueness part can be done much more easily, noting that $\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty F_k\subseteq F_n$ for any $n$, therefore $\diam\Bigl(\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty F_k\Bigr)\le\diam(F_n)$. Since $\diam(F_n)\to0$, this implies $\diam\Bigl(\bigcap_{k=1}^\infty F_k\Bigr)=0$ (provided the intersection is nonempty), so there is only one point in the set. — Harald Hanche-Olsen Oct 9 '13 at 18:22
search comments Comments with \diam and without 'diamond: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1071502/…
« first day (356 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1391 days later) »