7:55 AM
search posts No post with \Del: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1205843/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1351462/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
Actually, the first query returns many posts, since some posts contain \Delta. We can forbid \Delta or use regex.
search posts No posts with \Del (after excluding \Delta): data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1071496/1323755/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1351462/…
search comments Comments with \Del: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments Comments with \Del but not \Delta: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1071502/1323761/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/…
One of the comments seems to be false positive - I do not see definition of the macro anywhere on the site:
I must admit I don't get why the proof you wrote should work. It seems to me that you have to prove it for the usual smooth test functions $\varphi$. The proof should go along the same lines as the usual proof that $\Del^2 (1/|x|) = - 4\pi \delta(x)$ in 3D. I have never heard of analytic test functions. — Stephen Montgomery-Smith Mar 7 '15 at 5:51
1 hour later…
9:08 AM
data-explorer When checking for posts which contain some macro but no macro definition, I should also check for \renewcommand - not only for \newcommand.
data-explorer The query data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… returns less result than data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1205843/… (which I have been using so far).
data-explorer Similarly, data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… returns less results than data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1351462/…
6 hours later…
2:51 PM
3:06 PM
search comments Comments with \dt: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
Very nice, a few details I am curious about though. Why are you using x both as an integration variable and as a function ? I though that $\operatorname{Li}_2(z) = \int_0^z \frac{\log(1-t)}{t} \dt$, oh substitution! Silly me =) Will read through it carefully — N3buchadnezzar Aug 4 '13 at 14:24
@EricAuld: the fact that $\Phi_t$ is the flow of $X$ is $$\dt \Phi_t(h) = X(\Phi_t(h)).$$ Now use the fact $L_g^* X = X$ and choose $h=L_g^{-1} (p)$. — Anthony Carapetis Dec 16 '13 at 17:37
search comments The two newer queries: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts No posts with \equalby data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/…
search comments No comments with \equalby: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments The two newer queries: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts No posts with \fermi: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
search comments No comments with \fermi: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments The two newer queries: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts No posts with \half: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
search comments No comments with \half: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
search comments The two newer queries: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066863/1318475/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066865/1318477/…
search posts Posts with \floor: data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/972953/1381674/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094683/1381675/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066861/1318473/…
I have added the macro in this answer: math.stackexchange.com/posts/2960439/revisions (it is defined in the question.)
search comments Comments with \floor: data.stackexchange.com/math/query/556789/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1094685/1351465/… data.stackexchange.com/math/revision/1066862/1318474/…
« first day (248 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1499 days later) »