The questions are different, and the commit rate seems more "natural." We may have a chance this time.
(At least, I think we have a pretty good opportunity to make this work.)
I've also played with my Arduino more, so I actually have questions now. (It's kinda hard to ask questions about something before doing anything with it.)
The one concern that I have is that again, we seem to be missing out on the non-technical artists/designer audience that was being considered one of the main audiences of this site.
Question for general response (but I don't want a permanent record like on meta): What is our policy for re-asking some really good questions from the prior beta that were migrated to EE.SE?
In any case, those questions are not the best example questions as there is no specific problem being solved. Those are more like wiki pages than actual questions, so even though they may generate a lot of activity, they do not help with the private to public graduation.
I am referring to both the IDE question as well as the languages one and other list type ones.
What are some indications that you are outgrowing Arduino or that Arduino might be a poor choice for a given project? What are some common limitations that require you to move up to more capable devices/platforms?
@JVarhol Yes, however, last time we migrated content to other sites before the site was closed, saving some of the rep in a way. Although, things at the moment suggest that the site should survive :)
Yeah. The voting pattern does make sense, but it provides the wrong feedback to new users in particular: Post crap and you get responsibilities and privileges. Write good long posts, and you can stay where you are.
Yesterday I posted a questionbecause I had a problem with my program which has to be uploaded to online judge. However, the program is working perfect by the given information in the task, online judge is giving me Wrong answer. I also asked administrator who told me that there might be a problem...