@0scar Ok, Thanks. I've just edited & made a distinction between the "answer in comments" too, as when going to use them just now, I realised that the set of three are for self-answered comments (i.e. the OP answered in a comment) and the other alternative was for someone else answering in a comment. It was the latter example that I used here

Congratulations on winning your Ruby Nozzle btw, I've just seen the page that you posted... very nice indeed and quite impressive :-) However, I noticed that the page has a typo and they call it a "Rubby Nozzle" - obviously it is not a nozzle that you rub against something, but rather made of Ruby... lol. Maybe someone should point it out to the them...? :-)

@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 @Trish is correct, IMHO, and the dup shouldn't be deleted. So, I've taken the liberty of undeleting and closing as a dupe and upvoting so that it wouldn't be auto-deleted. I hope that you don't mind.

@Greenonline Thanks! Yeah I saw that spelling error too! I can drop a line there I now have some contacts there.

a little ged up on the filament storage question. Put in a BACK IT UP demand now. People shall link to why. I don't want a blanket statement, and most certainly not unsupported.

@Greenonline - I don't mind. I just didn't want to be accused of cluttering up the site.

On a Q&A, there is no clutter

@Trish - Oh, believe me there is ... ask me how I know ;-)

@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 well, OT questions are clutter...

@Trish OT? Overtime?

@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 off Topic

@Trish - Duh ... I'm a dolt ;-)

Sorry for being unresponsive lately, I've been way too busy with a course (Python programming and data analytics), kids stuff (PTA's) and my latest project.

I'll catch you guys soon!