« first day (3748 days earlier)      last day (928 days later) » 

10:57 AM
If there is no ADD, what is the point of authenticated encryption? One merely gets the CTR mode ( almost since the IV processes, etc.). — kelalaka 1 hour ago
@kelalaka AES-GCM still authenticates the ciphertext even if the associated data (AD, or sometimes AAD, additional associated data) is empty. The AD is typically a packet header or similar which must be transmitted in the clear anyway.
 
@SqueamishOssifrage You are absolutely right, my mistake.
I confused tag and AD, hrr.
 
AES-GCM is actually an instance of A5 in the paper, not of A9.
 
11:40 AM
In particular, if the system always incorporates the AD into the tag computation, then for a particular message authenticated with nonempty AD and then modified in transit to strip the AD, the recipient will reject the empty AD as a forgery (and vice versa, authenticate empty AD and let adversary stick nonempty AD on in transit, and the recipient will reject it as a forgery).
A9 is where the system incorporates the AD into the IV computation, and not (directly) into the tag computation, which is not how AES-GCM works.
 
 
3 hours later…
2:28 PM
Indeed, another halt option.
 
 
3 hours later…
5:39 PM
 

« first day (3748 days earlier)      last day (928 days later) »