@SEJPM thanks, I knew that this existed, but I didn't know that this can be applied to adding the point to itself.

I've noticed the user R1w's edits always use the same message "correct some mistake", even when there are no mistakes in the post. Is there some way to indicate that they should use the edit comment for useful information, rather than a generic response that is not even applicable half the time?

@EllaRose you can formulate custom edit-reject messages

maybe I'll try that

@sejpm I assume that implies they will see the reason for the rejection and the attached message?

@EllaRose I'm not actually sure

I suppose if two people reject the edit the editor will be notified of the rejection (just like you get notified of the approval) and then the "ruling" of the reviewers will be visible with any possible reasoning attached

apparently there's only a (easily missed) warning when doing the next edit

which then links back to the review which holds the decisions of everyone seeing the suggestion

@R1- If possible, please use a more informative edit summary for your edit suggestions in the future instead of the generic "correct some mistake" (which also sounds somewhat odd at least to me)

@sejpm I think that should be @R1w and not R1- ?

@EllaRose I super-pinged R1w@crypto.stackexchange.com which resolved to R1-, so I'm pretty sure the ping is correct.

oh ok

@EllaRose if you check their network-wide profile, it appears that crypto is about the only site where they use R1w and everywhere else it's R1-

huh, I didn't realize you could have different names on different sites

@EllaRose funfact: Rory the elder also uses different names on different sites

(and of course per-site customized abouts)