« first day (104 days earlier)      last day (407 days later) » 

12:10 AM
Our bodies are made of that quantum stuff so it is not totally foreign. I don't know what role its non-determinism has for us except as an example that non-determinism is possible. We may have our own variety of it.
 
 
2 hours later…
2:17 AM
@MBrouwer I think the poetry is alluding to an eternal, subjective perspective wholly grasped by the supreme consciousness and (so far) only experienced ephemerally by beings who share with us a common topology of thought.
 
 
13 hours later…
2:48 PM
@MBrouwer Quite honestly I don't think I'm qualified to make a judgment there
I'm confused... Joe Scott's video?
Quantum gravity (QG) is a field of theoretical physics that seeks to describe gravity according to the principles of quantum mechanics, and where quantum effects cannot be ignored, such as near compact astrophysical objects where the effects of gravity are strong. The current understanding of gravity is based on Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity, which is formulated within the framework of classical physics. On the other hand, the other three fundamental forces of physics are described within the framework of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, radically different formalisms...
Here I'm pointing to the section on candidate theories
If you're referring to Joe Scott's video, no, that's not Loop quantum gravity
"An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" is a physics preprint proposing a basis for a unified field theory, often referred to as "E8 Theory", which attempts to describe all known fundamental interactions in physics and to stand as a possible theory of everything. The paper was posted to the physics arXiv by Antony Garrett Lisi on November 6, 2007, and was not submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The title is a pun on the algebra used, the Lie algebra of the largest "simple", "exceptional" Lie group, E8. The paper's goal is to describe how the combined structure and dynamics of...
^^-- it's that
 
@MBrouwer I don't know if theories of "physical reality" like QM, String theory will be directly able to answer such questions by themselves.
the question here being is there an objective way to realise the classification of thoughts, whether such a classification varies in a population of minds and the harder problem of whether there exists a potential hierarchy of mind & its processes that extends beyond the narrow spectrum we seem to have default access to.
@MBrouwer Sure, but I believe that such understandings may not be necessary and IMO probably not sufficient by themselves to tackle the enigma of subjective experience
 
3:34 PM
I think that when you strip away evverything like thoughts and tendencies what remains is pure awareness
 
4:14 PM
@MBrouwer that's right the goal is to remove thought fluxes and thoughts in transience which piggyback on underlying awareness of the "I" feeling.
 

« first day (104 days earlier)      last day (407 days later) »