« first day (592 days earlier)      last day (1635 days later) » 

9:04 AM
@Mithrandir24601 do you think this is a good question? https://quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/8572/conditional-probability-between-parameter-and-operator-in-quantum-mechanics

Something I was recently thinking about
 
 
1 hour later…
10:24 AM
@MoreAnonymous Sure, there's nothing wrong with it - I don't think the answer is going to be anything insightful - at first glance it looks like an in principle standard application of Bayes rule.
There are a couple of differences in that I'd argue you should talk about $t+\delta t$, as it's continuous and that you'd need to take any measurements into account, which makes things much more interesting
and you should really talk about either 'we have a state that's continuously evolving and we're not measuring it, so this is what the probability would be, if we measured it' or 'we made a series of measurements and have the probabilities for each measurement etc.' because these are slightly different things, really
Slightly different in that the first is continuous, the second is discrete
 
11:00 AM
@Mithrandir24601 Good advice and took it :D
 

« first day (592 days earlier)      last day (1635 days later) »