« first day (108 days earlier)      last day (2415 days later) » 

00:42
0
Q: The general form of unitary operations on a single qubit

Mathophile-MathochistI want to understand the relation between the following two ways of deriving a (unitary) matrix that corresponds to the action of a gate on a single qubit: 1) HERE, in IBM's tutorial, they represent the general unitary matrix acting on a qubit as: $$ U = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta/2) &...

 
1 hour later…
02:05
0
Q: How to justify post quantum encryption security

Joseph JohnstonIs there some definition or theorem about what a quantum computer can achieve from which post quantum cryptographic schemes (eg lattice cryptography, but not quantum cryptography) can justify their security? I know the period finding function is capable of breaking RSA and discrete logs, but is i...

 
3 hours later…
05:15
0
Q: Can the moderator who "trolled" on this question please un-delete the comment?

user1271772What are the P(0) and P(1) probabilities for the T transformation in quantum computing? I commented on DaftWulie's comment. Changing basis brings you from 50:50 to 100:0, so the fact that the experimental measurements gave 85:15 is due to noise. A moderator has come and "trolled" by removing my...

05:30
1
Q: What classical public key cryptography protocols exist for which decryption is QMA complete or QMA hard?

user1271772Such a public key cryptosystem would be "quantum safe" in the sense that quantum computers cannot efficiently solve QMA hard problems.

 
3 hours later…
Anonymous
08:15
I responded to this comment. Where's my comment gone? What's next? Will this question disappear too? — John Duffield 40 mins ago
Anonymous
Hmm, this is becoming a bit of an issue now
2
0
Q: Advances in Quantum Channel Capacity

Josu Etxezarreta MartinezI have been reading about the Quantum Channel Capacity and it seems to be an open problem to find such capacity in general. Quantum capacity is the highest rate at which quantum information can be communicated over many independent uses of a noisy quantum channel from a sender to a receiver. Kno...

09:06
0
Q: Modeling energy relaxation effects with density matrix formalism

psitaeI know there are measures that can be taken to mitigate the effects of dephasing (I'm referring here to Dynamic Decoupling and the other ideas it led to). I find it surprising that there is no equivalent procedure to mitigate the effects of energy leakage. In principle, it seems like if you add e...

 
1 hour later…
10:13
0
Q: How to check states

dgratI don't know much about physics so maybe the question is stupid, but I wonder how engineers detect that the state function did not collapse due to environment while a calculation is performed? Theoretically, a measurement will break the system. Related is also the next question, how to detect tha...

 
1 hour later…
11:34
0
Q: Are qudit graph states well-defined for non-prime dimension?

SLesslyTallQudit graph states are $d$-dimension generalisations of qubit graph states such that each state is represented by a weighted graph $G$ (with no self-loops) such that each edge $(i, j)$ is assigned a weight $A_{i, j} = 0,\ldots,d-1$. The graph state associated with $G$ is then given by $$ |G⟩ = \...

11:50
0
Q: Quantum Arithmetic

nipponI'm looking at this paper and try to implement the Quantum adders they define myself. Suppose we have a number $b=b_{n-1}\dots b_1b_0$ and they want to add a constant number $a=a_{n-1}\dots a_1a_0$. They define $$A_j = \Pi_{k=1}^{j+1} R_k^{a_{j+1-k}}, \quad R_k = \begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&e^{i2\p...

Anonymous
12:27
@JamesWootton In case you're around, there are some pending flags on meta and main
13:08
@Blue Thanks for the heads up.
Anonymous
No problem, thanks
@Blue Did you understand that part: quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/a/2462/1386 ?
Anonymous
@Nelimee I saw the answer but didn't get time to read it properly, unfortunately
Anonymous
I'll see it sometime this weekend
Ok! Because I don't get everything even after 3 re-read :/
Anonymous
13:13
I'm working on Cao's paper for now
Ok nice! Trying to understand the general algorithm or the implementation? :)
Anonymous
@Nelimee You can of course ask your doubts in the comments. Daft Wullie is almost always around
Yup I know, but I think I would have too much questions for the comment section
Anonymous
@Nelimee General algo...trying to trace through the circuit they made :)
I'll try to synthesise my questions ^^
Anonymous
13:15
You can ask a new question on the main site, by linking to DW's answer
Anonymous
That's encouraged
Anonymous
@Nelimee Anyhow, heading out for now. See you around (and hope you get the questions resolved) ;)
Yup, I will probably do this =)
@JamesWootton I want to apologise if you were offended by the reference in the answer to the meta post. It was meant 100% sarcastically, and mostly in frustration to user1271772's (what I felt was unfairly aggressive) comment.
Unfortunately I don't have time to chat and discuss the issue now. But, I genuinely did not mean to cause any offence here.
@SLesslyTall As a user, I was amused and not offended. As a mod, I wag my finger at you for the tone of that post.
13:27
Haha, good. I had hoped that was the case.
 
1 hour later…
14:30
0
Q: What are the standard eigenvalues in C2*C2?

TinkidinkiIn C2, we generally take +1 and -1 as the standard eigenvalues, that's what Pauli-x, Pauli-z measurements, etc will give us. Is there a similar standard while measuring in the Bell basis and the computational basis in C2*C2? Of course, the actual eigenvalues don't matter, as long as we are talki...

15:21
@SLesslyTall I completely understand your frustration. Things like this do need to be discussed, and I think that's not what you're upset about, but about the tone of the post?
@Blue it's over dramatized. Comments get cleaned up, especially comments which are soap-boxing. He's been around for a while; he should know comments are ephemeral, especially ones where he's not discussing the answer but using them as an opportunity to espouse his own non-mainstream views.
15:34
0
Q: Reverse Quantum Computing: How to unmeasure a qunit

meowzzAfter taking some measure, how can a qunit be "unmeasured"? Is unmeasurement (ie reverse quantum computing) possible?

15:49
@heather I agree completely with the notion that I shouldn't be reaping in rep for the questions which I did not invent. It's more the tone that was used was completely out of hand
Although as a general point: it literally took me less than 30 mins of using the site after signing up to suss out that the aforementioned user was someone who generally approaches other QCSE users with a more aggressive tone than is necessary and often presumes too much bad faith in others' contributions.
I just wanted to flag to the mods that this is quite noticeable to new users and may dampen a desire for them to engage with the moderation and cultivation of the site (as it already has with me). I don't know what can be done about this, but I thought it was worth flagging it anyway.
@SLesslyTall we appreciate that, and the mods are discussing it. what happens may not be visible but i promise you we are doing something about it. i'll look at the question to try to clean up the language a bit. thank you =) also, taking off my mod cap for a minute, the sarcasm was rather funny. putting the mod cap back on - probably not the best of ideas.
Anonymous
16:19
@heather That's okay. But I'm a bit surprised about why my "obsolete comment" flags were rejected
Anonymous
4
A: Is quantum computing just pie in the sky?

Anti EarthWhy would you expect two different technologies to advance at the same rate? Simply put, quantum computers can be immensely more powerful but are immensely harder to build than classical computers. The theory of their operation is more complicated and based on recent physics, there are greater t...

@Blue James Wootton responded to duffield's comment. I thought I'd leave that there to point to, and the comment wouldn't make much sense without something to respond to.
Anonymous
At present Anti Earth's first comment looks like it's aimed at nobody :P (which is why I flagged it)
Anonymous
@heather Fair, but in such cases it's better if you don't "decline" the flag. The number of valid flags available to me decreases when you do that (and in turn I probably will be more reluctant to flag spam and offensive material)
@Blue oh, shoot. i'm sorry, i must have clicked the wrong thing.
Anonymous
16:30
I guess there should be an option to accept flags without taking any action
16:56
@Blue there is, you can mark it helpful but not do anything, but my first thought when looking at the menu is "dismiss"
 
1 hour later…
18:02
@SLesslyTall: I'm sorry that you found my tone to be "completely out of hand". I guess you do not appreciate at all how much I supported you. Rather than flagging your questions or formally suggesting for them to be removed, I suggested that you continue doing what you're doing, but only for a selection of questions, not the whole N&C book. This was a huge compromise in your favor, considering that what you were doing was in violation of copyright law.
One of the most prominent moderators in all of SE replied with a much harsher criticism of the N&C series, saying that it shouldn't be done at all, and not even in the community wiki (which I thought would be ok). I commented saying that some of the more interesting N&C questions can still belong here and EVEN with the same sort of titles that you were using. I thought you might appreciate how much on your side I really was.
In any case, I'm sorry for calling you out personally, but I think you knew that it was coming, whether from me, or from someone else, or from SE administration, or from Nielsen, or from Chuang, or from the publishing company, or from MIT (Chuang's university). I'm sure you're still not happy with the way I called you out, but I want you to know that I made effort to be on your side. Maybe you can be happy knowing that it could have been a lot worse if it was from someone else, ex. the publisher
Anonymous
18:27
The copyright issue is indeed serious. The second page of N&C clearly says:
Anonymous
> This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
@Blue Copyright laws are complicated - I'm allowed to photocopy up to some certain amount of any textbook, as long it's for educational, not-for-profit etc. use and I think the same idea applies more generally. Of course, I'm not a lawyer :P but the 'statutory exception' is the bit where things get fiddly
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 While that is true, creating a full library of solutions to all the exercises in N&C in order, could potentially make SE subject to lawsuits. Can't say how much it would affect us though. When @SLesslyTall made that meta post I thought they'd only be asking the difficult and interesting questions in N&C, but then things started getting weird.
@Blue Yeah, exactly
Anonymous
I think the 5 or so questions they already asked should be temporarily closed in the light of this situation, with a custom message. Of course, @SLesslyTall is free to ask and answer other exercise questions from the textbook, but in a different format.
Anonymous
18:40
What that format should be, is open to discussion
@Blue I think, if they were causing issues along those lines that were serious enough, Robert probably would have flagged them. Thinking about whether or not we should close them is something we definitely need to do but I don't think 4/5 questions by themselves is an immediate, major worry, especially as they are straightforward, standard run-of-the-mill questions. I might be wrong but we'll deal with things as they happen
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 Add to that the issue that they're all linear algebra questions :P
@Blue well, yeah. Unfortunately, I need to pack my laptop up now though, so don't really have time to actually chat, sorry :/
Anonymous
Okay, see ya!
0
Q: Asking opinion based questions

meowzzI understand opinion based questions are discouraged on the main site. Is it ok to ask them here?

19:25
@Blue re: "you'd have to calculate the initial and final total energy of the "entire system" (including the environment), which is practically undefined" what do u mean by "practically undefined"?
Anonymous
@meowzz I meant that it's difficult to determine practically
Anonymous
Your environment is in principle the whole universe
21:00
1
Q: What is D-Wave's "Pegasus" architecture?

user1271772How D-Wave's Pegasus architecture different from the Chimera architecture?


« first day (108 days earlier)      last day (2415 days later) »