I guess if I want an answer about resource requests I should make a meta post, either that or post my resource request and see if I get downvoted into oblivion :-P
the answer to the latter is probably "no" anyway...
I am wondering if resource request questions should be on topic, especially when resources are hard to find. For example, I've been wondering if there are any resources in English to learn Solresol, as so far I haven't succeeded in finding anything but dead links. Should questions like that be ac...
@humn I didnt vote to close but the "ideas for langauges" part of the question could make answers mostly opinion based (especially since I did a bit of research and couldn't find any existing or even fictional "truth languages")
"But it is wrong, all wrong. The idea that thought is the same thing as language is an example of what can be called a conventional absurdity: a statement that goes against all common sense but that everyone believes because they dimly recall having heard it some- where and because it is so pregnant with implications." - Pinker, The Language Instinct
It's just that regarding your truth question, some languages (such as Turkish) have a gossip mood for talking about things that haven't been proven to be real
and speaking of the Mark of the Beast (sort of... 4 hrs ago...), that reminds me of the time I translated the DeGarmo and Key song "Six, Six, Six" into Klingon. A very interesting exercise; I wonder if I can find it now... not that my translation was particularly singable, lol!
@Adarain Sure, I know that from normal linguistic terminology. But in conlang jargon, does it refer to simulated language change?
For the purpose of this site, it seems to me that it would be valuable to have two tags for simulated language change, and for descriptive real language change
it describes the process of tracking a language through time, ie simulating language change, yea. but I don’t find it appropriate to claim it distinct to conlanging
I personally consider it synonymous to language change
any on topic questions regarding language change by necessity has to be about help with simulated language change though, otherwise it would have to go on linguistics.SE
I mean for there to be language change with a conlang, it first has to have speakers. and I don’t consider imperfect acquisition by second language learners to be examples of language change
I’m sure there are some conlangs which have been passed down to their children. but iirc esperanto is the only language where a) that has been done in more than isolated cases and b) the only instance of second generation native speakers
I see your point though
but the tag excerpts need to be written differently imo. they shouldn’t read “in conlanging, diachronics means X” because that’s misleading. perhaps word them as “diachronics referes to the documentation of language as it changed through time. this is often simulated in conlangs”
@Adarain Yes, there is, and it consists mostly (but not entirely) of challenge questions, where the OP knows the solution and answerers need to work it out.
However, the process by which Puzzling SE transformed from a normal Q&A site into a challenge-and-solution site was ... extremely controversial.
(btw, I fully expect an overwhelming “no, or at least not for now”)
I’m also curious whether the questions of types 1 and 2 (which might be expectable to see on a linguistics olympiad btw) might be appropriate on puzzling.SE
they’re basically impossible without knowledge of linguistics
@Adarain Puzzling? Originally it was a site for Q&A about puzzles, based on the common SE philosophy of "questions should be based on an actual problem that you face".
@Adarain My answer would probably be more "background info based on Puzzling experience" than an actual answer on whether or not Conlang should do this ...
@Adarain 1 and 2 sound like the types of questions we see all the time on Puzzling, just not with a conlang flavour. 1 is the same kind of puzzle genre as these, and 2 is a bit like many of our cipher puzzles.
So regarding the whole diachronics vs. language-change thing, I don't think I'm quite sure about how they should be used, would a question about how accusative case markers emerge recieve one (and which) or both?
Interesting story I stumbled upon:
Aymara is a South American language spoken by more than 2 million people in the area around Lake Titicaca. Among the speakers of Aymara are the Uros, a fishing people who live on artificial islands, woven from reeds, that float on the surface of Lake Titicaca.
...
You die and ascend to heaven, there is a knight (truth-teller), a knave (pure liar) and a joker (random) sitting on a cloud - they all look the same. In order to gain entry you must determine their identities. You have 3 yes/no questions (each directed to only one of them). They will only respond...
@Gufferdk Depends what your intention was. If conlang X originally didn't have ACC case, and does now, and you want to know how that changed, you'd use language-change. If you want to know common reasons for case being introduced so you could model them in your creations, you'd use diachronics