« first day (569 days earlier)      last day (1752 days later) » 

12:00 AM
3
Q: Link of a singularity

japinI would like to understand the topological type of a link of a singularity in a simple example. Consider for instance the cone ${xy-z^2=0}\subset\mathbb{C}^3$. If we set $x = x_1+ix_2, y = y_1+iy_2, z = z_1+iz_2$ then this corresponds to the $4$-dimensional real subvariety of $\mathbb{R}^6$ given...

 
 
1 hour later…
1:00 AM
6
Q: Is there any conditions on a finite abelian group so that it cannot be class group of any number field?

user594846The Cohen-Lenstra paper says the probability that the odd part of a class group being cyclic is close to 0.98. So I was thinking: can we find any conditions on a finite abelian group so that it cannot be a class group of any number field?

 
 
3 hours later…
3:50 AM
4
Q: Variously pointed closed sets

Noah SchweberA tree $A\subseteq \omega^{<\omega}$ - possibly with dead ends - is pointed iff every path $p\in[A]$ has $p\ge_TA$. This lifts to two distinct notions of pointedness for closed sets in Baire space: A closed $S\subseteq \omega^\omega$ is pointable if there is some pointed $A$ with $S=[A]$. A cl...

 
4:43 AM
6
Q: A necessary and sufficient condition for (x1,...,xn) to be a permutation of (1,...,n)

JPFIs there an easy proof of the following statement? $\forall$ $n>0 \in \mathbb N$, $ \exists$ $a\geq0 \in \mathbb N$ such that for any set of integers $(x_1,...,x_n)$ and $1\leq x_i \leq n$: $(x_1,\dotsc,x_n)$ is a permutation of $(1,\dotsc,n)$ if and only if: $(x_1+a)\dotsb(x_n+a)=(1+a)\dot...

 
 
5 hours later…
10:03 AM
4
Q: Reference: Hajlasz-Sobolev Spaces with Values in a Metric Space

MrMMSLet $(X,d,\mu)$ be a separable metric measure space on which every ball has positive but finite measure. I've come across the definition of a homogeneous Fractional Hajlasz-Sobolev spaces which are defined as the collection of functions $f \in L^p_{loc}(X)$ for which there exists some $g \in L...

 
 
9 hours later…
6:39 PM
11
Q: Was Jacobi the first to notice the ambiguity in the partial derivatives notation? And did anyone object to his fix?

Michael BächtoldIn his 1841 article De determinantibus, Jacobi remarked that the notation $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}$ for partial derivatives is ambiguous. He observed that when $z$ is a function of $x,y$ as well of say $x,u$, then the coefficient $\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}$ appearing in the linear expan...

 

« first day (569 days earlier)      last day (1752 days later) »