@ChinmaySarupria First, I'm not going to waste my time on that meta post, it is rigged. Second, regarding the advaita defaultism - moonstar's comment is a start, your conversation on the other thread, many of the answers by say Tezz(simply taken here because he is the accuser on meta) on non-advaita questions, i can keep going.

@LakshmiNarayanan Looks like you haven't even read that meta post, it is about driving forward a sectarian agenda in Q & A. Do you know what a sectarian agenda is? It means answering a particular question but intentionally and selectively adding a few lines that are only there to demean other scriptures. Also, you should read my meta post as well, I've said if one user only answers or asks questions on the God or scriptures they like, that is absolutely fine, why will someone have any problem...

@LakshmiNarayanan with that? The issue arises when someone tries to demean others just to prove supremacy of the scriptures or God they like. And the names you said, moonstar or Tezz or I don't try to demean other scriptures or God in any of our Qs or As, neither do we drive a subtle sectarian agenda in our post.