@amWhy Actually, it was present already in the original revision. If you look at the revision history, this part was removed by Jack and added back by the OP.

@MartinSleziak I've edited your post to include the two chat-rooms, and also tidied up the grammar and formatting a bit. I thought users might like to see them together, but if you think they should be split into two posts, feel free to do so!

@user21820 Yes, I've received a notification that my post was edited.

I have also edited the link you've included - changed https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/26817/21820 to https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/26817.

@MartinSleziak There's another link you missed at the end.

It is probably a good idea that this room is listed somewhere - at least if the intentions is that it is actually going to be used for something.

@MartinSleziak Hopefully your Meta post starts directing more users to the various chat-rooms efficiently. =)

Whether "General discussion rooms" should be in separate post or not - I do not have strong preference one way or another. So I'm leaving it the way it is. (Of course the answer is CW, so I'm perfectly fine if other users edit it further - that's actually the point of community wiki posts.)

I have edited also the other link. (Of course, it's not a big deal whether userid is added at the end of the link or not.)

Personally I am not too optimistic about the assumption that this meta posts will substantially increase traffic in the chatrooms listed there. But maybe it can at least help a little bit so that some of them get noticed. (After all, that was the intention why I suggested creating such list.)

@MartinSleziak 337 users have seen your post in 2 weeks so presumably they've at least seen the topic-specific rooms. Not too bad I guess.

337 views $\ne$ 337 users

Yea okay I realized that just after I commented haha..

For example, I increased the counter a moment ago after I received notification that my post was edited and I saw the question before. :-)

@MartinSleziak That may be, but as it stands, it is unclear what is being asked, because the OP ranges in his post asking about one specific question that was closed on MSE, and why other posts in the same tags remain. Why me? Then the OP proceeds to return to an issue (MSE University). In the end, the OP is, instead of taking responsibility for and ownership of his problematic posts in the past and is trying to build sympathy by claiming he is being treated differently for personal reasons.