« first day (126 days earlier)      last day (1135 days later) » 
02:00 - 04:0004:00 - 21:00

2:07 AM
o/
 
2:28 AM
@micsthepick Just guess; I'll say T/F when I get round to it
 
log dump please
 
Nov 10 at 1:40, by boboquack
True:
1
3
511
5
7
9
15
51
33

False:
2
4
2017
91
6
8
551
552
11
512
19
123456789
12
113311
151
 
oh, found it
thanks
 
Latest one, which is 3/4/5 clues behind
 
master 14
@Wen1now
 
2:35 AM
14 is False I think
 
wow, big surprise
 
... "I think"?
 
(\s)
 
master 491
 
Since my computer program has disappeared into the mists of time, I'm doing this by hand
 
2:36 AM
oh, ok
 
491 is False I think
 
I would keep my zendo program in a dedicated file...
 
Yep I've found it
Although it is pretty short
 
ooh, hints!
a rule that is easy to program (or at least short)
 
Well, MD5::Digest(input).chars.last.ord % 2 == 0 is pretty short and easy to program, too
 
2:39 AM
Anyway 491 is False
 
guess: false if even or in [ 11
13
19
91
151
211
551
2017
113311
123456789 ]
 
master or mondo first
 
master 2384
 
although, I shouldn't be the one complaining about breaking flow
 
Does anybody have any stones left
2384 is False
 
2:40 AM
I think I amassed a few
 
Okay, I'll give a counterexample
Do you have any counterexample preferences? I may/may not satisfy them
 
If possible, give a true case that is even
 
IMO that'll reveal too much
 
IMO that gives away too much
 
2:42 AM
well I guess we are getting another odd false example then
 
Oh the last message sent
 
That suggests there is such a case :P
 
yes it did
 
*if they exist that is
 
(actually I can't tell)
 
2:43 AM
101 is False
 
master 911
 
911 is False
 
what was our domain again?
Z+?
master 7331
 
Yep
7331 is False
 
Should I treat the game as free-flow now?
mondo 81, true
 
2:48 AM
guess false
 
81 is False
 
what was 10?
(if we have not done ten then master 10)
 
10 is False
Just assume everything is False. True examples don't even exist anymore
^That's a lie. Ignore that
 
master 497
 
False
 
2:52 AM
master 18
 
18 is False
I don't get why it allows sending the same message twice unintentionally but not intentionally
 
because the client glitches
it must not be a server side restriction
 
master 39
 
master 27 afterwards
 
After what
 
2:56 AM
after you say what 39 is
 
after my autopass
 
Sorry I missed that
39 is False
Wow 27 is True
 
wow, how did I know!
 
mondo 0, true
 
Z+ does not include 0
 
2:59 AM
I don't think 0 was ever included in the list of allowed things
 
oh, oops
mondo 819, true
 
guess false :P
 
819 is True
 
ooh, interesting
 
guess: palindrome in binary
 
3:01 AM
That's weird. I wonder how that happened
Palindrome in binary is correct!
 
wow
 
I think that is the longest successful defense
def c(n):i=bin(n)[2:];return i==i[::-1]
 
that's because of low participation :P
 
Still... I should get a trophy. Or a hat.
 
def c n;i=n.to_s(2);n==n.reverse;end
Ruby
 
3:03 AM
I like to think that I could switch to ruby easily
but I probably would need a good reason
 
Valid koans are non-empty binary strings. 0 is false, 1 is true
 
master 000
 
000 is false
 
master 111
 
111 is true
 
3:05 AM
master 101
 
Yay I've gotten one truth. One step closer to enlightenment
 
101 is false
 
master 11
 
11 is true
 
mondo 1111
 
3:06 AM
guess True
 
guess true
 
1111 is true
 
yay.
 
pass?
 
guess: contains sequence of 1's solely
 
3:07 AM
Are you using a guessing stone yet
 
oh.
counter-example: 110 is true
 
My computer is on like a 10-second message lag. Sorry if my messages are far behind
mondo 11111 guess True
Free stones, I hope
 
guess true
 
11111 is true
 
and you get a stone!
 
3:09 AM
guess: True iff starts with a bunch of at least one 1s, then ends with a bunch of zeroes
autopassafterwards
 
that is not well defined
does a bunch just mean a sequence?
 
In either case: 010 is true
"at least one" is unambiguous and absent from the second half.
Also, at least one zero has several known counterexamples.
Mics' turn
 
master 0011
 
(but yes, do use unambiguous language)
0011 is false
 
(pass)
@Wen1now
 
3:14 AM
1+0* = my last stone usage I think
 
Giving a 5-second timeout to someone on a 10-second lag is kinda unfair ;-)
 
true
 
You had two.
You have one stone now and you are to master or mondo
 
master 011
 
011 is false
 
3:16 AM
master 10
 
hold on. Pass?
 
yep, autopass for me unless I say otherwise
 
10 is true
OK
 
the countdown would have lasted more than 10 seconds though
 
It's not exactly 10 seconds
master 11111110000
 
3:17 AM
does Mics also auto-pass?
 
umm
for the next 5. Let me know when it stops
 
11111110000 is true
 
I think it's a client-side issue; I receive messages in real time (because you guys reply as soon as my messages send) but the messages take a while to send
I mean I can see when the message has sent and when it hasn't. At least I think I can
 
It goes from green to black?
my messages do so almost instantly
master 01
 
01 is false
 
3:19 AM
@micsthepick Yep
master 00
I think that's undone
 
00 is false
 
master 1010
 
1010 is true
 
hmm. Give me a second
 
Is that an autopass abort for Mics?
 
3:21 AM
no
 
master 10101010
 
In fact renew the autopass thing untill I manually disable
 
Does anybody have a datadump
 
ok, easier for me to track :-)
 
3:21 AM
yes
coming
True:
1
11
10
111
110
1111
1010
11111
10101010
11111110000
010


False:
101
0
00
01
000
 
10101010 is true
 
@micsthepick your turn
Oops sorry disregard that false ping
 
huh?
master 011
 
011 is false
known false, that is
please retry
 
oops, missed it in my list
 
3:24 AM
I have a cool idea for my next game. But it might be too difficult. Oh well
 
I also have an idea pending, but I need a self-test first.
 
master 1011
 
1011 is false
 
master 100
 
100 is true
 
3:26 AM
master 001
 
001 is false
 
master 10000000000000000000
 
10000000000000000000 is true
 
10101010 seems to ruin things...
master 1{0}*999999999999999
 
What does it ruin...
^^What is that supposed to be
 
3:28 AM
1 followed by 999999999999999 zeroes
 
... I refuse to put this number into my calculator
 
I think that's a valid refusation
 
but it is a valid koan...
 
Indeed. And it's true.
but still worthy of a swat
 
I don't think all valid koan need necessarily to be accepted
...okay that last sentence parsed badly
master 00000000000000000001
 
3:30 AM
00000000000000000001 is false
 
I like how I have an intuitive understanding of what is True and what is False without being able to formalise it
 
like a subconscious intuition?
I sort of had that for a bit on your game
 
:) binary numbers are weirdly recursive/fractalike
 
master 0010
 
0010 is false
 
3:34 AM
master 1010101
 
1010101 is false
 
master 0100
 
0100 is true
 
master 1001
 
oops, disable autopass
 
3:36 AM
1001 is false
 
master 10010
 
Does there a dump data nearby
 
10010 is false
 
wait a sec
True:
1
11
10
111
110
100
010
1111
1010
0100
11111
10101010
11111110000
10000000000000000000
1{0}*999999999999999



False:
101
1011
1001
10010
1010101
0
00
01
011
001
000
0010
00000000000000000001
 
Autopass disabled for Mics. Both players have one stone.
 
3:37 AM
I'd nearly have a guess
 
Is that an autopass disable?
 
guess: true iff a string we have seen to be true, or such string with an arbitrary amount of zeroes appended to right end
 
What about (10)*
 
counterexample: 100100 is true
You are out of stones
 
hang on
okay
 
3:41 AM
Which means, Wen's turn
 
master 00100
 
00100 is true
Do you still autopass?
Mics, if you wish to guess, you should probably mondo instead of master
 
hey Deus!
 
hey!
 
I guess this makes it Deus's turn?
 
3:44 AM
so why the star and braces in "1{0}*999999999999999"?
 
that means 1 followed by 999999999999999 zeroes
 
Mics' koan wouldn't fit into the chat box otherwise
 
oh
 
yep, autopass for me until disabled
I have no idea as of now
 
master: {1}*999{0}*999
 
3:46 AM
{1}*999{0}*999 is true
 
@micsthepick What kind of notation is that?
 
Same as Mics' I presume
but yes, it seems non-standard. And ambiguous.
 
ambiguous?
how would you do it anyway?
 
"{1}1000" may parse as 1000 ones, or as 100 ones and a zero
 
Python style
 
3:47 AM
braces around the number of times you're using it too
 
'1'*999+'0'*999
 
Perhaps just use PCRE?
 
PCRE?
 
or string arithmetic
 
so
(100){255}
 
3:48 AM
Perl compatible regular expressions
 
in this particular example: (1){999}(0){999}
 
Yep
In this case, you can also drop the parentheses
 
true
 
I'm assuming that, without specification, it only acts on the last digit?
 
Yep
 
3:50 AM
I will now change my list to be PCRE compatible
 
e.g 10{100} becomes 10000000000000000000000000...00
I think it is mics turn
 
better idea, just always specify
 
Deus's koan becomes 1{999}0{999)
 
order: Deus, mics, Wen
mondo 1{111}
guess true
wait
 
guess true
 
3:52 AM
what was 1{999}0{999)
 
it was true, I believe?
 
Guess true
6 mins ago, by John Dvorak
{1}*999{0}*999 is true
 
1{999}0{999} was true
1{111} is true
mics may guess now
 
autopass for now
 
OK
Wen?
 
3:55 AM
master (11111100){10}
 
(11111100){10} is true
 
mondo 100000001
 
guess false
 
guess false
 
guess false
 
3:57 AM
100000001 is false
 
pass
 
wow, everyone has the same guess as me...
 
That means your guess is as good as any :P
 
master 111000111
 
111000111 is false
 
02:00 - 04:0004:00 - 21:00

« first day (126 days earlier)      last day (1135 days later) »