next day →
last day (16 days later) »
Astyx
21:00
hi
What's up ?
Simply Beautiful Art
@Astyx You busy?
Astyx
Not really
Nearly bedtime, but I'm not doing much
Simply Beautiful Art
a.k.a. want to try and see why I want to use that bounded thing I made?
Astyx
Sure, remind me what it is
Simply Beautiful Art
f(x+a) < g(x) < f(x+b) for some a,b and all x>x0, then f and g are bounded by each other.
Astyx
21:03
Right, that's fair enough
Simply Beautiful Art
Do you know of ordinals?
Astyx
A little
Simply Beautiful Art
Well,
$H_0(n)=n$
$H_\alpha(n)=H_{\alpha-1}(n+1)$ if $\alpha$ is a successor ordinal.
$H_\alpha(n)=H_{\alpha[n]}(n)$ if $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal
So $H_k(n)=n+k$
Letting $\omega[n]=n$,
$H_\omega(n)=H_n(n)=2n$
$H_{\omega+k}(n)=H_\omega(n+k)=2n+2k$
$H_{\omega2}(n)=H_{\omega+n}=4n$
$H_{\omega k}(n)=2^kn$
$H_{\omega^2}(n)=2^nn\approx2^n$
$H_{\omega^2+\omega}(n)\approx2^{2n}$
$H_{\omega^2+\omega k}(n)\approx2^{2^kn}$
$H_{\omega^22}(n)\approx2^{2^n}$
@Astyx You understand how this works?
Astyx
Give me 5 minutes :)
So
You're defining $H_k(n)$ recursively right
Simply Beautiful Art
Sort of yeah
Usually $k$ is reserved for things less than $\omega$
Astyx
21:19
Okay I think I follow (without going too much into the details)
Simply Beautiful Art
So you think you know what $H_{\omega^3}(n)\approx?$
Astyx
Something like $2^{2^{2^{n}}}$ ?
Simply Beautiful Art
No
$H_{\omega^22+\omega}(n)\approx2^{2^{2n}}$
Astyx
Let me think
Was it just a typo from my part or is what I wrote still wrong ?
Simply Beautiful Art
You are still wrong.
$H_{\omega^23}(n)\approx2^{2^{2^n}}$
Notice the jump from $H_\omega$ to $H_{\omega^2}$
Astyx
21:23
So $2^{2^{2^nn}}$ ?
Simply Beautiful Art
$H_{\omega^23}(n)\approx2^{2^{2^nn}}$
Astyx
Tell me what it is ?
Simply Beautiful Art
$H_{\omega^3}(n)\approx\underbrace{2^{2^{2^{\dots}}}}_n$
$H_{\omega^2}(n)\approx\underbrace{2\times2\times2\times\dots\times2}_n$
Astyx
Oh yeah right
Simply Beautiful Art
$H_{\omega^4}(n)\approx\underbrace{H_{\omega^3}(H_{\omega^3}(H_{\omega^3}(\dots)))}_n$
etc.
$H_{\omega^\omega}(n)=H_{\omega^n}(n)$
Astyx
21:28
Huh, cool
So what's the point ?
Simply Beautiful Art
So $\varepsilon_0=\omega^{\omega^{\dots}}$
And I want to show that $H_{\varepsilon_0}(n)\approx f_{\varepsilon_0}(n)$
where $f$ is the fast growing hierarchy
Astyx
$f$ is what ?
And what does that indice mean for $f$ ?
Simply Beautiful Art
$f_0(n)=n+1$
$f_\alpha(n)=\underbrace{f_{\alpha-1}(f_{\alpha-1}(\dots f_{\alpha-1}(n)\dots))}_n$
$f_\alpha(n)=f_{\alpha[n]}(n)$
Astyx
So same as $H$ except it's $n+1$
Simply Beautiful Art
And initial condition
Clearly, $f_a(n)>H_a(n)$
Astyx
21:33
Huh ?
Simply Beautiful Art
$H_0(n)=n<n+1=f_0(n)$
Astyx
Why "
And
initial condition" ? That's what I meant ? Or am I missing something ?
Simply Beautiful Art
Oh, nvm then
Astyx
?
Simply Beautiful Art
Never mind lol
Astyx
21:36
Nevermind what ?
Simply Beautiful Art
never mind my saying about initial conditions
Astyx
Oh right
Go on :)
Simply Beautiful Art
But I wanted to say $H_\alpha(n)\approx f_\alpha(n)$ for some very large $\alpha$
Particularly, when $\alpha=\varepsilon_0$
But as you can see, both these functions will grow insanely fast
Too fast for me to apply normal $\approx,\sim\mathcal O,\Omega,etc$
Astyx
What would both $H_{\epsilon_0}$ and $f_{\epsilon_0}$ look like ?
(Or is there no way to write them properly using basic operations ?)
Simply Beautiful Art
I can't write them using things other than $f$ and $H$
Astyx
21:42
Fair enough
I'm not too confortable with ordinals, especially infinite tetration of them
This'll get some time for me to get used to it
I have to go for today
I'll let you know if I make progress and come up with ideas
Bye
Simply Beautiful Art
@Astyx Bye!
next day →
last day (16 days later) »
all rooms
Transcript for
May '17
11
May
12
Room for Simply Beautiful Art and Astyx
join this room
about this room
00:00
06:00
12:00
18:00
all times are UTC
site design / logo © 2025 Stack Exchange Inc;
legal
mobile