Anyway, I thought that it may be a good idea to point out that what you claim here is wrong in the traditional sense of the meaning of a "non-circular proof" (see this).
@HenryWHHackv2.1.1 in order for you not to get in trouble for claiming to be a bot when you are not, just ... don't do what you did last time that you into trouble BAM! D.Hutchinson out!
I will be going away for some time. Feel free to include the information that I provided in the comments of your meta post (but without mentioning this room). Thanks for chatting with me @GeorgeChen.
@user21820 Yeah; I just think George Chen is simply trying save-face. Most of us, I'm quite sure, see his rather absurd behavior as rather extreme. I highly doubt any one with character and honesty, and logical thinking, and good will is talking behind your back. And I think that includes most users here. Actually, it's funny, because it ought to be Chen worrying about how he is being seen, and he keeps digging himself further in the mud.
...Unfortunately, I doubt people's opinion of him even matters to him, and he's likely oblivious to it anyway. That's why I'm serious about my use of terms earlier.
