@orthocresol haha, I'm half way behind

delete me:

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/89995/4945 deleted

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/91121/4945 deleted

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/90745/4945 deleted

@Martin-マーチン poor dear Soumik, he'll lose 39 rep in a snap without a notification :P

@Martin-マーチン delete, because: a closed, low-effort question with an almost unreadable answer; and no effort by the poster to clean it up even after being told too many times

@Martin-マーチン idk about deciding this. the question you linked to doesn't explain CH2F2 bond angles either, and i cannot comment on the validity of the answer

@Martin-マーチン another poor unreadable answer. plus, without a citation to the book, the question is basically useless. delete with fire!

Why am I unable to flag answers as very low quality? Like this one

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/64063/5026 deleted

There's no reason to keep it when Jan's answer is there, far less substantial

@GaurangTandon Not sure why you can't flag it, but I've deleted it anyway.

@orthocresol no, I don't have an option for low quality flag. And I can't flag it as NAA, because it is an answer, albeit a very poor one :/

Got it. chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/63234/…

The newest answer has a VLQ flag option, while the old answers do not. So, do you mind if I flag with a custom message and say "VLQ"?

@GaurangTandon but it is NAA

@AvnishKabaj yah, this one is NAA

@GaurangTandon whats d full form of vlq and naa

@Abcd not an answer; very low quality

@orthocresol i just raised a custom VLQ flag to demonstrate my point, please have a look at it