@ais523 @snoringfrog I'm of the opinion that we're attempting to track language interpreters because, as the original post states, repeating the exact same language is, obviously, impossible (as the program would have to deterministically print one of two different numbers). This is not the case if we're tracking languages rather than interpreters.

That said, I'd like to be convinced that we can add Lua.

And if an interpreter is not originally specified, I'd imagine it's ok to switch it up.

Yeah, I think we should be able to switch interpreters later, provided all previous submissions work identically in both interpreters.

@ais523 how long do you think you will need for the Lua submission? If you think you can make it, I'll gladly make YABALL #68, and let you take #67

The "deadline" is June 13, btw

@Luke I'm not convinced it's possible at all; I've been focusing on the practical languages and have broken most of the esolangs in the process

but I'm more encouraged than I used to be

I'll keep working on it but you shouldn't hold up the rest of the polyglot waiting for me

Hmm, okay