@MaxVernon There isn't a cutoff. If it were that easy, the automated script could take care of such things. Evaluate the whole Q & A on its merits, taking account of the views as one of the inputs. That one seems to have little lasting value as far as I can see, but I am not a PostgreSQL user (and only one of the close-voters was). Maybe ask in the Heap? Update: heh the roomba deleted it. Still might be worth asking about resurrection.

→ 3 messages moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 2 messages moved to Trash

← 2 messages moved from DROP QUESTION queue;

→ 1 message moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 1 message moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 1 message moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 2 messages moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 1 message moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

@MaxVernon you forgot to vote again

→ 2 messages moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 1 message moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 14 messages moved to Trash

← 14 messages moved from DROP QUESTION queue;

@PaulWhite I did vote to delete... is that what you're referring to?

@PaulWhite my comment/question about the number of views "cutoff" was a tiny bit snarky... sorry about that :-)

@MaxVernon no - the downvote that would assist auto-deletion

@MaxVernon no apology necessary; I didn't read it that way

@PaulWhite ahhh. actually I did downvote it (perhaps that was yesterday though - not sure)

@PaulWhite oh good

@MaxVernon there were no downvotes when I checked - mine was the first

@PaulWhite ahhh, then it was last night. There might have been some merlot last night :-)

@PaulWhite thanks

→ 2 messages moved to 👻 Ghost Records 👻

→ 10 messages moved to Trash

← 10 messages moved from DROP QUESTION queue;