« first day (391 days earlier)      last day (2227 days later) » 

1:06 AM
@AvnishKabaj ^
 
1:47 AM
@Abcd is $g - \frac{\alpha(l/6 -l\cdot sin^2\theta)}{sin\theta}$
The answer
 
@AvnishKabaj Nope :/
 
What's the answer
@Abcd ansaaaa
 
@AvnishKabaj $a= \dfrac l 2 \sin\theta \alpha + \dfrac l 2 \omega^2 \cos \theta $
 
 
1 hour later…
3:03 AM
@Abcd are you sure the second term is there
 
3:21 AM
@AvnishKabaj yes
 
3:43 AM
Does anyone remember/ know that formula that relates coefficient of restitution's square with change in kinetic energy during collision? @AvnishKabaj @GaurangTandon @Tanuj
 
4:04 AM
@Abcd it wasn't supposed to be rote learned iirc; i'd just derive it
 
@GaurangTandon are we referring to the same formula?
@GaurangTandon It reduces 4-6 steps!!
 
i know, well i didn't rote learn it
 
I see
 
 
1 hour later…
5:27 AM
Hey @JohnRennie !!
 
 
1 hour later…
6:41 AM
@JohnRennie Are you there?
 
I'm pretty busy this morning and won't be available for a while. Sorry :-(
 
Oh, fine.
 
7:04 AM
 
7:55 AM
For not skidding , ...I think...
@Abcd...Wcosθ=μN+F_{c}sinθ...
F_{c} is centrifugal force ...
For the other one...
Wcosθ+μN=F_{c} sinθ...
 
 
1 hour later…
9:00 AM
Let me retry here:
Friction = $f$
@NehalSamee You have written the same equation twice.
$f- mg\cos \theta + m\omega^2 \sin \theta = 0$
Agh! no
$f - mg\cos \theta + mr\omega^2 \sin \theta = 0 $
Then:
$N - mr\omega^2 \cos \theta - mg \sin\theta = 0 $
$f_{max}= \mu N $
$\mu({-mr\omega^2 \cos \theta + mg \sin\theta})= mg\cos \theta - mr\omega^2 \sin \theta $
 
9:18 AM
Hope it helped @Abcd...
 
Oh my last equation is wrong,
Correction:
$\mu ({mg \sin \theta+ m r \omega^2 \cos \theta })= mg \cos \theta - mr\omega^2 \sin \theta $
On solving,
$\omega = \sqrt{\dfrac{g- \mu g \tan \theta}{\mu r + r\tan \theta}}$
$f_{min}= 0$
Voila! $\omega_{min}= 0.204$
Voila! $\omega_{max}= 0.5 $
Done.
@NehalSamee Ty for your contribution too.
 
 
3 hours later…
12:47 PM
just post
 
in The h Bar, 2 mins ago, by Abcd
@JohnRennie The moment of inertia of a square of side a about its diagonal is $\dfrac{Ma^2}{12}$. Now if I cut it through the diagonal into two equal triangular pieces, wouldn't the moment of inertia of each about that diagonal be $\dfrac{Ma^2}{24}$? (coz MI is a scalar quantity)
 
i'm tempted to say Yes
 
@GaurangTandon But see this question:
Never mind, I did it.
 
so what was the answer?
 
@GaurangTandon A
 
12:52 PM
plz explain how
 
It would be very tough with integration.
@GaurangTandon See consider a full square plate of mass 2M
 
oh ok got it
yes yes got it
 
Yeah, thats the silly mistake I was making !!
54 secs ago, by Abcd
It would be very tough with integration.
@GaurangTandon can you do this with integration?
 
i mean I can, but I don't want to
super boring
 
I see.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:13 PM
@JohnRennie Quick question...
 
@Abcd Yes?
 
@JohnRennie I am trying to use:
$(v_o- at)= R(\omega_o+ \alpha t )$
But why doesn't it give the right answer,
I get $7v_o/9$
 
I'm not sure offhand how to approach that. It seems simple enough ...
 
2 mins ago, by Abcd
$(v_o- at)= R(\omega_o+ \alpha t )$
Does this make sense?
$v_o - \dfrac f m t = R (v_o/(3r) + I/(fR)t $
Where f is friction.
I'll get value of $t$
Then I'll put it in velocity
 
I see what you're saying. The frictional force provides both a linear impulse and an angular impulse.
 
4:22 PM
Yes
And for pure rolling $v= R\omega$
 
Force times time is the change of linear momentum and torque time time is the change of angular momentum. That's probably the way I'd approach it.
 
Why is my method wrong?
$f= \mu m g$
On solving $\dfrac {2v_o}{9\mu g}= t$
$v= v_o - (\mu m g/m )\dfrac{2v_o}{9\mu g}$
 
What's I for a disk again?
 
$\dfrac {1}{2} mR^2$
$\implies v= \dfrac {7v_o}9$
This is bad :"( . as well as sad. How can physics yield different answers with different methods :/
 
Hmm, I just got $\tfrac{7}{9}v_0$ as well ...
 
4:36 PM
let me show you how they have done it:
@JohnRennie ^^^
@JohnRennie Is this their mistake^^^ ?
Have they taken the wrong signs?
 
If we rewrite their equation we get: $$ mrv_f - mrv_i = -I\omega_f - I\omega_0 $$
That doesn't seem right ...
 
Okay...
 

« first day (391 days earlier)      last day (2227 days later) »