last day (48 days later) » 

00:41
Well Hello.
hello
So... I must confess, it is easier to prove for $0<a<1$ for division by $0$ reasons
So, I suppose we are going to do this problem with a contour just for fun and your learning?
Yes. I suppose it's going to be related to this, but I cannot exactly understand that answer.
Well, I'm going to choose a different shape for our problem. Still remember what a contour integral sorta means?
Well, you said that it had to do with something with residues, and integrating over the complex plane, and the arrows became zero or something like that so we had to consider certain points?
Or something along those lines.
Yeah, pretty much
00:46
Pacman.
I'm going to use what I'm going to call the Pacman contour
Hahaha
Have your Mathjax set?
Yes, I managed to add the bookmark.
So, $$f(x)=\frac{x^a}{1+x^2}$$
Let $R$ be the radius of the big circle and $r$ be the radius of the small circle along our contour
We also have
$$I_n=\int_{C_n}f(x)\ dx$$
And $C_5$ is the entire path, including all pieces
What is $I_{n}$ and $C_{n}$? Is $C_{n}$ the shape?
$C_n$ is the shape and $I_n$ is the integral along the contour $C_n$.
00:49
OK.
Arrows designate the directions of the integral as well
So, given $r,R$, then $I_1$ is given by... what?
(trust me, it should be your gut feeling. What does $C_1$ represent?
$(R^2-r^2) \pi$? (Could you clarify what $n$ is, please)?
$n$ up there? it's just a place holder for me to put $n=1,2,3,4,5$ in.
$I_1$ should be given by...
Oh, OK.
$$I_1=\int_{C_1}f(x)\ dx=\int_r^Rf(x)\ dx$$
Integrals you know and love with actual bounds instead of weird $C$ things
00:53
OK.
Now, for $I_2$, we use what is called "Jordan's lemma"
Don't freak out, it's incredibly basic and powerful at that
Basically, we use the squeeze theorem
In complex analysis, Jordan's lemma is a result frequently used in conjunction with the residue theorem to evaluate contour integrals and improper integrals. It is named after the French mathematician Camille Jordan. == Statement == Consider a complex-valued, continuous function f, defined on a semicircular contour C R = { R e i θ ∣ θ ∈ [ 0 , π ] } ...
I'm trying to follow you.
Yes...but I'm just gonna teach you the basics real quick
OK.
Look at that graph
Consider the integral along that line as $n\to\infty$.
What is the result after $n\to\infty$?
00:56
$y=0$.
Yes
Basically, if the integrand goes to $0$ fast enough, then the limit of the integral is $0$.
Yes.
What about this one as $n\to\infty$?
What happens to the area?
Slightly harder, huh?
Especially if I don't let you calculate the integral first, then take the limit
In other words, it's a race between how fast the function goes to 0 versus how fast the "length" of the path goes to infinity
It seems to be increasing, according to calculations.
OK.
Well, yes, it is increasing. But that is the rough idea of Jordan's lemma
Now, let's go back to our function
Approximately how fast does the function go to $0$ as $R\to\infty$?
We are looking at $C_2$.
01:02
I can't understand. Is $R$ fixed?
What is $p$?$$\frac{x^a}{1+x^2}=\mathcal O(x^p)$$
$p=a-2$.
What does $R$ have to do with our integral though?
$R$ is the radius of the outer circle
Now, what is the "length" of the contour $C_2$?
$2 \pi R$?
Yup.
Roughly speaking, there is a constant $k$ such that
$$|f(x)|<kx^{a-2}$$
And the integral is bounded:
01:05
Yes.
$$|\int_{C_2}f(x)\ dx|\le|2\pi Rkx^{a-2}|$$
Length times "height" I suppose
Oh, whoops
There we go
Now, what is $|x|$ along $C_2$?
(distance from 0)
$R$
And so it all simplifies nicely:
$$|I_2|\le2\pi kR^{a-1}$$
For every $0<a<1$, as $R\to\infty$, we see then that $I_2\to0$.
Don't you mean $$Rx^{a-2}$$
No, $|x|=R$.
01:09
Ah.
Anyways, we now know that $I_2$ is negligible.
$|a|<1$?
Yes, OK.
Well, yeah. $|a|<1$ is fine.
But for $0<a$, it's easier to see that as the smaller $r$ goes to $0$, $I_4\to0$
I leave it to you to show in the same manner that $I_4\to0$.
Now $I_3$ is a weird little thing IMO
$$I_3=\int_{C_3}f(x)\ dx$$
@SimplyBeautifulArt Could you clarify the relationship between the circles and $$\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{a}}{x^2+1}$$?
It is almost like $C_1$. Can you guess what the integral comes out to be?
As the big circle tends to infinity, and the small circle tends to $0$, what does $I_1$ tend to become?
(It is an integral from point $r$ to point $R$)
:-|
01:13
I'm not sure.
$$I_1=\int_r^Rf(x)\ dx$$
As $r\to0$ and $R\to\infty$.......
It is the integral we wish to evaluate?
It is.
But not in a manner of your substitutions and differentiations
Now, do you see why the above is true?
I mean, with the $I_1$ and all.
OK.
What is $I_3$ then?
01:16
Does $I_{3}=I_{1}$?
Nope
Arrows for example
$I_3=-I_1$?
Aha!!!!!....nope
I tricked you, it's a bit harder than you might've thought
$$I_3=\int_R^rf(xe^{2\pi i})\ dx$$
The trick here is that it is rotated $2\pi$ radians around, and for non-integer $a$, this makes things interesting
(a great example of why $0\ne2\pi$ in the purest of senses.)
Now, if you plug it all in, we get
$$I_3=-\int_r^R\frac{(xe^{2\pi i})^a}{1+(xe^{2\pi i})^2}\ dx$$
$$=-e^{2\pi ia}\int_r^R\frac{x^a}{1+x^2}\ dx$$
Where I factored that all out and simplified.
$$I_3=-e^{2\pi ia}I_1$$
OK.
At this point, your probably wondering where the trig function in the solution comes in, but don't worry, it's quite a nice surprise at the end if you haven't figured it out
The last challenge is to figure out $I_5$, which is the entire integral from $I_1$ to $I_4$.
We do this with Cauchy's residue theorem.
Cauchy's residue theorem is almost always applicable for closed contours. That is, it has to loop allll the way back to where it started
First, it asks us "for what values of $x$ is $f(x)$ undefined?"
(hint: division by $0$.)
01:24
$x= \pm i$.
As long as $a>0$, we ignore $x=0$.
(we can handle that too, but not now)
The residue here is very simply given:
Residue 1 = $$\lim_{x\to i}(x-i)f(x)$$
Residue 2 = $$\lim_{x\to-i}(x+i)f(x)$$
And $I_5$ is the sum of these times $2\pi i$.
$$I_5=2\pi i(res+res)$$
I have to go now, hope you can figure the rest out
So $$I_{5}=2 \pi i (\text{Residue 1}+\text{Residue 2})$$ By Cauchy Reisude Theorem?
Hint: Complex definition of cosine/Euler's formula for where the trig function comes in
Yup
And...
$$I_5=I_1+I_2+I_3+I_4$$
You may now solve for $I_1$, given all of the above, which is out integral in question
Good night!
02:15
@S.C.B. And as a last note, I usually find this more "elementary" than real methods.
For example, you didn't tell me why the Weierstrass product equaled the integral form of the gamma function
And it also extends to more general problems without acknowledging special functions
 
11 hours later…
13:16
@S.C.B. if you want, I can give you an integral that is nearly impossible to solve without contours, but easily solved
 
2 hours later…
15:01
@SimplyBeautifulArt Tell me more.
@S.C.B. About what?
I mean, I can give you a problem to try out
Could you tell me the problem?
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{1-x}{1-x^3}\ dx$$
Solve this using contours integrals
(first, decide what shape. The $-\infty,+\infty$ should tell you at least one part of the shape)
@S.C.B. When you think you have the right shape, tell me
4
Q: Calculate $\int_0^\infty {\frac{x}{{\left( {x + 1} \right)\sqrt {4{x^4} + 8{x^3} + 12{x^2} + 8x + 1} }}dx}$

EufiskyProve $$I=\int_0^\infty {\frac{x}{{\left( {x + 1} \right)\sqrt {4{x^4} + 8{x^3} + 12{x^2} + 8x + 1} }}dx} = \frac{{\ln 3}}{2} - \frac{{\ln 2}}{3}.$$ First note that $$4{x^4} + 8{x^3} + 12{x^2} + 8x + 1 = 4{\left( {{x^2} + x + 1} \right)^2} - 3,$$ we let $${x^2} + x + 1 = \frac{{\sqrt 3 }}{{2\c...

Wait a moment.
Also, you can now answer questions like this
15:08
I'm somewhat preoccupied.
I'm doing a difficult inequality.
15:36
Seems to be an extremely hard inequality. @S.C.B.
I don't like using Lagrange Multipliers, so I am trying to manipulate the condition.
The condition is vexing.
Usually you establish a bound on $xyz$, but no bound can be found.
15:45
@S.C.B. well, good luck
16:25
@DHMO scroll to top for solutions to the integral
ok
@SimplyBeautifulArt Well, here again.
@S.C.B. ok
So, we have...
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{1-x}{1-x^3}\ dx$$
@S.C.B. ideas on the shape?
16:57
Man, you've been busy @S.C.B.
A circle? I don't know.I am going to look up more information.
On contour integrals
What makes you think I have been busy?
@S.C.B. rep
Think about it. You need a line going from negative infinity to positive infinity, and some other line to finish the shape
@S.C.B. btw, someone (the one currently in this room you don't know) wants to do Discord chat with you.

  last day (48 days later) »