Ugh... @amWhy

@XanderHenderson "Ugh" is spot on! That's his fourth comment below four different posts with a link to that question. You may act as you see fit, but it is gimusi's most recent effort to search for what are deemed poor questions that were answered by Did, now me, four or more years ago. Next target, who knows?

On the one hand, I am frustrated with gimusi's behaviour---he is clearly targeting you and Did; on the other hand he isn't wrong about the linked question (presuming that his point is that it is terrible and should be purged).

@XanderHenderson I understand. At the time, I sincerely thought the OP was confused. I don't blame anyone for voting to close and delete it. But gimusi would have had to, just as he did with Did, scoured through pages and pages of questions I've answered, to find it. Thus I am upset about the targeting. I've never gone to gimusi's profile to go down the long list of crap he's answered; my votes have always arisen from CRUDE requests, or the search for the more recent of questions closed, at least

two days prior.

Oh, I agree that gimusi is acting in bad faith.

His behaviour is abysmal.

Though I am not sure why anyone should care if a four year old question like that one gets closed and deleted.

@XanderHenderson True. It really isn't a big deal to me, save for gimusi's behavior (linking you, Jyrki, trying to link T.Bongers, etc). It's his behavior that bothers me, not the loss of that question!

Yeah. I've flagged his comments.

@XanderHenderson He seems very angry; but that may be a result of more and more people "catching on to him".

I honestly don't know what his deal is. He does not seem to understand that standards for the site have evolved over time, and that there are some high rep users who have benefitted from that change (you included).

He seems to think that it is "inconsistent" to judge actions from four+ years ago by somewhat different standards.

I'm going to go make some latkes. It has been a long day, and I want potatoes. :\

@XanderHenderson Yummy! Save some for me!

I do not understand the point...

@user170039 My point in that particular comment was "I don't understand your point. You appear to be acting in bad faith. Clarify."

All good now, @user170039?

Well, then I am not sure that I can help you.

The question to which gimusi linked is an old, inactive question which has a highly upvoted answer by a user with whom gimusi has argued in the past.

There is little reason to expect that question to come up in a general search, or for a user to just come across it.

Hence it appears that gimusi loaded up that user's profile, ranked their answers by number of votes, then linked to the first answer to an obviously terrible question.

And I still do not understand the relevance of that particular question.

I can use smaller words, if you would like.

I really want to answer this question with "Between 1:37 AM and 8:12 PM."

@XanderHenderson ????

The question is actually pretty reasonable, but the title is "When is a set infinite?"

It seems like the answer should be a time.

Perhaps "In any month containing an 'r'"?

@XanderHenderson Hah!

Ooh, @XanderHenderson you're reaping in the late answer reviews today!!