« first day (1694 days earlier)      last day (3048 days later) » 

1:15 AM
in Discussion on Mi Yodeya Userscripts, 47 mins ago, by HodofHod
Version 4.1.0 released: "s" flag for Sefaria added to Tanach. Thanks to @DoubleAA for doing all the work!
3
 
 
2 hours later…
2:54 AM
@DoubleAA yeyasher kochachem!
 
 
13 hours later…
3:45 PM
This cool series is apparently (creepy search tells me) soon to feature @MonicaCellio. Would people here be interested in a similar series of interviews with Yodeyans? I would propose to try to get people in order of total 2015 reputation, which, at a glance, looks like potentially a nice cross-section of different types.
 
@IsaacMoses Could be interesting!
 
@IsaacMoses I wondered when your creepy search would alert you to that. :-) FYI, there are a few posts queued up in that series, so it'll probably be a couple week before the one featuring me shows up. (But hey, I got a nod in the one you linked. :-) )
@IsaacMoses cool idea, and that list does look like a good cross-section. Where would we post them? The Worldbuilding interviews are one series on its blog (we started the blog a few months ago). We don't have a blog, though it's come up from time to time and there's no reason we couldn't.
(We just can't have an SE blog; they're not making new ones. WB asked for an exception to that and SE pointed us at the platform we're using instead.)
 
@MonicaCellio I don't know if medium.com would be the right platform, but there are plenty of free blog platforms out there. This sort of interview could be an easy way to generate enough content to form the initial basis for a blog.
... with this content, the entire potential readership is other Yodeyans, but it'd be a start, and I think it could be genuinely interesting to the community.
Related:
8
Q: Now that we graduated, should we do a blog?

Shmuel BrinWe discussed making a blog in a previous post. Now that we graduated, what do people think about starting an official Mi Yodeya blog?

 
@IsaacMoses Medium has pluses and minuses. There are plenty of other platforms too. One useful feature of Medium is that a blog can have multiple editors and people can submit posts, so it needn't all block on one person to post things the way some do. (I'm not current on this space, though.)
Anyway, I like the idea of having a blog, with an interview series being one of several types of posts.
 
@IsaacMoses Do you creepy-search yodeyans too?!
I see Monica mentioned, but not Mi Yodeya
 
3:57 PM
Another type of post we do there that would also work here is the "question highlighting" type, either by tag or by time. One person does a post about his favorite Q&A from challenges for a month. I just did one on a particular tag and somebody will be doing another of those.
 
@Daniel I know how he found that, but I'll let him answer if he likes.
Oh, he just did. :-)
 
@Daniel That would be a little creepier than I'm willing to be on a routine basis.
 
@IsaacMoses Well I'd probably be safe :)
But Monica Cellio is probably not a particularly ambiguous search term
 
@HodofHod any objection to me adding "highlight posts/tags" (a la the above discussion) to the list in your meta post? (I think that's the one useful thing from one of my answers; I've thought better of the inward-facing stuff. So I could move the one thing to your answer and then delete mine.)
@Daniel it's not, something I try to remain mindful of when I write anything on the Internet.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:31 PM
@MonicaCellio Hey Monica, you mentioned that you have borrowed the Hebrew chanting book. The full edition is far outside my price range, and i don't know if the student edition has the information i'm looking for. Do you have the student edition or the full? And if it is the student, does it have the information regarding the grammar?
 
@Aaron sorry, I haven't borrowed it; my cantor pulled it out and showed me some things, and we'll be working with it in future meetings. The book was fairly hefty, a couple inches think I think, for what that's worth.
 
6:55 PM
@MonicaCellio Hm?
Oh, sure. It would also fit in your answer, I think
 
@HodofHod 3.5 years ago you answered a question on meta about having a blog with a list of things that a Mi Yodeya blog could include. I also answered, suggesting (among things) that we could highlight interesting questions. I'd like to fold that into your answer and delete mine, along the lines of what we were discussing in this room earlier.
 
@MonicaCellio Oh, that's what you mean. Sure! You can CW it, if you like.
 
@HodofHod it would fit in mine, but I want to remove the inward-facing stuff from mine (questions needing good answers, etc), and once I do that all that's left is this suggestion. Since yours is pretty comprehensive anyway and I don't think this is controversial (read: I don't think voters will object), I figured folding into yours is easier.
 
7:30 PM
Huh. I just earned the Cleanup Crew hat here; the last thing I did here before it showed up was to delete some obsolete comments from today here. (I commented with a question; we had a bit of a back-and-forth; the author edited the post; I deleted our conversation.)
 
@MonicaCellio That hat (and other secret hats) is explained here
ah although I see it's not all-the-way explained
 
7:44 PM
@Daniel Pops recently listed a few that haven't been correctly identified yet and this is one of them. I've just emailed him my theory.
 
I'm not sure whether I asked this question clearly
Can anyone provide some feedback on how it can be improved if necessary?
 
@Daniel I had just finished reading that -- looks clear to me.
 
@Daniel Wouldn't any valid answers automatically make it so that the reader could never be in such a situation?
 
@IsaacMoses How so?
I suppose an answer could do that if it were to say exactly how much danger constitutes pikuach nefesh (like 20% likelihood of death)
(I assume the threshold is lower than that)
But a valid answer could just tell me what to do if I get into such a situation
 
@Daniel If that prescription is according to Halacha, then it is telling you how to evaluate a situation of risk according to Halacha, and therefore, you can't be in a situation where you don't know how to evaluate risk according to Halacha.
I'm only jocoserious.
 
7:55 PM
@IsaacMoses :)
@IsaacMoses So then I guess technically the question could be boiled down to "what's the threshold for pikuach nefesh?"
I could reformulate the question to reflect that better
 
@Daniel No, seriously, it's valid to ask, besides "What's the Halacha?", "What should I do when I don't have a way of knowing what the Halacha is?". Normally, the answer to the latter is "Ask your rabbi," but emergent possible p"n conditions are an interesting case in which that may be off the table as an option.
 
oops well the question got an answer now, so I'm not sure I can change it
@IsaacMoses Yeah I was kind of thinking along those lines
I can't decide whether the answer that was just posted answers the question or not
 
@Daniel The answer that you got answers both questions, which is sort-of what I was predicting.
@Daniel I think it does. The answer is: There is no floor.
 
@IsaacMoses Yeah I think you're right
I was predicting that the answer would be the same too
The quote at first glance seems to be addressing the case I was not asking about, but could also be interpreted to address the case I am asking about
 
So, if I wanted to only talk in images existing on the internet, would I be able to do so for my last sentence? Yes; I could.
 
8:02 PM
@IsaacMoses that immediacy comment about CingYR made me think of this question.
 
@Daniel Once you know the Halacha that essentially any risk is sufficient and to take care of it first and ask later, that resolves the question of what to do if you don't know if the risk is sufficient. It is.
 
@MonicaCellio "When you're in the midst of the situation on Shabbat, is it better to phone your rabbi (guaranteed melacha) in order to minimize further violations" I know that rabbis always say to call your doctor before driving to the hospital to give birth in case the doctor says to wait a while
But calling your rabbi on Shabbos might be an exercise in futility
@IsaacMoses Yes, I agree
 
@Daniel I wonder if there are any special posek hotlines, e.g. in Israel, that one can call on Shabbat.
Like, maybe the IDF chief chaplain.
 
@IsaacMoses It's an interesting thought. But the rabbi doesn't necessarily have the benefit of pikuach nefesh considerations that a doctor does
Although he might
But if someone asks the rabbi "Can I carry all this stuff out of my house because we're being evacuated?" the rabbi might have to just put down the phone
 
@Daniel it probably wouldn't work if he didn't have an answering machine, but those are so common now that I was assuming the chance that the caller might be heard and that could lead to the rabbi picking up (if an emergency).
@Daniel interesting. I didn't know that.
 
8:08 PM
@Daniel It's probably incumbent upon him to say "Leave the stuff and save your life." before putting down the phone.
 
@MonicaCellio Better to definitely violate what is maybe a derabanan and possibly avoid what is almost certainly a deoraita
@IsaacMoses Right but if saving your life isn't an issue he couldn't say much
It would basically be a pikuach nefesh hotline
You call the rabbi and ask if you can violate shabbos for pikuach nefesh
if you know about the hotline, you don't have to call it
@IsaacMoses That's true if "leave the stuff" is necessary to save your life, but possibly not the case if one could survive even carrying stuff
 
8:51 PM
0
Q: Criteria for tag: Judaism101

LN6595As per our discussion in Creating a new tag for simple questions we want to decide on objective criteria before launching this new tag. What makes a question qualify for the tag Judaism101? The primary purpose of this tag is to allow interested users to track basic questions. Some examples of q...

 
9:07 PM
@MonicaCellio Yes and no. They were more common ten years ago than now, I think: now, I think, more people have voicemail that they cannot screen. (That impression is based on very little data. Or, for the pedants, very few data.)
 
@msh210 Why would the pedants' data on this be larger and fewer than those of anyone else?
 
@IsaacMoses Only because the impedants' is are^W is^W are smaller and more.
 
@msh210 impedance? Well, in the case of resistance, at least, we know there's more as size goes down.
 
@IsaacMoses (Thanks for the link. I was going to question you on that: the last electromagnetics I took was in eleventh grade, and I don't even remember the definition of resistance, but I'd expect more resistance from a longer wire. But the link clarified that you meant sectional area, not length.)
 
@msh210 I think you mean: <cough> For some values of "size."
 
9:20 PM
@IsaacMoses (That link also tells me that resistivity of a substance is measured in ohm meters. Copper, for example, has a resistivity of ~10^−8 ohm meters, which requires a good saw and a very good scale.)
 
@msh210 What if the ohm meter is made out of copper?
... or is the assumption that it's made out of standard materials? They probably have a reference one in a vault in Paris.
 
@IsaacMoses Well, as overall size goes down, assuming shape stays the same, sectional area goes down more than length, so resistance goes up, as you said.
@IsaacMoses No doubt. Alongside the reference candygram.
 
@msh210 I hope they keep that one isolated from the reference foot, for hygienic purposes.
 
@ShmuelBrin, is your avatar a solid white box, or is something preventing me from seeing it?
@IsaacMoses Don't worry: no one will take a peck of the candygram, so hygiene ismoot.
 
@msh210 "smoot" is a measure of distance, not hygiene.
 
9:35 PM
@IsaacMoses (Yes, and peck is volume. I was just throwing in units for kicks.)
 
@msh210 (Oops)
Not an answer to any of our many existing marijuana questions (I checked): "Orthodox Union Certifies Medical Marijuana Products, Deem Their Use a ‘Mitzvah’"
 
@IsaacMoses That's a unit of error. Typically, measurements result in two values at once (due to Heisenberg uncertainty, I guess) -- and they are positive and negative values of the same magnitude.
 
10:33 PM
@msh210 Maybe try posting a new answer and converting to comment and seeing what it says.
 

« first day (1694 days earlier)      last day (3048 days later) »