"You know that latkes and dreidels and presents are all good fun, / But if that's all you do, then your holiday's just begun." I think they plagiarized this from the intro to C-MY?.
@Shokhet Wow. Thanks very much for sharing your work here and in your class!
I'm actually tempted to edit this quotation into the question part of the Intro and make C-MY? bleeding edge, but eh.
@all I'm not quite sure what to make of this answer to a question of mine. I don't know what the "BHS" is, or if it's a source used by Jews.
I mean, the answer came from someone with >6K rep on BH.....
help
well, he also cites "the Samaritan Pentateuch" .......should someone make a mention of "Jewish sources for a Jewish site"? ....I think this is his first post
@Shokhet BHS is a scholarly source, not a religious one. So where Jewish tradition would say that if there's a difference between mesorah and an extant manuscript then mesorah wins, scholars will look at all the sources. As well they should. I haven't studied BHS or the Leningrad Codex on which it's based and can't speak to the details of differences there.
High rep on BH might or might not mean much. In this case, note that the user has over 200 answers and not a single one into double digits. He's persistent, prolific... and shares doctrine with the majority there, many of whom vote on doctrine rather than SE norms of answer quality. Joseph isn't bad -- BH has some real drivel-spewers, some with high rep, and he's not one of those -- but I do not consider him someone to look to there, either.
Most of the users there want to use the site to advance Christian ideas, and they've had official support in doing so. (Still have, but the newer mods do better there.) They now have a few people who are trying to be scholarly rather than evangelical, and who "get" what SE sites are supposed to be. They are in a minority. Answers from David, Frank Luke, or Dan (maj... whatever his name is now) are usually well-supported, sourced, and sound. They are the best of the site, answer-wise, IMO.
But, to come back to your original question, they are bringing scholarly sources, which may or may not be consistent with Jewish sources and tradition. As with anything else you see from strangers on the Internet, you should fact-check anything that really matters to you. There have been a few Jews on BH (most have left but Bruce still hangs out there) & some of the Christians cite Jewish sources, so you'll see mentions of Rashi & the Rambam & the talmud there too, alongside the rest.
As for the answer you received here, I'm having trouble following it. More specifically, I don't see how he (or the source he's citing, if it's their argument) get from what's on the page to that conclusion about the cities.
@Shokhet I didn't think you were doing that. Rather, I thought you might be thinking that high rep there might mean particularly credible or reliable or something, and, well, there are issues on that site. Some of the high-rep users give good answers. I think this one is kind of in the middle; he's not one of the bad ones but he's not at the top either. IMO.
@Shokhet yup. And I don't want to just give an opinion without leaving a trail; I tried to point out some specifics so you could look and evaluate on your own should you choose.
@MonicaCellio I mentioned to Isaac before that I'll probably print out some of the Q/A sets I posted here for quick notes -- I might not get around to speaking out all of them, but I certainly hope to cover some of them.
@Shokhet excellent. And once you're done with the talk you won't need those printouts so you can give them away to people who might then come visit the site. :-)
@MonicaCellio I found out about this site when someone quoted research he did for his chabura on MY :-) .....what goes around, comes around, I suppose :)
@Shokhet well, 2.0. I committed to the Area 51 proposal for the site here but somehow missed that it already existed as an SE 1.0 site that I could presumably have gone and joined. So I was here on the first day of beta, but not for the couple years before that.
.....I just learned from his answer that some scholars had the text with a ה, while people who kept the tradition ("Masoretes;" I suppose that would be us :P) have the text without the ה.....but I don't see how his conclusion follows.
I don't understand your answer. I understood that the word האל in this context was non-sacred, but I don't understand how you conclude from that fact that this wording "suggests that the fugitive did not receive automatic exoneration of guilt when fleeing to one of "these cities."" — Shokhet10 secs ago
.....anyway, I need to condense the other parts of my notes (non-MY parts) into something usable for a presentation, so TZT!
@MonicaCellio Thanks for the help with that parshanut answer :)