« first day (739 days earlier)      last day (4004 days later) » 

1:50 AM
@Charlie seems like teimoni mixed with regae.
 
2:18 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob :)
 
2:40 AM
@Charlie i only listen to teimoni not regae ;(
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob oh :(
 
not sure if you can see my playlist but thats what i like to listen to
but on itunes i got better stuff just youtube doesnt have it all
also i need to stop listening to music ;(
its against holocho
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob oh, could you explain
?
 
explain what
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob why listening to music is against holocho
 
2:47 AM
because after the destruction of the beith hamigdosh we shouldnt be listening to music
its a gazerio
 
:-/
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob According to whom? I have not heard this before
 
according to the gamoro
 
Where?
 
rambam and shulchon oruch pasken this way as well
Gittin 7a
 
2:58 AM
Some music seems to be allowed; some are disputed: halachipedia.com/index.php?title=Listening_to_Music
 
@Argon i follow RaMbaM
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Ah, okay
 
i hold he understands better and transmits the original meaning of what the gamoroh meant
 
I guess my minhag is a more lenient position.
 
it is not a matter of minhag it is a matter of holocho. following holocho is not minhag. it is either you listen or you dont
same thing with carrying on shabboth in boro park. i hear many people saying if you have minhag in your familiy to carry then go ahead
this is not minhag this is holocho. it is ither you carry or you dont
 
3:03 AM
It's either you follow Ramabam on this, or you don't
 
same with those who carry only papers or tissues
@Argon i follow RaMbaM on everything not shulchon oruch
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob which is not normative, so while you're free to do that, I'd encourage you to be more careful when representing what is or isn't against halacha. Many, many observant Jews see no problem with music (of appropriate types, at appropriate times, etc), so a blanket statement that music is "against halacha" is clearly not broadly applicable. Also, if it were, why would halacha need to tell us about not listening to music during the omer and the three weeks? It would be redundant.
2
 
@MonicaCellio not listening to music during the omer is minhag just like not taking a hair cut
@MonicaCellio it truly is against holocho of rambam and shulchon oruch which most follow
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob so if listening to music is forbidden all the time, why bring it up when talking about the omer?
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob source in SA? (I assume "it" is your global statement.)
 
@MonicaCellio because it is an ashkenazi minhag who do let music
 
"Rashi and Tosafot rule fairly leniently on this issue and permit music to be listened to on a moderate basis outside of taverns"
http://koltorah.org/ravj/13-32%20Jewish%20Perspectives%20on%20Music.htm
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob but minhag can't trump halacha, so if Ashkenazim can listen to music, then either listening to music is permitted globally or it's permitted for a rather significant portion of the Jewish community. Hence my comment that a blanket statement that listening to music is against halacha is...problematic.
 
@Argon @MoriDoweedhYaAgob @MonicaCellio
6
Q: Music, not allowed the whole year?

SimchasTorahThe Halacha is ( אורח חיים הלכות תשעה באב סימן תק''ס סעיף ג) That since the Destruction of the Temple we may not listen to any Music. How is it that most people do listen to recordings?

 
@DoubleAA thanks.
 
again that is ashkenazim
who hold lenient on everything
 
3:12 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob ya like on kitniyos
 
Please stop generalizing.
 
kitniyoth is no problem
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob, I'm not actually here to argue music; this is just a recent example of a pattern I've seen often in this chat room, usually in conversations involving you (but not only from you!). I'm asking you, out of respect for visitors who don't know the individual practices of everybody here, to be more careful about making blanket statements that aren't really blanket.
2
 
@DoubleAA kitniyoth is 1500s not even in rishonim
 
3:13 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I know. And Ashkenazim are lenient, right? ?....
 
@DoubleAA there is nothing to be stringent about there...
@DoubleAA it is minhag shtuth
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Perhaps, but claiming Ashkenazim are always lenient on everything is patently false.
 
ok let me revise that then. ashkenazim are lenient on all holochoth which are real holochoth. and made shtuthim to be stringencies on things which need no stringencies
better?
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob No. It's still inaccurate and you know it. You really want to claim that I can't find you one place in Rishonim where Ashkenazim are more machmir than the Rambam?
 
like i said there is no need to be stringent on things which dont need stringencies
if there would be a need for stringencies RaMbaM would have brought it down
for he doesnt deviate from the gamoro unlike ashkenazim
 
3:18 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Then your claim is really "Ashkenazim sometimes differ from the Rambam."
Big chiddush...
 
my claim is ashkenazim are not learning the same way as RaMbaM. and RaMbaM represents the meaning of the gamoro properly unlike ashkenazim.
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Then say that and realize that millions of people argue on your last statement. Don't say:
8 mins ago, by MoriDoweedhYaAgob
who hold lenient on everything
which is false.
 
being lenient on everything could be also being stringent on something
lenient on lenient=stringent :D
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Then we're back to:
8 mins ago, by Double AA
Big chiddush...
 
@DoubleAA and i said that i follow RaMbaM and i hold he transmits the holocho properly as meant to be followed. and therefore say this is holocho. it is against holocho for me to say you should listen to music for it is against holocho to listen to it.
 
3:31 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob If you can't talk about other opinions at all then this probably isn't the right site for you. Besides no one here should be asking for or giving actual psak so your concerns shouldn't be relevant.
 
@DoubleAA the psak was given by RaMbaM already. and i mentioned that i should not listen to music because it is against holocho. and i was asked where it was brought down.
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob and then you proceeded to mock other views. You can discuss them and even reject them, but you should not mock them here.
 
@DoubleAA i was not mocking i was saying as seen throughout history. that the ashkenazic community instead of agreeing and accepting that they are wrong. they forge things in the names of jaonim and make other things up in order to give their practices a right to stand even though they are against holocho.
RaMbaM said it very good. those who confuse minhagim with holocho and the opposite will surely have a bad time
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob you're doing it again. "accepting that they are wrong", "make other things up", "even though they are against holocho" - this brand of "I'm right and everybody else is wrong" really isn't the sign of someone who claims to not be mocking, who supposedly wants to engage in discourse. (And if you don't, then what @DoubleAA said is right -- this might not be the right site for you if you just see it as a platform for declaring truth.)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob That only might be seen through history if one assumes they should have accepted that they were wrong. If one thinks that the Teimonim and Rambam were wrong, then one can say the same thing the other way.
The point is that neither is good 'history'
History doesn't involve itself with axiology.
 
3:39 AM
@DoubleAA but teimonim and RaMbaM have things to back them up. ashkenazim on the other hand dont unless they make it up or kvetch it out from somewhere
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob A good rule of thumb: if the other side can claim the same argument against you, it isn't a good argument.
 
@MonicaCellio you should read hHachom jose faur then you will understand what i am talking about. i am not sure if @DoubleAA did read him but i think he knows what i am talking about at least
@DoubleAA ashkenazim cant claim rambam made up things in the name of jaonim nor can they say the same bout teimonim
@DoubleAA not sure what you are trying to say
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob They can claim he isn't reading the gemara right. I'm not saying they do or don't (or that he did or didn't) only that they could claim that.
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I don't care to engage with you on a discussion of specific halachot (and I've never heard of your source so no, I haven't read it). My point is that the way you approach these discussions here is not constructive.
 
there you go
@DoubleAA they can claim he isnt reading it right because of girsoth or that they are learning better than him. but one who surely learns properly will see RaMbaM is correct and not tosafoth for sure.
 
3:43 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob without a better reason to spend time on it, I don't expect to read that. As I said, I'm trying to address a behavioral issue here, a point I've now raised several times and you haven't acknowledged.
 
@MonicaCellio it is against holocho to follow rabonim who have strayed from holocho
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob That's not an objective fact. You can't prove it objectively.
 
@DoubleAA no but if you learn you will see it as fact
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Perhaps. Many apparently tried and didn't come to that conclusion.
 
@DoubleAA try harder
 
3:45 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You've tried harder than all rishonei ashkenaz?
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob what does that have to do with what I said? (This comment does not endorse your statement, to be clear.)
 
Stop declaring who must and must not be right or wrong when there is no objective test.
It will get you nowhere.
 
@MonicaCellio so i dont count rabbonim who deviate from holocho as authoritative
@DoubleAA ashkenazi rishonim used a different philosophical approach to understand holocho
not the philosophical approach of the gamoro
 
@yoel כלל גדול בתורה If you define Gedolim as anyone who has your view then you won't find any that disagree. — Double AA Jan 3 at 21:14
 
@DoubleAA i never said they are not torah scholars. i only said they have not understood the gamoro as intended
 
3:49 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob so? I should care who you do or don't count why? Again, your approach is not helpful, and your misrepresentation of normative Judaism when discussing things with newcomers and outsiders is actively misleading. Tonight was the first time I've seen Argon in this room and you talked as if your interpretation is what everyone does. You do this with Ali too. I ask again: be more careful about that. Yes, caveat asker and all that, but we should try to do better.
 
@DoubleAA RaMbaM says it pretty good. r Hillel n r Shammai didn't argue on anything. their students did however. why? because as the generation went by they were not on the same mental level as the previous rabbonim
therefore machloketh occured
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Hillel and Shammai argue at least 3 times that are recorded in the Mishna.
 
@MonicaCellio who says your judaism is normative?
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob who says yours is?
 
@DoubleAA besides those 3 they did not argue
 
3:50 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Perhaps. I don't know how you know that.
 
@DoubleAA says so in RaMbaM :D
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I don't claim mine is. I suggest you follow that approach.
 
@MonicaCellio you said my approach is not normative. who says what is normative and what is not?
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob that's a very interesting question :)
 
@DoubleAA i say mine is normative because from various holochoth you can see it was done by navee'eem and throughout the gamoro. unlike various minhagim which later on became holocho by ashkenazim
 
3:52 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Good. I say mine is for the same reasons.
Now where are we?
Nowhere productive.
 
@DoubleAA say what you want until you bring proof yours is what the navee'eem did
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob well, if a significant proportion of the Jews in the world don't do something, that's an argument against...
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob same to you. where's your proof?
 
@MonicaCellio if a significant amount of jews jump of a bridge does that mean its really holocho?
@DoubleAA i know you are but what am i
 
3:54 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I'm arguing how to tell what's not. What is is harder.
 
@DoubleAA That's a very serious argument here.
This is all irrelevant. I'm not here to defend Ashkenaz or Teman. I'm here to resist mocking or judging (in an absolute sense) any position on this site.
 
@DoubleAA same here.
 
@MonicaCellio if many jews say not to wash feet hands and face before davening. particularly shahHarith because that is the required holocho and praiseworthy for other tafilloth
then we have a problem
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You're being circular. The other says it is not required by halocho.
Do you not see the circularity?
 
3:58 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob when you say something to me that relates to anything I've said I'll pay attention. Until then, I'm tuning you out.
 
"If X is wrong then X is wrong." Good but how do you know X is wrong?
 
right... so that is what i am saying. go to the source of the holocho and look for yourself. then factors can come into play as in girsoth and the way a person learns something
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Right, that's called Talmud Torah. And different people get different results.
And then people try and paskin, and still get different results. If you don't think that's how Torah works, then open a Gemara and see for yourself.
 
@DoubleAA and i go by RaMbaM because i know for sure he had it right. and as seen throughout history that many things came into play into ashkenazic paskening
which contradicts holocho. such as kabboloh
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I didn't say you couldn't do that. I said you couldn't mock or judge (in an absolute sense) other opinions on this site.
 
4:01 AM
not only ashkenazim but ashkenazim influencing sefaradim
@DoubleAA for you its mocking for me its beneficial criticism
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob As far as my duties as a mod on this site go, if the recipient thinks it violates that rule, then it is not allowed.
 
@DoubleAA the recipents shouldnt be to soft bout it. that is how Talmud Torah is right?!
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Doesn't matter and don't care. If they can't take it, then the onus is on you to formulate your positions differently.
 
@DoubleAA i would formulate my position differently but i wont take back me sayng that ashkenazim are wrong. that is on the person receiving the message to understand that i am not saying judaism is wrong. i am saying i disagree and that person should look into why i disagree instead of getting mad
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Try saying: I think/believe that Ashkenazim are wrong.
No one will disagree with that.
 
4:06 AM
@DoubleAA i hold ashkenazim are wrong done deal :D
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Cool. I accept that statement as True and not offensive.
 
Boruch HaShem
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Also True and not offensive.
 
@DoubleAA AlhHamdullilah
@DoubleAA so in my teimoni shul i made a good friend not to long ago. and he and his uncle go according to RaMbaM as well. they are both ashkenazim. his uncle teaches in baruch college here in the city. they both do chalita. the uncle gets a shochet to come with him to a farm. shechts 6-7ducks(he prefers ducks) and he does chalita at home. he learned from mori gafih while he was a live and now if he has questions he calls mori rosSon arusi the student of mori gafih.
@DoubleAA mori arusi told the uncle that since chickens are much bigger here in the states due to chemicals and such compared to teimon. he should keep the meat in the water for double the time. mori arusi said that in teimon they held the meat in the boiling water for about 3mins and here we should hold it about 6-7mins
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob 7 minutes? That's pretty long. I thought you do chalita after the meat has been cut up, so why does it matter how big the original animal was?
 
4:14 AM
@DoubleAA i havent ate meat since that time you have mentioned it to me and i have looked over it. i am going to start doing it myself but maybe sSlee will be better in my situation because of less mess
@DoubleAA you salt it for 24mins wash it thoroughly then drop it in for 3mins in boiling water(what they did in teimon)
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob but before or after they chopped it into whatever size piece they were going to use?
 
the pieces of chicken are bigger when cut up compared to the chicken in yaman
so a pulka is bigger in america than theimon. therefore you hold the pulka for twice as much
thoughts?
 
How long would they put a 24oz steak in for? Would it differ from a 6oz steak?
 
i would assume so
it takes longer for the process to start in a bigger piece of meat?
thats what i am getting out of it
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob So then what was the 3 min time said in reference to?
 
4:20 AM
@DoubleAA the chicken in general is smaller than the chicken here. so when you cut the wings and breasts and thighs off they are still smaller size than the american chicken. so the smaller bird takes less time for chalita compared to the bigger bird
 
@DoubleAA is this true?
 
 
1 hour later…
5:52 AM
2
Q: How do I escape underscores in data explorer?

Charles KoppelmanIt seems that underscore (_) is a wildcard character in Data Explorer. How do I escape it to search for an actual underscore? Better - is there any indexing on words a la Lucene or RegEx support that I can access in the Data Explorer or do I have to do brute-force LIKE queries? Even better -...

 
All: Close this for clarification from the asker, or is the asker's intent clear enough as the question is now? ↓
0
Q: Employment questions I have

CostaI have three questions. 1) Can a religious Orthodox Jewish employer, refuse to employ a Non Observant Jew on Shabbos or other Jewish holidays, if the Non Observant Jew volunteers to work on this, since the Non Observant Jew has always worked on Shabbos and Jewish Holidays all his life in other j...

All: Any reason not to merge judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/… into judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/cherem as a synonym? (Ping @DoubleAA)
 
@msh210 I don't know how big are the differences (and Cherem is colloquially used for both cherem and nidui)
 
6:07 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob you keep saying that ashkenazim are wrong for not following RaMBaM on everything, but plenty of sephardim, mizrachim, and even teimanim follow Shulchan Aruch
your position seems to be unique to yourself
 
@Daniel ...and some Temanim, I think.
 
@msh210 Ok. We'll say pretty close to unique
 
@Daniel teimonim follow shulchon oruch because they want to be like majority. sefaradim followed shulcon oruch because they accepted ashkenazi philosphy over their original philosophy of the jaonim
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob ...and you don't because...
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob So because of the ashkenazim, Judaism is forever corrupted?
 
6:11 AM
 
@Daniel he views that paskening like the rambam to be an ikkar (like an axiom). There is no proof (and there can't be) either way (whether the Rambam is right or not)
 
@msh210 i dont because shulchon oruch paskens liek the zohar in a few places. and his understanding of holocho is also revolved around kabboloh althought he does go by rambam in many places. he himself says that rambam is bigger than him and that holding by rambam is better than holding than him
@Daniel not forever. make tashuvoh and follow holocho properly
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Cite that last, please.
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob If that were the case, why would he ever pasken differently from rambam?
 
avkat rochel siman 32
 
6:19 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob There went your credibility. He does not say there that following the Rambam is better than following himself.
 
sure it says
 
He says that if a community has been following Rambam for generations, it should not change.
 
no it doesnt say if a community
it says if a community or a person is follow RaMbaM
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob The only thing he says about an individual is "how can someone force him to leave" the Rambam -- but does not actually say the guy shouldn't leave the Rambam. He only says that about a community that's been following the Rambam for generations.
 
right. he says why should the people following himself make others who follow RaMbaM follow him? RaMbaM is much greater than he is and they have on who to stand by
 
6:22 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob He says nothing about greater. He'd presumably say the same rule about himself -- or at least about the Rosh -- as he does about the Rambam.
 
he says he is greatest of all poskim...
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Sorry, quite right. I maintain though that "He'd presumably say the same rule about himself -- or at least about the Rosh -- as he does about the Rambam".
 
he would not say the same about the rosh for he says the RaMbaM is the greatest poskim in the arab lands and the west. rosh was the posek of spain he moved there from ashkenaz
 
Heck, he derives it from a statement about Bes Shamay, whom we know the halacha isn't like. So Rosh can't be worse. Not can SA himself (certainly not according to the Avkas Rochel!).
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I don't get your point. What does choice of country have to do with anything?
 
@msh210 he says although we dont hold by beith shammai a person is can still hold like beith shammai if he wishes
@msh210 look in the page you linked. he said RaMbaM is greatest posek of all the arab lands and the lands of the west meaning spain. rosh was from spain. rambam is bigger than rosh
 
6:28 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob He's quoting a g'mara to that effect, yes.
 
@msh210 right. so the people in his times were forcing people who were majority long ago but eventually became minority
these people follow RaMbaM but eventually most accepted the shulchon oruch and were forcing people who follow RaMbaM to accept shulchon oruch
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You misunderstand me. When I said "He'd presumably say the same rule about himself -- or at least about the Rosh -- as he does about the Rambam" I meant that a community following the Rosh for generations should not switch. I didn't mean a claim of greatness.
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob I do not understand what you wrote here.
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Nor here.
 
@msh210 he mentions rosh later as to say those who follow rosh should not budge either. but he makes RaMbaM much higher than rosh.
 
Anyway, I think I'm engaging a troll, so I'm quitting while I'm ahead(?).
@ShmuelBrin I agree. It may however be worthwhile to split off cherem d'Rabenu Gershom as a separate tag. What do you think?
 
6:32 AM
@IsaacMoses heheheh
 
@msh210 also check beith yosef orach haim 3
@msh210 those communities following the rosh as seen through history were against rambam. read hHachom jose faur's papers i listen above about that time in history. mamash eye opening breath taking yet really sad
@msh210 rosh forbade his community to learn rambam not only mora navuchim but he even dismissed their plea of getting mishei torahs for the community
@msh210 did you read it?
 
6:55 AM
@msh210 Umm. Yes; close. Too many questions. 1 is, as you commented, hard to fathom (as currently phrased) and also phrased like Too Localized argumentation. (I suspect he means "allow to pick up hours under an existing employment relationship" by "hire.") 2 and 3 need to specify whether they're questions of Halachic or secular employment law; for the latter, they'd need to supply jurisdiction and may still be off-topic (though I'm more inclusionist than some on that - ...
... secular employment law as it affects Jewish practice is potentially quite on-topic IMO.)
 
@IsaacMoses Fine; thanks.
 
@IsaacMoses @msh210 Am I imagining the duplicative nature of these answers? judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/28385/… Is the spelling out of mispar katan worth a separate answer? ( The last paragraph is new)
(Yes, it does seem petty, and I'm really not concerned; I'm merely curious.)
 
@msh210 i'll be waiting for a responce
 
@HodofHod I don't think we've deleted answers in the past for duplication unless there was absolutely nothing new in the newer answer. At least that's my impression; I may be wrong.
 
7:10 AM
@msh210 Right. I wasn't thinking deletion, but rather editing. I don't know whether or what, though.
 
@HodofHod Yeah. Me neither.
 
@msh210 Ok. I thought it was probably not action-worthy, but I decided better to ask than to wonder.
@msh210 Ona separate note: How was Shavous?
 
@HodofHod Good, b"H. I almost finished Iyov (finally!). I have one more perek and hope to finish tomorrow. Good food, too. How was your Shavuos?
 
@msh210 Excellent! I really need to have cheesecake more often!
Oh! the spirituality was good too!
;)
 
@HodofHod Not too often, though. :-)
@HodofHod Maybe others here will have better ideas than I.
 
7:18 AM
@msh210 Iyov? Is this a custom I'm not familiar with?
Or is that where you finished to in tikkun?
 
@HodofHod Don't want too much simchas yom tov, y'know.
No, kidding.
@HodofHod That's where I'm up to in my trip through Nach.
 
@msh210 Ahh.. What's your kvius?
 
:9499949 I've deleted what appear to have been pastes of copyrighted material.
@HodofHod None. Hence the "(finally!)" -- I've technically been in the middle of Iyov for years (though not actively learning it all that time).
 
@msh210 why is it copyrighted? let me check
 
@msh210 Ouch. You learning it with meforshim? That probably takes forever in Iyov....
 
7:22 AM
@HodofHod For Iyov, I used only the M'tzudos.
I started out with grander ideas, but....
 
@msh210 how is it copyrighted? it is from sacred-texts.com/jud/gfp/index.htm#contents
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Sorry! By all means re-post all that stuff. (I can't undelete the messages once they're deleted.)
 
@HodofHod Well, that edition includes the M'tzudos, but that's not the edition I happened to use.
 
7:25 AM
Our nation is wise and perfect, as has been declared by the Most High, through Moses, who made us perfect: "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people" (Deut. iv. 6). But when wicked barbarians have deprived us of our possessions, put an end to our science and literature, and killed our wise men, we have become ignorant; this has been foretold by the prophets, when they pronounced the punishment for our sins:
 
@msh210 /facepalm
 
"The wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid" (Isa. xxix. 14). We are mixed up with other nations; we have learnt their opinions, and followed their ways and acts. The Psalmist, deploring this imitation of the actions of other nations, says, "They were mingled among the nations, and learned their works" (Ps. cvi. 35).
Isaiah likewise complains that the Israelites adopted the opinions of their neighbours, and says, "And they please themselves in the children of strangers" (Isa. ii. 6); or, according to the Aramaic version of Jonathan, son of Uzziel,
"And they walk in the ways of the nations." Having been brought up among persons untrained in philosophy, we are inclined to consider these philosophical opinions as foreign to our religion, just as uneducated persons find them foreign to their own notions. But, in fact, it is not so.
NO TOUCHY!
just so you know the psalmists were ashkenazim
one famous psalmist is ramchal although he was much later than rambam
 
Anyway, it's 2:26 am, and I should go to bed. TZT, y'all.
 
@msh210 get back to me when you read that link i sent you
 
 
8 hours later…
3:38 PM
@HodofHod it seems pretty similar but not 100%. It would have been better IMO for him to propose an augmentation of your answer than write a new one, but oh well. I'm not sure what edit could be reasonably done, but I note that the voters are also speaking on the matter.
 
 
4 hours later…
8:00 PM
@MonicaCellio Right. If it was 100% I'd be flagging, probably.
 
@HodofHod yup, for a complete duplicate that would be the right response.
 

« first day (739 days earlier)      last day (4004 days later) »