@SwiftPushkar Moderators votes are binding. So, they usually don't close/reopen vote unless they're sure. Hence users should always cast close/reopen votes so-that decision involves input from community :)
@Pandya - Yes , I generally also do not cast close votes unless the post is exactly duplicate or not related, but do discuss with other users about possibility first. I have observed that Most of the time the posts are only partly same ,so in those cases it's quite difficult to relate both posts as some other additional enquiry often is present.ЁЯШГ ЁЯСНЁЯСН
@TheLittleNaruto Those who are blaming others are just hiding their own flaws . The Hinduism ref. is totally unnecessary from q. point of view. Just throwing mud on others to hide own uglyness.ЁЯША
but i don't think the Girls went to homes of husband untill at least the boy finishes his studies at gurukula (age 18-20) so even they were married before , but actual marriage life used to start after that age only.
Rudolf Otto claimed:
That Krishna himself was a historical figure is indeed quite indubitable. [Source]
Despite this, much of modern Western discourse ignores (or displays skepticism towards) a historical Krishna, while Indian discourse maintains that he is in fact historical.
I have read ...
What was the age of Sita at the time of marriage?
16 years
Explanation:
3.47.4 & 3.47.5 : Sita told Ravana (before abduction) about the time she spent after marriage in Ayodhya
рдЙрд╖рд┐рддреНрд╡рд╛ рджреНрд╡рд╛ рджрд╢ рд╕рдорд╛ рдЗрдХреНрд╖реНрд╡рд╛рдХреБрдгрд╛рдВ рдирд┐рд╡реЗрд╢рдиреЗред
рднреБрдЮреНрдЬрд╛рдирд╛ рдорд╛рдиреБрд╖рд╛рдиреНрднреЛрдЧрд╛рдиреНрд╕рд░реНрд╡рдХрд╛рдорд╕рдореГрджреНрдзрд┐рдиреАредред
She had been in I...
I don't know what you flagged but if you flagged as wrong answer, then it may get declined. The age was 6 years not 16.
Rudolf Otto claimed:
That Krishna himself was a historical figure is indeed quite indubitable. [Source]
Despite this, much of modern Western discourse ignores (or displays skepticism towards) a historical Krishna, while Indian discourse maintains that he is in fact historical.
I have read ...
