« first day (1485 days earlier)      last day (3808 days later) » 

bmike
bmike
02:28
@DanielLawson Dang - that's a nasty way to lay people off. Hopefully there's some decent benefits being paid for them while they transition.
OTOH, I haven't read MacWorld print for much in the last decade - so I'm not surprised they were not profiting - great people worked hard on that publication.
 
4 hours later…
Ian C.
Ian C.
06:37
@DanielLawson man, what a lame way to cut staff.
 
10 hours later…
stuffe
stuffe
16:21
@bmike Nasty on the one hand, but on the other, how about doing it the week before and denying these people a last all expenses paid trip to Cupertino? Covering this as their last job may help their portfolio to hopefully get something else sooner perhaps.
Ian C.
Ian C.
16:35
I suppose that's as good as any a networking opportunity, an Apple event for Apple-covering writers...
 
5 hours later…
bmike
bmike
21:08
@stuffe They are all so well known that they won't need much networking, but I figure not springing it on them the next day would show more couth

« first day (1485 days earlier)      last day (3808 days later) »