« first day (2178 days earlier)      last day (2180 days later) » 

12:19 AM
@MartinSleziak I waited a bit and then replaced (hausdorff-space) by (separation-axioms).
@MartinSleziak I see that is now a synonym of .
 
 
11 hours later…
11:00 AM
A new tag was created by Rodrigo de Azevedo. Possibly with the intended meaning from dynamical systems?
In mathematical analysis, a positively invariant set is a set with the following properties: Given a dynamical system x ˙ = f ( x ) {\displaystyle {\dot {x}}=f(x)} and trajectory x ( t , x 0 ) {\displaystyle x(t,x_{0})} where x 0 ...
2
Q: For which values of $\alpha$ is the disk $B = \{(x, y) \mid x^2+y^2 \leq 1\}$ positively invariant?

Gragbow Given the following dynamical system $$\begin{aligned} \dot x &= f(x,y) = -x + \alpha y \\ \dot y &= g(x,y) = -y\end{aligned}$$ for which values of $\alpha$ is the disk $B = \{(x, y)\mid x^2+y^2 \leq 1\}$ positively invariant? Now what I have done is that I have taken the orbital ...

3
Q: Positively invariant $(S,I)$-triangle for SIS dynamical system

JOEFConsider the following differential equations $${dS \over dt} = \lambda-\beta SI-\mu S+\theta I$$ $${dI \over dt} =\beta SI-(\mu +d)I-\theta I$$ In all papers that I have read it is only mentioned that $$\Omega = \left\{ (S,I) : I\geq 0, S \geq 0, S+I \leq {\lambda \over \mu} \right\}$$ is ...

1
Q: Determine whether a set is Invariant, Positively invariant or negatively invariant

Bernard.MathewsI have just started a dynamical systems course and I am a bit confused as to how to determine if something is positively or negatively invariant, or just invariant. I know the defintions for invariance are as follows: Let $B \subset X$. $B$ is called Positively Invariant if $S_tB\subset B$ f...

0
Q: Geometric intuition of an invariant set, positively invariant and negatively invariant

Mathematicing Definition: Invariant set A set $S \subseteq \mathbb{M}$ is invariant if $\Psi_{t}\left ( S \right )\subseteq S,\forall t$ -if $\forall x \in S$, $\Psi_{t}\left ( x \right )\subseteq S,\forall t$ -if $\forall x\in S,q\left ( t,x \right )\subseteq S,\forall t$ Definition: ...

1
Q: Show a positively invariant set open

user177196Suppose $f := R^n -> R^n$ is continuously differentiable. Given $\phi(t,y)$ is the solution to the IVP: $\dot{x} = f(x), \ x(0) = y$. Assume $x_0$ is an asymptotically stable equilibrium of the system $\dot{x} = f(x)$. Show that $D = \left\{y\in R^n: lim_{t\rightarrow \infty} \phi(t,y) = x_0\righ...

2
Q: Show that the annulus $1 \leq x^2 + y^2 \leq 3$ is positively invariant

Gragbow Given the planar dynamical system $$\dot x = x - y - x^3, \\ \dot y = x + y - y^3$$ show this is positively invariant in the annulus $1 \leq x^2 + y^2 \leq 3$. Hints: $$x^4 + y^4 = (x^2 + y^2)^2 − 2x^2y^2$$ $$x^4 + y^4 = \frac 12 (x^2 + y^2)^2 + \frac 12 (x^2 - y^2)^2$$ M...

 
 
2 hours later…
12:47 PM
What would you think about tag? This arose from comment here:
-2
A: Clarifying the usage of (path-length) tag

Martin SleziakPosting a possible proposal so that we can discuss in the comments (or at least show by voting) whether this would be the way to go. The tag path-length could remain, and it could be used for questions concerning length of a path in the graph-theoretic sense. This should be clearly explained in ...

I kind of hoped that somebody would post some suggestion what to do with the tag in an answer. (Especially knowing the opinion of users who are active in graph-theory tag woudl be useful.) Since some time passed without much feedback, I posted an answer myself. If you consider this tag to be too specific, please say so here in comments (or simply downvote the proposal). — Martin Sleziak 21 hours ago
If graph-theory isn't specific enough, and with a whole week's questions showing on the first page I think it probably is, then graph-algorithms surely is. — Peter Taylor 4 hours ago
Just to clarify what you mean @PeterTaylor - you're suggesting to create a new tag (graph-algorithms)? — Martin Sleziak 4 hours ago
No, I'm suggesting that if a more specific tag within graph theory were necessary (which I don't think it is) then graph-algorithms would be preferable to path-length. — Peter Taylor 4 hours ago
@PeterTaylor Thanks, at least now understand what you mean. A new tag (graph-algorithm) maybe might be reasonable, since graph algorithms are indeed quite a big topic. They include many other topics, not only algorithms related to path lengths. (In case you reconsider and you decide to propose such tag, maybe you could make a post about it - I am not sure whether it is better to go with a separate question or to make a post in the tag management thread.) — Martin Sleziak 4 hours ago
 

« first day (2178 days earlier)      last day (2180 days later) »