Dec 27 '14 at 10:05, by Martin Sleziak
I am not sure whether elementary-proof is needed, but at least the usage should be clarified in the tag-info.
If you enter the text [tag:tag] in the tag wiki textbox, it produces tag. If you enter the text [tag:tag] in the tag wiki excerpt textbox, it produces [tag:tag]. Why can't you include formatted tag names in the tag wiki excerpt? Both the tag wiki and the tag wiki excerpt make use of MathJax...
There has just recently ben created a double-factorial tag. I don't think we should have another tag just for this and that the tag factorial suits it well enough. I propose we change the tag wiki for factorial to include double factorials and remove the double-factorial tag.
The formal-proofs tag currently has no tag wiki. In my opinion this might invite people to use the tag for any question asking for a (more or less formal) proof. Very similar to the way the proof tag was used before it got removed and blacklisted. My personal assumption, however, was that formal-...
Looking at the tags, I see that transformation tag is the first tag without a tag wiki. Upon further investigation I see questions that are barely related. Some of them are geometry related, some are to do with linear algebra and others are even to do with integration. Is this tag really construc...
The Fibonacci Numbers can be defined in different ways. $$F_0 = 0; F_1 = 1$$ $$F_0 = 1; F_1 = 1$$ It doesn’t really matter. However, the fibonacci-numbers tag wiki says unequivocally that $F_0 = 1$, while the excerpt says equally firmly that $F_0 = 0$. Should both wiki and excerpt be edited t...
Currently there are three tags about K-theory: k-theory, algebraic-k-theory and topological-k-theory. The last two seem straightforward enough, but it's not clear to me what the standalone k-theory should be used for. There has already been a discussion about these tags, but it was about getting...
Certainly sharing the ideas is one of the main purposes of all SE communities including MSE. In the case that somebody solves an interesting problem partially or he/she has a possibly nice idea or question which he/she thinks worth to be analyzed more carefully by other experts, it could be a nic...
It seems like these are nearly identical in nature. The tag for complex integration was created three months ago and the contour-integration tag has been around for over two years. I feel like the complex-integration tag should be a synonym for contour-integration.
As far as I understand, empty tags should be removed after 24h. But right now, the tags geometric-modeling and cycle-index are still around even though I'm 100% certain that they have been empty for much more than 24h. There is also chain-rule, but I don't know for sure that it has been emptied l...