« first day (4296 days earlier)      last day (741 days later) » 

12:19 AM
Now that @leslie has sullied it, I retract the rhetorical tool.
 
What allows math to exist?
 
Whatever allows you to exist.
 
Finally figured out how to do it with intervals
(The thingy from before)
On the left I have three intervals and on the right I have two, and the sum of their indicator functions is the same
(Make them shrink as they head to the right so that they are compact)
(and so that the summands on the right become only one line)
 
I have no idea what you’re doing, DogAteMy.
 
12:33 AM
That's OK
 
12:43 AM
@TedShifrin Can math/philosophy explain everything we experience though?
 
Yeah this is more in the realm of metaphysics/philosophy I'm just gonna scurry away.
 
1:03 AM
@Obliv The answer is no.
 
no it isn't
 
GET OUT OF HERE LESLIE
 
ok, but no is not the answer
 
Tell me, leslie, what is the answer?
 
yes is the answer. no is the question
 
1:06 AM
yes
 
no
 
$$no^{e^{2}}$$
 
puts everyone on ignore
 
ted: yes
 
1:12 AM
This is somewhat difficult to draw
Imagine the diagram shrinks to a point as it goes to the right, so that the two red curves in the top join up to a single curve, and the same for the two white curves
Then on the top we have $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ (the red and white curves)
and on the bottom we have $X_1$, $X_2$, and $X_3$ (the disconnected red segment, the rest of the red curve, and the white curve)
and the sum of the indicator functions of the $Y$ equal that of the $X$
and they're all homeomorphic to an interval
 
1:28 AM
Alternate version^
 
1:44 AM
@TedShifrin I am trying to understand why the dual of Lie algebra of vector fields on S^1 is isomorphic to the quadratic differentials of the form $u\,d\theta\otimes d\theta$. This might not be unique to the circle, but do you have any ideas?
Maybe the quadratic differential part isn't supposed to be special...
 
What’s $u$? How is that a Lie algebra?
 
C^\infty. It's from an old Kirillov paper that I am reading.
 
No clue.
 
English exam in an hour.
 
ajay: huh? what did you say?
:)
 
1:53 AM
 
I have my english final exam in 1 hour.
 
Why the dual of vector fields isn’t just $1$-forms? Both bundles are trivial. Shrug.
 
ajay: what style of exam is it? what are they testing?
 
Well that's why I am wondering if it's not just 1-forms and quadratic forms are isomorphic, too.
 
1:55 AM
Like that it's just an isomorphism that's being brought up because it suits the needs later, rather than being something super insightful alone.
 
This is too much structure for me at this hour.
 
Can you read Russian, by the way, Ted?
 
Yes, but long forgotten.
 
ajay: huh, seems like a weird mix of basic comprehension and persuasive writing.
 
Its descriptive writing and persuasive writing.
Describe what you see, feel and hear in a very crowded street.

As I wandered leisurely down the street, swarms of bodies swirled around me. Stepping out of their reserved shells, exuberant adults and teenagers dressed in exquisitely crafted and snug kimonos humoured each other with high-pitched stories from work and school. Loitering young men rapidly attacked their phone screen as if determined to slay the ultimate villain at the final level in a video game. Next to the pier, young and old couples shared sphere-like lollipops while huddled together. They laughed vibrantly and unashamedly
 
1:56 AM
I am never persuasive.
 
reminds me a little bit of portions of the LSAT [exam taken in the USA to qualify for law school].
 
An example I wrote
 
you will ace it.
 
i'm so stressed as this whole paper is impressionistic, it depends on the marker if they want to give you the marks.
@leslietownes I Hope
 
the trend in the US is to abolish reliance on big exams but i'm personally a fan of them. it's how i got into college and beyond. if it comes down to something more holistic, they'll find out who i am.
 
2:00 AM
Yup, crap.
 
I like some exams, just because I can "celebrate my learning".
And because they have set mark schemes
 
ted: we went to the duck pond and saw not one but two forms of baby geese, and baby ducks. dinner (on me) is sushi. my daughter will yell about sashimi as usual before eating more than her fair share.
i have no idea how i would have changed careers without the LSAT and people relying on it.
 
so munchkin knows the difference between sushi and sashimi? She wants to cut down on carbs?
 
yes, she's very particular.
 
2:17 AM
Oh, Kirillov is just using the coadjoint representation to construct the literal smooth dual.
 
hola amigo
 
3:02 AM
Is it Day of the Mother or Day of the Mothers
Apparently in Spanish both Día de la Madre and Día de las Madres are used
and in English we have arguments over where to put the apostrophe
 
3:18 AM
the person who founded it wanted it in the singular.
i dunno. my name ends with s and i've been struggling with apostrophes all my life.
put 'em where you want 'em.
 
Theyr’e where they do’nt bel’ong.
 
3:53 AM
@leslietownes No commen't
 
pbhhbt
 
@TedShifrin Ow... that hurts my head.
 
4:21 AM
Go’o’d!
 
4:34 AM
Ah, yes, my favorite contraction: Go over there -> Go o'er dere -> Go'o de -> Go'o'd
 
4:50 AM
LOL
 
5:21 AM
I had skipped this question also in my yesterday's exam math.stackexchange.com/questions/4446340/…
:(
 
Hi how can I access trash?
 
5:40 AM
hi, im trying to understand this paragraph from Jost: Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis , imgur.com/a/Pzqz83H , page 134 of the latest edition, im familiar with the definition of sobolev spaces of vector valued functions on open subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$, but not sure what he means by $H^{k,r}(U)$ when $U$ is an open subset of a manifold , im also unsure why he claims that $\phi_{2} \circ \phi_{1}^{-1}$ has bounded derivative on the support of $s$ in $U_1 \cap U_2$
he seems to be claiming that this support is compact in $U_1 \cap U_2$, but i dont see why this has to be the case
in his appendix he has a bunch of results for sobolev spaces on open subsets of euclidean space, but nowhere in the book does he actually define these spaces on open subsets of manifolds, although these spaces are referred to
 
My exam has finished!
It was much easier than my first paper!
 
6:03 AM
Personally I have only ever found it to be a joy.

Any of the not so joyful stuff that can come with it tends to not be mathematics.
 
Can anyone please take a look at this? math.stackexchange.com/questions/4446340/…
One thought: Let $\ker \pi:=K$.

$G/K\cong H$

So $H\times G/H\cong G/K\times G/H$

Define $f: G\to G/K\times G/H $ as $f(g)=(gK, gH)$.
I aim to show this $f$ to be isomorphic but the problem at hand is that $f$ might not be onto (?) as I think that if $a\ne b$ are in G then $(aK, bH)$ is not in range f.
Even if f is onto, then ker f=$K\cap H$ ,which may not be identity so this seems wrong.
 
I am confused about theorem 1.11.
In Rudin.
Why is $\alpha\in L$?
What concludes $\alpha\in L$?
 
6:21 AM
hmm, I suspect jost was speaking modulo partitions of unity and some other nonsense
 
6:31 AM
@WilliamJohn draw a picture and I guarantee you will see why that is the case.
 
6:57 AM
I'll put my apostrophes where I wan't
*whe're
 
Is it true that if I have a uniform variable of the unit square [0,1]^2 that then the characteristic function is the product of the characteristic function in each coordinate? So I mean that $\Phi_(X,Y)(u,v)=\Phi_X(u)\cdot \Phi_Y(v)$?
 
@dc3rd Doesn't work.
 
How do you specify that a compliment of a set, is taken from another set?

e.g. I have a set $A$ which is a subset of $B$, which in turn is a subset of $C$. I want to talk about $B-A$ as the compliment of $A$, but I am unsure how to refer to $B$ as the set the remaining members are taken from, (as opposed to $C$).
 
7:44 AM
my question from above is now clear I could prove it!
 
8:05 AM
Desmos comes to the rescue for my graphic design needs
The same pattern (with multiplicity!) from two lines and four lines, respectively
Pretty
Both together
 
8:52 AM
Y'know what?
As much as I like that top pattern, this one does the same job more simply:
 
9:29 AM
@dc3rd Well I guess I was bit sleepy. Now I see I asked a dumb question.
$\alpha$ is lower bound of B thus it is element of L
 
 
1 hour later…
10:41 AM
hooooooooola
Question eligible for bounty in 22 hours
bilibili blablabla bububu
 
 
1 hour later…
12:00 PM
@user400188 Just use the notation you use, B-A. This is the complement of A in B.
(it's known as the "relative complement")
 
 
1 hour later…
1:31 PM
This is a parametrization of a space curve: $S=\big(e^{-e^s},e^{-e^s},e^{-{e^{-s}}} \big)$ What minimum number of parameters do I need to introduce for the set of all curves in the parameter space to partition $M=(0,1)^3$ without intersections?
My attempt is to add real positive parameters $r_1,r_2,r_3$ so that $S=\big(e^{-r_1e^s},e^{-r_2e^s},e^{-r_3{e^{-s}}} \big)$
but I don't know how to show whether the curves in the parameter space partitions $M$ and without intersections
 
what are these? exponents for ants?
 
@anak It's a model, sir.
I am giving final exams today. On both of the exams, about 1/3 of the questions are word-for-word copies of questions from previous exams. I am not optimistic. :/
 
Yeah, I wouldn't be optimistic either.
Students so rarely check their mistakes on previous exams, it seems.
 
1:56 PM
On the other hand, I went to Gallup on Saturday for a rug auction. I got a fractal rug!
It's like FOUR "Two Grey Hills" in one!
 
2:31 PM
Very cool looking!
 
hi chat!
 
The best part is that I didn't catch it in the preview, and it came up after I didn't get the rug I really wanted (I dropped out when the bidding exceeded four times the opening bid). Because I didn't get what I wanted, I still had money in my budget for that gem.
 
Hello
I have a question about category theory
 
2:52 PM
go ahead and ask
 
it is about the objects
the set up is
Fix a functor from two categories and fix an object from the source
when we consider ( x , h : A---> Gx )
G is the name of the functor here
 
Does anyone want a preview of my question before I release it on all platforms?
 
my question is, if we are going to define a map from two objects of the comma category
what to do with h?
Ie taking two objects of this form, ( x , h : A---> Gx ) and ( ( y , f : A---> Gy )
let me put G : D-->C is our functor
so f and h lives in C
how will f and h map to each other?
x to y will be a map in D
@LucasHenrique I hope my notation and what i am trying to say is clear, because I am a bit confused about this notion
 
@geocalc33 Try adding $1$ to $s$
 
3:08 PM
@AkivaWeinberger hello Akiva
 
Hello
I really like this diagram I discovered
2 lines = 4 lines
 
does anyone know a book of category theory with problems and solutions?
 
The figures are the same "counting multiplicity", meaning if a point is in two lines in one diagram, it's in two lines in the other
This is impossible in a finite diagram (with finitely many points of intersection)
 
the topic is very new to me and seeing something being solved after trying it on my own would be helpful
 
See how the way the frame crops the image breaks the top black line into three pieces
I do not @JackOhara
I know "Seven Sketches in Compositionality" is good but I don't remember if it has solutions
I tried reading "Category Theory in Context". I started getting lost towards the end… I do not know if there are solutions online, though
 
3:11 PM
I see thanks !
I need something mathematical not applied
also if you know of some video lectures would be of great help :D
@AkivaWeinberger what did you feel about Category Theory in Context
Is it something for selflearning ?
 
I found it useful but difficult
It has a lot of prereqs though
It assumes you know topology and abstract algebra etc because that's the "context"
 
oh
haha thanks , that should have been added as prereq then
from what it is written about it, the prerep are none - -
 
I mean, the definitions and stuff don't require the knowledge, but then it's like "Here's an example of this concept in ten different fields of math"
(My brother, upon seeing the title of the book, remarked that "the context for math can't be more math")
 
haha :D
 
4:02 PM
@AkivaWeinberger Your brother is wrong. :D
 
Emily Riehl agrees, obviously :P
 
Also, no one has shown up yet for this morning's final exam. Which means that they will need to show up either tomorrow, or on Thursday. But, I get the rest of the morning off. Yay!
 
(The bold in the image is from using Twitter search to find it)
I don't think I've had an exam where I get to choose the day
 
@AkivaWeinberger Two of the classes I am teaching this semester are asynchronous online classes, but the "guidance" from the state is that we must have at least 50% of the final grade in a class be determined by proctored assessments. Thus I am proctoring final exams. But people work, have other classes, have lives, etc, so I have given them three choices.
I am, frankly, not surprised that no one showed up at 8:30 on a Monday morning. But today is the morning I had time.
I am guessing that there will be a few people tomorrow afternoon, and a lot Thursday evening.
 
@XanderHenderson what are you teaching?
 
4:08 PM
(Where "a lot" is still a small number, given that enrollment is so very, very low this semester.)
 
and do you have room for one more student? :D
 
@JackOhara Calc and precalc. And the semester is nearly over.
 
oh :(
I know those topics anyway :D
Category theory course would be much appriciated
 
I had a guy take calculus from me once, after having tested out of it via AP exams. He was looking for an easy A.
 
as online course
 
4:09 PM
He barely managed a C+.
 
well any area of math needs to be taken seriously or you cant ace it
 
@JackOhara His problem was that he didn't believe that college calculus was going to be different from high school calculus.
 
I did make that mistake before as well !
 
"Okay, guys, the derivative of the function $x \mapsto x^3$ is given by $$\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{(x+h)^3 - x^3}{h} = \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{x^3 + 3hx^2 + 3h^2 x + h^3 - x^3}{h} = \lim_{h\to 0} 3x^2 + 3hx + h^2 = 3x^2,$$ cool?"
"BUT THERE IS A SHORTCUT! YOU JUST BRING THE 3 DOWN AND DECREASE THE EXPONENT BY 1!!!!"
 
…Is that not covered by the AP exam?
 
4:12 PM
the AP curriculum is particularly bad in that it conveys to many the idea that it contains everything one needs to know.
 
"Okay, can you prove it?"
"WHY DO I HAVE TO PROVE IT?! MY HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER TOLD IT TO ME!"
 
There's something a bit odd about the unruly student arguing for not questioning authority
 
"Okay, well, until you can prove it (or until I have proved it for you), you don't get to use the Power Rule, because you need to have a deeper understanding of what a derivative actually is..."
@AkivaWeinberger Oh, that happens a lot. "That isn't the way my high school teacher taught it, so you must be wrong."
 
It's been ages since I took that test but I thought the limit definition of the derivative was on it. I guess not?
 
I think that this accounts for a lot of the pushback against Common Core in the US, too---"That isn't they way I learned it, so why are you teaching it to my kids all different?"
@AkivaWeinberger It probably is, but my guess is that it gets rushed through pretty quickly.
And that students aren't made to do very many basic examples.
 
4:14 PM
the limit definition of the derivative was definitely part of the AP curriculum when i took it. it did not play a central role.
 
Of course, we all know the real definition of the derivative is $f'(x)=f(x)y-yf(x)$ in the noncommutative ring where $xy-yx=1$.
(It's a neat exercise to show that that actually works, at least for polynomials. The main clue is to check that $fg'+f'g=(fg)'$.)
 
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Lie brackets and other abstract nonsense.
:P
 
4:34 PM
Hello
Given a numeric value that changes once each day, what are some ways that a person can get a sense of how that number changes between two specific dates? I was thinking the average of the difference between adjacent days.
Simplicity would be preferred as it would be used by an average person, not a specialist.
 
it might depend on what the number is. just the difference itself might be meaningful and most helpful. people often like to report percentage changes, which is kind of interesting, because percentages can be confusing, particularly time series of percentages.
 
Can someone give me an example of a complete algebraically closed field other than the complex numbers?
1
A: Do the properties of metric completeness and algebraic closure characterize the complex numbers up to isomorphism?

Adam HughesI cannot find the topic where I thought I saw this a couple days ago, so here it is: Short answer: No. There are infinitely many fields which are complete and algebraically closed and not isomorphic to $\Bbb C$. You want a minimal algebraically closed, complete, archimedean field containing $\...

 
4:59 PM
Could one do that $H_k(\mathbb{S}^1\vee \mathbb{S}^1)=H_k(\mathbb{S}^1)\oplus H_k(\mathbb{S}^1)$ without appealing to good pairs
because, $\mathbb{S}^1\vee \mathbb{S}^1 = \mathbb{S}^1\cup \mathbb{S}^1$ where $\mathbb{S}_1 \cap \mathbb{S}^1$ is a point
I am identifying $\mathbb{S}^1$ with its image under canonical map $\mathbb{S}^1\rightarrow \mathbb{S}^1\vee \mathbb{S}^1$
 
Every Calc I university course makes the students do a derivative from the definition (even on the final). But not on the AP. With only 5 free response questions, it’s just not worth it.
@mathsresearcher I don’t understand the question. So you want to use the axioms but not Mayer-Vietoris? And you mean $k>0$?
 
5:22 PM
Does anyone know about this theorem? [in green]
 
@mathsresearcher Let $X_1$ be $S^1\vee S^1$ minus a point in one of the circles, and $X_2$ be it minus a point in another
and then they're open sets and Mayer-Vietoris applies
and also those things are homotopic to circles
@Prithubiswasleftmse What's the definition of convex?
Surely $\begin{cases}-x+1, & x\le-1 \\ 0, & -1\le x\le1 \\ x-1, & 1\le x\end{cases}$ is a counterexample, no? The tangent at $0$ is the $x$-axis
 
What does “no good pairs” mean? Whence my question.
 
@Prithubiswasleftmse
 
@AkivaWeinberger A function f is convex on an interval, if for all a and b in the interval, the line segment joining (a,f(a)) and (b,f(b)) lies above the graph of f.
 
Convex for Spivak is strictly convex.
 
5:29 PM
Ah. So my example is only weakly convex and you want strictly convex
I suppose the key is to show that the (infinite) line joining (a,f(a)) and (b,f(b)) lies below the graph when x is not between a and b
 
He is also talking about everywhere diff here, I think.
 
and then take the limit as a and b kiss
It shouldn't matter I think @TedShifrin
Last night, it finally happened - my water bottle cap wasn't tightly screwed before I put it into my backpack
 
Marinated textbooks?
 
The real worry was my laptop, but it seems fine miraculously
 
@Prithu Look in the later editions. He proves it there.
 
5:35 PM
I'm still unreasonably proud of this picture
2 lines = 4 lines
This is the simplest way I could figure out how to make that happen
 
Still makes no sense to I.
 
In the top, I have two lines (black and red); in the bottom, I have four lines (two black and two red)
The figures are the same "counting multiplicity" (if a point is in two lines in one figure, then it's in two lines in the other)
This (breaking the same figure into different numbers of lines) is impossible if you have finitely many points of intersection
(see how the cropping of the image breaks the top black line into three pieces)
(with some light manipulation - cutting it off at the left and compactifying it at the right - you can turn it into compact arcs (three at the top and two at the bottom))
 
Aha …
 
Also, "thickening up" the lines gives you an answer to my open disks question that I asked on main
^Trivial variation
 
6:06 PM
Alternate version (doesn't turn into the compact version as nicely though)
(also, even though the decomposition is technically simpler, I'm not a fan of the colors… Desmos doesn't have very good options)
Final form maybe?
 
7:36 PM
what does this answer?
 
@JoeShmo If I understand correctly: divide the plane into some number of subsets. Given any point in the plane, that point will be contained in some number of those sets. Now divide the plane into a different collection of subsets so that if a point is contained in $n$ of the original sets, it is also contained in $n$ of the new sets. Is this possible? How?
The sets @AkivaWeinberger is considering are all "nice" curves.
And the pictures are purty.
 
they are.. looks like a coloring problem?
quite literally :-)
it resembles his question from the other night, which come to think of it might itself be a coloring problem
 
@JoeShmo Coloring problems, as I understand them, are typically about coloring graphs. This seems to be somewhat distinct.
 
yeah yeah but you might be able to construct a graph from all this, although it doesn't look obvious
 
It depends on how @AkivaWeinberger has phrased the problem.
 
7:45 PM
although, since clearly the pattern repeats, each node would be a period, etc.
 
As I see it, it is about subsets of the plane---the edges matter, as well as the points of intersection.
 
yes, but although I don't know what I'm talking about, I suspect you might be able to do something with (planar) graph theory
his question from the other night was $X_i, Y_j \sim \mathbb{R}^2$ are homeomorphic, $\sum_{i=1}^m \mathbf{1}_{X_i} = \sum_{j=1}^n \mathbf{1}_{Y_j} \implies m = n$, where each $X_i, Y_j$ are open intervals essentially, so for example you might correspond a node to each interval, and then maybe edges go between overlapping intervals, and then by graph theory magic (the graph is bipartite?) blah blah.. $m = n$. Or not.
 
For this one in particular I have $X_i,Y_i$ homeomorphic to $\Bbb R^2$
 
sorry, not intervals
maybe suffices to consider $\mathbb{R}$?
open balls
including balls with infinite radius
 
I mean, $\Bbb R^2$ and the open unit disc ($\{x\in\Bbb R^2:\|x\|<1\}$) are homeomorphic
I also asked a version where they're all homeomorphic to $[0,1]$. That's a bit trickier, but I think you can do this sort of thing:
 
7:52 PM
yeah, so what?
 
Oh, sorry, I misread what you said
Yeah, you're all good
^That image has two compact arcs
2
Q: Can you tell how many open disks are added together?

Akiva WeinbergerAs a disclaimer, I know the answer to this question; I'm sharing it here because I think others may enjoy tackling it. (Notation: for $X\subseteq\Bbb R^2$, $~\mathbf1_X$ is the indicator function of $X$, defined by $p\mapsto\begin{cases}1,&p\in X\\0,&p\notin X\end{cases}$.) Suppose $X_1,\dots,X_j...

14 mins ago, by Xander Henderson
@JoeShmo If I understand correctly: divide the plane into some number of subsets. Given any point in the plane, that point will be contained in some number of those sets. Now divide the plane into a different collection of subsets so that if a point is contained in $n$ of the original sets, it is also contained in $n$ of the new sets. Is this possible? How?
@XanderHenderson Your description of the problem is so much clearer than mine was, lol
I should have phrased it like that
 
wait so whats the answer to the question from the other night?
 
@JoeShmo Language, please.
@JoeShmo What question?
 
that was to Akiva....
 
@TedShifrin No. I want to use Mayer vietoris. My decomposition of $\mathbb{S}^1\vee \mathbb{S}^1$ is $\mathbb{S}^1\cup \mathbb{S}^1$ such that $\mathbb{S}^1\cap \mathbb{S}^1$ is the wedged point.
 
8:09 PM
@JoeShmo Which one
 
homeo subsets
 
Homeo to R^2? It's what I drew
In one figure we have 4; in the other we have 2; their sums are the same, therefore $j$ and $k$ don't need to be equal
 
ok, where did you get that from
I see
 
@mathsresearcher So you do the usual thing of “thickening” up to get open subsets. One circle union an open arc of the other, etc.
 
yupp
@TedShifrin
 
8:20 PM
So what’s your question?
 
 
1 hour later…
9:43 PM
is there no variant of cauchy schwartz in a riemannian manifold
ignore that
 
10:03 PM
can one equip the space $\scr S^1$ of smooth convex curves s.t. f(0)=0 and f(1)=1, with a natural algebraic structure?
 
10:14 PM
What do you mean by algebraic structure?
Subtracting $x$ from everything gives you convex curves with f(0)=f(1)=0, which might be easier to think about
I suppose it's an like an affine subspace
Well…if you do curves that are pure convex or pure concave maybe
 
I think it could be a monoid
$y=x^n$ is convex on $(0,1).$ and $x^n x^k=x^{n+k}$
so that means you can associate the monoid structure $(\Bbb R_+,\times)$ to the class $y=x^n.$
and then I'm guessing that you have all these monoids attached to every class. then prove that they are all homeomorphic?
I don't know
 
10:36 PM
It's also a convex set
in the sense that a convex combination of convex functions is convex
If $f$ is convex, is $2f-x$ convex?
I suppose what I want to say is that it's a "translate of a convex cone"
 
11:14 PM
Hello guys, guys I'm trying to study convex conex and I would like to see some good examples, by any chance someone has a good reference for this ?
 
So you can draw all sorts of pictures, @Alek. What specifically are you having trouble with?
 
I'm struggling a lot with this cone $K_{d}^{\mathrm{lc}}=\left\{p \in \mathbb{R}_{d}^{\mathrm{lc}}[x]: p(x) \geq 0\right.$ for every $\left.x \in\{0,1\}^{n}\right\}$ where $\mathbb{R}_{d}^{\mathrm{lc}}[x]$ are the free square polynomials. I would like to prove that it has a compact base and talk about the extreme rays. But i feel kinda lost with this, so I would like to go in more detail with some more theory
 
Polynomials of fixed degree?
I don’t know a source for general theory.
 
11:31 PM
degree is bounded by $d$. Finding some reference for general theory seems quite hard, I have read Boyd's book, and Barbinok's book in this topic but I feel like is not enough
 
What does $\rm lc$ stand for?
(Free square… do you mean square free?)
 
So the unit sphere in finite dimensions (which this now is) is compact. The cone is closed.
 
Yes I mean square free, srry for that
The "lc" thing mean square free for me, I labeled like that XD
 
@anak Ah, thank you, that was the term I was looking for :)
 
@AlekMurt libre de carrés?
 
11:43 PM
libre de cuadrado
 
aha
that would be my next guess XD
 

« first day (4296 days earlier)      last day (741 days later) »