« first day (4487 days earlier)      last day (830 days later) » 

00:34
@DarwinZou I think the answer is probably generational. I have tried for decades (starting in the'90s) to go 'paperless' but whenever I do mathematics I fall back to pencil & paper.
ted transitioned from vellum to paper and said, one technological change is enough.
incidentally i'm running out of old materials for ted to use in these jokes. we've done clay tablets, papyrus, and "scrolls" of unknown composition.
and now vellum.
Don’t forget coal on tablet.
so there will be one coming up where equations are smudged onto cave walls next to illustrations of the day's hunt. at that point maybe i'll have to find a new joke.
I mean the stable LeslieCoin is probably the talk of the town with the crypto-world finally beginning to go up in flames.....
oh yes, as other markets crash, lesliecoin reigns supreme.
00:50
I prefer BuffyCoin, which was founded on the principle that you can take the cryptocurrency out of the crypt, but you can't take the crypt out of the cryptocurrency. Of course, it's based on proof of stake.
@PM2Ring Violation of principles if it is called BuffyCoin and you are referring to the same Crips I think you are referring to....
 
2 hours later…
02:32
none compare to bogcoin.
03:27
0
Q: Computing $H_*(T^2,T\vee T)$

one potato two potatoI'm currently trying to compute the homology of $T*T$ where $T = S^1\times S^1$ and $*$ is a join operation. One known is that $X*Y\simeq S(X\wedge Y) = S(X\times Y/X\vee Y)$ where $SX$ is a (unreduced) suspension of $X$. To do this first note that $$\tilde{H}_n(X*Y)\simeq\tilde{H}_n(S(X\wedge Y)...

Fresh AT question
03:49
best to leave questions age a little.
2
04:31
@Thorgott I had discussion on this in another room and I have understood this now.
05:08
How to show that $\mathbb Q$ is not locally compact?
Suppose on the contrary, that $\mathbb Q$ is locally compact. Take any $x\in \mathbb Q$, there exists a compact space $C\subset \mathbb Q\implies C$ is compact in $\mathbb R$ and that $C$ contains an open set $U\subset C$ of $\mathbb Q$ that contains $x$.
I don't see how this gives a contradiction.
$U=V\cap \mathbb Q$ for some open set V in $\mathbb R$.
maybe show that every neighbourhood has a cauchy sequence that does not converge?
x is in U and so is in V. There is a d>0 such that $(x-d,x+d)\subset V\implies (x-d,x+d)\cap \mathbb Q\subset U$. Now take an irrational number $i$ in the interval, then by density of the rationals there is a sequence of rationals in the interval converging to i. The sequence must have a limit point in C. But clearly that doesn't happen.
here I have used the fact that $\mathbb R$ (and therefore $\mathbb Q$) is a metric space (this is to ensure that a sequence in C converges in C).
Btw the question I asked in the above post, if $\iota_*$ is injective, is true. Because the generators are 2-cells in CW complex
So I'm gonna delete the post after an hour.
05:24
my knowledge of manifolds is not manifold.
Computing a product of two tori using cellular homology was helpful instead of using Kunneth formula.
i cannot disagree.
06:31
How do I earn reputation the fastest?
Stop playing video games and using social media...
find the biggest, toughest looking dude in your neighborhood, walk up to him, say "hey man, do you---" then sucker punch him.
6
Lol, street rep
I'm just saying reputation don't come unless I make petty edits to people's posts. My answers are almost never accepted, etc.
You can make bot account then upvote your own post.
I actually tried that years ago, those accounts get removed real quick
06:41
it's a difficult question to answer, because reputation and site policies are essentially structured to make reputation difficult to scale up. if there were a strategy for pressing the gas on reputation, bad actors would exploit it until the rules changed or the accounts got kicked off.
Lol for real?
and then the reputation literally gets taken back
yes lol
Didn't even thought about it until you mentioned it.
i do think it's hard to earn rep by posting interesting answers. a lot of the huge reps you see are from people who got a lot of upvotes long ago when it was easier.
posting an interesting question is another way of getting upvotes, and you don't even have to know the answer! :D but you do have to post an interesting question, which is harder than it sounds.
I wish I could remove all of my dumb math question :(
06:44
And then I had a question recently about a sequence converging and someone assumed I meant series convergence and decided to single-handedly completely change my question which was ridiculous
I don't know what the intention was with that. They must've assumed I'm a complete idiot not knowing what question I even want answered.
sorry to hear that, that kind of edit is discouraged i think. it is common enough for questions to raise the reaction of "wait, do they mean __?" but that can be done in a comment asking the OP if they meant __ or to otherwise clarify something.
its very common for questions to be significantly improved by clarifying edits, but it should generally be the OP that does that.
star for good joke
Someone asked if I meant series even though I had 0 indication that there was a sum happening and my rationale and definitions had nothing to do with a series. Within a few hours someone else changed it, very strange.
07:06
yes, that's an example of an edit that should have been rolled back. i see that you did roll it back.
07:23
@copper.hat But I usually use Kunneth formula first and next compute cellular homology to be sure.
Suppose that $X_\alpha$ is locally compact for every $\alpha$ and compact for all but finitely many $\alpha$, then the product space $\Pi_\alpha X_\alpha$ is locally compact.
How to prove this statement?
Proof of the statement requires Tychonoff theorem but I don't see how that applies here as we are given X_a compact for all but finitely many.
Infact, I don't even understand why Tychonoff is required here at all.
07:53
Qualifying exam problems are really a treasure. So many interesting problems I've never seen before.
08:12
I can't see how $N$ slides over to $f(N)$. So the sliding is taken along the surface I guess. The disk is stretched so that it contains $N$ and $f(N)$ and the sliding is taken inside of that stretched disk? It would be helpful if you draw some pictures in your mind. — one potato two potato 22 hours ago
Can't understand how sliding of $N$ to $f(N)$ occurs.
 
4 hours later…
12:41
0
Q: Chainging the hypergeometric series $F(\alpha,\beta,\gamma;z)$ to an integral form

one potato two potatoThis is problem 6.9 in Stein complex analysis. Let $$F(\alpha,\beta,\gamma;z) = 1+\sum_{n=1}^\infty{\alpha(\alpha+1)\cdots(\alpha+n-1)\beta(\beta+1)\cdots(\beta+n-1)\over n!\gamma(\gamma+1)\cdots(\gamma+n-1)}z^n$$ be the hypergeometric series for $\alpha,\beta\in\Bbb C$ and $\gamma\neq 0,-1,-2,\...

A minor chaos
@Koro nice
@Koro try proving it without Tychonoff
13:01
@Koro well for $x\in \prod_\alpha X_\alpha$ grab open sets $x_\alpha\in U_\alpha$ with compact closure for each $X_\alpha$ which was assumed to be locally compact. This is your open neighbourhood with compact closure
The Tychonoff is used to prove that this closure is indeed compact - it's homeomorphic to product of $\overline{U_\alpha}$ for $X_\alpha$ locally compact, and $X_\alpha$ otherwise, that is we have a product of compact spaces
Now try to prove the reverse direction.
@CottonHeadedNinnymuggins just answer honestly. Sometimes the reputation just comes in time
Difficult things go unnoticed the most, but sometimes they too find a way.
That said, to earn reputation faster, try answering a bunch of easy questions, like on the calculus level
people like when it's nice and easy, then they go and upvote you
because they can understand what the hell you are saying in the first place
13:41
I'm reading about localisation, and in my book (Neukirch - Alg Numb Thy) the following remark is made:
I don't understand why if $X$ is finite or omits only finitely many prime ideals, then only the prime ideals from $X$ survive in $A(X)$. For the finite case, consider the localisation of a domain $D$ at a non-zero prime $P$. Then $0$ will still be prime ideal of $D$ and $D_P$, while $0$ doesn't belong to $X=\{P\}$. So I don't think I'm interpreting correctly what they mean by "only the prime ideals from $X$ survive in A(X)".
Should I read it as "only the prime ideals $Q$ that are contained in some $P\in X$ survive in $A(X)$"? Then the finite case makes sense at least.
14:12
Or I can see it in the special case of a Dedekind domain and non-zero primes
never mind, it seems to be a mistake (someone else had pointed it out too)
I don't find the appeal of this part of algebra. Too dry
@AlessandroCodenotti what does $H(M, X) <\varepsilon$ means where $M$ is a subcontinuum of $X$?
If the derivative exists, then the difference quotient $\frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x-a}$ strives against a limit for $x \to a$.
Is there a case where the difference quotient doesn't strive against a limit for $x \to a$?

There is $f(x) = |x|$, then the difference quotient strives against $1$ or $-1$ depending on $x \to 0^{\text{+}}$ or $x \to 0^{\text{-}}$ for $a = 0$, but that means it's striving against two limits, not "no limit", right?
14:39
Suppose I have a complex polynomial in n variables. Is there a name for the property $\sum_{i=1}^n (\partial_i P) ^2 = 0$?
14:52
@ILikeMathematics sure, consider $x\sin(1/x)$. this extends to a continuous function with value $0$ at $0$, but the difference quotient at $0$ diverges by oscillating.
15:28
@ILikeMathematics I don't understand the phrase "strives against" in this context. What do you mean?
@Thorgott et @Jakobian I'll get back to you soon.
Suppose that V is a real vector space of dimension n. Then the dimension of the space of all k tensors on V is $n^k$.
 
2 hours later…
17:15
@s.harp property? It rarely holds.
user532965
17:26
hello may I ask algebraic geometry question?
Can we write an expression for all eigenvalues of a matrix to be less than one in absolute value?
feel free to ask any question, answers aren't guaranteed of course
10
Q: Proving an implication of two dimensional matrix.

BAYMAXIf $A = \begin{bmatrix} x & 1\\ y & 0\end{bmatrix}, B = \begin{bmatrix} z & 1\\ w & 0\end{bmatrix}$, for $x,y,z,w \in \Bbb{R}$. I have observed by considering many examples of $x,y,z,w$ that: If all the eigen values of $A^2B$ and $AB^2$ are less than one in absolute value $\implies$ $\det(AB+A+I)<...

Can finite dimensional CW complexes always be embedded in some $\mathbb{R}^n$?
Sir how to generalize Powers of Matrices in summation notation??
A^n in Sigma Notation??
This question was asked by my sir when we were studying basic maths for physics and Linear Algebra(Vectors and Matrices at JEE level) chapter came..
Edit (A is a square matrix of order m)
17:44
@Thorgott Mind if I ask a question about orders anyways?
@NewGuy Per the room description, don't ask to ask. Just ask.
Are modules used in algebraic topology also?
@monoidaltransform with finitely many cells?
Lots of presentations of $\Bbb Z$-modules, yes
Ohh okay. Lot of abelian groups then
And more generally …
But the stuff you learn in working with modules is essential
17:59
I see. Thanks for the info.
@Thorgott I figured it out (though I must say I only realised the final step while I was trying to formulate my question in the chat, so that did help me)
Whenever you have a (co)homology theory with coefficents in any ring different from $\Bbb Z$ you are working with modules
@Jakobian No clue without context, what is H? Maybe Hausdorff distance?
18:15
@AlessandroCodenotti do you know something called a shore?
Hausdorff distance doesn't quite make sense
$M$ is a subcontinuum of $X$
ah wait. Maybe it is Hausdorff distance
ah yes. It is in fact Hausdorff distance. Thanks!
@monoidaltransform finite ones can, yeah
@ShaVuklia well, that's great too
additional to cohomology theories with arbitrary coefficients, modules also pop up in other places, e.g. by looking at modules over the cohomology ring of a space or by working with modules over the group ring of the fundamental group
But that’s well beyond first-year AT :)
18:40
If I have a stopping time $T$ which is finite a.s. and I want to compute $P_x(K_x\circ \theta_T|T<\infty)$ how can I rewrite this? So I'm a bit confused since we condition on $T<\infty$ and not on a sigma algebra
$K_x\circ theta_t$ is not so important. I only want to understand the conditioning part
Is there a chat I could speak to a moderator with? I've got a minor issue I'd like to deal with
Maybe CURED chatroom? Or wait and ask Xander.
multilinear algebra is confusing. So many symbols! Am I the only one having this feeling?
Well I've raised the issue in the Math's Mods office chat, hopefully the moderators will see that
Finding basis of space of alternating k tensors on V
18:55
What’s the big deal?
@Koro
multilinear algebra is easy
the trick to doing multilinear algebra is to realize it's just linear algebra on different spaces
<something about universal properties>
for alternating $k$-tensors on $V$, just take $\mathrm{d}e_{f(1)}\wedge ... \wedge \mathrm{d}e_{f(k)}$ where $f:\{1, ..., k\}\to \{1, ..., \dim V\}$ is some increasing function
So if V is of dimension n, then I understand that if k>n, then the alternating k tensor space is the zero space (any k tuple of basis elements will have repetition so alternating maps on it will give 0). Now if k is atmost n, then Munkres says that -We show first that an alternating tensor f is entirely determined by its values on k-tuples of basis elements
whose indices are in ascending order. Then we show that the value of f on such k-tuples may be specified arbitrarily.
I don't see how coming with 'indices in ascending order' intuitive.
i.e., for someone doing this for the first time.
the idea is that if you know the value on some $k$-tuple, you also know the value on any permutation of that tuple by virtue of being alternating
19:00
So it feels like memorizing at times.
well what do we know about alternating tensors
there can't be repeats, and the order has to be fixed because otherwise we can just shuffle them
@TedShifrin :(
Does uniform convergence imply absolute convergence?
sorting tuples by ascending order is just one way of fixing a system of representatives for all $k$-tuples up to permutation, which is something we want to do because of the previous remark
@Curio of a series? No
19:01
Function series
Thanks
Take any convergent series of numbers which doesn't converge absolutely and let functions be constant
You can try my lectures, Koro, although I define things without using tensor product. Perhaps it’ll improve your intuition.
By properties of wedge product itself, we know we have to have at most such vectors, and it turns out they suffice as well. Is my intuition
Hello! How are you?

I want to show that it holds that $P_sG_k=\tilde{G}_kP_s, \ s\geq k$, where we get $\tilde{G}_k$ from $G_k$ by exchanging two entries $\ell_{j_1,k}$ and $\ell_{j_2,k}$ with $j_1,j_2\neq k$ ($j_1\neq j_2$), that are exchanged also at the permutation $P_s$.

Could you give me a hint how to show that? I don't really have an idea.
I saw a question right now that was a duplicate of my own from a while ago and I flagged it, I'm hoping that was the right call?
19:13
I have posted the question in the main : https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4578124/matrix-exchanging-elements

I would be glad if someone could help me because I got stuck.
Is yours answered, Goku?
I understand the proof now. Thanks all.
@MaryStar You need to establish your notation to start with.
Entries of what? Permutations of what? Are these all matrices? Very unclear.
@Jakobian hmm is this the thing in a dendroid where a point is a shore if there are two open sets such that every arc from the first to the second goes through the point? Or am I mixing it up with something else?
@AlessandroCodenotti hmm... it might be related. From what I understand it's just a property stronger than being noncut
19:31
@TedShifrin yes, by yours truly in fact
19:42
@TedShifrin It is not given more information. $G$ and $P$ are matrices, especially $P$ is a permutation matrix and $\tilde{G}_k$ is a new matrix which is $G_k$ when we exchange two entries $\ell_{j_1,k}$ and $\ell_{j_2,k}$ with $j_1,j_2\neq k$ ($j_1\neq j_2$).
I suppose that $G_k$ is the matrix of the steps of the LR-decomposition. @TedShifrin
So LR decomposition with pivot where P is the corresponding permutation. @TedShifrin
20:03
Do you have an idea? @TedShifrin
@Jakobian ahh that's the thing with arbitrarily big continua missing the point
Yes it's related but I forgot the details. I got interested for a question I was trying to solve but I couldn't make much progress and I moved on to other projects
@Goku Then you should vote to close because there’s a duplicate with an accepted answer.
@MaryStar Think about what conjugating by $P$ does ($PAP^{-1}$).
20:20
Do you ever go into the General Topology chat btw?
Yeah, I think I got interested a bit in continua again :)
do you know of any ways to find references for the things you're interested in? Is there a method, or do you just look around and see
articles, say
I want to stop just reading books and try and see if I can find something on my own
at some point at least
20:35
I have been given the following function $$h(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \Re\{a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}\}\mathrm{d}k.$$ I have also been given $a(k)$, but I think it need not be specified. I want to determine the Fourier transform $\hat{h}(k,t)$, in particular, $\hat{h}(k,t=0)$.
If the real part in the integral was removed, so that we would have $$f(x,t)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(k)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} \mathrm{d}k.$$ Then $a(k)$ would just be the Fourier transform of $f(x,t=0)$. However, unfortunately I can't just remove the real part and so I am stuck.
In which variable is the Fourier Transform to be taken?
From $x$ to $k$.
Is $a$ real valued?
Yes.
At first glance, it looks like the even part of $a$
But I’m sitting in a waiting room on my phone, so take that with a grain of salt
20:46
OK :)
@robjohn I hope all is well.
This is for a friend. My wife has an appt tomorrow, and I’m waiting on insurance to see if I can get the next test I need.
It’s fun getting old.
I am way ahead of you. Two major heart surgeries and a cancer surgery. But goofing off now. All fondest wishes to you all!
I would be very grateful if you could explain the even part of a function. Suppose $a(k)=2\pi \delta(k)+C/((k-1)^2+2)$, where $\delta$ is the Dirac delta and $C$ is a constant.
@Thorgott I think now I do have a question that I am unable to solve.
I'm trying to show that $\mathfrak p\supset\mathfrak a$ is the only prime ideal containing $\tilde{\mathfrak a_{\mathfrak p}}$. It's clear to me that $\mathfrak p$ does contain it. However, I was unable to use the local prime correspondence, and it was pointed on in a stack post that this doesn't work indeed. Instead, looking at primary decompositions should do the trick.
I figured if I can show that $\tilde{\mathfrak a_{\mathfrak p}}$ is primary, then the claim is indeed true. However, I was unable to do this. Do you have any ideas?
Btw, here $\mathcal O$ is a 1-dim Noetherian domain
21:02
@schn the even part of $f$ is $x\mapsto\frac{f(x)+f(-x)}2$
@Jakobian I just google around or ask my advisor, she knows a lot of continuum theory
@robjohn Ok, thanks
@Jakobian No, I barely even read this chat lately
@TedShifrin O dang Ted, I don't know if those are past or future treatments, but that is heavy, hope you're doing decently alright
Dirac Delta is even, so it is its own even part
21:06
Or maybe I should try to understand lohll's answer in math.stackexchange.com/questions/3074990/…
Also the book hyperspaces (which also does a lot of continuum theory) has plenty of references to papers and open questions, it's a great starting point @Jakobian
oh, I understand that answer now
@Thorgott I guess never mind again. Sorry for pinging you constantly
@ShaVuklia Way past. Cancer gone almost 11 years.
Oh, good to hear:)
@TedShifrin Ted-1 Cancer-0
21:17
@AlessandroCodenotti ah alright. Thanks
@ShaVuklia no worries, glad you figured it out
21:36
@robjohn hope it works out.
 
1 hour later…
22:39
0
Q: terminology gromov hausdorff uniform convergence term

MathematicallyInterestedI know that if $X$ is a compact metric space and $X_n$ are such that $X_n\rightarrow_{GH} X$ then that notation means $X_n$ converges to $X$. However, we does it mean for one to say that if $X$ is compact, then we can find $X_n$ that approximates $X$ uniformly? Does it mean that there exists $C\g...

23:08
@TedShifrin isn't this about the steps of the gaussian elimination, i.e. Changing rows / columns due to pivoting?
Does a generalization of syntheic methods exist when it comes to "Langley's" problems? I've read that such papers have been published but surprisingly I found none so far
23:33
wikipedia references somebody's unpublished result for a recent example solution of such a problem. i don't know if it's 'synthetic,' but a web archive of it (in japanese) is linked on that page.

« first day (4487 days earlier)      last day (830 days later) »