« first day (4447 days earlier)      last day (581 days later) » 

12:00 AM
(specifically for a circle of radius 1)
OK eventually I'll run out of time to edit my comment
There it goes
'cause $|dz|=dz/(iz)$ for $z$ constrained to the unit circle
 
 
1 hour later…
1:02 AM
@Xander @robjohn I'm very annoyed that this OP deleted his post after our comments. My comment should probably have been an answer. I was only able to find it by going backwards on my own web browser. Can we do something about it?
 
 
1 hour later…
2:25 AM
@TedShifrin fixed
Add an answer if you wish
 
@robjohn Many thanks.
 
3:10 AM
Fun fact, $\left\lvert\int_a^bf(x)\operatorname d\!x\right\rvert\le\int_a^b\left\lvert f(x)\right\rvert\operatorname d\!x$ isn't always true
 
i'll allow for the mathrm d, but that spacing is -- oh you fixed it
 
because, and this sounds extremely dumb, if $b<a$ then the integral on the right is negative but the one on the left is nonnegative
@leslietownes Yeah for some reason I sprung for the fancy TeX
Excuse me, $\TeX$
 
the thing with interpreting the intergral as oriented when b < a is a necessary evil in calculus class but in general i think of it as a bad thing
i've never been compatible with orientation
 
It's the tame version of the (actually serious) complex analysis issue I was talking about earlier
where students accidentally wrote statements equivalent to $|2\pi i|\le0$
 
it's like the change of variable formula when the map isn't one-to-one
monsters lurk within
 
3:13 AM
Ah yeah
This is why differential forms... something something, I think
That sentence got away from me
Here's a neat trick. Show that if $f(z)=a_nz^n+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+\dotsb+a_1z+a_0$ then $\max_{|z|=1}f(x)\ge\max_ka_k$
My students (cowards) did this in one line with a special theorem from the textbook that essentially states exactly this
(which I'm pretty sure was the intended solution)
whereas actually proving from scratch is a good puzzle
(The problem actually was just to show $\max_{|z|=1}f(x)\ge1$ in the special case where $a_n=1$, but the more general thing also holds)
 
a_k are real?
 
Oh sorry $\max_{|z|=1}f(z)\ge\max_k|a_k|$
 
f(x) is real?
 
applauds leslie obnoxiously
 
Look-
The version of what I said that makes sense is what I meant
Work with me
 
3:20 AM
i can do this all night
 
But you're falling victim to all the stuff we agreed was very important for students to get right.
 
begrudgingly you have a point
I think I've been pretty lenient on stuff like that, to be honest. The only reason I took so much off from this person -
4 hours ago, by Akiva Weinberger
At least these weren't the person who tried showing that $\sup_{|z|=1}|e^{1/z}|$ was $e$ by writing, "By way of contradiction, suppose $|e^{1/z}|>e$. Then $\frac1z>1$. Then $z<1$. Then $|z|<|1|$. But this contradicts that we're on the unit circle."
- was because I couldn't find a quick way to repair the argument by assuming those were just typos
 
I would not be lenient about thinking $\Bbb C$ is ordered.
Nor that $\log$ is single-valued. These are huge thematic points in $\Bbb C$ analysis.
 
Right. But if I could find a way to assume "oh they accidentally left off a magnitude bar" somewhere it might be different. But that argument is legitimately unrepairable
On this problem about the polynomial, a few people are concluding that $\sup_{|z|=1}f(z)\ge1$, and not adding the extra sentence that justifies $\sup=\max$
 
I'm saying you shouldn't be so lenient even when you can repair.
If you don't nail them on homework, they'll mess up on exams and say "but the grader didn't care."
If the prof says to be lenient, then fine, but if I were the prof, I would order you not to be.
 
3:26 AM
Fine
I feel like not justifying $\sup=\max$ is a 0.5 point offense
which is enough for them to at least look at the problem and register that something happened
 
My experience in 40 years of teaching (and grading most of my own homeworks beyond calculus-level) is that it's better to be tough on homework grading and slightly more lenient on exam-grading because exams go badly enough without that.
Grading out of 1 point, I agree that I wouldn't dock them half the problem for that.
I usually grade problems out of 3, 5, or 10, or something more divisible.
 
@TedShifrin I like 3.
 
I'm grading out of 10
Six problems, sixty points total for the p-set
 
Well, I would dock more than .5 points out of 10, for sure.
 
3 = almost perfect; 2 = okay, but there are some important errors; 1 = well, at least you tried; 0 = blank or unintelligible.
 
3:29 AM
Anyhow, I'm 8 years out of practice now.
 
Anywho, I just finished my evening class, and am going to go to bed now, because I have a conference to run in 10 hours.
G'night.
 
I'll discuss with the professor tomorrow before submitting the grades, and he can recalibrate me.
 
i never did fractional points. if it's worth marking off for, it's worth taking off real points.
there should also be a lot of room for scolding in red ink without taking off points.
 
Not red ink.
Green. Or purple.
Red ink is so angry. :(
 
I'm doing digital lol
 
3:31 AM
But I really am going to bed now.
 
Gradescope
 
Night, Xander. Happy conference!
 
Ooh, some people are using the maximum modulus principle on $z^nf(1/z)$, which reverses the order of the coefficients
 
@leslietownes only the best students read.
 
I really am learning more from my students than they are from me [cliche intensifies]
 
3:34 AM
I used to spend countless hours grading and writing comments and suggestions. With many students I could tell they had read none.
 
i generally found that i couldn't expect someone to read something if i didn't take points off.
 
Yeah, that's my expectation
 
i usually managed it so you could get 9/10 on every homework and still get an A+ in the class.
 
though as a student I also have experienced receiving a failing or near-failing grade on something and thinking "oh god I can't bear to even look at this"
(Though that hasn't been relevant to my grading!)
(Also, not math classes.)
 
Read the NYT about the organic chem prof who was fired at NYU because the woossy students complained.
 
3:36 AM
If you read the Reddit thread on that you'll get a very different perspective, lol
(Reddit has a lot of students on it)
 
Oh hell, I had A students in upper courses with 80 averages on hmwk and exams.
 
If 80 averages count as As that's less of a problem I think
Or more of the opposite problem, which might have been your point
 
I don’t believe in standard grading systems beyond low-level courses.
 
The students don't have a choice to not care about grades.
 
the worst thing i generally saw when TAing, not so much when teaching, was profs who would allow someone to get a C+ or even a B on an exam without correctly solving a single problem. partial credit run amok.
 
3:39 AM
That doesn’t mean they deserve high ones just because a realistic grade keeps them out of grad school.
 
Fair enough.
Yeah, I may have to start being more strict with my grading. A friend of mine who's taking the class, and who doesn't know I'm grading him, mentioned to me the other day that he was surprised people were doing so well grade-wise
('cause they have access to min, med, max, mean, and st dev)
 
This is not a new phenomenon. Back in the 70s a pushy Jewish mother called and harangued my dad at home !! Because the C her daughter had earned in Music Theory 3 might keep her out of grad school. My dad, stunned, responded, So?
 
and I joked back that I could "tell Ethan [the TA] to start grading more harshly" and he said "Oh no, forget I said anything"
 
i'm not super doctrinaire, but i do think, if you can't solve a single problem on an exam correctly, on midterm 1, midterm 2, and final, then you should not pass the class. and you're f*cking up the next prof's job if you, as an instructor, let them do it.
 
@TedShifrin They couldn't curve it to a B sharp?
@leslietownes That's fair. There's an old analogy - and I don't remember who came up with this - that teaching is like having someone build a foundation of a building, looking around, assessing, and stating "I think this is a C foundation... Now onto the first floor."
 
3:42 AM
When I graded my intro to higher math course, leslie, my course grade was largely based on numbers of problems done right on the final. I.
think that for that sort of course you’re more than right.
 
i had a parent phone me once. they were a big wheel at the medical school (or wanted me to think that) i said, uh huh, uh huh, ok. call the chair if you feel that strongly about it. never heard of it again.
 
The music theory joke I made is messing with my head a bit because I never thought before about how in grades C is lower than B but in music it's higher
 
it's kind of... both, in music? isn't it?
 
If you go all the way around, I suppose
(B sharp and C are the same note, anyhow)
 
@AkivaWeinberger We’ll just grade numerically, as in Europe.
@AkivaWeinberger Not with well-tempering.
 
3:45 AM
Wasn't there a thing where in some countries 1 was the best and 5 was the worst and in others it was the opposite
at least in decades past
 
And MIT computes GPAs on a 5-pt scale, not 4.
 
@TedShifrin Right, I forgot...
 
Aops sure hire lots of people
 
Never quite sure why, either as a student or as a faculty.
 
Octave equivalence is a sham anyway. Bohlen–Pierce all the way /s
 
3:48 AM
@JJH. I’m not convinced they’re all of the highest caliber. I taught in person for them 2 years, before covid.
 
I was a counselor at BEAM over the summer, which is run (or at least funded? not sure) by AOPS
They're AOPS-affiliated somehow
Was really fun
(BEAM used to be called SPMPS back in the day, apparently)
(pronounced "spumps")
Little 11- and 12-year-olds learning about fractions
 
i've had a miniaturized version of this with some law schools having HH and variants as a qualified (i.e. not as good) version of H and others where it's better.
 
What's H?
 
Indeed.
 
honors or high pass or something. maybe just H the same way KFC is KFC now.
 
3:51 AM
That's what outside of Germany they call a B, yeah?
(Another music joke)
H = ha! HH = ha! ha!
 
(H majeur?)
 
so many law schools want to say on paper that they don't give letter grades when in reality they just use different symbols for A, B, C, D
 
Les françaises also have an H?
Tier lists online for whatever reason go S A B C D F
or maybe that's just TierZoo
 
4:09 AM
Ah
-10 points for "Did not solve problem"
Starts an induction proof, gets nowhere, draws a large X mark through the entire second page
 
large X mark through a page is very much a vibe i'm feeling
that should be worth positive points
 
I left a note on one line in the X'd-out page
saying that "I feel like you were kinda close here"
but they didn't do anything with it, so...
Like, "Oh, you wrote out the perfect theorem to use, then forgot about it"
 
vaughan jones once wrote "courage!" next to a point where i was doubting myself in an exam situation
 
Ha!
Of the Jones polynomial in knot theory?
 
Maybe worth a few points, but the X ….
 
4:18 AM
yep
i couldn't quite remember the hypotheses of what i was trying to use and was frank about that in my exam paper, when i could probably have styled it out just by saying 'because X implies Y, then Z"
courage!
 
Sounds like Julia Child’s advice …. When flipping a potato pancake, etc.
 
With enough confidence you can do anything.
 
maybe not quite that, but one does need confidence to do some things
 
except for my friend in my smooth manifolds class who asked me if writing "Obviously, $C^\infty(M_1\times\dotsb\times M_n)=C^\infty(M_1)\oplus\dotsb\oplus C^\infty(M_n)$" was enough justification or if he should replace the word 'obviously' with a few more sentences
 
and certainly one should not snitch on oneself in an exam paper by spelling out exactly what one is failing to remember
 
4:23 AM
whom Ted has already heard about
(The theorem is neither obvious nor true)
 
Leslie you should make a song about "one"
Ever since I started chatting on here the word "one" or "oneself" kept popping up, in most of your messages
 
i did that on my qual too, i said straight up "this needs local convexity because of counterexample X but in the moment i don't see how i'm using that here"
cue attack wolves
ajay i do my best to universalize and depersonalize because my experience is the human experience
 
One should use 'one' when one wishes to use an impersonal pronoun. Two should use 'two' when two wishes to use an impeopleal pronoun
Wow, that joke didn't work in my head or in writing
I think the impersonal "you" can trip up non-native speakers 'cause they're not always taught about it
 
my daughter wrote out the numbers 1 to 100 today and while some of the 3s and 7s are backwards she wrote recognizable versions of all of the numbers
maybe i'll scan it tomorrow
U2 made a song about 'one'
 
4:38 AM
wow
not sure i could do that
saw u2 where they were just t1
 
fun fact: the www in website addresses is in fact sextuple-u
 
don't believe everything you read in reddit
 
I have an open mind
or an empty one
not sure
Of course...
 
i'm pink therefore i'm spam
 
I've never sum'd a day in my life
Cogito'd neither
 
4:51 AM
i canceled my scientific american decades ago
 
These days firing a prof is easy. Complain the classes are hard. The grading is bad. That's it.
What a shame. The prof in question is highly experienced and author of many textbooks. Can't imagine such things. He is 84.
 
not to be ageist but i wonder how great the instruction is at 84. i think i would be terrible at that point.
 
I think there isn't enough in the article to judge, to be honest
It really depends on how the class was
Also, it's notable that the student petition did not request that the prof be fired
 
Yeh. NYU took that decision.
But the whole saga could have been handled better, imo.
 
I could imagine the class being hard because the teacher wasn't teaching, and I could imagine the class being hard because the students weren't putting in the required effort
 
5:06 AM
@leslietownes this could be legit but again I have seen teachers at that age not losing the agility yet.
 
i'd 1000% agree with students at a place like NYU just not wanting to be bothered with instruction, but i'm hesitant to go immediately there because those are exactly my priors.
i suspect myself.
 
Also I've never taken orgo so I don't really know how hard the class is generally
I hear orgo is hard everywhere
My main thing is math, but nearly all the math I know is self-taught, so I'm not a product of the education system
 
it is one of the main weeder classes for medical school. non-organic chemistry usually precedes it and there are one or more math classes in the mix too.
 
People criticize how calc 1 classes are taught and my only response is "I have no idea" lol
(It's the time of night where I am an unrestrained braggart. Good to know)
(Maybe I should stop grading)
 
@AkivaWeinberger that is great. Like George Green.
 
5:10 AM
Well ok I did go to school
so not that level of self-taught
 
Lol. That dude was a legend.
There are many self-taught in the history. But this man took it to a new level.
 
Easier with the Internet now.
Do you know about the SoME2 contest that just ended? It generated a treasure trove of educational math content
(By "self-taught" I mean "My dad bought me a ton of books")
("and I was the nerdy middle-grader walking around with a math book everywhere")
 
5:48 AM
@AkivaWeinberger Good books serve the best. That's for sure.
2
 
6:16 AM
If $f_n$ is a sequence of $\mathbb {\bar R}$ valued measurable functions, then the limit $\lim_n f_n$ if exists is measurable?
If the the measure is complete, then yes.
But otherwise?
 
6:39 AM
If the limit exists everywhere then yes.
The limsup, liminf are measurable.
 
7:28 AM
31
Q: Published AI-generated nonsense math papers

Mateusz KwaśnickiI guess most of us know that one can easily automatically generate a math-like nonsense paper, and that it is possible to have such a paper published. However, I was quite sure that nobody actually does that. But recently I was looking at papers which cite one of my colleague's articles, and I en...

 
 
1 hour later…
8:29 AM
@copper.hat yes, I understood. Thanks a lot :).
 
 
4 hours later…
12:40 PM
0
Q: Proving in details proposition 2.12 of Folland

KoroLet $(X, M,m)$ be a measure space and let $(X, \overline M ,\overline m)$ be its completion. If $f$ is an $\overline M$-measurable function on $X$, there is an $M$-measurable function $g$ such that $f=g\,\, \, \overline m$-almost everywhere. Some symbols have been changed for brevity. To prove t...

 
When you want to search up a question on math.stackexchange, do you usually have better results with Google or ApproachZero?
 
imho, searchonmath used to give the best results but it has partly become a paid service now.
Between Google and Approach0, I'd say the latter is better for search on mathstackexchange as the former doesn't seem (I'm not sure) to understand mathjax.
 
 
1 hour later…
1:57 PM
@Koro Google seems to give better results when you are searching for something that doesn't contain math expressions
As an example, take interesting Pythagorean Theorem proofs, searching "interesting Pythagorean Theorem proofs site:math.stackexchange.com" seems to give more results that are relevant than Approach0 (atleast on the first page)

Are you typing the keywords into Approach0 seperately? That's how I'm doing it, not sure if there is a better way to search only titles or something
 
 
2 hours later…
4:22 PM
Hi, I question. Is there a problem with that line? \begin{align*}
\log(n+1)-\left(\log(n)-1+\mathcal{O}(\log n)\right)=&\log\left( \frac{1+1/n}{1}\right)-\left(-1+\mathcal{O}(\log n)\right),\\
&\to 1,\quad n\to+\infty.
\end{align*}
Since that $\mathcal{O}(\log n)\to 0$ as $n\to +\infty$, so the limit should be $1$.
 
@ILikeMathematics I type equations and some keywords too.
Can anyone please take a look at the proof here?
0
Q: Proving in detail proposition 2.12 of Folland

KoroLet $(X, M,m)$ be a measure space and let $(X, \overline M ,\overline m)$ be its completion. If $f$ is an $\overline M$-measurable function on $X$, there is an $M$-measurable function $g$ such that $f=g\,\, \, \overline m$-almost everywhere. Some symbols have been changed for brevity. To prove t...

 
@Koro Just did. I left some comments in your posting.
@leslietownes U@ also made a song related to 2 in their seminal album War (Two hearts ...)
 
@OliverDíaz thanks a lot :-). After your comment, I realized that I should have said $c_j\ne 0$ in my post. I have made this small change in the post.
 
4:37 PM
@Koro How did you link your question like that?
 
@ILikeMathematics Just copy url of the question and paste it here.
 
Alr, thx
Could anyone please take a look at this, I don't seem to be getting any answers, I'm not sure if there is anything I should edit into the question
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4538686/how-to-determine-at-which-point-a-function-with-even-and-odd-exponents-is-symmet
I think my topic tags are pretty broad, yet it seems like not many people are seeing my question?
 
5:01 PM
The analysis/real-analysis tags don't seem appropriate.
I would recommend doing a general translation substitution $x\rightsquigarrow x-a$.
 
use the one tag that is always appropriate: complex-geometry
 
5:24 PM
slaps leslie
 
:: offers other cheek::
🙏
☮️
 
6:01 PM
A question related by my another question is if the notation $f(n)O(\log n)$ make sense?
 
6:15 PM
Oh, alr, I will remove them then
But is the question hard/is there no good general answer? It has 82 views
 
6:35 PM
@AkivaWeinberger I forget the correct answer. They should be injective tensor products or projective?
 
I've finally found out that I'm doing math better when I'm not sleep deprived
Friday. What a blessed day
Taking your mind off of those stressful moments is surely a good thing
 
6:51 PM
@ILikeMathematics Did you work out my suggestion about letting $u=x-a$ and considering $g(u)=f(a+u)$?
 
7:09 PM
@TedShifrin Oh, I thought that was meant for Koro, let me try
 
7:22 PM
@TedShifrin Can you please elaborate what $a$ and $f(a + u)$ should represent? I have $f(x) = 2x^3 - 6x^2 + 8$ and I want to check it for point symmetry at some point
 
Given $f,g:X\to \overline {\mathbb R}$ measurable, how to show that fg is measurable?
If it were $\mathbb R$ instead of R bar, then I can do this.
 
So I'm suggesting you try to find the right $a$ if there is one. For example, is $g$ is even? Is $g$ odd?
 
Also, I think that defining a function to have value $\infty$ is nonsense.
 
koro i must be missing something, it's the composition of x -> (f(x), g(x)) with the continuous [hence measurable] product? who cares about infty?
 
Is there any rational explanation to this?
 
7:26 PM
@ILike: For example, to say $g$ is odd (even is clearly hopeless) is to say $$4+a^3+3au^2=3(a^2+u^2) \quad\text{for all }u.$$
 
At least we're not using the one-point compactification of rational numbers
 
@ILike Most likely you're going to need a vertical shift as well.
 
Leslie: I define extended Borel sigma algebra on $\overline {\mathbb R}$ as $\{B\cup H: B\in \mathfrak B, H\subset \{\pm \infty\}\}$. So I am trying to show that $(fg)^{-1}(B\cup H)$ is in sigma algebra on X.
In case of no bar on R, I showed $(f\pm g)^2, c f$ for any constant c to be measurable so $\frac 14\{(f+g)^2-(f-g)^2\}=fg$ is measurable.
 
If I set $g(u)=f(a+u)+b$, what must $a$ and $b$ be in order to have $g(-u)=-g(u)$?
 
@TedShifrin So you basically would try to factor $f(x)$ so you can see the horizontal and vertical shift?
 
7:32 PM
No, certainly not factoring. Simplify the algebra when you do the shift.
 
so here's a borinng linear algebra question i'm tryingn to remember how best to resolve
 
Maybe you want to factor $g(-u)+g(u)$.
Well, hello, @Semiclassic, stranger.
 
\o
 
7:33 PM
\o/
 
Is that a picture of Trompolini on his golden throne?
 
This is super tedious but kinda addicting
 
So, DogAteMy, did the prof want you to be so lenient?
 
let $u,v$ be a pair of oblique vectors in the plane (so not parallel but not orthogonal either) from which I form the matrix $M=uu^\top+vv^\top$.
 
Will talk in half an hour
 
7:34 PM
Ah.
 
@TedShifrin don't $a$ and $b$ have to be 0? $g(-u) = -g(u)$ means it's point symmetrical to (0|0)
 
now, using the definition of rank I know that this is at most rank 2. is it possible that $M$ is actually rank one?
 
Only if your original $f(x)$ was symmetric about $0$.
 
i think the answer is no but i'm struggling to remember how to actually prove it
 
@Semiclassic Only if $u,v$ are linearly dependent, I believe.
 
7:36 PM
yeah, which "not parallel" would exclude
the grungy proof i guess is to choose wlog $u=e_1$ and $v=v_1 e_1+v_2 e_2$
 
Let's assume $u=(1,0)$ and $v=(\cos\theta,\sin\theta)$.
But I want to assume they're unit vectors first. Then how can you have a kernel? You need $\text{proj}_ux = -\text{proj}_v x$.
But this immediately says $u,v$ linearly dependent.
Unless $x=0$.
QED
 
hmm. what if they're not unit vectors? (or, equivalently, leave them as unit vectors but take $M=uu^\top + c vv^\top$)
 
Same proof.
Apply to $x$. The first term is a scalar multiple of $u$, the second a scalar multiple of $v$.
 
ah yeah
 
Looking at the image is harder. Kernel is easier.
 
7:42 PM
yeah, $(u\cdot x)u = -c (v\cdot x)v$ is convincing
 
Certainly $x$ can't be orthogonal to both $u$ and $v$ :P Unless it's $0$.
 
more generally that would mean that a sum of $k$ projectors is rank $k$ unless there's a linear dependence between the vectors
 
among?
 
among, yes
my students had a quantum computing quiz this week, where the question asked them to take some 2-by-2 real symmetric matrices, put them in the form $\sum_{k} p_k v_k v_k^\top$, and deduce whether they were rank one
 
Ah, understanding the spectral theorem physically.
 
7:46 PM
the intent was for the $v_k$'s to all be orthogonal, in which case the rank is simple to see
 
Well, if you apply the spectral theorem, they are orthogonal.
 
yeah, you can always find an orthogonal basis
but we weren't clear about that in the wording of the problem, so not everyone did
and the question i had was whether you could still use that to distinguish rank one or not
 
Ah, you can do completing the square instead and get the $LDL^\top$ decomposition.
See chapter 5 section 3 of my book (or something).
 
This comes back to Sylvester's law, which we've discussed in here numerous times.
 
7:48 PM
@Koro what prevents you from writing $(fg)^{-1}(\infty) = f^{-1}(0, \infty]\cap g^{-1}(\infty) \cup f^{-1}[-\infty, 0)\cap g^{-1}(-\infty) \cup ...$?
 
It all depends whether you're thinking of the symmetric matrix as a bilinear form or as a linear map. :)
 
we don't actually use the word 'rank' in the course, to be precise. for us it's just a question of "can you write it as $M=a vv^\top$ or not"
if it is it's a pure state, if not it's mixed
 
We can't assume quantum students know elementary linear algebra? SAD.
 
7:49 PM
@Semiclassical how were the grades on the quiz?
 
hasn't been fully graded yet
 
Anyhow, I'm fine with the completing the square approach.
It ties in nicely with row ops and echelon form :)
 
ted i reviewed an article for a journal that had 'quantum' in the title and i said, i think you will find that if translated out of quantum language a guy named schur did this in 1920.
 
@leslie Jargon hides things.
 
7:50 PM
it was a cool result though.
 
OK, getting to be lunchtime for this bonzo.
 
@Semiclassic Have I sufficiently addressed your concerns? :D
@leslie I don't know if you have something further to comment here.
 
8:08 PM
Doing math during lunch break from coding
 
@Jakobian yup, that works. Thanks :-).
Let $B\cup H\in \mathfrak B_{\overline{\mathbb R}}$ and consider $(fg)^{-1}(B\cup H)=(fg)^{-1}(B)\cup (fg)^{-1}(H)$.

If $H=\{\infty\}$, then $(fg)^{-1}(H)=(f^{-1}(-\infty, 0)\cap g^{-1}(-\infty))\cup (g^{-1}(-\infty, 0)\cap f^{-1}(-\infty))\cup (f^{-1}(0,\infty)\cap g^{-1}(\infty))\cup (g^{-1}(0,\infty)\cap f^{-1}(\infty))\cup (f^{-1}(\infty)\cap g^{-1}(\infty))\cup (f^{-1}(-\infty)\cap g^{-1}(-\infty)) $
Similarly, the cases when $H=\{-\infty\}$ or $H=\{-\infty, \infty\}$ can be handled.
This completes the proof.
 
38 mins ago, by Ted Shifrin
QED
 
9:16 PM
@TedShifrin But what's the point of considering $g(u) = f(a + u)$? Finding the horizontal shift?
 
Yes, to find the $a$ which (possibly) gives you symmetry.
 
9:32 PM
This is my favorite matrix: $M_s=\begin{bmatrix}e^s&0&0\\0&e^{-s}&0\\0&0&e^{-s}\end{bmatrix}$
 
ok. y?
 
because (correct me if I'm wrong) it's a generalisation of $A_s=\pmatrix{e^s&0\\ 0&e^{-s}}$
I also like the simplicity of $M_s$
 
10:16 PM
Students did poorly :(
Out of 60: Min 24, med 55, max 60, mean 51.18, stdev 8.18
The person who got 24 arguably shoulda got less but I felt pity
@TedShifrin
That one person has been on our radar for a while
I think that student got the lowest score for all four p-sets so far
 
How many 60s?
 
Median 55 is ridiculously high.
 
I don't consider this doing poorly, except for the poor 24. I agree that person is in trouble.
 
10:23 PM
What was the mode?
 
Just out of curiosity, I'm going to look up my homework grades from the last time I taught the graduate complex analysis course.
The average grade was under 69%.
The homework average in the last Honors Multivariable Math I taught was 79% (proofs only — computations on WebWork). That was graded by a former student of mine, not by me. The non-honors students averaged 52% on homework :(
In the second semester, the homework average was about 80%. 8/12 students got As in the course.
That was probably the all-round strongest class I ever had for this course; no super-super-stars but very strong.
Anyhow, your 85% homework mean seems high to me.
Great news: Mehmet Oz spoke at a very ritzy Rethugnican fund-raiser in Southern CA last night and stood in front of a car used by — guess who — Hitler, complete with swastika on it!!! Unbelievable!
 
par for the coourse, really
 
The homework scores or the last thing I just posted?
 
10:42 PM
@TedShifrin last thing
 
I still get gobsmacked by these pieces of garbage.
 
It's all about the thug life.
> Thug life is a term used with pride, to describe a person who started out with nothing and built themselves up to be something.
The problem is they forget where they came from.
 
That must be an urban dictionary definition which is different from the meaning I'm used to.
 
They said it was misinterpreted as the gangster life.
 
Maybe there are different definitions for people over 50.
 
In my old-person brain, there were no racial connotations to "thug." I pictured rednecks.
 
Yeah, Al Capone thugs.
> 1810, "member of a gang of murderers and robbers in India who strangled their victims," from Marathi thag, thak "cheat, swindler," Hindi thag, perhaps from Sanskrit sthaga-s "cunning, fraudulent,"...
 

« first day (4447 days earlier)      last day (581 days later) »