« first day (3164 days earlier)      last day (1859 days later) » 

1:15 AM
Does the equation $\prod_{i=1}^{\infty}(1+c/n^2) = \frac{sinh(\sqrt{c}\pi)}{\sqrt{c}\pi}$ hold for general c? Sorry in advance for bad latex notation if that doesn't render properly
 
1:27 AM
@user193319 thank you. that makes sense.
 
2:10 AM
I wonder why this room is becoming less active over time. I guess there are many other places to chat now about mathematics?
 
2:55 AM
meh, natural ebb and flow
 
 
1 hour later…
3:58 AM
This room is like super active compared to most others
5
 
 
2 hours later…
5:38 AM
11 hours ago, by manooooh
@AkivaWeinberger concerning to our proof of $un=n$, which kind of proof method is it: a direct proof, counterreciprocal or argumentum ad absurdum? I think it is a direct proof, right?
@manooooh I think it's a direct proof, too
@Semiclassical So IIRC the amount by which two random variables fail to be independent is measured by E(XY)-E(X)E(Y)
The covariance
Is there a way to measure how three variables fail to be independent?
(Like the example from before where (X,Y,Z) is chosen from the coordinates of the vertices of a tetrahedron, i.e. X and Y are chosen from {0,1} independently at random and Z is their sum mod 2)
You can tell that I've never actually taken a class on probability
 
Probably one might need a 3rd order Covariance tensor to capture all those triple correlations
 
6:23 AM
I think E((X-E(X))(Y-E(Y))(Z-E(Z))) measures how "tetrahedral" X, Y, and Z are
Say they're taken from {-1,1} for simplicity (so E(X)=0 etc)
So we have E(XYZ)
This means we want XYZ to be positive, so an even number of them should be -1
 
6:58 AM
And that expands to E(XYZ)-ΣE(X)E(YZ)+2E(X)E(Y)E(Z)
So that equals E(XYZ)-E(X)E(Y)E(Z) iff ΣE(X)E(XY)=3E(X)E(Y)E(Z)
which is true if (sufficient but not necessary) X, Y, and Z are pairwise independent
(otherwise E(XYZ)-E(X)E(Y)E(Z) isn't translation independent)
 
7:48 AM
My book says:
Laurent’s series of an analytic function in an annular region can be
differentiated term-by-term. As a consequence, since Log z is not analytic
in any annulus around 0, it cannot be represented by a Laurent series
around 0
I don't get why 'not analytic' implies no Laurent series
 
8:00 AM
@Silent because of the "around $0$"
 
8:48 AM
Log z isn't even continuous in an annulus around zero, right?
if you're taking the principal logarithm
 
9:03 AM
if you're taking any logarithm at all
also this is the basis of like the entirety of complex analysis
$\displaystyle \prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2^n (\exp(2^{-n} t) - 1)}t$ converges for all $t \in \Bbb R$ right
 
9:28 AM
Hi
if $a_{1} < a_{2} < ... < a_{n}$ integers $(X - a_{1})(X - a_{2})...(X - a_{n}) - 1$ is it irreductible on $\mathbb Z[X]$?
 
10:23 AM
I have such a bad cough
I can't get two words into a sentence without coughing
If I could infect people through a chat room you'd all be sick now
@LeakyNun In other words $\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^\infty\dfrac{\exp(2^{-n}t)-1}{2^{-n}t}$?
I know that $\exp(x/2)\le\dfrac{\exp(x)-1}x\le\exp(x)$ (at least for $x\ge0$)
 
10:55 AM
suppose i have an "arc-ed" cross meaning a bended cross how do i show exactly that it is contractible
that its identity map is contractible
which homotopy to use
 
@AkivaWeinberger I would advice that, you peel out pomegranate, and boil that peel, let it cool naturally, and drink.
 
That's an idea
Sounds like so much effort though
 
its just two step process :)
 
Does it taste like the seeds when you do it like that?
 
it tastes a little bad, but that's effective
 
10:58 AM
Arright
 
11:50 AM
3
Q: Infinite subset contains finite subset of any size

Math ManiacIs it true in ZF that given any infinite set $X$ and any natural number $n$, there is a subset of $X$ with cardinality $n$ (i.e. equinumerous with $n$)? Here, $X$ is defined to be an infinite set if $X$ is not equinumerous to any natural number $n$. This may turn out to be quite trivial, but I ...

It may be cool to have an "Strictly Dedekind infinite set" where all its subsets are infinite, but to do that will require circumventing "finite choice" by somehow nuking induction, which is way too costly to be worthwhile
 
12:22 PM
@ManolisLyviakis Like ナ?
 
Is the topology on the manifold that the regular value gives you the subspace topology?
 
Problem: Let $A \subseteq \Bbb{R}$ be a measurable set with finite measure. Then $F(x) = m(A \cap (-\infty, x))$ is continuous...Proof: Let $y < x$. Then $$|m(A \cap (- \infty,x)) - m(A \cap (-\infty,y))| = m(A \cap [y,x)) \le m([y,x)) = |x-y|$$
So $F$ is actually Lipschitz and hence continuous.
Does this sound right?
 
12:39 PM
I don't get why sinz and cosz are the only entire functions that can assume the values sinx and cosx, respectively, along the real axis or any segment of it.
 
1:06 PM
@AkivaWeinberger yes
how can i see a graph as the quotient space of the disjoint union of vertice and intervals
so consider X to be a graph
In topology, a subject in mathematics, a graph is a topological space which arises from a usual graph G = ( E , V ) {\displaystyle G=(E,V)} by replacing vertices by points and each edge e = x y ∈ E {\displaystyle e=xy\in E} by a copy of the unit interval [ 0 , 1 ] {\displaystyle [0,1]} where 0 {\displaystyle 0...
what does it mean it is the quotient space of the disjoint union
 
1:21 PM
it just mean that is the union of these set but gluing the vertices to the egdes?
 
1:33 PM
@AkivaWeinberger 10/10
 
@Silent They're uniquely determined by their values over any arc in $\Bbb R$
 
@AkivaWeinberger let $X \sim U(0,1)$
$X=1-X$, so $2X=1$, so $X=\frac12$
 
1:51 PM
Trying to figure out good terminology for something
 
@ManolisLyviakis Yeah. Imagine taking $A=[0,1]\cup[2,3]\cup[4,5]$ and taking the equivalence relation $x\sim y$ if either $x,y\in\{0,2,4\}$ or $x=y$
Then $A/{\sim}$ is $A$ with $0$, $2$, and $4$ glued together
and it's a graph
 
Suppose I’ve got a poset. I think, in general, you can always assign numbers to the elements of the poset in a way that agrees with the partial ordering
 
specifically, the star with three edges
 
Not in a unique way, of course
But is that instinct sound? I’m coming at this from an example, so my knowledge of posted is pretty bad
 
If it's a finite poset then it's always a subset of the order relation on a finite subset of $\Bbb N$, I'm pretty sure
(I guess I should've said it's always a subset of a total order on the same amount of elements)
('cause it doesn't matter if they're in $\Bbb N$ or $\Bbb Q$ or $\Bbb R$ or whatever)
 
1:57 PM
Yeah, thought so
 
'Cause you can do this inductively, can't you? Like, inductively assign to each thing a rational number
Choose a random thing and call it 0
 
The other intuition is that, if you draw the Hasse diagram
 
Move things less than it to one pile, things greater than it to another pile, and put things incomparable to it in whichever pile you want
and then choose a random thing in the "greater" pile and call it 1
and something in the "lesser" pile and call it -1
and in the next step you assign -2, -½, ½, and 2
etc etc
 
In my particular case the poset is finite with unique greatest and smallest elements
 
and then, if it really bothers you at the end that you have labels in $\Bbb Q$ and not $\Bbb N$, you can map the labels order-isomorphically to some set of the form $\{1,2,\dots,n\}$
 
2:00 PM
@AkivaWeinberger nah, that’s not an issue
For me anyways
I’m more interested in what such orderings are possible, subject to some conditions on what values are assigned on the boundary of the poset
Eg take your poset to be 3-letter words from the alphabet 0,1,2
 
I guess you could look at the minimum "range" (distance from the largest label to the smallest) but that'd probably just be the length of the largest chain
(…minus one?)
 
With one word covering another if all it’s letters are greater or equal than the other’s
So 210 covers 110 covers 100 etc
 
Mhm
The largest chain would be 000-001-011-111-112-122-222 I think?
Or that's tied for largest anyway
 
Looks right
 
meaning the "range" of the labels has to be at least 6
Well I mean
Just label each word with the sum of the entries
 
2:07 PM
When you draw the Hasse diagram you get 7 levels, containing 1,3,6,7,6,3,1 elements respectively
 
so 122 gets a label of 1+2+2=5 for example
 
Right
 
and then 000 gets a label of 0 and 222 gets a label of 6, so that gives you a labeling with the smallest possible range
 
What I’m particularly interested in is the following
Let $f$ be a mapping from each word to [0,1]
 
such that f respects the ordering?
 
2:09 PM
Yeah
 
And we probably want f(000)=0 and f(222)=1 or something like that
 
Well, I only require the latter
But I also require f(221)=2/3, f(211)=1/3, and permutations thereof
Trying to remember if that’s all.
I think it is?
Obviously that allows a lot of freedom. The boundary conditions prescribe the values for 7 of the 27 words
 
sanity check: F'(x/2)+F'((1-x)/2)=1 means 2F(x/2)-2F((1-x)/2) = x+F(0)-F(1) right
oh I spotted the mistake the very moment I posted it
sanity check: F'(x/2)+F'((1-x)/2)=1 means 2F(x/2)-2F((1-x)/2) = x+2F(0)-2F(1/2) right
 
[Very random]
A dedekind sunset is a sunset that has indefinite number of stages which can arbitrarily reach the horizon, but never able to reach it
 
2:30 PM
Autocorrect replaces "subset" with "sunset" a lot for me
 
It does especially on my mac. Because it is so common, I decided to capitalise on the autocorrect and fabricate this concept of dedekind sunset
as a joke
 
 
2 hours later…
4:14 PM
 
i feel attacked
 
4:28 PM
@AkivaWeinberger funny thing is, while I do say the letter z as "zee" (as is typical of Americans)
 
I remember being so confused when I moved to Canada as a kid and people used the word "zed". Felt like I had entered a different world.
 
I sorta wish "zed" was the standard here as well
if only to avoid confusing "z" and "c" and "see"
 
Ha, you should try Mandarin.
 
Hey all!
So glad one of my formulas gives the right result!!:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3173284/what-is-the-limit-of-this-dirichlet-series
 
5:23 PM
"five, pip pip, cheerio" is my new favorite number.
 
I have to admit, though, I never really gave much thought to the pronunciations of $k[x]$ and $k(x)$
 
Just read the two letters and add "with round brackets" in the second case
 
Howdy, demonic @Alessandro, DogAteMy, @Rithaniel
 
Greetings Ted.
 
5:38 PM
@TedShifrin hey!
 
Hi Anonymouser
 
haha .. .nice ..
 
Rithaniel were you asking about relations on proper classes the other day or was it somebody else?
 
its Sircumference
 
Ah, nevermind then, I had time to elaborate on how to talk about proper classes in ZFC today
 
5:46 PM
Yeah, classes are category theory? Or set and model theory?
I've been bogged down in generalizations of absorbers in non-associative magmas this last month, myself.
 
Proper classes are just collections too big to be sets, they come up in different contexes
 
Ah, yeah, then I'm distantly aware of them, yeah. Like the surreals are a class, right? Or is that the hyperreals?
I always mix those two up in my memory.
 
Surreals if I remember correctly
The usual examples are the class of all sets, the class of ordinals and the class of cardinals
 
I definitely want to take a class on that sort of stuff after I get into graduate school.
 
A first course in set theory should cover all this stuff and much more
 
5:58 PM
Yeah, all the set theory I know was actually given through a course called "intro to proof." So yeah, maybe a course specializing in set and model theory would be the way to go.
 
I have the equation $\frac{1}{r}(A\exp{(\mu r)}+B\exp{(-\mu r)})$ and the condition that it must be finite everywhere in the region r<a
Can I get restraints on A and B with this?
 
It's not an equation.
Do you have $r>0$?
Or does $r<a$ mean $-\infty<r<a$ ($r \ne 0$)?
 
What is it then?
 
A function.
 
Sorry I mean $0 < r< a$
 
6:07 PM
Think about the first degree Taylor polynomial of your function without the $1/r$.
 
Sorry with that inequality it should be greater than or equal to 0
not just greater than
 
No, not equal, because you have $1/r$. Of course, you want a removable singularity at $r=0$.
 
It should be greater than or equal. It’s a physical situation and has to be included.
 
You can't divide by $0$. Give me a break.
 
from the context of the question (I don’t think it’s completely nessecsry to send it through)
 
6:09 PM
As I said, you want a removable singularity, but $0$ will never be in the domain.
 
But you could have the limit of the function be finite
 
You should review the definition of a function.
 
Okay saying 0 isn’t in the domain
 
Anyhow, I told you ten lines ago how to solve it.
 
6:13 PM
I'll channel Demonark and say "inf."
 
Oh so, to have a removable singularity I’ve got to have the numerator equal 0
 
at $0$, yes.
 
Why does this make it removable?
Pas in I understand by the limits this makes it finite
im not that clued in one removable singularities
 
A removable singularity is precisely one where you have a finite limit.
 
6:16 PM
@JakeRose Isn't your expression already finite everywhere in the region $0<r<a$?
 
He meant bounded.
Because he really wants a limit at $r=0$.
 
@Ted turns out i low key like baby number theory
idk who i am anymore
 
LOL
RIP geometry.
 
geometry is still bae tho
 
Hey all, I believe the following formula to be true any idea on how to proceed

$$ \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty}\ \sum_{r=1}^n d_r \left( f(\frac{k}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right) = \lim_{s \to 1} \! \underbrace{\frac{1}{\zeta(s)} \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{d_r}{r^s}}_{\text{removable singularity}} \int_0^\infty f(x) \, dx $$
 
6:21 PM
I developed a healthy pedagogical liking for baby number theory when I taught algebra and wrote my book.
 
honestly the only math ive encountered that i dont on some level really like is foundations
 
Even some aspects of math logic can be fascinating.
But I appreciate them from afar.
 
ya i dont think it's like bad it just aint for me
 
Now you know how I ended up in complex geometry — it brought so much different stuff together ...
 
ya it's highly good
 
6:24 PM
*on how to proceed to prove it?
 
6:39 PM
Where $f(x) $ is a smooth continuous function whose integral $\int_0^\infty f(x) dx$ is absolutely convergent. $d_r$ is the r'th number of a sequence.
 
6:50 PM
Hello!
I need help
They ask me to find the beam of curves orthogonal to the family of curves $ky^2=e^x$
So I end up with $y^2=-4x+C$, which is correct
My question is: should I isolate $y$ to get $y=\pm\sqrt{-4x+C}$ or the answer should be "$y^2=-4x+C$"?
Thanks!
 
Given that the initial family of curves is given implicitly, it seems reasonable to give the resulting orthogonal curves in implicit form as well
 
@Semiclassical oh, that makes sense! So the answer could be "y^2=-4x+C". Thanks!
 
7:15 PM
It depends on the interpretation of the grader, of course
 
Does anyone know what can I do to solve this?
0
Q: Game theory - two-person, zero-sum game problem

Al t. Attempt: To facilitate numbers consider the equivalent table $$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|lcr} &&A.J. && &G.N. \\ \hline & 1 & 2 & John & 1 &2& Mark \\ \hline Butterfly & 5 & 3 & 1&6&4&2 \\ Backstroke & 6 & 5 & 2&4&3&1 \\ Breaststroke & 5 & 4 &1 &6&3&2 \end{array} $$ I am having diffic...

 
7:39 PM
@ÉricoMeloSilva so it begins
 
How's it going?
 
Pretty well, the new semester has just begun
 
Nice, same here except replace "semester" with "quarter"
 
What are you taking?
 
7:48 PM
Graph theory, algebra 3 (mainly number theory), probability, and a civilizations class
 
Sounds good
 
How about you?
 
I'm doing models of set theory 1, a set theory seminar, type theory, a practical project in logic thing and noncommutative geometry
 
8:04 PM
Oh, noncommutative geometry? That sounds fun.
 
@Daminark so wut begins
 
Your path toward number theory
 
oh word
 
And yeah I personally am most excited probably by noncommutative geometry among such topics but they all seem p cool
 
literally everyone at the grad school im gonna go to is already a number theorist so i guess it's inevitable
 
8:07 PM
@Rithaniel It's actually functional analysis
 
So, functional analysis mixed with a little geometric interpretations of the functions?
 
The idea, according to the course description, is that there is a duality of categories between compact Hausdorff spaces and unital commutative C*-algebras and so somehow the study of noncommutative C*-algebras should have a topological interpretations
 
What's the name of a multivariate distribution that's similar to a multivariate Gaussian but biased in one direction? i.e. more probability is placed in a particular direction?
 
8:47 PM
I'd like some feedback, please . . .
in Constructive Feedback, 55 secs ago, by Shaun
What d'you think of the following answer?
 
 
1 hour later…
9:49 PM
Hey guys. I'm reading a paper which I'm supposed to give a talk on, but I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the methodology of the proof for Theorem 1. Anyone free to try and help me out a bit?
It's a model theory paper about the elimination of quantifiers in various algebraic structures.
 
Oh that's a cool result, I didn't know there was a converse
 
Yeah. Definitely. I enjoyed reading through the introduction, but the proof of the first theorem is challenging to get through. I think I'm not understanding the link between little f and big F. But I'm not sure.
 
I'm not sure, I would need to read it carefully but it's too late here
Seems like a very nice paper though, I bookmarked it for the future
 
10:53 PM
2
A: Hint Predicated on a False Claim?

Derek HoltYes, there exist normal subgroups of order $p^2$ for which there is no $c$ of order $p$ outside of $N$. However there exists such an $N$ for which such a $c$ exists.

 
11:14 PM
Suppose $\alpha \in \Bbb{R} \setminus \Bbb{Q}$. Are there criteria for when $\Bbb{Q}(\alpha) = \Bbb{Q}[\alpha]$?
 
Since cohomology of spaces with Z coefficients is just homology of spaces with torsion shifted up a degree, is it true that rational homology and rational cohomology agree in all degrees
 
So, to show that $\Bbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}] = \Bbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, it suffices to show that $\Bbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}]$ is a finite dimensional vector space over $\Bbb{Q}$?
 
11:31 PM
@user193319 does $\Bbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$ contain $\sqrt{6}$. Does $\Bbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}]$?
 
Yes, $\Bbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}] \ni 1 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sqrt{3} = 1 \cdot \sqrt{6}$
and $\Bbb{Q}[\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3}] \subseteq \Bbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$, so both contain that number.
 
@user193319 Precisely when $\alpha$ is algebraic. When $\alpha$ is transcendental, $\Bbb Q[\alpha] \cong \Bbb Q[x]$.
$\Bbb Q[\alpha,\beta,\dots,\gamma]$ is always a field whenever these guys are algebraic.
What's the proof that $\Bbb Q[\alpha]$ is a field when $\alpha$ is algebraic?
 

« first day (3164 days earlier)      last day (1859 days later) »