« first day (2844 days earlier)      last day (2180 days later) » 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

12:00 AM
i wonder how someone who go about writing a book like "examples in analysis" or top or alg and so on
 
@EricSilva counterexamples in analysis is a thing
 
i feel it would either be too short or too big
ik
i was riffin on it
 
somtimes interesting examples require knowledge from another field
Like you can define class groups in terms of commutative algebra, but I'm not sure you can compute a single nontrivial class group without algberaic number theory or algebraic geometry
 
That's still algebra :P
 
12:04 AM
non-associative, commutative magma ---> rock paper scissors
 
@Ted I saw a copy of ur book sitting in a bookstore the other day and bought it
multivariable one
 
damn, Eric, you shouldn't be wasting your money!
 
it was like 10 bucks
the bookstore was closing
 
yeah I am waiting for it to get published as a dover book
 
oh wow
 
12:06 AM
and selling everything for ridiculous prices
 
I doubt that'll ever happen, @anakhronizein ... at least while I'm alive.
 
Heh, it's a joke, Ted.
 
Oh, that's interesting. Who's in charge of my books when I'm gone?
 
Your great grand daughter
 
That's the empty set.
 
12:07 AM
Grand daughter????????????
 
You're barking up the wrong trees.
 
I was hoping to.
 
well, congratulations, Eric. Now you can complain first-hand :P
 
Life's too short to be on Ted's good side.
 
lol
 
12:11 AM
There's no need to interact with Ted at all.
 
It's okay, Ted. We all love interacting with you.
 
Um, very false.
 
Well I can only speak for myself.
 
And that's fine with me.
 
@Ted why is this book SOOO expensive usually
 
12:16 AM
Because he likes making $$$$
 
I hate it, Eric. I truly do. I tried making Faustian deals with editors and they were never taken seriously.
No, @anakhronizein. It's totally out of my control and I get very little.
 
Did you try publishing with Dover?
Did you try publishing freely on the internet?
 
Notice that I left my diff geo notes in .pdf form for free ... despite about 5 offers from publishers.
 
i feel like this price range is like more than id ever pay for a book that isnt like a rare book
 
Part of the textbook game is to have publishers market your book so that people who wouldn't know otherwise find out about them.
All math books have gone crazy in the last decade, Eric.
For a one-year course it's not that out of the ordinary.
 
12:18 AM
ya but that feels bad to me
 
You've lost touch with what textbooks are like.
 
Dover maintains cheap prices.
 
it feels v sketchy when books cost this much
 
Dover does no marketing or advertising, and I'm pretty sure Dover doesn't do first-time publication.
 
Dover does first-time publishing
Guaranteed.
 
12:19 AM
I don't disagree at this point, Eric. As I said, I definitely opted to keep my diff geo text free.
I'm not sure they want to do any typesetting stuff, @anakhronizein. They want pre-produced stuff. Maybe LaTeX has changed that, but originally they worked with the original typeset versions.
 
LaTeX has made it very easy.
 
a huge portion of dover books are public domain too
 
Easy, breezy, beautiful. Dover. (tm)
 
It's still nontrivial. Trust me. I've given my publishers LaTeX files in all three cases.
It still took a lot of work to get the book produced.
 
Yeah it's fine. I am haranguing you needlessly.
 
12:21 AM
Yeah, you're f***ing obnoxious.
Besides, my 112 lectures are totally free, so screw the book.
 
Others seem to publish their textbooks semi-independently fairly easily with low costs, though. I will ask around for you in case your contract expires and you want to change publisher.
 
i feel like in this era we're at the point where if we want to provide math textbooks to people as cheaply as possible we should just post them on the internet like @Ted has done w his diff geo notes
 
Contracts don't have a time limit of which I'm aware. With aggressive action on my part, I could probably get rights back.
 
It depends on the contract. You would know what you signed though.
I just have had friends who have publishing deals expire, but that was not for math books.
 
I actually didn't keep copies of the contracts when I moved, sadly. I'm pretty sure they're permanent and specifically say that if I'm incapacitated or dead they can get someone else to be an ex-post-facto coauthor.
 
12:24 AM
Hott uses Lulu for their publishing, it seems. lulu.com
Hardcover, $30 canadian, 600+ pages.
 
publishers sound scary
 
Not bad, I'd say.
Publishers are scary. They take advantage of mathematicians who don't know any alternatives.
Poor mathematicians. :(
 
Well, some mathematicians actually do try to make serious money from their books. That wasn't the market I went into. But plenty do.
 
Some "applied" mathematician is currently making money off of your books instead. :(
 
OK, I'm done with this.
 
12:27 AM
You were done before, but you keep on coming back for more of my jokes.
Yeah, Lulu.com seems to advertise towards teachers who want to make textbooks.
Neat. I might consider binding some notes one day.
Note to self: apologize to Ted when he is more receptive. :(
 
1:25 AM
@TedShifrin thanks for the suggestions
 
1:57 AM
I'm struggling to understand why the method for finding the centroid of a quadrilateral works.
I've read that the centroid of a system must lie on the segment connecting the centroid of it's individual parts
But I have no idea why this has to be
If anyone could help me understand that would be great
 
2:23 AM
I asked my question here:
0
Q: Centroid of quadrilateral on coordinate plane

DarkRunnerI'm having trouble understanding the motivation between finding the centroid of a quadrilateral. Q: Find the centroid of a quadrilateral with vertices at (-8,12), (7,15) (13,-9), and (-2,-3). I've solved the problem, using the procedure described @How can I construct the centroid of a quadrilat...

 
3:02 AM
@Mathein do you know any decent sources for Galois theory? I'm not liking D&F all too much
 
 
1 hour later…
4:09 AM
Demonark: Ian Stewart has a wonderful paperback on Galois theory.
Emil Artin also has a very short paperback book, much older.
 
Does anyone know a result called Schur's lemma about n by n matrices? It says something about maximum number of matrices with a certain property (symmetric something something) being exactly something like $(n+1)(n+3)$ or similar.
What about Field and Galois Theory by Patrick Morandi?
 
Hmm, thanks, I'll look into both of your suggestions!
 
4:25 AM
Ah, found the result I was looking for. It had nothing do with symmetric matrices. xD
 
Lol yeah the only Schur's lemma I've heard of was something about irreps
So I was just like whut
 
That's what Google kept telling me lol.
This one says the maximum number of linearly independent mutually commuting complex matrices of order $n$ is $\lfloor n^2/4\rfloor +1$.
 
4:42 AM
Interesting
 
4:53 AM
[Random]
in The Factory Floor, 3 mins ago, by Secret
Consider a timeline with an unusual topology such that each second as measured in the rest frame is like:
 
5:29 AM
@Mathei I noticed that $N(\alpha)=2^3$ and argued with norms and factorisations that it must either $\mathfrak p_1^3$ or $\mathfrak p_2^3$
And since $3$ is prime that must also be the order
 
 
1 hour later…
6:42 AM
@Daminark I know the book by Artin that Ted mentioned and it's very good
I also liked the chapters in Aluffi on fields and Galois theory. For more advanced stuff you can also look in Lang. If you want videos, there's a course on Galois theory on coursera: coursera.org/learn/galois (you have to register, but you don't have to pay if you don't want a certificate)
 
7:00 AM
Nifty, thanks!
 
I had to track down the calculation of an example yesterday, since I was missing an argument for whether a certain coefficient should be $1$ or $2$. Ended up finding a reference to Jantzen's 1973 thesis, which was fortunately on the shelves in our library. Then it turned out that the argument in it was not quite thorough enough for me to follow.
But after showing it to Jantzen, it only took him like a few minutes to recall that he had that part covered by an earlier example in the thesis.
That's some impressive remembering
 
How's it going
 
7:24 AM
Yo
 
8:11 AM
Prove that there is an additive function $T: R → R$ (A function $T: V → W$ between vector spaces $V$ and $W$ is called additive
if $T(x + y) = T(x) + T(y)$ for all $x, y ∈ V$.) that is not linear. How to give example. I tried to find the example. I couldn't. How do I find? $T: R → R$ $T(x+y)=T(x)+T(y)$ But we need $T(cx)\neq cT(x)$ for some $x\in R$
@secret do you have some idea?
 
Hmm...
 
Can you please help me?
 
I am thinking
 
@ManeeshNarayanan choose a $\Bbb Q$-basis for $\Bbb R$, then define a map $\Bbb R \to \Bbb Q$ by sending each element in $\Bbb R$ to the sum of its coefficients when written as a sum in that $\Bbb Q$-basis
 
okay.
What do you meant by $\mathbb Q$-basis?
@MatheinBoulomenos
 
8:15 AM
$\Bbb R$ is a vector space over $\Bbb Q$
so it has a basis as a $\Bbb Q$ vector space
 
Hi!
Im trying to prove that language $ L_1 = \{ a^i b^j c^k | 0 < i < j < k\} $ is not context free.
Is the string $ a^p b^{p+1} c^{p+2} $ a good choice to pump up or down the 5 cases?
 
T(x+0)=T(x)=T(x)+T(0) thus T(0)=0. T(c0)=0=/=cT(0)=0?? Uh...
why is the value of T(0) makes no sense under additive nonlinearity
Uh what?
11
Q: Does a nonlinear additive function on R imply a Hamel basis of R?

Keshav SrinivasanA function is additive if $f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)$. Intuitively, it might seem that an additive function from R to R must be linear, specifically of the form $f(x) = kx$. But assuming the axiom of choice, that is wrong, and the proof is rather simple: you just take a Hamel basis of $\mathbb{R}$ a...

How does axiom of choice allow us to bypass that problematic T(c0) case?
 
@Secret what do you mean?
We only need $T(cv) \neq cT(v)$ for one $v$, not for every $v$
 
O, then T(c0)=cT(0)=0 has to hold, I see
 
The function will be linear when restricted to $\Bbb Q$ and as long as you fix $T(1)$ you have it on the whole of $\Bbb Q$
 
8:25 AM
It seems to me that this guys answer is wrong. Since he doesn't from the start pick a proper string?
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/566724/using-the-pumping-lemma-to-prove-l-aibjck-mid-i-j-k-is-not-conte
 
I should study deeper on how axiom of choice allow the T(cv)=/=cT(v), as in, how these v are produced to introduce nonlinearity, hmm...
 
8:42 AM
@MatheinBoulomenos How do we prove that this vector space is infinite? Can you give one infinite L.I set?
 
I could, but why do you even need that it's infinite for the argument?
note that a finite-dimensional vector space over $\Bbb Q$ is countable
 
I was searching for the dimension of this type of vector space. Actually, I couldn't prove it. That is why I asked.
@MatheinBoulomenos
$\{1,2^{\frac{1}{n}},...,2^{\frac{n-1}{n}}\}$. I am not able to find infinite one
@MatheinBoulomenos
 
9:00 AM
Anyone know how to apply the pumping lemma to CFL in automata theory?
 
 
1 hour later…
Suppose $\overline U\subset \mathring V\subset X$. Will the inclusion $U\subset V$ be a cofibration?
 
 
1 hour later…
11:38 AM
Are you here @Mathei?
 
11:54 AM
@AlessandroCodenotti what's up?
 
I have another general question about the ideal class group
I know that its cardinality contains a lot of information about the number field I'm studying, but what can be deduced about a number field from the structure of its ideal class group? For example if it's cyclic or abelian or has some other nice property
 
Hmm, not sure
 
the ideal class group is the galoisgroup of the maximal abelian unramified extension
of the field
and it's always abelian
 
Hmmm what's an unramified extension?
 
it's when it's not ramified over any prime
maybe also including the infinite place
 
12:07 PM
@AlessandroCodenotti what you are right now, but shortly afterwards you'll become a ramified extension folds sleeve, proceeds aggressively
 
So for all primes $p\in\Bbb Z$ we have that $(p)$ factors into a product of distinct prime ideals in $\mathcal O$, right?
lol, hi @Balarka
 
that's when it is unramified over $p$ yes
 
@AlessandroCodenotti also from what @mercio said, the subgroups of the ideal class group are subgroups of the galois group of the maximal unramified abelian extension of your number field, so you get information about intermediate extensions too by the galois correspondence
 
What do you mean with abelian extension?
 
@AlessandroCodenotti an extension whose galois group is abelian
 
12:21 PM
Ah makes sense, thanks
 
@AlessandroCodenotti Also I don't know if you already knew this but the ideal class group tells you whether or not the ring of integers of a number field is a UFD
 
Yes, but for that I just need to know how many elements it has, not the actual structure of the group
 
Ah okay, just checking
Then yeah, the structure gives you information about extensions of number fields
 
12:40 PM
Is this true : Let $f:[a,b]\to\Bbb R$ be continuous. If $\int_c^df(x)\,dx=0$ for all $[c,d]\subset [a,b]$, then $f$ is zero function.
 
it has to...? since all possible definite integrals of f in the interval [a,b] will be zero and $\bigcup_{c,d \in [a,b]} [c,d] = [a,b]$?
 
it's true
 
thank you
 
I don't know how to prove that, my guess it might have something to do with nested intervals theorem
I am also thinking about:
Suppose:
 
You can show that it must be 0 almost everywhere and continuous+0 almost everywhere implies that it is the zero function
 
12:52 PM
Does anyone know what Ian means by diagonalization in his comment on this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2039788/…
?
 
right
This question meanwhile, caused me to wonder about the properties of the following discontinuous function:
 
@AlessandroCodenotti Is this correct proof: Suppose $f\ne0$, and WLOG, $f(x)>0$ for some $x\in[a,b]$, then $f(y)>0$ for all $y\in (p,q)\subset [a,b]$, for some $(p,q)$, since $f$ continuous, and taking some $[m,n]\subset(p,q)$ would imply $\int_m^nf(x)\,dx>0$, contradiction.
 
Looks good to me
and even simpler than I was suggesting
 
thanks
 
$$g(x - \frac{c+d}{2}) = \begin{cases} -1, x < \frac{c+d}{2}, x \in \Bbb{Q} \\ 1, x \geq \frac{c+d}{2},x \in \Bbb{Q}\end{cases}$$ for all $c,d \in [a,b]$
such that for any $\int_p^q g(x)dx = 0$ but $g(x) \neq 0$
 
1:00 PM
@Secret so, is this one defined only for rationals?
 
uh, it's more like stitching step functions together at the rationals
so it is the limit of the following process:
 
ok. is this function continuous over $\Bbb Q$? I think its not.
 
No $g$ is discontinuous. I am wondering about a question inspired by your question and I am wondering whether $g$ is discontinuous everywhere
 
If you want non-continuous function which is not zero but integrates to zero, just give a point some nonzero value in domain.
 
1:06 PM
e,g, f(x)=0 for all [0,1] except 1/2, and f(1/2)=1
 
Put it simply, $g$ is a function that flip sign in a step function like manner at every rational
but since it does not quite resemble the dirichlet function, I am not sure how to analyse the severity of its discontinuity
 
Is there a notation for some kind of unordered cartesian product?
 
hello
When we speak of the quotient topology generated on $Y$ by a map $f: X \to Y$, is it implied that $f$ is surjective?
 
1:22 PM
@feynhat Not necessarily, but $f$ surjective is the interesting case
Because the topology on $Y\setminus f(X)$ is discrete
(I guess some authors might require $f$ to be surjective, but that's not strictly needed)
 
@AlessandroCodenotti How do you define quotient topology?
 
$U$ is open in the quotient topology on $Y$ with respect to $f$ iff $f^{-1}(U)$ is open in $X$
 
Or in other words, it is the largest topology on $Y$ such that $f$ is continuous, right?
 
Right, that's equivalent
googling I see that requiring $f$ to be surjective is pretty common, so you should which convention your professor/book is using (my professor didn't ask for $f$ to be surjective, but all the interesting examples have $f$ surjective anyway)
 
But this may not necessarily imply that $f$ is surjective. Munkres defines quotient topology as the topology on $Y$ with respect to which $f$ is a quotient map. Now, for $f$ to be a quotient map $f$ must be surjective. We have conflicting definitions.
 
1:30 PM
Is there any theory for describing the class of convex 2D objects that can intersect a circle in at most 4 points?
 
It's a matter of convention, Munkres probably assumes that $f$ is surjective then
 
@AlessandroCodenotti You said that topology on $Y \setminus f(X)$ is discrete because $f(U) = \phi \ \ \ \ \forall U \subset Y \setminus f(X)$, so we can include all the subsets of $Y \setminus f(X)$ without disturbing the continuity of $f$, right?
 
It's not that we can, but we must include them if we want $f$ to be continuous since $\varnothing$ is open in $X$
 
If we remove some of them from the topology, $f$ will still be continuous right?
Its just that it will no longer be the largest topology.
 
Ah, yes sorry you're right
but we want the finest topology
 
1:42 PM
My previous question is now organised into a MSE:
0
Q: A highly pathological discontinuous function. Trying to analyse its value at irrational points and continuity behaviour

SecretConsider the following pathological function $g : [-1,1) \to \{-1,1\}$ constructed in stages: \begin{align} g_0 (x) & = \begin{cases}-1, x < 0\\ 1, x \geq 0\end{cases}\\ g_1 (x) & = \begin{cases}1, x \in [-1,-\frac{1}{2})\\-1, x \in [-\frac{1}{2},0)\\1, x \in [0,\frac{1}{2})\\-1, x \in [\frac{1}...

 
I don't think $g_n$ converges, even pointwise, to a function $g$
 
hmm...
I wonder how we can approach proving the nonexistence of a discontinuous function with discontinuity a dense set of the reals, such that despite it is either -1 or 1, any integral of a subinterval (with rational end points) of its domain is zero
 
Just make it $1$ or $-1$ on the rationals and $0$ everywhere else
 
what is $g$
 
1:58 PM
Best described as a discontinuous function with alternating 1 and -1 such that it has a jump at every rational and that for p,q rational, $\int_p^q g(x)dx = 0$
Its integer analogue will be the following function:
 
best described as "doesn't exist"
 
so the integer analogue has the property that it is rotationally symmetric about every integer point
 
o..o
 
I am wondering whether we can do the same if the jumps are at the rationals
and that is what g is
 
what is a jump
 
2:01 PM
jump discontinuity, such as at x=0 in the step function
 
what is a jump discontinuity
 
I don't know if you will call discontinuities in a dense set jump discontinuities though....
for any function $h$, $p$ is a jump discontinuity if $\lim_{x \to p^+} h(x) \neq \lim_{x \to p^-} h(x)$
 
so those limits have to exist ?
 
yeah (and finite)
 
2:19 PM
Is $f_n : [0,1] \to \Bbb{R}$ defined by $f_n = n 1_{[0,1]}$ a cauchy sequence with respect to the $L^1$ norm? If my calculations are right, it seems to reduce to determining whether $\epsilon > 0$, there is $N \in \Bbb{N}$ s.t. if $s \in \Bbb{N}$ and $n \ge N$, then $\frac{2s}{n+s} < \epsilon$...But I'm having trouble showing that this is true...
 
 
2 hours later…
4:30 PM
ok cr** I am screwed
I forgot the rationals are not well ordered in the usual ordering, thus there is actually no anchor to ensure the function is of certain form
 
4:48 PM
Simple question: given $a,b > 0$, does there exist $x \in \Bbb{R}$ such that $|1-x| < a$ and $|x| < b$?
 
@user193319 From triangle inequality you get $1\le |1-x| + |x| < a+b$.
So $a+b>1$ is a necessary conditions. I think it is also sufficient - if $a+b>1$ it is possible to find such $x$.
 
wait...can't I just choose $x \in (0, \min \{a+1,b\})$?
Does that work?
 
Such choice definitely gives $|x|=x<b$.
But what happens, for example, if $a=b=1/2$.
You choose $x$ such that $0<x<1/2$ and you have $|1-x|>1/2=a$.
 
Ah...This is annoying. I'm just trying to show that $\mathcal{C}[0,1]$ is dense in $L^P[0,1]$, it seemed to just reduce to this problem, but I guess I'm wrong.
 
if only there's a more efficient way to generate those intervals...
 
5:01 PM
@user193319 What about $x=\frac{b-a+1}2=b-\frac{a+b-1}2$. (Assuming $a+b>1$.)
You have $x<b$. You also have $1-x=\frac{a-b+1}2=a-\frac{a+b-1}2<a$.
This still probably needs some fine tuning to avoid negative values and avoid $x>1$.
 
@MartinSleziak That's possible, but these calculations are being to get too fine-grained to solve this problem, so I'm being to think that my approach to proving the density of $\mathcal{C}[0,1]$ is wrong.
 
5:17 PM
Man it feels good to be doing math again
 
@Balarka college application business is finally over?
 
Yup
 
Woot
 
Truly
 
5:32 PM
Hello. If someone here can help... math.stackexchange.com/questions/2784875/…
That's solved.
 
5:49 PM
How does one show that $C[0,1]$, the step of all continuous real-valued functions on $[0,1]$, is dense in $L^p[0,1]$? Any hints or MSE link would be appreciated.
 
@user193319 I have asked in the searching chatroom. On the off-chance that somebody has a bit of spare time and is willing to spend some time searching.
 
Jon
6:07 PM
I have question regarding the geometric effect of a linear transformation for example the linear transformation $R^2$ to $R^2$ which is $L(x) = (-x_1,x_2)^t$ my main question about this question is I know that if you say$x_1 =1 , x_2 = 1$ you can plot the first point but what about the second what exactly is a reflection? Why is the reflect $(x_1,x_2)^t$?
 
6:26 PM
@Jon "you can plot the first point but what about the second"
What exactly are these "first" and "second"?
 
Jon
First point is $L(x) =(-x_1,x_2)$ second point $(x_1,x_2)$
So $(-1,1)$ and $(1,1)$ are the points
 
@Jon So you want to know why the image of the first point $(-x_1, x_2)$ is $(x_1, x_2)$. Did I understand your question correctly?
 
Jon
Yeah wouldn't a reflection be the opposite like $(-x_1,-x_2)$?
 
Your reflection transformation is $L$. So apply $L$ on $(-x_1, x_2)$. What do you get?
 
Jon
I don't understand. L is the linear transformation?
 
6:34 PM
Which axis are you taking the reflection about?
 
Jon
$x_2 $ axis.
 
Yes. And the reflection about $x_2$ axis is given by the transformation $L$.
 
Jon
I see so $x_2$ is the only one to change because the reflection is just on the $x_2$ axis not on the $x_1$ axis.
 
Questions?
T_T
 
 
1 hour later…
7:55 PM
Is there some analytic form for an integral like $$\int_{x_i=-a}^{+a} f(x-x_i) dx_i$$
 
8:10 PM
Its like I'm looking at the function through a window that is 2*a
But also for example at $x=0$ the "windows" overlap the most
 
Jon
There is Simpsons double integral math.stackexchange.com/questions/2554573/… @Mikhail
 
Not really sure how that's related
 
Jon
Never mind then I was thinking as an algorithm.
 
8:30 PM
Good evening. Is there somebody to help me for this question?
0
Q: Snell's law in relativity: a clarity on the notes

SebastianoI am following a training course and updating of fundamentals of modern physics at my university. I had any photocopies of a colleague (see images) I think they are not very clear without a comment and without a detailed explanation. I kindly ask if there is anyone who can help me to understa...

 
8:43 PM
A little of mathematical comedy due to mathematical terminology and possibly inferrable meanings of terms
 
l e l
 
latus rectum is damn good
 
@BalarkaSen rectum?
 
8:48 PM
@LeakyNun Not just any regular rectum, latus rectum.
 
Anyway, a few weeks ago I had shared here an algorithm to find the tangents which need to be computed during Chan's algorithm. That algorithm was incorrect, because it was not handling a few cases...
 
i want to prove that $f_n(x)=\begin{cases} nx,~ 0\leq x\leq\frac1n\\ 1, ~\frac1n\leq x\leq1\end{cases}$ is not a Cauchy sequence in $(\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R}),d_{\infty})$
i found $d_{\infty}(f_p,f_q)=1-\frac{q}{p}$
how to continue
?
 
@PolineSandra is that the supremum (maximum) norm?
 
Hopefully, nobody used it for some mission-critical application :)
 
@LeakyNun yes
 
8:53 PM
@PolineSandra well note that $d_\infty(f_p,f_{2p}) = -1$
by your calculations
(I didn't verify
btw why is your $d_\infty$ not symmetric?
 
$d_{\infty}(f,g)=sup_{x}|f(x)-g(x)|$
 
right, but your result is not symmetric
 
i choose $p>q$
 
oh
...
 
i'm in cauchy
 
8:56 PM
well then note that $d_\infty(f_{2p},f_p) = 0.5$
so just choose $\varepsilon = 0.5$ to derive a contradiction
 
ok thak you
 
9:46 PM
hey @Leaky, mind helping me out with sth in algebra?
 
so it's about groups;
let $G$ be a group of order $pq$, where $p>q$ are prime, $q$ doesn't divide $p-1$. We know that $G$ contains a cyclic subgroup $H$ of order $p$ (by Cauchy’s thm), and since $q=[G:H]$ is the smallest prime number that divides $pq$, we know that $H$ is normal. Now let $a\in G, a\notin H$. My book says that $aH$ generates $G/H$.
I don’t really see why. I know that the order of $a$ must be $p,q,$ or $pq$, but apparently it can’t be $p$. Not sure if that would even be sufficient, but otherwise I have no idea how to show taht $\langle aH\rangle=G/H$.
 
pass to the quotient
$aH$ is not the identity
 
The order of $G/H$ is $q$ which is prime so it is generated by any non-identity element, and since $a \notin H$, this is such an element
 
$|G/H| = q$
...
so who got sniped?
 
9:51 PM
lol
apologies
 
:P
 
why is it generated by any non-identity element though?
 
I guess the thing to note is that the order of any element divides the order of the group by Lagrange's theorem (order of element is order of subgroup it generates) and so if your group has prime order $q$, then any non-identity element has order $q$
 
if we have $Z/10Z$, then, then $\bar 2$ doesn't generate the group
 
10 is not prime
 
9:53 PM
oh right
 
$\Bbb Z/10\Bbb Z$ doesn't have prime order
 
yay
 
haha thanks
 
@ÍgjøgnumMeg can Ext be defined for groups? does it still correspond to the equivalence class of extensions?
 
9:54 PM
absolutely no idea
lol
 
hm, how does it follow then that $q$ divides the order of $a$? I understand that the order of $a$ must be at least $q$, but why the divisibility property?
 
Lagrange's Theorem
 
o shit again
let me think
 
sorry
I mean
if $G$ is a group and $a \in G$ then the order of $a$ divides the order of $G$
 
yes, so the order of $G$ is $pq$
but we have to exclude that the order of $a$ is $p$
 
9:59 PM
Yes but the group you're talking about is $G/H$
which has order $q$
 
right, but I'm talking about $a$ now, and not $\overline a$
 
I see
so what's your issue?
 
well, why can't the order of $a$ be $p$?
 
because $aH$ generates $G/H$
there is a surjective homomorphism $\varphi : G \to G/H$ sending $a$ to $aH$
so $q = \operatorname{ord}(aH) \mid \operatorname{ord}(a)$
 
10:05 PM
oh, I had forgotten about that
 
ah ye
 
10:17 PM
Hey there nerds
 
hi
 
gwarn
 
10:34 PM
anybody know how to find the roots of (f(z))^(1/log(z))?
 
10:44 PM
Dec 17 '17 at 10:02, by Balarka Sen
@LeakyNun Find a holomorphic covering of $\Bbb C \setminus \{1, -1\}$ by the unit complex disk.
Dec 17 '17 at 17:11, by Balarka Sen
But this by no means is a proof; I only constructed a topological covering map $D^2 \to \Bbb C \setminus \{-1, 1\}$ modulo all details. I want a holomorphic covering map.
@BalarkaSen what you asked for is the modular lambda function
and is not very easy to define elementarily
and it's also used in the proof of little picard theorem
 
Correct, that's why I asked you.
 
do you suppose I could have come up with a proof of little picard myself...
 
I feel like I can do a trickster argument by saying $\Bbb C \setminus \{1, -1\}$ admits a metric of constant negative curvature, so it's covered by $\Bbb H^2$ by invoking uniformization theorem lol but that's just ass
@LeakyNun Sure why not.
You're a smart person
 
@BalarkaSen how are you
 
Much better. The admissions are over now, so I feel a lot better.
 
10:54 PM
when will you hear?
 
A month later.
 
good luck my friend
 
Thanks!
 
@TedShifrin indeed I am now being advised by bogomolov
 
Hello!!

Let $g:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be arbitrary and let $f:\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be defined by $f(x,y)=yg(x)$.
I want to prove that $f$ is differentiable in the origin iff $g$ is continuous in $x=0$.

Could you give me a hint how we could show that?
Do we maybe have to use the definition of derivative with the limit?
 
10:59 PM
@MaryStar how do you define differentiability for $\Bbb R^2 \to \Bbb R$?
 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (2844 days earlier)      last day (2180 days later) »