« first day (2633 days earlier)      last day (2405 days later) » 

12:02 AM
In other words, $\dfrac{n^3+100}{n+10}=n^2-10n+100-\dfrac{900}{n+10}$, and the problem states that the left-hand side is an integer
so the right-hand side is an integer as well, which means $\dfrac{900}{n+10}$ must be an integer, meaning that $n+10$ divides $900$.
 
@AkivaWeinberger thanks :P I was washing my sock and as I came back you have already answered lol
I would still type my explanation here though
 
To be clear, this is a consequence of the fact that $(n+10)(n^2-10n+100)=n^3-1000$, which itself is a consequence of the difference-of-cubes equation
$a^3-b^3=(a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)$
 
We know that $n+10$ divides $n^3+100$ and that it divides $(n+10)(n^2-10n+100)$, so they have to divide their difference, namely $900$
 
Wait, I misspoke
 
lol
$a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$
 
12:07 AM
$(n+10)(n^2-10n+100)=n^3\color{Red}{{}+{}}1000$, which is a consequence of the sum-of-cubes equation
$(a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)=a^3\color{Red}{{}+{}}b^3$
 
oh, I was also wrong lol
my identity was right but it didn't match
(ok strictly speaking it can match but whatever I'm going to end this argument with myself)
 
The answer is still 890
 
12:21 AM
So Google made a Go bot that thought itself how to play Go without learning from any human moves
AlphaGo Zero
 
Does this solve the sleeping beauty equation? ((n-1)/n)*(1/3) + (1/n)*(1/2)
If n = 1, the probability should be 1/2
 
and it beat both previous versions of AlphaGo (which beat the human champions Lee Sedol and Ke Jie), 100–0
@TylerL It definitely starts at 1/2 and goes to 1/3 in the limit, but why that equation specifically?
 
I'm trying to make the second coefficient = 0, but didn't know how. It makes sense that if n-1 is the first coefficient... the second coefficient should be that leftover possibility (1 out of n = 10 chance that you flip HHHHHHHHHH)
wait
n-1/n works but not sure 1/n works
should it be 1/n! ?
1 combination in n combinations = all heads
so the sleeping beauty problem can be modeled ((n-1)/n)(1/3) + (1/n!)(1/2)
 
1/2^n maybe?
Chance of n flips all being heads is 1/2^n
 
hi, DogAteMy
 
12:28 AM
Hiya
 
nice
makes the equation look cool as well. ((n-1)/n)(1/3) + (1/2^n)(1/2)
@AkivaWeinberger that makes sense now that I remember learning binary is 2^bits
 
I don't think it makes sense for the probability to change as n changes… the only problem is how exactly we measure the probability. If we do this on n separate weeks and she always answers Heads, is the probability that Heads is correct (a) the number of days on which she's right over the total number of days, or (b) the number of weeks on which she's right over the total number of weeks?
 
Should it be 2^(n-1) though? So if n === 1, you get 1/1 * 1/2
 
(a) would give 1/3, (b) would give 1/2
Then again, you've thought about this problem longer than I have
 
Idk Akiva
lol still thinking about what you said
You're measuring how certain she is that it's 1/2 I guess... 1/2^(n-1) works because she should be exponentially less certain after a few experiments
Akiva here's the simulation after 1000 tries (it nears 1/3) codepen.io/TylerL-uxai/pen/Bwvrwv
 
12:37 AM
@AkivaWeinberger do they play with themself?
@AkivaWeinberger beating is not a transitive relation :P
 
shoot
If you put 1 in for n, it's 2^0 = 1 so it's 1/1 * 50%
 
@LeakyNun Yeah, it's based on self-play.
(Er, "does it play with itself")
 
@AkivaWeinberger nice
 
I assume at some point they'll let it play against Ke Jie or whatever
 
DogAteMy: I think this needs to be X-rated.
 
12:46 AM
Dirtiness is in the mind of the beholder. :P
 
Well, and what's your point?
 
Maybe I should learn how to play Go at some point. But it's considered harder than chess, and I'm still pretty crappy at chess
 
Go, I'm told, is more topological, but, yeah, I'm horrid at chess, so I avoid both.
I stick to bridge.
 
Yeah, you try to enclose areas and such
or something
 
Something to do with $\pi_0$, too.
 
12:54 AM
(((2^n)-1)/2^n)*1/3 + 1/(2^(n-1))*(1/2)
 
@Akiva i play go and I'm much worse at chess than go despite liking both a lot
 
Hm
Have you looked at the AlphaGo games?
 
heya Eric
 
(Hlello)
 
I watched all the Lee sedol games
 
12:56 AM
DogAteMy, apps done?
 
howdy
 
Also hi everybody lol
 
hi Meow
 
im finally getting around to readng spivak
does anyone have an interesting limit problem
also ted im gonna email you something one sec
 
@TedShifrin Mostly, gonna do one final check with the college advisor
Well, for the common app anyway, and for the Yale-specific questions
 
12:57 AM
where did you apply? if you dont mind my asking
 
Cool, DogAteMy
 
Yale for Early Action, gonna do a bunch of less-selective and safe schools if that doesn't work out
 
@Meow, have you done limits of rational functions yet?
 
i dont think so, can you give an example problem?
 
I wouldn't say they're less selective and safe, DogAteMy, unless you revamped your list completely.
Easy one would be: $\lim_{x\to 3}\frac{x-2}{x+3}$. Or try using quadratics, etc.
 
12:59 AM
The ones you gave me?
 
DogAteMy: Well, some of the ones you had in the first place.
 
$\lim\frac{4x^4+1}{2x^2+1}$
 
one thing that's kind of iffy is like
i know how to prove a limit using epsilon-delta
 
@TedShifrin Yeah, those were pretty selective
 
Oh, that's too yucky.
 
1:00 AM
but i dont have any tools yet
so i cant really tell what the limit is gonna be
 
There are methods, @Meow. Which edition are you reading?
 
also, did you mean $x-3$?
 
Well, you can sure guess the limit.
 
in the denom
 
No.
 
1:01 AM
A very powerful tool is that $\lim f(g(x))=f(\lim g(x))$ if $f$ is continuous.
 
everywhere continuous?
 
Meow doesn't know officially what continuity is.
 
For example, $\lim\dfrac1{g(x)}=\dfrac1{\lim g(x)}$
 
These things follow from limit theorems.
 
and $\lim e^{g(x)}=e^{\lim g(x)}$, etc
 
1:02 AM
dont have mathjax one sec
 
Lim 1/g(x)=1/(lim g(x))
 
@Meow: Plus you haven't told me which edition.
 
sorry let me check
 
lim e^g(x)=e^(lim g(x))
 
These are theorems, DogAteMy. He needs to prove them.
And Spivak doesn't get to exponential until integration.
 
1:03 AM
What about something like this for the sleeping beauty problem? i.imgur.com/xQqffH5.png
 
@TedShifrin Right, sure. Once he proves it, it's a very powerful tool.
 
apparently, third
 
@TedShifrin Hrm
 
Ah, OK. I added some explicit stuff on limits for the fourth, @Meow. Let me email you a handout I gave my classes.
 
and let me email you
 
1:04 AM
@TylerL Right, that's equivalent to the last thing you wrote
 
I dropped the * 1/2 and just did 1/2^n
It works for case n = 1 but idk how to prove it with induction or anything
 
Yeah but the last one had 1/2^(n-1)
 
yeah
 
so the 2 and the 2^(n-1) combine to make 2^n
 
email sent
 
1:05 AM
hahaha
smart
 
mine too, Meow
 
@MeowMix If you have a graphing calculator (desmos), try graphing $\frac{3x^2+1}{2x^2+1}$, try changing the exponents and coefficients, see if you can make conjectures
 
@Ted Spivak does exponential that late??? wow i forgot he does some weirdness
 
Oh, he knows this kind of stuff, DogAteMy. He's trying to learn Spivak now.
Yeah, Eric, log defined as a definite integral. It's really the only rigorous thing to do.
 
it works for n = 999999999 and for n = 1, but idk about proving it for n > 1
 
1:06 AM
Oh, I see. So he just needs to do it rigorously.
 
i mean power series tho
 
maybe run it through the sigmoid function?
 
Actually, Eric, before the "early exponentials" texts appeared, most calculus books did that — Thomas, etc.
Power series comes way after integrals.
We're not doing Rudin.
 
lol
 
Rudin did $a^x$ pretty ea—sniped
 
1:07 AM
did you send it to the right e-mail
 
it's been a long time since i picked up a calculus text
 
Oh, did you switch emails.
 
yes, it's the last one you used when you sent the CG
 
gmail addy
 
—rly, and then defined $E(x)$ as a power series, and proved it equals $e^x$ where $e=E(1)$
 
1:08 AM
or alternatively, the one i just sent a email to you withj
 
zachattach@gmail.com
(joking)
 
Oh, I have never seen that addy before.
 
i thought you said zach attack but it turned out to be attach
zatch attatch
^ pronunciation
cba to write out the IPA
 
cant be asked
@TedShifrin we have an issue
 
1:10 AM
I resent, Meow.
LOL?
 
your email doesnt have the pdf as an attachment, it's just text that says <limits.pdf>
 
I guess in my brain sequences and series belong together and these are more foundational than the derivatives and integrals but this sounds like bad pedagogy in a calc book
 
The attachment didn't go?
GRR.
 
These kids and their newfangled electronic mail!
 
1:11 AM
/gr̩ːː/
 
Sent again. GRR.
 
/ˌgəɹəɹə/
 
DogAteMy: Next year you'll miss me :D
 
Next year I can still go on chat, no?
Is something happening on your end?
 
Nah, you'll be way too busy.
 
1:13 AM
he's moving to the indigenous forests
 
college sucks
 
oh
 
Meow, did you get it?
 
I'm actually gonna take a gap year in Haifa first
 
1:14 AM
affirmative
 
Oh really, DogAteMy? Interesting.
 
i feel like i know a lot of people who took gap years in israel
 
but I'm probably gonna take engineering there (Technion - Israel Institute of Technology)
 
Eric, all Jews.
 
@EricSilva Extremely common in my community. All three of my siblings did it
 
1:15 AM
DogAteMy: Interesting. You strike me as very un-engineering, but I think that's a great idea.
 
though they all went to Jerusalem
 
oh P.S. that code hs no comments, sorry
 
@TedShifrin Yeah, I know nothing about it, but I might find it interesting
In any case, useful to learn anyway
 
I lived in Boca Raton in soflo which had loads of new york jew expats so that's probably why i know a lot of people who did it
 
A change of pace from your theoretical math profile, sure, DogAteMy.
 
1:16 AM
everyone i know loved it so sounds like ull have a good time @Akiva
theoretical math = worst math
 
Get'im!
Also I think they prefer to call it "pure math" :P
 
they?
 
im being mostly facetious
 
I do not like the "pure" moniker.
 
1:17 AM
for it is without blemish
 
It suggests that applied math is impure, and I really don't like that.
 
i like theoretical vs applied
 
Tainted by the physical world
 
but i dont like the rigidity of the nomenclature
 
And it really isn't vs ... there is lots of overlap.
 
1:19 AM
i like the idea of being able to straddle across the "divide"
 
One of my favorite courses I taught was an applied math year-long class.
But we did some proofs and all sorts of neat stuff.
 
And at the end of the course, you built a dam
 
i have a question ted
 
Damn you, DogAteMy, we didn't.
 
how did they make these kinds of graphs back then?
 
1:20 AM
ill probably apply to at least one applied reu for my last undergrad summer
 
like $\sin \frac{1}{x}$
 
I actually don't know that, Meow. Graphic artists had serious jobs.
Mainframes could do graphics.
 
i wish i owned a 1970s mainframe
 
It would be as big as your parents' house.
 
ok
maybe in my backyard
 
wait could i even fit another house in my backyrd
 
thanks, DogAteMy
 
what did i just watch
 
A… a dam failure
 
[Random]
Leaky's mention of polynomial division in the previous conversations on solving $n+10$ divides $n^3-100$ once again trigger this attempt again:

$\sin a = \frac{b}{c}, \cos a = \frac{d}{f}, \tan a = \frac{bf}{cd}$

$ce^{2ia}-c=2b,fe^{2ia}+f=2d,(bf-icd)e^{2ia}+(bf+icd)=0$

Suppose $e^{2ia}=q\in \Bbb{Q}$. Then

$c(q-1)=2b,f(q+1)=2d,(bf-icd)q+(bf+icd)=0\implies bf(q+1)+cd(1-q)i=0 \implies bf(q+1)=0 \wedge cd(1-q)=0$

Equation 1 and 2 may have countably many solutions as the constraints are $q=\frac{2b}{c}+1, q=\frac{2d}{f}-1$
 
1:22 AM
@Akiva idk why but watching this really disturbs me
 
Or a model of one
 
oh speaking of mainframes
im probably gonna buy myself a used server
 
Soil got liquified
 
Anyhow, I'm about to go cook dinner. Meow, did you have a question about what I sent?
 
@Ted what's for dinner
 
1:24 AM
umm no i dont think so
Le petite rolleux de Pizza
 
I cooked some coho salmon last night, so a bit of leftover plus red dandelion greens plus ... something else.
OK, well, y'all take care. Talk later.
 
have fun
 
A country was punished to have a record number of dams forever
Eternal dam nation
 
h o r r i b l e
 
Aw, my sink is clogged
 
1:26 AM
Rip in sink
 
Hi dam-in-ark
 
i blame Daminark for that one
 
ok so
 
he shouldnt have made his name so punnable
 
My real name is even worse so...
 
1:29 AM
what do you a-mean
 
You sound-a Italiano right-a there-a
Silv-a
 
lol
 
can i separate the limit of a ratonal funtion into two limits, the numerator and denominator?
wait no what if the denominator is 0
 
Hello. Can anybody help me prove the correctness of this algorithm: imgur.com/a/aHPiZ
 
@Daminark shame you left rep theory as soon as it turned into full on number theory + group theory
 
1:35 AM
If $\lim g(x)\ne0$ and $f,g$ are continuous, then $\lim\dfrac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\dfrac{\lim f(x)}{\lim g(x)}$
 
ok
so i cant use that here
then what the hell am i supposed to use
 
@tonytouch Tryna show a is a multiple of b?
 
all i have to work with is this theorem
no calc tools
 
@MeowMix what exactly do you want to do?
 
Don't know much about that particular programming language but the idea seems to make sense
 
1:37 AM
 
which one?
 
number 6 without calc tools
only limits
and i have to use theorem 2
 
do you know what a conjugate is?
 
Factor them
$x^2-1={}?$
 
how does one factor a square root
 
1:39 AM
that's definitely not the right term for what we're suggesting...
 
sorry akiva, meant problem 6
 
more like reverse factoring
 
no because akiva said factor
 
Yeah I know what you do there
 
1:39 AM
then i realized he was looking at the wrong one
 
You don't factor but you do something similar
 
rationalize the numerator?
 
@AkivaWeinberger before this I had to prove by induction that x_n + by_n = a, where x_n an y_n are the values of the variable of x and y after n iterations. I think I had to use this to prove the correctness of the algorithm
 
@0celo7 Is your icon a double torus with a disk removed?
Topologically
 
No, random
What's special about a double torus with a disk removed?
 
1:40 AM
Well it's clearly a genus-something torus with a disk removed
All orientable surfaces with one boundary are of that form
Seems to be if you seal off that boundary with a (topological) disk you end up with a genus-2 torus
I only mention it because I spent a lot of time thinking about a version of that shape (except made of flat pieces instead of one curve)
 
wait a second
wait no that doesnt lead anywhere
then i just have another square root expression
 
Are you sure it will only have two holes?
 
That's the tricky visualization part of the puzzle. But I think so
Theoretically we could just calculate the Euler characteristic but that seems annoying
 
wait a second
this does lead somewhere
can someone confirm my suspicion
 
@MeowMix Did you not learn how to rationalize denominators?
 
1:44 AM
i learned denominators
is it, multiply by $\sqrt{a+h} + \sqrt{a}$
 
like in high school algebra, $$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2-\sqrt 3}$$ was not an acceptable answer
 
to get a difference of squares
 
@MeowMix so do that here
 
@Meow yeah it's what i suggested
 
ok ok
$\frac{1}{2}a^{-1/2}$, just what calculus would have given me
 
1:51 AM
@AkivaWeinberger I need some of Balarka's heroin to figure this out
 
Heh :P
Figuring out the genus of your thingy, you mean?
 
also if i have a function $f$ continuous at $a$, does $\lim_{x\to a} f(x) = f(a)$?
 
I actually have a few images saved on my phone that show how the deformation goes
 
or do additional conditions need to be met
 
(or one way, anyway)
So coincidental that your icon happens to be a (smooth version of) that same surface
 
1:53 AM
@AkivaWeinberger yeah
so this is definitely a torus with a disk removed
 
God I hate algebraic topology.
 
So it makes sense that your thing, which is like one step up, would be genus 2.
 
looks like a tennis ball
 
@AkivaWeinberger Yeah. It's a minimal surface btw
 
1:55 AM
One thing you can do, other than visualize a deformation, is try to visualize the homotopy equivalence to 2g loops
 
does this surface minimize something
gg sniped
 
@0celo7 Ahh
(cont'd) (which is slightly easier)
 
Minimal surfaces are all ridiculous
 
2g loops wedge summed, I mean
 
minimal surfaces are cool af
 
1:56 AM
It's such a strange condition
They look crazy
 
i need to read colding and minicozzi asap
 
So your start with the boundary shape and see what soap film it would make?
Where did the boundary shape come from? @0celo7
 
@EricSilva It's not that good
It goes from really technical to really sketchy
Pacing is off
Not a fan
 
ive heard good things from the geometers at my school
Andre Neves seems to really like it
 
I've heard good things too, but many people who know the stuff already tend to think everything is good
 
1:59 AM
that's maybe a good point
 
@AkivaWeinberger I think the soap film stuff is something they tell people for grant money
 
Yeah, if you already know a topic (even somewhat) it's easier to forgive a book for being a little unclear
 

« first day (2633 days earlier)      last day (2405 days later) »