« first day (911 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) » 

12:00 AM
today's intellectual high-tide mark for me: realizing complex exponentiation makes more sense on the universal cover of the punctured plane
a close second: proving two point groups defined on an elliptical curve are isomorphic regardless of choice of "base point"
 
That's great, but I have no idea what that means, since I'm just in calc II :p
 
i bet you know what polar coordinates are, right?
 
yes
 
well, the usual way to define exponentiation is $a^b = e^{b\log(a)}$
but that doesn't work so well on the complex plane, because the complex exponential function is not 1-1
so there's not just "one" log function...there's "lots"
 
okay
 
12:09 AM
when we write a point in the plane as (r cos(t), r sin(t))....the problem is with t
if you add an extra dimension for t, this problem goes away, the circles becomes helices
this turns the complex plane into something like a giant spiral ramp, and on this 3-d structure, log is now a single-valued function again
 
sweet
that's pretty cool
 
if you pick a "base range" of interval length 2pi for "level one", the transformation to get from one level to any other (a deck transformation) is just a vertical shift of k*2pi for some integer k, the "winding number" of our circular circuit on a circle in the plane
the elliptic curve thing is harder to explain: but here's a "baby example": say you have a circle, pick a point on it, call it O.
pick two more points, A and B, and draw a line between them.
then define A+B to be the point on the circle where the line parallel to AB through O intersects.
voila! now we can "add points" on a circle!
 
12:25 AM
That is prettu damn cool
know any physics?
 
only a very tiny amount.
 
well more of a trig question
I need to get the top bar, in terms of the slanted bar
using theta
It ends up with slant/tan theta = top bar
but why is it a tangent?
 
hmm....so the weight is suspended from the slanted bar, and attached by something horizontally as well?
 
well
the weight is halfay up
yea
just like the picture
 
do we have any dimensions at all?
 
12:32 AM
well
here's the problem
it's like a torque problem
so the slanted bar is wiehgtless
so T_cw = T_ccw
then the T_cw = 100*.5 length of slant
and T_ccW = the top bar (T)*trig function(theta)
then T = 50/trig(theta)
but why is the trig function tan?
 
ok, torque at what point?
 
the pin
at little circle?
at bottom left?
thats the torque point
 
so where the top bar joins the vertical bar is a rigid connection?
 
12:49 AM
it's a wire
but essentially rigid
 
well i'm confused. suppose the weight is w, and the length of the slant is L. why isn't the T_cw = (wL/2)cos(θ)?
 
1:04 AM
then the wieght is going down, so it is 1/2 the length away, so it's t_cw=(W*(l/2))
wait
that might be it
you said it's cos(theta)?
why did you say that?
 
because i thought only the perpendicular component contributed torque
 
Back from dinner... :\

Yes, only the perpendicular component contributes to the torque.
 
hmm, wait, what?
what perpendicular component?
oh, wait
nvm, waht?
 
perpendicular to the slant bar
 
what's perpeinduclar to that?
 
1:17 AM
the angle between "straight down" and perpendicular to the slant bar is also θ, so i get (wL/2)cos(θ) for the force perpendicular to the slant bar from the weight
 
So, wait
If the angle is like that |\
straight down and perpedicular
the angle in between them?
 
the rest of the weight gets transferred ALONG the slanted bar, which doesn't produce any torque (but might push the vertical support sideways, if it's not stiff enough...this produces torque at the base of the upright....but we're not there)
yes, like you drew it
 
@Link Not the angle in between. When we say perpendicular, we mean perpendicular to the lever arm.
 
So, one sec
I'll draw you it
 
when he drew |\, i assumed he meant for the "\" to be perpendicular to the slant
 
 
@Link b is equal to theta
 
okay
why?
 
angle b = θ
 
and why are we using cos theta?
 
Hang on... drawing something up real quick
 
1:31 AM
draw a right triangle with "base" the perpendicular to the slant piece, "origin" at the point the weight is attached (or the wire its hanging by, whatever), so the horizontal leg is perpendicular to to the slant piece
 
wait, what?
 
the components of the force due to the weight are (wL/2)cos(θ) perpendicular, and (wL/2)sin(θ) in the direction of the slanted bar.
 
So, think of it as a inclind ramp?
 
the angle b is θ because we have similar triangles
 
Here:
https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1BQmQBYX0QZ2GVBoMBkLd7eRRiNGjTfpwOkHauna96Mk/edit

Red is the force of gravity.
Green is the perpendicular component
Blue is a connecting line (just to help visualize).
Why is b = theta? We know that a+theta+90 must equal 180. Note that we have a+b+90 = 180 as well in the upper part of the triange.
 
1:37 AM
@anorton nice drawing
 
@DavidWheeler thanks! :)
 
what therom is that though
i know certain angles are the same as each other
 
what theorem is what?
 
with intersecting lines
 
if you have a force F at an angle ψ to a reference line....the resolvant components parallel and perpendicular to your reference line are Fcos(ψ) and Fsin(ψ), respectively. in this case, ψ is the complementary angle to θ, so we can swap the sine and cosine when we swap the angles
 
1:41 AM
I've added something to the diagram to show why b=$\theta$
 
thanks
I get it now
 
Glad to help.
ok. bye for now--I've got my own physics and engineering hw to do. :)
 
wait
it's cos theta?
So i got 100N * 1/2L * cos theta = T sin theta
but when I solve for T
nvm
I got it
 
now you see where the tangent comes from?
 
2:31 AM
@Sanchez yo
 
@BenjaLim yo
nice :)
let me grab some food though
 
@Sanchez From either Fulton's book or the book by Joe Harris.
 
3:16 AM
@BenjaLim, cool. Fulton might be better for your purpose.
 
3:33 AM
I'm skeptical about definite integration in physics.
 
Maybe I'm ignorant, but I don't know why we can apply definite integration.
 
eh?
 
@FrankScience Hmm, because of the formulation of weak derivative and sobolev spaces.
 
Is there any more elementary explanations?
 
3:45 AM
not that I know of.
 
I'm only considering classical mechanics.
For example, $\mathbf F=m\mathbf a$, etc.
 
@Sanchez why do you think fulton is better?
 
@BenjaLim, Harris' book is an "example" book, and I dont' think it's necessary to work through that book. (But whenever you find you are lacking examples you can search the book for them) Fulton's book is shorter and gives you a glimpse of AG, which is sufficient for you to move on to modern language. (and it covers Riemann Roch!)
 
@FrankScience Yes, even in classical mechanics. Variational formulations frequently use the weak derivative formulation.
I don't actually get your question, but to look at it this way, we restrict our solutions to the subset where we can apply definite integration wherever needed.
So, if I have a first degree DE, I would assume the solution is differentiable almost everywhere, nothing more.
If I have a second degree DE, I assume the solution is twice differentiable almost everywhere.
 
twice differentiable is a much stronger condition than integrable
 
3:59 AM
@DavidWheeler yes.
 
usually the functions actually considered in physics are "nice" in the sense that they are at least "piecewise smooth" (although one doesn't often see third derivatives)
 
Well, I'll take some examples. In my high school, there's a physics problem stated:
 
@DavidWheeler Yes, that is what I meant by differentiable almost everywhere. :-)
In engineering, we look at only piecewise continuous! :P
 
@OrangeHarvester well, as i understand it (my measure theory is weak), that has a more precise definition with regards to integration via a measure
 
@DavidWheeler yes, it is. My measure theory is non-existent actually. Whatever I have picked up is kind of apprentice.
 
4:04 AM
Suppose there dogs, say A,B,C, are standing at three endpoints of a equilateral triangle with side length $l$, once, they start to chase together, say, A chase B, B chase C and C chase A, speed $v$. How much time does it take for them to meet together?
 
but yeah, piecewise continuous with only a finite set of discontinuities is certainly integrable, no matter what integral you're using
 
@FrankScience okay....
@DavidWheeler I guess I erred before, piecewise requires only finite exceptions instead of countable as I was assuming.
 
those nasty dirichlet functions! boo!
 
user19161
So guys, this month I got a total of 5 downvotes, including posts I have deleted. Sad right?
 
Dirichlet functions?
 
@DavidWheeler Yo. As I like to call them, "ruler" functions.
the modified I mean.
 
user19161
Hey @benja I got 15k =)
 
@FrankScience What about your problem?
 
still riemann integrable, tho
 
@OrangeHarvester That might be a pretext, since my physics is bad. I always think something in physics is out of rigor.
@DavidWheeler What's Riemann integrable?
 
4:15 AM
it's the most "basic" form of integral, formed by approximating with step-functions
 
@DavidWheeler I mean, which one is Riemann integrable you've mentioned?
 
a function is called Riemann integrable, if it has a Riemann integral. i know, sounds kind of circular, right?
 
Now it's clear.
 
The Dirichlet function
 
It's not since it has continuities everywhere.
 
4:18 AM
there's more than one, but the most common is f(x) = 0, x irrational, f(x) = 1/q, if x is rational and equal to p/q in lowest terms
 
It's so-called Riemann function.
 
@DavidWheeler that's actually the modified dirichlet.
 
it's NOT continuous, that's the point
 
It's not continuous but continuous a.e. and bounded.
 
4:20 AM
no it's not continuous a.e.
 
It's pointwise continuous on $\mathbb R\backslash\mathbb Q$ since $\lim_{x\to x_0}R(x)=0$ for all $x_0\in\mathbb R$.
 
the modified function i just gave is only continuous at 0. the one where f(x) = 1, for rational x is nowhere continuous
it's CONSTANT on $\Bbb R \setminus \Bbb Q$
not for all $x_0 \in \Bbb R$
 
Read that, please.
 
user19161
Hey @math I am still up, LOL
 
Hahaha
 
user19161
4:30 AM
@math101 Email.
 
yes the modified one (the first one i gave) has continuities at irrational points (my mistake, the only rational continuity is at 0). the other one doesn't. so you're right, the modified one is continuous a.e. i get them confused sometimes.
 
user19161
Getting confused is a sign of a great thinker.
 
@JasonBourne bleh. :P
 
$R(0)=1$ as convention.
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester Meh.
 
4:32 AM
SInce $0=0/1$.
 
user19161
You're all nuts.
 
Nuts does not even start to describe what I am. :P
2
 
@FrankScience um, what is $R$?
 
4:56 AM
Hello people, I wanted to know what do we call those numbers which can be represented as a sum, x^y + y^x, where x, y are naturals
There's even a wiki page about it but I forgot the name of that person on whom, these numbers are named
please help
 
5:19 AM
Hey @OrangeHarvester
Can you give me an example that although f and g may fail to have limit at a cluster point / limit point c, their sum f + g can have limit at c
 
f = +1 if rational, -1 if irrational.
g = -f
 
Why did you have to specify functions by rational and irrational?
Why not use just regulare functions?
 
so that it doesn't have limit at every point
that's also fine, just for convenience
take f(x) = 1 if x > 0, f(x) = -1 otherwise
g = -f
 
Okkkkkkk Then g+f=0
 
yea
and it's clear that f doesn't have limit at 0
so is g
 
5:22 AM
Ya I see that
 
Does -f mean -1 if rational, +1 if irrational?
 
We take functions $g,h$ which has a limit at $c$, then we take a function $f$ which does not have a limit at $c$, and construct the function as $g+f$ and $h-f$.
 
yes @skullpatrol
 
Now I saw somewhere that f(x)=sin(x) has a limit everywhere. What does that mean?
 
The function sanchez describes can be represented as a double limit involving the sin function
 
5:24 AM
@Ethan yes. we were having a discussion about that recently.
 
What? What do you mean @ethan?
 
I remember seeing it, in one of rudins books let me find it wait
 
@math101 At every point in the domain which is mostly $\mathbb{R}$ here, the limit exists for the function.
@math101 Here @Ethan
 
Ye thats it
 
Cool
So any continuous function has limits everywhere
 
5:31 AM
@math101 a function is said to be continuous at a point if it has both left and right hand limits and they are both equal to the value of the function at that point.
 
Thanks @OrangeHarvester That just clarified everything
@OrangeHarvester It is quite apparent that you lied to me this morning
 
@math101 I lied?
 
...liar, liar...
 
@OrangeHarvester LOL you claimed to be not that great at math
@skullpatrol liar liar :P
 
pants on fire
 
5:34 AM
Stick your head in fire
 
@math101 ohh. Well, I do know somethings. :P
Pants over my head on fire! :-)
 
@OrangeHarvester displays a great deal of modesty
 
I remain perfectly safe.
 
@OrangeHarvester That is what you think
 
@math101 okay. I will be immodest now, and take that as a compliment. :P
@math101 ohh. :P
 
5:36 AM
I am thinking of making a trip to India :P
 
the definition of continuous appears circular...
 
@math101 cool. :D I must warn you that it is terribly hot in here, opposite of Canada.
 
so leave your snow shoes at home ;P
 
@skullpatrol I did not know there were snow shoes till I visited Himalayas. :P
 
I was only kidding. Its a place I dream of visiting. I came across an ad featuring best hotels in India today and they looked soo tempting.
@OrangeHarvester What? What do you mean?
 
5:41 AM
@math101 there are large number of Indian people living in Canada. And some of my friends are there too. They tell me that if you live in an Indian neighbourhood, you would not feel any difference between that neighbourhood and India.
 
This past December my colleague visited India for 3 weeks. Their daughter lives there. She said it was fascinating
@OrangeHarvester yesss definitely.
 
@math101 ohh, so you have been to one of those. nice. :-)
 
minus the poverty :(
 
Nope :| But we have china town and Little Italy. There are many various ethnic neighbourhoods in Canada.
 
@math101 okay.
 
5:43 AM
@OrangeHarvester Have you heard of Natalie Dillucio?
 
lol
lolol
 
lolololo
 
lololololololololololololololololololololololololololol
 
loololl
 
lol
 
5:44 AM
@skullpatrol well, not all of India is poor. For example, the neighbourhood I live in currently, I rarely come in contact with poor people. However, the neighbourhood of my parent's home does have poor people around.
 
HAHAHAH @Ethan I was just about to congratulate you for not deleting comments in a while
 
I didnt want to offend any 1
 
@math101 no, the only canadian singers I know are Celine Dion, Bryan Adams, and may be one or two more who are Canadian but I do not know.
 
@Ethan Awww that is sooo sweet of you :)
 
What is Panda Expres?
 
5:45 AM
un(removed)
 
She is a Canadian bollywood singer. She currently lives there
 
@math101 Okay. Looking her up on wikipedia.
@math101 Okay, I saw her in the song "Bari Bari" by Coke Studio. I did not know she was Canadian.
 
Ya she isnt that famous but her mom works with me so she doesnt stop talking abt her
 
@math101 Hehe. Well, she is decently famous here I guess, considering that AR Rahman invited her, who is like the "dude" of contemporary Indian music.
 
Ya she has great connections In india
@OrangeHarvester I take back that comment
 
5:53 AM
No take-backs/edits after the "remove/edit" deadline passes :P
 
ahh that's okay. :-) I had typed a reply to that,

" Hahaha. That's true. Its not just americans, Indians have always welcomed other people until very recently. It is in our blood or something. Persians would come to use with ideas of art, and we built complete temples adapting their ideas. Then, chinese came with their stuff, and we adopted that. Anyone would come up with something new, and we would adopt it." :P
 
Ya indians are awesome. They are the most patient people ever
 
Who are the least?
 
hahah cant say I may offend ppl
 
I am the least patient person I know.
 
5:57 AM
Well I wasnt referring to individuals obv
Derp
 
I was trying not to offend anyone ;)
 
Derp
 
10 hours of "Derp"?
available on YouTube
as I recently found out
 
Check this out.
#9 and #10
#12 and #14
 
6:02 AM
derp ;-)
 
Its actually a great word
 
Patience by Guns N' Roses... is what I was thinking of @math101
 
@skullpatrol Its awesome. I love itttttttt
 
@skullpatrol good one.
 
Whoops that was offensive
 
6:08 AM
@math101 guns and roses?
 
Yes
 
Hmm. It is not my favorite band, but november rain is my all time favorite song, right up there with carnival of rust.
does you listen to the poets of fall?
 
Calling someone a "weirdo" is in no way offensive.
 
the killers? @skullpatrol
 
@OrangeHarvester I like this song
 
6:14 AM
@OrangeHarvester What do you mean?
 
It is sooo relaxing
 
@skullpatrol do you listen to the killers?
 
He sounds sooooooooo gay
 
@OrangeHarvester Sometimes.
 
@math101 he? the killer guy?
@skullpatrol I love their songs, spaceman, read my mind.
 
6:16 AM
Poets of the Fall
 
I thought so too. was not sure.
@math101 Here is a song I introduce almost everyone to, because I like it so much.
 
@math101 Why do you like it if it sounds "gay" to you?
 
@skullpatrol Ohhh that is what disturbs me abt it
 
hmm..
 
@OrangeHarvester Its amazing
 
6:19 AM
@skullpatrol does "gay" have to be with a negative connotation?
@math101 yup.
 
@OrangeHarvester Not necessarily. But that kind of voice just grates on my nerves
 
@math101 ohh. I did not think like that. I thought more of the sense of his videos.
 
@OrangeHarvester Not always, but when you put "sooooooo" in front of it...
2
 
Well he is an artsy kind of guy
 
@skullpatrol ohh.
 
6:22 AM
Context fixes meaning :)
 
Yes
 
Yes.
JINX!
 
Yes
 
LOL
 
hence the double in double-Jinx :D
 
6:23 AM
bleh. you said after I already jinxed it.
there is no double jinx, and neither jasper nor robjohn is here, so no one to resolve it.
 
I am gonna watch the movie slumdog millionaire. I am obbsessed with Indian Culture
I recently read the most amazing book on Indian culture
 
which one?
 
ughhh It just slipped my mind
 
@OrangeHarvester Why do we need robjohn or jasper to resolve this?
 
@math101 Many Indians don't really like slumdog millionaire, they think it potrays a very narrow picture of India which is not flattering, more so because the producers still try to attach some glamour to it, like saying, "That's how we roll over here."
@skullpatrol They are our jinx arbitrators if you remember.
 
6:27 AM
@OrangeHarvester But a big chunk of india does indeed live like that
 
@OrangeHarvester We don't have to go to arbitration do we?
 
@skullpatrol well, then I say there is no double jinx.
 
@OrangeHarvester why?
 
@OrangeHarvester Secret Daughter
 
@math101 Yes. a sizeable chunk (<10%) does live in conditions like that. But there is no need to say that we are proud of it or something. It is a problem, should be treated as a problem. The way the film was marketed gave me the impression that they were "selling" the poverty and underworld factor.
@skullpatrol well, you have to say yes, before I say jinx for that.
 
6:32 AM
So I shldnt watch it?
Does function f(x)=|x|+(1/x) have a limit at x=0?
 
Take it with a grain of salt.
 
@skullpatrol well said.
 
Thanks
 
hahahahah
@OrangeHarvester the book was called The Secret Daughter
 
@math101 Yes. Just read about it on amazon.
 
6:35 AM
Books are better for the mind than movies, in my opinion.
 
@skullpatrol Slumdog is based on a book Q&A by Vikas Swaroop.
 
@skullpatrol I agree. Most movies are trash and don't allow you to use your imagination
@OrangeHarvester so what do you say to my function up there
 
@math101 It does not have a limit at x=0.
 
Any where you have to "divide by 0"
it has no meaning in the set of real numbers.
 
It grates on me that it was nominated for Academy Awards when there are far many better films. The way Rajesh Kutrapalli introduces himself as Slumdog in TBBT. Being slumdog,it is unfortunate that someone has to live through that, is not something to be proud of, however, that is the perception that is being propogated and that is something I do not like.
 
6:39 AM
Ok I WONT WATCH IT :P
 
Watch it for entertainment's sake...
 
Whoops that was offensive
 
@math101 Most of the movies are not really good, bollywood and hollywood. :P
 
true dat^
 
@OrangeHarvester Agreed upon. Its a time waster.
 
6:42 AM
Do you guys know what THE most common noun is in the English language?
 
Food
 
@math101 For example, see the tearing apart of a recently released Indian movie.
 
@math101 no, "the" is not a noun...
 
@math101 nope...
one last guess
 
6:45 AM
hmmmmmm sleep
 
Nope, not sleep, but you are getting close...
 
pyjamas?
 
lol
 
so ......?
 
The most common noun is what you send doing when you sleep
 
6:47 AM
huh? that made no sense
 
tic tock
 
goes the clock
 
time
 
Profound.
How enlightening
 
Profound, but true. The most common noun in the English language.
According to the OED.
 
6:50 AM
Tis getting late. I should head to bed
 
Good night.
 
Bed TIME
 
Good BYE
 
later
 
DERPS
 
7:04 AM
@OrangeHarvester Heya
 
7:50 AM
Yo. Two of my edits show up as only one edit in the version history. Is there a mechanism that absorbs edits together if they were by the same user and in close proximity, or something?
 
Have you compared the "side-by-side" versions?
 

« first day (911 days earlier)      last day (4124 days later) »