« first day (642 days earlier)      last day (4372 days later) » 

user19161
12:00 AM
@BenjaminLim I am ready.
 
@PeterTamaroff You dont say, I have never realized that. Thank you for pointing that out for me =)
 
I just got it
 
@Jordan congrats
 
user19161
@ben OK thanks for telling me. One day I will share my secrets too, but it is not this day. And it is not along the same lines as what you shared.
 
@Jordan Avoid cursing, please.
 
12:01 AM
hahahahahahaaha
 
@JasperLoy ok thanks.
 
Ben, it just changes a sign in the equation, so what?
 
@N3buchadnezzar Did you see my comment about sasha
 
meaning I still stick to it
 
12:02 AM
@BenjaminLim Alexander yes, thanks for pointing that =)
 
@BenjaminLim Oleksandr Pavlyk to be precise.
 
@tb Well it gets confusing that levi civita symbol
@PeterTamaroff Except my supervisor's name is alexander
the usual english one
 
oh, yes it is. Anything having more than two indices is evil.
 
@tb You're really taking the piss out of me :D :D :D :D
@tb In australia people like to take the piss out of each other
 
user19161
Anyone heard of the clothes brand "true religion"? It's crazy. A pair of shorts costs 600 Singapore dollars.
 
12:03 AM
@BenjaminLim Dont you need a medical degree or something for that?
 
@N3buchadnezzar for what????????????????????????
@JasperLoy No.
 
Look at the comment I cited.
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim My friend wanted to buy a present for his girlfriend and walked into the store. We were shocked.
 
@JasperLoy If you come to australia and want to look like an australia you can buy clothes here: generalpants.com.au
@N3buchadnezzar "to take the piss out of someone" = " to make fun of someone"
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim One of my favourite profs is an Australian. He always drinks apple juice during lectures!
 
12:05 AM
@JasperLoy Do you have general pants and co in singapore?
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Oh yeah I think I learnt that expression recently.
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Not that I recall.
 
@JasperLoy to take the piss out of someone?
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Yeah, I have a very small vocab. I took the test at testyourvocab.com and my score was under 18,000 words.
 
user19161
You may wanna try the site.
 
12:07 AM
@JasperLoy That sounds interesting. I'll visit it now.
 
@JasperLoy wow you're really full on about language, good on ya!!
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Simply because it's easy to earn rep on ELU!
 
@JasperLoy Not as easy here eh?
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Well, I've forgotten all the math I've studied. But if I ever apply to grad school I will start studying again. I have gotten my book list ready.
 
@JasperLoy where did you do undergrad?
 
user19161
12:08 AM
@BenjaminLim locally
 
NUS?
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Yes. Some of the profs there know some of my secrets...
 
like what
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Well, they are secrets for now like I said.
 
12:09 AM
ok
 
user19161
Don't worry, I am not working on the millenium problems, so that's not the secret!
 
@JasperLoy have ya been down under
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Yes, I told you I have a serious problem remember?
 
what is it???
 
user19161
@BenjaminLim Not now, maybe I'll tell you in a couple of years.
 
12:12 AM
@JasperLoy I got 16,100 being english my second language.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Wow, that's about the same as me. The people on ELU have like twice or thrice our vocab!
 
What's ELU?
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff English SE.
 
Oh, why not ESE? (Sounds contradicting, right?)
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff ELU=English Language and Usage. QED.
 
12:14 AM
ok
 
@JasperLoy Alright. No need to get so formal.,
 
user19161
Hey @ben so you are Chinese too right?
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff No, formal proof is writing the proof in logical symbols only, haha!
 
user19161
In that sense, almost all proofs are informal!
 
user19161
In practice, nobody writes proofs like that, we just need to know that it can be done.
 
12:16 AM
Has anyone seen this comment by Asaf? What a nice gesture.
 
user19161
@ymar Wow, Asaf is like a superhero!
 
:)
OK, just wanted to show you this. Exam tomorrow, gotta go. :)
 
user19161
I only recently learnt that our autogenerated avatar was based on our email address. I thought it was completely random.
 
@JasperLoy INteresting! How does it work?
@N3buchadnezzar HAHAHAH WHAT?!
 
user19161
12:19 AM
@PeterTamaroff I am not sure. Some algorithm or something. Someone on StackOverflow made one showing unicorns instead. You may see at unicornify.appspot.com.
 
@PeterTamaroff Just eading a blog about some of wolframs earlier blunders.
Like typing Guinea Pigs, would get you the pig population on Guinea and so forth.
Like this one
 
LOL
afk
 
user19161
So I will cast my votes in about 20 hours...
 
@JasperLoy This is amazing.
 
user19161
@AntonioVargas Yeah, at first I was wondering why so many people use unicorn avatars.
 
user19161
12:27 AM
OK actually it's not that many unicorns we have on SE.
 
@JasperLoy Yes, it is based on the md5 digest of the email address
 
user19161
@robjohn md5 is beyong my pay grade, even though I use Debian!
 
My unicorn is pink too. My email address is cursed.
 
user19161
@AntonioVargas Pink is sweet.
 
@AntonioVargas generate your own gravatar
 
user19161
12:28 AM
I have been thinking for a long time whether to use pgf or pstricks for graphics. Right now I am with pstricks.
 
@JasperLoy <3<3<3 tkz euclide
 
user19161
@N3buchadnezzar pst-eucl
 
user19161
Also, there is no equivalent of what pst-solides3d can do. It's the most amazing LaTeX graphics package to me!
 
12:55 AM
@JasperLoy huh?
 
man e is a weird number, if I am using l'hospitals rule what do I do with e^x? when x is infinity?
 
What's the whole expression whose limit you're taking?
 
$$\lim_{x^{-\inf}} (x^2 - x^3)e^{2x}$$
 
Write it as $$\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{x^2 - x^3}{e^{-2x}}$$
 
Let's make that $$\lim_{x\to-\infty}(x^2-x^3)e^{2x}=\lim_{x\to-\infty}\frac{x^2-x^3}{e^{-2x}}$$
 
12:58 AM
Use Lhopitals for $\infty / \infty$.
$$\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{x^2 - x^3}{e^{-2x}}=\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{2x - 3x^2}{-2e^{-2x}}$$
 
Now this is an $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$ form.
 
We still have $\infty / \infty$
$$\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{2x - 3x^2}{-2e^{-2x}}=\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{2 - 6x}{4e^{-2x}}$$
 
I rewrote as infinity minus infinity
 
It is the same.
$$\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{2 - 6x}{4e^{-2x}}=\lim_{x \to {-\infty}} \frac{-6}{-8e^{-2x}}$$
Now we can see the limit is $0$.
 
how?
 
1:01 AM
Think.
 
e^-inf is -inf
Is it okay to let one side go to infinity?
 
I'm off to the park with Lilly. be back in a bit.
 
@Jordan BUt you have $e^{-(-\infty)}$
 
I get it
how do I know what is considered an indeterminate form?
 
1:09 AM
Reading the theory.
 
@Jordan Pragmatically speaking, I'd just about bet that your text has a list of them.
The two basic ones are $\frac00$ and $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$.
 
Here, here you have two more examples.
 
what about 6/0? that is just undefined right?
 
Then you have $0\cdot\infty$, $1^\infty$, $\infty^0$, and $\infty-\infty$.
@Jordan Right.
The first three of these can be reduced to one of the two basic forms by standard techniques. The $\infty-\infty$ form is the nasty one.
 
0/0 isnt just undefined?
 
1:14 AM
@Jordan The fraction $0/0$ is undefined, but it's possible for $f(x)/g(x)$ to have a limit as $x$ approaches a point where they're both $0$.
 
so then why is that not true for any undefined number like 6x/0?
 
Because if $f(x)\to 6$ and $g(x)\to 0$, it's guaranteed that $f(x)/g(x)$ does not approach a finite limit.
 
I understand now
 
1:29 AM
There is something terrible wrong with people creating 3d images of shells in latex.
 
@BillDubuque BTW, I would personally appreciate it very much if you made precise statements: «some mods have acted far too impulsively»... Which mods? They have done what exactly? When? Communication online is prone to problems, as we all know, and vagueness does not help in the least.
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez Hey Mariano!
Can we speak in Spanish for a while?
 
let me deal with flags and other fun stuff, and I'll be back :D
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez =)
 
@Mariano: If I delete the comment, I'll replace it with something along these lines: Bluntly, I consider that indefensible. It ill serves the people asking the questions (and their teachers, for that matter). Is that preferable?
 
1:39 AM
I wish people simply ignored Wolfgang Mueckenheim and his many puppets... He's already contributed enormously to turning several other fora into wasteland, and he only feeds on attention :(
2
There is not much that can be done to stop him from creating new user accounts, but at least regular users should pick up his main lines, recognize them and ignore him :(
@BrianMScott, much better :) It's getting flagged as it is: making it clear that it is your position will at least make that clear :D
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez How can I identify him.?
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez I thought it pretty obvious that it was just my position!
 
he rants about Cantor, actual infinity, the diagonal argument, etc
@BrianMScott, being explicit online is always a plus
 
@BrianMScott DId he post here at SE?
 
Brian is talking about something else
 
1:43 AM
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez True, true. I'm afraid that his comment really rubbed me the wrong way $-$ much more than the actual answer did.
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez And what are you talking about? We were talkig about him in the chat, but I presume he wasn't here in SE:
 
you people need to learn how to produce a real — :D saying $-$ is Just Wrong™ :)
 
@PeterTamaroff We were talking about a comment that I made to an answer, one that some apparently found a little too strongly-worded for comfort.
 
@BrianMScott Mind if I see the comment in context?
 
You can't: it's been replaced by a less abrupt version.
 
1:46 AM
Flags which tell mods that some answer is wrong or not really an answer always leave me wondering...
At most, what we mods could do is leave a message saying the answer is wrong
but the flagger apparently already noticed this... so the comment could well be left by him/her
 
Well, if it really isn't an answer, it should be deleted right?
 
it is not an answer in formal temrs —for example, if it is someone askign a question, or commenting on someone else's answer (not uncommon) then yes
and in those cases we turn them into comments or, inextreme cases, delete them
 
That's my point.
 
but if the answer is wrong, then it is not our job to fix it or delete it
the set of candidates for mods would need to be significantly cut down if we had the requirement that mods should be able to judge correctness!
as would the number of current mods, in fact
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez That's so true. Definitely. Down votes should be used there.
 
1:50 AM
Comments pointing out the error(s) are more useful.
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez Did you see Carrió @LaCornisa today?
 
@BrianMScott, indeed
@PeterTamaroff, nop
Similarly, often users vote to close and then flag the question with an explanation of their vote
 
I usually do that.
 
This is common with duplicates
 
I haven't seen bad answers recently which is good.
 
1:54 AM
but we are not experts in all subjects, so we are rarely the best to judge if two different questions are really the same
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez Should I be checkig my mail? :P
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez You'd have loved my first dean: he maintained that since he was a physicist, he was capable of judging the quality of publications by members of the math department! (In some ways he was a very good dean, but not that one.)
 
@BrianMScott Maybe in Soviet RUssia he was a physicist.
 
@PeterTamaroff, sadly no: I spent most of my weekend babysitting my nephew so I have done exactly none of the items in my to do list :/
I am going to bed late tonight!
 
He really was a member of the physics department, and I'm sure that his math background was reasonably good, but there were about two dozen people in the math department, and I don't think that any one of them would have claimed to be able to judge the work of all of their colleagues in the department.
How old is your nephew?
 
2:01 AM
@BrianMScott I confused dean with janitor, XD
 
Ah, now it makes sense. :-)
 
3 years, @BrianMScott
 
So you've been busy.
 
Is he a pretty good-natured kid?
 
2:02 AM
I think that my sister makes him drink coffee before leaving him with me :)
yeah, but he is 3 years old :)
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez LOL, I think sugar would suffice.
 
Yes, but active and difficult would be a lot worse.
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez If he was older you could entertain him with math stuff.
 
haha
well, we spent a lot of time with numbers and letters :)
but he's not gotten to summing yet
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez My youngest brother wasn't much older than that $-$ four, I think $-$ when he was told that he could have two strawberries from the neighbors' garden and interpreted that as $2+2+2+\ldots$.
 
2:09 AM
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez I'm still confused about Mueckenheim. Where does he participate with fake ids?
 
He's done so both here and on MO.
 
@BrianMScott And where was he taught how to sum?
@BrianMScott But now we can be sure he's out irhgt?
 
@PeterTamaroff He didn't have to know what the sum was; he just kept on adding. :-)
 
@BrianMScott Oh, I see. Funny.
 
@PeterTamaroff Not really: he can always register under yet another pseudonym.
It now occurs to me that some of the loons on de.sci.mathematik may be sock puppets of his, too.
 
2:12 AM
Well, if we see anthing contradicting cantor we can flag it =)
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez What is out policy on these type of questions? I like the pic personally.
@BrianMScott What is your opinion on the above?
 
I have no problem with the pic, personally. But nor do I have any attachment to it
 
It's cute, but I don't really care either way. I'd be annoyed if people started doing such things frequently, though.
 
2:27 AM
Right. I don't want this place to look like, shudder, reddit.
 
I agree
 
@mixedmath Democracy calls then. Let's delete it.
 
Nah. Isolated incident. And it has a dog.
 
Or state that it shouldn't be repeated
 
Special provisions apply to pictures of dogs.
 
2:28 AM
@PeterTamaroff Don't borrow trouble.
@DylanMoreland I prefer cats, m'self. Or a platypus.
 
@BrianMScott You're right. But maybe I can write something asking for that not to be done again.
 
@PeterTamaroff Wait for it actually to happen; otherwise you may simply give people ideas!
 
@BrianMScott In what sense, ideas?
 
Telling people not to do something often pushes some contrary folks to do that thing, or something similar.
2
 
Back from the park. I haven't seen any word about the town hall yet.
 
2:32 AM
@robjohn Context
??
 
There's supposed to be a big chat featuring moderator candidates.
 
@PeterTamaroff There is a town hall being scheduled to talk to those running for mod
 
@MarianoSuárezAlvarez I plan to post a (constructive!) meta thread on this. But it hasn't yet percolated to the top of my priority list. It does not involve you as I recall.
 
@DylanMoreland But no word on when? Tomorrow was to be a possibility
 
2:34 AM
Yes - I was even hoping for tomorrow
apparently, that's not to be the case
 
@DylanMoreland OH, that! Town halll chat.
 
@mixedmath who knows?
@PeterTamaroff Yes :-)
 
@PeterTamaroff Yes, I noticed that you were mentioned in that thread, so it seemed curious that you wouldn't know about it :)
 
@DylanMoreland BRB. I can do Wednesday 8, 9 PM UTC-3.00. If you happen to do something tomorrow it will have to be for a short while. and on tuesday night, I have to study, so there's no possibility there.
 
I'm certainly not running it. That would be a disaster.
 
2:50 AM
@DylanMoreland Working with Matthew Emerton, eh?
 
The one and only.
 
How is that?
 
Ask me in a few years. It's great, more or less. I spend a decent amount of time wondering what I've gotten myself into. But the stuff he's doing and how he's doing are is so incredibly cool. And he has more insight than anyone I've ever met, or at the very least he's freer with it.
Good at wasting his time on our meetings every week, I like my project, etc.
 
I am extremely jealous. I assume you're at Chicago with him? It says on your website that you're at Northwestern but I assume you made the move with him.
 
Nah. I split time.
 
2:58 AM
Oh, so you're still in Evanston?
I guess that it's not that much of a commute!
What are you currently working on?
 
It's about 1:20 each way. I do a lot of grading on the train.
 
Hey, let me ask you something. If I was going to come visit Northwestern, who would I talk to? Who's the grad chair?
(also, who would give me a good impression of the department).
 
I only make the trip if he's teaching a course. He lives closer, so I go visit him there otherwise.
Paul Goerss. He's a good guy.
 
Cool, cool.
I know you have a bias, but how do you like it there?
 
Hard to say. I split time so I'm not as involved in the department itself as I once was.
And they have a lot of hires to make.
 
3:04 AM
What do you mean?
 
But it's a good place. I say that at something of a distance, so maybe it counts for something. We're treated well, in the sense that our teaching load is low, our offices are nice, we get enough money, your advisor can buy you out of teaching, etc.
 
I see you were at Michigan for undergraduate. Any opinion of there? NW and Michigan are definitely two big places I'm thinking about
 
Department culture is pretty good. Always lots of stuff going on. Particularly if you're into anything involving mathematical physics or analysis. Friendly place, daily tea, etc. Decent selection of courses that I don't go to, unfortunately.
It isn't some unhappy competition, and people have been getting good jobs out of here recently, etc. And Michigan is great too. Depends on what you're looking for and what you're interested in.
Michigan is much larger.
 
I mean, algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry are the things that interest me most. Complex geometry is up there too.
 
Michigan is really strong at algebraic geometry. Rob Lazarsfeld is a good person to talk to.
 
3:12 AM
Maybe I'll go to Chicago and work with Emerton too :)
 
Perhaps you will. That's a different place.
 
Different in what regard?
 
What little caution I can muster regarding Matt is that he only has one gear and that gear is very high.
 
Sounds like heaven.
 
It depends. I think you have to give up on understanding everything he says and for me that was really hard.
 
3:16 AM
Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, I've had fleeting experiences like that, and they always suck. But, I guess that just means that you're with a guy who's the real deal--and eventually you'll be like that.
 
But Chicago is one of those places that you just go to, unless you've got some other outrageous offer. They have a lot of rock stars.
 
Haha, of course. I am going to go out there this summer and talk to a few people--apparently Peter May's the guy to see.
 
I guess there's the theory that it's better to be a top person at Michigan than the worst person at Harvard. I don't know. I haven't met many people who selected in that way.
I guess. I would talk to Benson Farb, if it were you.
[Nothing against Peter May.]
 
Hmm, I'll be sure to see him.
Is Kottowitz still there?
 
He's emeritus. Still around at times, but I only know this because Ngo says they talk.
 
3:23 AM
How many ways are there to create a subset of distinct integers from a set S to sum up to all possible sums 1 to max(S)?
 
lololol Ngo, huh? No big deal.
 
@DylanMoreland Rock stars aren't always a good thing. I knew two very good grad students who left Berkeley for Madison because too much revolved around the rock stars at Berkeley at the time. They were much happier at Madison.
 
I assume you, him, and Drinfeld eat cookies and chat :)
 
I just wanted to make it clear that I'd only heard he was around still. I don't see him.
 
No, no. I wasn't calling attention to it, that's just awesome that you talk to him.
 
3:28 AM
does anyone know about subsets
 
What about them?
 
number of ways to break up a given number X into distinct, specific numbers
 
@JohnSmith is this still about the PE problem you're doing?
 
Hi all
 
3:30 AM
@AlexYoucis wassup man
 
@JohnSmith You mean partitions I guess.
 
yes, been working at it for a few more days straight. i'm going crazy
 
Nothing much dude.
 
@AlexYoucis I am so tried.
so so tired
 
Then, go to bed.
 
3:30 AM
you got facebook or somethin?
 
i'm not getting anywhere
 
@JohnSmith What's the specific question?
 
@AlexYoucis Stayed up so late yesterday some stupid vector calc stuff
 
i have a main set in the form of [1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 19, 28, 41] for instance and I am trying to find the number of subsets where the max element is less than the sum of the rest of the subset
 
@AlexYoucis You like Regina Spektor right?
 
3:32 AM
Damn straight I do.
 
I recommend you the Jezabels
 
it's also the same as 2**n -1 - minus the number of sets adding up to 1 thru max(S)
 
What makes you think I am not already aware? :F
 
@AlexYoucis You know about them???They're from sydney and are just up and coming
 
3:33 AM
@JohnSmith I suspect that that's a fairly nasty problem; it looks awfully close to the knapsack problem.
 
@AlexYoucis Never underestimate a dedicated fan...:)
 
@JM You know about the jezabels too?????
 
for example if i want to know the number of subsets that have an inner sum of 8: [(2, 6, 9), (2, 6, 13), (2, 6, 19), (2, 6, 28), (2, 6, 41), (1, 3, 4, 9), (1, 3, 4, 13), (1, 3, 4, 19), (1, 3, 4, 28), (1, 3, 4, 41)]
would be the count of valid sets
 
@BenjaminLim Not a fan myself, but people I know talk about them... a lot.
 
@JM You know about the tv show Budoy?
 
3:34 AM
yeah i know it's nasty/is reminiscent of the knapsack problem
not quite the same though
 
@BenjaminLim Yes, the show was rather popular a few months ago...
 
@JM Among several cebuanos here they call me Budoy
@JM I just realised if you say "kayu" in tagalog it means all of you, while "kayo" in bisaya means fire
 
@BenjaminLim Hence you need care if you're talking across different dialects.
 
exactly.
That's really confusing!!!
ok I need to go, bbl
 
not asking for anyone to solve it for me but just to get me on the right track, anything that can offer any insight that I am glazing over
i'm spinning my wheels hard on this one and about ready to defenestrate myself
 
3:41 AM
@JohnSmith defenestrate. Never heard that one before.
 
@JohnSmith Is this something to which the answer is definitely known, and you're supposed to find it, or is this a problem that you set yourself?
 
answer is definitely known, supposed to find
 
@DavidK Look up the Defenstration of Prague.
@JohnSmith But in these the maximum element is greater than the sum of the other elements.
 
the negation case
I am not yet sure which way to take it
 
Okay.
 
3:44 AM
I can either find subsets where the inner sum is greater than the max
or 2^n-1-the sum of sets where the inner sum is <=the max
both yield the same answer
 
@BrianMScott Nice!
 
@JohnSmith Do you have any idea what kinds of parameters are expected in the answer? Presumably it depends on more than the cardinality of the set and the size of the its maximum element.
 
tinyurl.com/cmx7xdg is the full problem statement
 
@John: don't I seem to recall that you said that there was something special about your integers?
 
Can someone here help me find the Galois group of $\Bbb{F}_{2^{3}}(x)$ over $\Bbb{F}_{2}(x^{3})$ ? I know it is cyclic and of order 9, but I'm not sure if it is $C_{3}\times C_{3}$ or $C_{9}$. Of course $C_{N}$ is the cyclic group with $N$ elements.
 
3:48 AM
special?
 
@JohnSmith Yes: the fact that they're generated by the recurrence $s_n=s_{n-1}+s_{n-3}$, with initial values $s_1=1,s_2=2,s_3=3$.
 
yes
pastebin.com/raw.php?i=L8sgCgaK is my output for N=10 case (501 solutions), showing all ways of having subsets where the inner sum exceeds i
 
Sums of numbers defined by recurrences sometimes satisfy recurrence relations of their own. Sadly I don't have my book for these things...
 
The PE problems that I've seen are distinctly non-trivial; I'd not expect to be able to offer any useful suggestions without spending quite a bit of time thinking about the problem.
 
Correct, JM, that's what I am trying to look for
I am expecting that there will be some sort of pattern to this but nothing I try seems to work, and I expect it's because I am missing something in terms of math knowledge
 
3:54 AM
@DavidK There are two subfields of index $3$, right? $\mathbb F_2(x)$ is in there, and so is $\mathbb F_8(x^3)$.
 
@DylanMoreland Yes.
 
So how could it be $C_9$?
 
I agree. And this is what I was thinking. But
 
for instance if you look at the counts in what i just posted (2, 5, 12, 28, 61, 128, etc) I try to figure out if that follows a pattern but I can't find out one that does
things like that
 
@JohnSmith You have a four-term recurrence (one of the terms has a zero coefficient), in any event; their behavior's not as easy to study as three term ones like Fibonacci, but there are results. Look up things like difference equations.
 
3:56 AM
I'm honestly quite lost here. I don't really know what the automorphisms even look like...
 
yes I have tried difference equations
 
I've tried to write them out explicitly but I'm not having much luck with that.
 
@JohnSmith I would presume you always check any sequence you get with the OEIS...
 
yes
including sub-pieces of the sequence just in case, and many times i'll offset them by 1 or 2 or lag them by increasing integers just to see if there's another pattern hiding
 
Okay. Sadly that's all I can help you with; sorry if I don't have anything concrete...
 
3:59 AM
@DavidK You can use your knowledge of the quotients. See something like Prop. 3.20 in Milne.
 
the fact that it is asking for f(10^18) means the main set is 10^18 numbers long, which is huge. it implies that there is a recurrence in some breakdown of the counts that will allow for easy modular matrix exponentiation, which is trivial to do.
the problem is the mathematical intuition behind the recurrence of the counts
nothing i try seems to hold
 
@DavidK I'm slightly worried about some things I haven't checked for your particular problem. But this is a start, at least.
 
@DylanMoreland Worried about what things?
 
@BrianMScott I didn't see your original comment (presumably here), but I think this is another example where standardized meta comments could help. Such a comment linking to a meta thread discussing the pros and cons of hints vs. complete solutions for homework would help readers to understand other's viewpoints and possibly lead to less tension on the main site. I hope to find some time to take the next step with the proposal.
 
@BillDubuque Marvis's response to my first comment got under my skin, and I simply said 'Bluntly, that's unacceptable'. Not very diplomatic, though I did expect everyone to realize that I was talking about my own opinion, not site rules.
 
4:08 AM
is anyone willing to help set me on the right path with this problem or am I still out cold? ;-;
 
I'm willing; I'm just not able, at least not without spending a good deal more time thinking about it.
 
@BrianMScott Ah, I see. That is definitely one of the most contentious issues on the site. It would be good to have meta threads (and comments) that we could occasionally bump to keep folks constantly informed on such matters. Such meta discussions may help serve to divert meta level discussions from the main site. I too have gotten comments saying please state that is your opinion when, of course, that should have been clear. I'm not sure what motivates remarks like that.
 
@DylanMoreland I'm not sure how that Prop will help me here....
 
I wish it were understood that everything I say is merely my opinion.
2
 
Wait, so your word isn't actually verifiable fact?
 
4:14 AM
Wasting words on little outs and caveats because someone is going to say, "Hey, man, that's not an absolute truth" is tiresome.
 
Is this directed at me?
 
@DylanMoreland Safer, though.
 
@DavidK Sorry, that had nothing to do with your Galois group.
 
Oh good.
 
i suspect there's some recursive relationship here
 
4:16 AM
Does it have to do with what you're "worried about" ?
 
@DavidK What you do know about the extension $\mathbf F_2(x)/\mathbf F_2(x^3)$?
 
Umm, nothing. $\Bbb{F}_{3??}$ ??
 
@DylanMoreland My impression is that some folks say such things because they hope to subtly attack the statement by leaving the impression that it may be an isolated or minority opinion, disingenuous as that might be.
 
@DavidK Sorry, I've been up for a while.
 
@DylanMoreland Ah. Well, I believe that it is the splitting field of $f(y)=y^{3}-x^{3}$ over $\Bbb{F}_{2}(x^{3})[y]$. Man I hate that notation.
 
4:22 AM
@BrianMScott True. It reminds me of preparing students for an exam I didn't write.
 
@DylanMoreland :-)
 
@DavidK This is the part that confuses me. It seems like if you want to split that polynomial, then you need cube roots of $1$. And those are in $\mathbb F_4$.
 
@DylanMoreland Yes, this was a concern for me as well. So perhaps not the splitting field. So the cube roots of 1 are not in fact in there.
 
@BillDubuque Can I show you something?
@BrianMScott @BrianMScott Are you there?
@DylanMoreland You there?
 
Knee-deep in commutative diagrams, but here.
 
4:56 AM
I only noticed this just now: the rep gaps between most users in the first page are wider than I remembered them. (Not even counting how Arturo outshines us all.)
 

« first day (642 days earlier)      last day (4372 days later) »