« first day (2519 days earlier)      last day (1889 days later) » 

12:56 AM
5
Q: Boltzmann factor vs. graph of Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution

Karsten TheisIn discussions of the Arrhenius equation describing how rates change with temperature, there is often a reference to collision theory. In the Arrhenius equation, $$ k = A e^{-\frac{E_\mathrm{A}}{R T}}$$ there is a Boltzmann factor interpreted as the fraction of collisions of sufficient energy ...

 
 
9 hours later…
10:12 AM
11
Q: Quadrupole moment of a molecule

MarkoWhat is a quadrupole moment of a molecule and how does it arise? How is it measured for a particular molecule? I've read the Wikipedia article on quadrupoles and understand that it has to do with the distribution of charge, but I'd like a more chemistry-oriented explanation.

 
 
5 hours later…
3:22 PM
Howdy, how do you calculate the moles of a product if you have the formula and you know the moles of the limiting reagent?
 
3:34 PM
@user10535 (moles of product produced per mole of limiting agent) x moles of limiting agent
 
@A.K. Thank you very much
Thermochemistry:
Given the chemical equation, the standard enthalpy of the reaction, and number of moles of the products on the left hand side of the equation, how do you find the amount of heat evolved by the reaction?
 
 
1 hour later…
4:43 PM
?
 
5:34 PM
@A.K. @user10535 there is no quantity 'moles'.... just saying :P
 
5:51 PM
@Martin-マーチン ^
 
6:05 PM
Okay, so what is the right way to solve?
 
6:26 PM
@user10535 balance the chemical equation and see how many moles of each reactant is needed, then there's the enthalpy of formation formula.
 
I have the balanced equation and I know the mole ratio
What I don't get is how q=mcdelta T relates
I know that in this case (because the instructions say as much) to use the specific heat of water
And I have the moles
But I do not have delta T
 
@user10535 That usually happens when the heat released/absorbed is supposed to change the temperature of this glass of water I'm drinking or something
 
And I am solving for q
 
Oh, but you should calculate q based on the reaction data alone
 
What does that mean?
 
6:29 PM
You get q, then see how T changed
 
I don't have q
How else can I get q?
 
@user10535 delta H_f(products) — delta H_f(reactants)
^ That's an emdash, not a minus sign. @Loong is going to kill me
 
Oh, good
So I have that number
And here is what the question is asking for:
It wants the heat evolved for the given amounts of the substances that react
 
Note that if they say, for example, that 29 moles of products were produced from nitroglycerin explosion, you conclude that it's four moles of nitroglycerin, not one
 
And I have to use the enthalpy of reaction that I calculated earlier
And I have the enthalpy
So how do I do that?
 
6:32 PM
Does my "note that" help?
 
So I multiply by the ratio of the limiting reagent to the product?
Multiply the enthalpy number?
 
Yep, the normal calculations of stoichiometry
 
By the way
What units are q usually in?
Joules?
 
KJ per mol if it's calculated for the 'standard' reaction, and kilojoules if you just threw a random bunch of substances and they're not the 'standard' quantity
1 J is a pretty small amount of energy. It'd be more like the reactants sneezing than a legit reaction
Remember, it's not allergy if your face is not three times larger
 
Thank you very much. Those are all my questions for today
 
6:37 PM
Salut
 
7:03 PM
Happy Nowruz y'all
 
7:38 PM
@user10535 The heat transferred q is always in units of energy. Most commonly kJ.
It's an extensive quantity (think q = mcΔT, you need to multiply by the mass, so that makes it extensive).
 
7:51 PM
3
Q: Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

chompionSeveral places state the 'principal energy of an electron' can be calculated as such: $$E = \frac{2π^2mZ^2e^4}{n^2h^2}$$ Another equation I found was: $$E = -\frac{E_0}{n^2},$$ where $$E_0 = \pu{13.6 eV}~(\pu{1 eV} = \pu{1.602e-19 J})$$ As seen in these equations, the greater the principal n...

 

« first day (2519 days earlier)      last day (1889 days later) »