« first day (2427 days earlier)      last day (1962 days later) » 

Jan
12:35 AM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Oh hello @M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ, long time no see o/
 
 
4 hours later…
Jan
4:24 AM
Waiting for JSPS to publish the selection results is hard.
 
@orthocresol :P
 
 
2 hours later…
6:51 AM
@Jan Hallo Herr Jan!
Or Frau. It got confusing back then
Anyway, why did I expect to see something like this second thing in the morning?
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ: Thank you for admitting that you seek just to close every list question whether or not you have any understanding of what is being asked. — user1271772 8 hours ago
Where the hell is the "Not Constructive" flag when you need it?
Actually, I didn't though
I had a cinch of hope they're aiming for a constructive discussion
 
Jan
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ I like this one more:
@Jan, do you have anything else to say? — user1271772 3 hours ago
 
@Jan I should add a canned comment to the comment templates: "Thank you for making me realize spending [] minutes of my time trying to help you around was a mistake."
I know better now, it was only 15 last night
Whatever, flagging and moving on
@Ortho and @Loong really do need something to do, don't they?
 
Jan
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Didn’t even raise a flag.
 
Meh, I flagged two random comments just to raise the stink
Whether or not they purge the whole thread doesn't matter. Moving on
@Jan What else is going on in Bavaria?
Wait, Japan actually
Right?
 
Jan
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Japan, yeah.
In Bavaria, snow is happening and the new minister president is trying his best not to completely fail his first year in office.
 
7:06 AM
Heh, do politicians ever succeed anymore?
 
Jan
In Japan, Autumn is happening, medical universities are admitting they forged entrance examination results although they won’t admit it was for reducing the number of women. They come up with excuses like ‘but men are worse in communication so we needed to increase their scores accordingly.’
Also, I’m waiting for JSPS to publish the selected postdoc fellows and feverishly refreshing their page a few times a day ~.~
 
That's not feverish
Not if you did it few times every minute, that'd be a different thing
Here people are too jaded to complain anymore
I guess
I can't get out and listen to the random cab driver ranting about the world
 
Jan
For a minute or so, I’m being feverish.
 
Day 50 of transplant
 
Jan
But I also have to prepare a presentation for our year-end powerpoint seminar.
And they decided to put general lab cleaning on a Saturday.
 
7:10 AM
No pain, increased brain matter, increased health, increased muscle mass
 
Jan
Waitwot?
 
But also increased BP and FBS thanks to the facking Prednisolone
Nov 20 at 7:40, by M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ
I finally got a new kidney!
 
Jan
Oh, nice.
Not kid’n ye, are ya?
 
Nopes
I have three kidneys now
Which makes me eligible for a moderator position.
 
Jan
Good good. One can never have enough kidneys.
Damn, I thought I would need the greater part of three days to prepare the slides. Now I’m three quarters through the second day, procrastinated intensly on SE and am practically done. That’s not what I expected D=
Guess I’ll have to go back to the lab tomorrow ~.~
 
7:18 AM
I hate it when they don't take long enough
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ That's also what she said
@Jan How many slides were they?
@Jan The 2.5 % yields await!
Back to the book for me
I've been filling my time with studying and that's why I'm currently not on every second of every minute
 
Jan
7:51 AM
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Around 10-ish
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Oh, I got less than that ~
 
@Jan 10 . . . thousand?
Must have been some slides
@Jan Your sulfuric acid is fake
Tempting every other acid to fake it as well
And the bases are two-face anyway
 
Jan
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Nah, supposed to be a ten-ish minutes presentation for each member, with that much time again for discussion.
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ The assertment that I used sulphuric acid is fake.
 
Oh. 3000 words per slide
@Jan It is the source of all evil nonetheless
I remember when they lasered Britannica onto a needle
Must have been a similar experience
 
 
2 hours later…
9:39 AM
-1
Q: Is this sentence correct (Deadline soon please help me)

Maria H Hey I am a student and I have a deadline soon I need your help. I already done my work and I need someone to only check it for me. PLEASE, I will appreciate you whole my life and for your help. I will never forget, I am so stuck. My work is to fill the blanks. I will never ask homework q...

I will appreciate you my whole life
Please
 
 
3 hours later…
12:52 PM
@AvnishKabaj I love that the only thing resembling chemistry in that whole onebox is the logo and the tags
> Hey I am a student and I have a deadline soon I need your help. I already done my work and I need someone to only check it for me. PLEASE, I will appreciate you whole my life and for your help. I will never forget, I am so stuck. My work is to fill the blanks. I will never ask homework q...
So much text
 
Agreed
 
0
Q: Synergic Bonding in Carbonyl complexes

Gagan HegdeWhat is synergic bonding? How does it affect the C-O bond in the carbonyl ligand?

Reopenable?
Probably not
@Mart this guy is banging on the expertise drum, so let the experts decide: chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/106806/… Is it reopenable? I don't want anything to do with that guy again
@Martin-マーチン Obviously if you connect two dots you always end up with a tetrahedron.
 
I'll look into it
 
Jan
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Had to star that one :D
 
1:07 PM
@Jan but you didn't, and also you obviously only need one dot to get to the tetrahedron...
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Ah... that makes me loose my Christmas spirit.
 
Jan
@Martin-マーチン Yes I did, like two minutes ago. Check it!
 
ah, well now i see , you referred to the original quote...
 
My birthday is on Dec 26
Basically a version of Jesus that's compatible with Win 10
 
haha :D
alright, need to indulge more into that question
 
Jan
Why is the 24th incompatible with Win10?
 
1:14 PM
There have been no recent updates to it
And everyone knows up there they all use Macs anyway
 
Preinstalled with linux though
That question is a gift keeping on giving.
 
Jan
If these are jokes, I don’t get them.
 
@Jan They're encrypted and only 70 percent yield people can access them
 
Jan
Good thing the standard reaction gives north of 90 percent.
 
Textbook reactions don't count
Back to the book for me
 
Jan
1:24 PM
Not textbook, just established lab procedure.
 
everything below quantitative yield is held back...
> The yield is quantitative after recovering 99% of the starting material.
I think the question is incredibly broad, even if it were limited to a single compound. For example: any molecule is hard for Hartree-Fock to be described anywhere close to correct, especially considering the properties you name. Obviously you can go post-HF, then only almost all molecules are hard to treat. And then there is "MP2 is a graveyard for transition metal chemistry". Also ab initio is only technically challenging for > 1000 atoms, there is not really a theoretical limit. Usually the smaller molecules are harder to describe. But I guess I am only stating the obvious here. — Martin - マーチン ♦ 18 secs ago
 
Jan
1:39 PM
@Martin-マーチン Sadly, my starting material is volatile so how much I recover depends on how long it was on the rotavap Y__Y
 
well... there's that then...
Bad molecules top spot: sodium diatomic
 
Jan
I don’t think I procrastinated so much on a single working day since writing my thesis …
 
 
2 hours later…
3:27 PM
@Martin-マーチン Oh I guess someone needs a more rigorous background before asking a question then
Ugh, why am I letting them bitter up my day?
I made so much progress today! Unlike Jan
 
I have been asking myself these things, too.
 
The Viking hat is really a banana to me, BTW
A mostly red, weird banana
 
I've got the routine visit to the surgeon general and my nephrologist tomorrow, so I'm confident all extra progress will go down the toilet, don't worry
 
that's awfully pessimistic
 
3:30 PM
Nope
Not if it's planned
 
okay then: that sound awfully pessimistic
please enlighten me
 
Well they're both located at the busiest district of the town, so the healthy 400 minutes of studying I do every day won't be possible tomorrow
Watching the same Iranian cars with the same dull colors, just different plate numbers, for 3 hours
I'm not on a tight schedule, the exam I'm studying for is 192 days away
Basically, I've been a different person after transplant
Dialysis days were really off my week. I had a week of only 4 days
I couldn't walk for 10 minutes without feeling elevated heart beats and dizziness. Thrice.
Now I walk/jog 10 kms a day at 7.2 kmph speed
I feel healthy as hell. Pretty sure hell is healthy. It all depends on your perspective
There's also this:
in Language Overflow, Dec 10 at 18:29, by CowperKettle
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-12-dialysis-patients-brain-injury.html
Back to the book!
 
 
1 hour later…
4:52 PM
Well that sound quite good then. And if you are already studying for an exam 192 days away, that must be pretty important... So good luck with that :D
 
5:26 PM
-2
Q: I was reading the chapter oragin chemistry and could solve it out can u help me

J.hirin organic chemistry if we have functional group and a double bond which gets preference in UIPAC names for numbering carbon atoms

This needs to be preserved
Unidentified Intermittent Pack of Aspired Chemists
 
 
2 hours later…
7:34 PM
2
A: Regioselectivity in iodolactonisation of γ,δ-unsaturated carboxylic acid

orthocresolThere are several arguments. Firstly, five-membered ring formation is generally kinetically more favourable than 6-membered ring formation. As ring size increases, the entropy of activation also increases – this is explained in greater detail in Clayden 2ed, pp 805–807. It is true that six-member...

This answer was way better than the homo lumo mumbo jumbo I read in clayden
Are the exceptions given in clayden the only exceptions
Or the important ones?
@M.A.R.ಠ_ಠ Loong rises from his coffin
Mortal, what hast thou doneth to nomenclature of mine? Atone for thy sins
 
 
4 hours later…
11:10 PM
@AvnishKabaj Exceptions to what? Baldwin's rules?
There are many... which is why we usually say "favoured/disfavoured" as opposed to "allowed/forbidden".
Clayden is generally quite a reliable textbook - not sure what you're referring to. There are certainly some bits which are simplified.
 

« first day (2427 days earlier)      last day (1962 days later) »