The comments in this post discuss this issue, though without a clear conclusion unless I'm missing something.
For something as simple as grams per mole for example, there are actually several ways of displaying the units:
1) g/mol
2) $\mathrm{g/mol}$
3) $\mathrm{g~mol^{-1}}$
4) $\mathrm{g\do...
I just saw you put up an answer, I'm gonna take a read of it here...
I definitely agree with the conclusion. What made me think of this is a user who is putting in tons of work doing edits lately, but they seem to correct every fraction, units or otherwise, to the \frac format. I've just been leaving his corrections in place. Don't know if I should say anything to them.
Also, if you want to refer to a specific message someone's posted, hover over that message and click the 'Enter'-looking arrow at the right edge of the post.
@airhuff Like so
The referenced post then gets highlighted when you mouse over the post that does the referencing
and you can click the upside-down Enter-arrow at the left edge of the referencing post to be taken to wherever the referenced post is.
You can reference posts even waaay far back into the chat history.
There are lots of little tidbits of how the tools work, like these.
What if I put a note in a comment of a question he's reformatted with the @ format to ping him to it or whatever, then delete the comment later? That's how a lot of people have gotten messages to help me.
I have to take off for a bit..great chatting and thx again for the help!
@airhuff You can only ping people in comments if they either wrote the question or answer you're commenting on, or if they've also commented on that question/answer.
Also, you can only ping one person per comment.
In chat, people are only pingable if they've posted something in that chat room within ~the last week.
I don't think someone who has only edited a given question or answer is pingable in a comment there
I just had to read some general descriptions of sodium chloride and it was always classified as odourless (e.g., by Wikipedia). However, large amounts of table salts (around 1 kg) have a clearly perceptible odour to me. By table salt I mean salt sold for the purpose of cooking – I have not been t...
Hey guys, I need some help in using freqchk utility of gaussian. I followed the instructions by using my chk file that is created after a frequency calculation, and then pick the same values as the temperature I originally used in the frequency calculation (in order to use that as a sanity check, since I should expect all thermodynamic parameters to be identical). However what I got is something weird like this:
Zero-point correction= 0.000000 (Hartree/Particle) Thermal correction to Energy= 0.002833 Thermal correction to Enthalpy= 0.003777 Thermal correction to Gibbs Free Energy= -0.202143
In addition it seems none of the frequencies were read from the chk, as I get zeros everywhere in the frequency printout
Ok nvm, it seems g09's freqchk is unable to read g16 freq calulations
and the computer cluster we are using say module load gaussian will load the latest gaussian version, but it turns out via using module display gaussian, it was found to be loading g09e01
As for why g09 have trouble reading g16 checkpoint files correctly, I have no idea without the source code
With great power comes great responsibility, they say. Until you can count your molar masses, maybe you don't need sulfuric acid all that much. — Ivan Neretinyesterday
Yup, I was thinking about that meta proposal. Thought you were the best person to take a look at the edit, but when it's copied from HyperPhysics, oh well.