« first day (1605 days earlier)      last day (2788 days later) » 

1:14 AM
@MartianCactus what do you mean?
 
 
6 hours later…
6:57 AM
@ringo popularity on SE is really unpredictable
i guess this one is layman-accessible
so people must have come here via google
6
Q: Mysterious upvotes

Ivan NeretinI'm talking about one recent question: Has a carbon compound ever been found having an ionic bond? The question is quite trivial, so is my answer, and I expected it to get a modest sum of 2-3 upvotes over time. But 12? Flattering as it is, this just doesn't feel right. What kind of flashmob is t...

lack of good questions recently
 
7:24 AM
You've been climbing though I see ;)
Perservering
10,000 reputation ... access to moderator tools ... access reports, review reviews, and addition of little brown box to your hot bar that never goes away
 
 
1 hour later…
8:58 AM
Why does it increase across the groups?
 
9:19 AM
@orthocresol @MAFIA36790 Could you help me?
 
@ringo haha, turns out I don't really use those much... On the bright side I get to see every deleted answer
"Bright"
@user34388 chemguide should have something on it
go and search
 
@orthocresol Thanks
@orthocresol however, according to the orbital theories, doesn't an electron in O have less energy than C?
oh, so it takes more energy to remove the electron
chemguide mentions the shielding effect
(as well as the charge of the nucleus)
Does this confirm the half-orbital-stabilizing theory?
@orthocresol
 
 
2 hours later…
11:30 AM
is anybody free to help with some mathjax?
1
Q: Explination letter codes of quantum mechanics

Arno van der WeijdenI'm trying to find an explanation for the letter codes (X, A, B, C, etc) when you get a term symbol like this X3 Σ-g. Can anyone point me to some literature that explains these letter codes??

trying to typeset that term symbol, but $\Sigma_g^-$ renders the superscript minus very low
$\Sigma_g^-$
this doesn't happen if there's only the superscript, so $\Sigma^-$ comes out correct: $\Sigma^-$
enclosing the minus sign in {} doesn't help either $\Sigma_{g}^{-}$ $\Sigma_{g}^{-}$
 
user116211
hmm, @mart might help @ortho....
 
user116211
I've no idea :(
 
me neither, quick search on google and tex.se doesn't bring up anything
that works, the solution is to enclose \Sigma in curly braces
 
user116211
Mart is an expert on this; you here @mart?
 
${\Sigma}^-_g$ comes out as ${\Sigma}^-_g$
 
user116211
11:37 AM
@orthocresol ohh.
 
thanks anyway haha
 
user116211
@orthocresol you helped yourself ;P
 
12:42 PM
xdxd the @mart triggered me instead of him
 
1:01 PM
@MartianCactus it triggers all of the people logged into chat that start with those letters
So you just pinged me....
 
 
3 hours later…
3:39 PM
Is "1,4-dioxocyclohexane" the systematic IUPAC name of "1,4-dioxin"?
I meant 1,4-dioxocyclohexa-2,5-diene
I meant 3,6-dioxocyclohexa-1,4-diene
 
 
2 hours later…
5:18 PM
Should "barium monofluoride" be named "barium (I) fluoride"? Or is the parentheses only for transition metals?
 

« first day (1605 days earlier)      last day (2788 days later) »