« first day (1293 days earlier)      last day (3095 days later) » 

12:26 AM
@Nova Calculate log[Zn] from equation on pic then calc [Zn]*20 which is answer - what's hard here? ;)
 
ok cool, so plug in log(z) for x and the voltage for y
thanks for your help. That's what I was doing, but I wasn't getting the answer. Ill go through it again
ok cool it works, I messed up the dilution part. thanks again
 
no problemo :)
 
@Mithoron Hey!
 
@Loong o/
 
Why do we still have to review your edits? Let's change that.
 
12:43 AM
@Loong O.o Upvoted my two almost nice answers
That was a surprise
I thought about anwering to break 2k but be it that way :)
 
Now, you should be able to review suggested edits. Just do it responsibly. ;-)
 
Think I was somehow little afraid of this "promotion"
Strange, I have such rights on other site for many years
 
0
Q: I need help with Chemistry help now

user22755All of the following are solutions except: Ocean water 24 karat old nugget a concrete building block a sterling silver bracelet

 
O.o what the... ?
 
well, at least OP used the tag.
 
1:00 AM
Using help in the title twice was a dead giveaway anyways :D
 
although OP wrote "24 karat old nugget", my mind always automatically reads "24 karat gold nugget"
2
 
hehe, also commas would be nice :D
0
Q: Acid-Base Neutralization Reactions

KeiannaI need help balancing this and solving a few others. and solving this, it confuses me H2SO4 + NaOH = H2O + Na2So4

How much more this of homeworks...
 
1:17 AM
2 days ago, by Loong
user image
 
Haha :D
What-if is really nice, sad he's not updating as much as earlier
 
> I can pick up a mole (animal) and throw it.[citation needed] Anything I can throw weighs one pound. One pound is one kilogram. The number 602,214,129,000,000,000,000,000 looks about twice as long as a trillion, which means it’s about a trillion trillion. I happen to remember that a trillion trillion kilograms is how much a planet weighs. … if anyone asks, I did not tell you it was ok to do math like this.
 
1:37 AM
:) Ech, should really go to sleep, g'night!
 
@Mithoron good night
 
1:50 AM
hey guys how do indicators for redox titrations work
where the do the electrons come from that reduce/ozidize them?
if I am titrating iron with cesium, one iron electron gets transfered to one cesium atom.
so how does the indicator change color when its not gaining/losing any electrons
 
 
3 hours later…
4:50 AM
@Nova The principle is the same as with acid base indicators. The indicator changes colour after all the reactant you are titrating is used up.
 
so the titrant starts reacting with the indicator?
 
Yes, that is one way of doing it
it's not really clear what reaction you are using...
 
im referring to the indicators that change depending on the voltage of the solution
 
You are surely not titrating iron with caesium...
@Nova Sorry, I don't understand what that means
 
im talking about "redox indicators"
like tris(2.2-bipyridine)iron
 
5:11 AM
@Nova... sorry had to take care of something
What are you titrating with what?
 
 
1 hour later…
6:22 AM
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. ping...
 
 
3 hours later…
9:12 AM
@Nova I assume you mean cerium (Ce), not caesium (Cs). My guess is that, after Ce(IV) is done oxidising your sample, it oxidises the Fe(II) to Fe(III) which changes the colour of the indicator. So the change in colour tells you when your sample has been fully oxidised.
I am assuming your indicator contains Fe(II). Other indicators may contain other metal ions, or perhaps none at all. Just replace accordingly.
So if you really want to think about it in terms of electron transfer, initially your sample is transferring electrons to Ce(IV). Then when your sample has no more electrons left to transfer, the indicator will transfer some of its electrons to Ce(IV). When the indicator loses electrons it changes colour.
However, I'd recommend you just think about it in terms of simple oxidation or reduction, instead of electron transferred from A to B, unless you are worried about the mechanism of the redox reaction.
 
10:02 AM
@Martin-マーチン Ping!
 
 
1 hour later…
11:05 AM
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
 
Jan
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Pong!
 
@Jan Volley!
 
Jan
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. Ball!
 
@Jan Suck
 
11:53 AM
@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. ┬─┬ ノ( ^_^ノ)
I'll be back in about 10 mins, you can tell me your plans then... and i will tell you stuff about what you tell me... and then you can tell me stuff about the stuff that i told you...
and if anyone else has stuff to tell, we can tell stuff about that stuff too
just saying...
i mean there is stuff going to happen
( ¬ ‿ ¬)
 
Jan
@Martin-マーチン So much stuff, it almost sounds illegal D=
 
12:11 PM
@Jan well, well, well....
 
 
1 hour later…
1:32 PM
Anybody here who has powers of 3D imagination?
 
Jan
@Loong I can imagine very elaborate worlds, does that count?
 
@Jan Sure. ;-) You just need to imagine a chiral molecule.
Of course, this explanation cannot be correct:
8
A: Molecular chirality and optical rotation

ManishEarth since for every orientation of the molecule, we can reverse the orientation such that the light appears to be falling on the molecule from a direction other than the one for our original molecule. This is false. Let's take 2-butanol. For this stereoisomer, light is turning clockwise when vi...

 
Jan
@Loong May possibly work ;)
 
However, it is not quite obvious, which step is actually wrong.
I think, from the second to the third picture, when the molecule is simultaneously rotated by 180° around the vertical axis and by 180° around the horizontal axis, one disc representing the polarization is only rotated by 90°.
 
Jan
Yes, step 2 to step 3 is a rotation of the molecule (180° around a vertical axis as the discs are) followed by flipping of the molecule by $\sigma_\mathrm{h}$ to the vertical $C_2$ axis.
Actually no, it's not …
Followed by rotation around a perpendicular $C_2$ axis.
And the disc is rotated by 180° and then flipped.
The final image of the discs seems to be correct …
 
1:49 PM
@Jan Yes, the final flip, when the discs are viewed from the other side, is ok. The flaw has happened before.
 
Jan
But he shouldn't flip the molecule but rather keep it the same, shouldn't he? Minute rotation from 'the back of the disc is slightly pointing forward' to 'the front of the disc is slightly pointing forward'.
I think I've figured it all out, @Loong. I hope that conflicts with your view for maximised confusion ;)
 
@Jan I guess, I know the mistake, too. But there are various possible geometrical variants of this step. Let's hear your approach! :-)
 
Jan
@Loong See my block above ;)
 
@Jan oh, yes, I did not see that the molecule was flipped in the last step. (S)-butan-2-ol changes to (R)-butan-2-ol.
Hm, now I see two mistakes. Why don't they cancel each other? :-D
Ah, ok, the wrong drawing of the molecule in the last picture does not affect the wrong rotation of the polarization between picture 2 and 3.
 
Jan
@Loong If two mistakes always cancelled out each other, I would have long synthesised my target molecule plus its ethyl derivative.
 
2:04 PM
@Jan :-D Yes, and if it doesn't work, just make one additional mistake to change it back again.
 
2:15 PM
@Loong @Jan I cannot see any mistake with the answer
 
Jan
@Martin-マーチン Not sure about the physical part of the description, but the drawings are more than is said. There are extra flips and rotations here and there that are not part of what @ManishEarth said in the surrounding text.
 
no the drawings are correct and consistent with the explanation, as is the explanation
 
Jan
Oh wait …
The rotation axis is perpendicular to the screen for images two to three!
But the last image is definitely not showing the same molecule.
@Martin-マーチン Now I see the correct 'flip' (which is indeed the minute rotation I talked about), too. But the molecule changed.
 
@Jan yeah thats right...
i have overlooked this
@Jan C2H5 and CH3 have to be exchanged
well, well, somebody should comment
 
Jan
Your last image is incorrect; you accidentally swapped $\ce{CH3}$ and $\ce{C2H5}$. Otherwise nice description. — Jan 10 secs ago
 
2:30 PM
:D
Ina does not want to talk about the HW stuff...
 
3:00 PM
I guess, picture 1 and 2 would be already sufficient for the explanation. The polarization is turned counterclockwise when the light goes from left to right as well as when it goes from right to left.
 
3:47 PM
@Martin-マーチン Martin doesn't want to talk about the HW stuff . . .
 
4:39 PM
So @Mart, anyway, I want to write a meta post and ask the community what they want a homework question to mean.
Like, as a first step, we're gonna gather ideas on what policies should exists and how much they should be enforced. What do you think?
 
you can do that... no problem... we'll see how that goes
 
Oh @Mart \o
OK, so going ahead and writing it.
 
i am about to pack up, its almost 2 and i am still at the office
 
Wow.
 
i just wanted to let you know, that i'll be on vacation for about two weeks and you will probably don't get any input from me
 
4:41 PM
Don't worry, I'll make ask you to feature tomorrow.
(ノT_T)ノ ^┻━┻
 
we already have a featured post, which is not progressing as planned I guess?
 
Yes, it's stale.
I'll come back to it when I got the time.
 
well, gather the intel on hw and then we see... I don't see us getting a new policy this year, with all the holidays in the way, people hardly have time to care for stuff like this.... and since this is a replacement thing, it really needs votes...
gn8
imma off to bed
 
@Martin-マーチン good night
 
\o
 
 
4 hours later…
8:49 PM
room topic changed to The Periodic Table: Haikus are awesome / Chemistry is even better / So pull up a chair [blowing-the-lab-up] [german-stuff] [hullo] [love-you-all] [martin] [table-flipping] [tre] [welcome]
^^ The info was too long.
 
9:23 PM
55
Q: Windows Unable to Delete ._. File

Mike KI currently have a file on the root of my external hard drive simply named ._., which I am guessing was added to my hard drive after using it on my MacBook a while ago. I'm trying to delete this file on my Windows 10 machine; however Windows keeps claiming the file cannot be found. I also tri...

Hehe
 
Sad Where's porkchat's emoticons?
 
I'm on firefox. No porkchat
My laptop died last week, so I'm on a temp computer
 
Temperature computer? :P
 
Idk what happened? It was working fine, and the next day when I started it, the screen wouldn't change at all (always black). I changed the ram, removed the battery, ...., nothing would fix it. And it wasn't beeping anymore like it should do when it's RAM-less.
 
9:29 PM
Suicide?
 
Alrighty I need to sleep. Later!
 
hello
 
@Mithoron o/
 
Hey tiny gray bald eagle
 
9:31 PM
o/
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ no nick manipulation
@AinzOoalGoal I can be sth less serious. Changing ram probably wouldn't help
 
@Mithoron Well, sometimes faulty ram affects graphics
 
Could be power supply, but you say it turns on normally?
 
Anyhow, I can't find any way to fix it :((
 
If it turns on it could be indeed graphics or screen
 
@Mithoron The computer turns on, the fan works, the leds on the side work. The screen doesn't, nor does the beeper
But I don't think the issue is exactly in my screen. I linked it to an external screen through the VGA output, and it wasn't detected
 
9:43 PM
Than it looks like graphics. You have only integrated?
 
Hmm that would be very bad, doubt the main board could be repaired :(
@AinzOoalGoal Seems you should go to specialist. Even in bad case new main board shouldn't cost much
 
@Mithoron The laptop is 5-6 years old though. It might be time I get a new one
 
Maybe, but it would be much more expensive
 
Well, in the end, it's my parent's call :P they're the one who pay
 
10:04 PM
;)
 
10:24 PM
@skullpetrol Is there a problem with your post?
 

« first day (1293 days earlier)      last day (3095 days later) »