« first day    last day (4383 days later) » 

CHM
12:05 AM
@Fx bye, get out now, will you?
 
12:53 AM
0
Q: Acid catalysed synthesis of ethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate

CHMOne synthesis of quinolones begins with the formation of an ethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate, as seen in this Organic Syntheses paper. I've been asked if the malonate derivative would be formed if methylmalonate was treated with trimethyl orthoformate with a catalytic amount of $\mathrm{H^+}$, with...

 
F'x
1:04 AM
@CHM I did, but now I'm back
 
CHM
@Fx good
I think using **text** is better than using \textbf{}
I'm going to use ** for chemical names
 
F'x
@CHM good; also, I think it might make web-indexing better
@CHM the link in your malonate question doesn't work for me; it opens a white page
 
F'x
@CHM that one works
 
CHM
@Fx editing after reading the comment.
sure
 
F'x
1:10 AM
by the way, I liked the or
 
CHM
@Fx hmmm... add it back, then.
 
F'x
and would have thought "colligative properties" is only used for liquid-phase solutions
 
CHM
I assume a lot of people could use it, yeah
@Fx that's why I asked him to be clearer... I hadn't thought about eutectics before you mentioned. I was thinking more of an unpurified synthesis compound.
About the tags, you can add them back. I didn't think they were erased, I thought mine were appended.
 
F'x
@CHM no worry, but I am curious: do you have any example of colligative being used for a non-liquid solution?
regarding eutectics, it happens for all binary mixtures, and that includes a synthesized compound + its impurity
 
CHM
@Fx my training would make me say no.
Colligative properties of solutions is what I mean.
But then again
A solution can be solid, can it?
@LanceLafontaine good to take notice of the comments. If you can write a precision in the comments, you should consider adding it to the main question, and then removing your comment.
If you do that, I'm going to remove mine too. It keeps things clean and clear.
 
F'x
1:16 AM
@LanceLafontaine hi!
 
CHM
@Fx I'd think that the evolution of Tfus of a with augmenting Xb where a and b are metals would be considered a colligative property.
Since they're only one phase...
@Fx I've edited my question.
 
1
Q: Are there any ionic amorphous solids?

F'xThis question on NaCl crystalization actually got me wondering: are there any ionic amorphous solids? Like ionic crystals are crystalline materials of electrostatically-attracted ions, can ions form an amorphous phase? I can see no reason why not, but I cannot think of any example either…

 
F'x
@CHM yes; and I've found a patent for your reaction with clays: patentstorm.us/patents/5041619/description.html
 
CHM
@Fx hmmm.. interesting.
I'm confounded.
Some of my mates thought keto-enol tautomerism was important in the process- I think they haven't looked at the molecule carefully :P
 
F'x
@CHM well, that was my first thought too… but admittedly, my organic chemistry classes are a far distant memory
 
CHM
1:27 AM
@Fx "the aluminum silicates employed as catalysts"
@Fx Haha. I don't see how an ester would undergo keto-enol tautomerization, since.. it's not a ketone.
 
F'x
@CHM they're clays
 
CHM
@Fx you're surely more familiar with catalysts than I am.
What I'm pretty sure of, is that without the catalyst, the reaction wouldn't be very efficient.
 
F'x
but anyway, any chance of trans-esterification there? not that it yields the product you want, but I am wondering…
 
CHM
"If these acids or acidic salts are used without the catalysts, the necessary reaction times are lengthened considerably with a simultaneously clearly reduced yield."
Well, yes, there could be.
 
F'x
@CHM in fact, it's the only thing I could see happening with acid and no heat
but again, take that with a metric ton of salt
 
CHM
1:30 AM
There are actually many different paths one could follow, but they're not in the direction of the desired product.
Organic Chemistry be damned!
3
 
F'x
@CHM and that, Sir, is duly starred!
 
CHM
@Fx haha.
Do you think TD-DFT will revolutionize organic chemistry?
Come to think of it, it could put an end to the misery of "informed guessing"
 
F'x
@CHM the only thing I can see revolutionizing organic chemistry would be the undergrad and grad students creating a powerful union :)
 
CHM
Are they that underpaid?
And/or working with tied hands?
 
F'x
@CHM never done an internship or lab work in organic chem?
 
CHM
1:34 AM
@Fx no.
Lab work, for my diploma.
 
F'x
@CHM they you don't want any spoilers :)
but I found it to be extremely tedious and unrewarding work, and the powers that be typically don't care much for your opinion on anything
 
CHM
I'm not looking forward to one either. I'm more comfortable with chemical physics/physical chemistry.
 
F'x
put it another way: for some reason, organic chem appears to me as the most conservative and hierarchical field of chemistry
 
CHM
Bleh. That's what it looks like from the outside. Everybody competing to be the next best informed guesser.
What stinks about organic chemistry training, is the sheer lack of it.
 
F'x
@CHM when I was a student, it was considered the crown jewel of chemistry, so most of the hours devolved to it
 
CHM
1:37 AM
When you enroll for a degree in chemistry at a college, you'll get 3-4 organic chemistry courses, but only 1-2 organic chemistry labs.
At least, over here.
 
F'x
ah, we didn't practice much, though, indeed
 
CHM
@Fx I'm talking about lab experience.
 
F'x
@CHM got it, now
 
CHM
We'd need to spend a whole semester in an org.chem lab
Doing reaction after reaction, 5 days a week.
2 or 3 lab reports, nothing too heavy
 
F'x
@CHM but then nobody would do chemistry anymore, right?
 
CHM
1:39 AM
Haha, no I didn't mean do only organic chemistry labwork
 
F'x
I mean, organic chemistry stop being fun the day you realize that it's not only beautiful pen & paper constructions, but that sometimes the fucking yellow product is just a marroon liquidish molasses
 
CHM
Hahaha
 
F'x
anyway, I've got go and get some work done
see you later!
 
CHM
And when you spend 35 hours (in undergrad) synthesizing a product and only get to scrape a miligram or two from the sides of your flask...
@Fx bye
 
2:09 AM
@CHM this is why organic chemistry blows; in biochem I can piece together a 100% stereo-specific compound with a weight in the hundreds of thousands of amu in some aqueous solution at 37°C overnight
 
CHM
@NickT marvelous.
 
using like, digested cheese and some Marmite
 
CHM
I don't dislike synthetic chemistry that much, actually. I think it's absolutely necessary to learn, for a chemist/biochemist. What I dislike, is the way you need to guess around (once past a certain point, your intuition can get a beating)
See you're using enzymes
I'd like organic chemistry if we could use custom enzymes with 99% yield/stereospecificity/regioselectivity/chemoselectivity etc
But that's still far away.
@NickT Are you a student?
 
0
A: Why do any impurities lower the melting point of an isolated substance?

Nick TThermodynamically, you're considering the chemical potentials ($\mu$) of the liquid and solid(s), specifically the temperature where they're equal. In a mixture, the potential is lower as the disorder (entropy) has increased, so all things equal, it will favor the liquid over a purer solid where...

I think I'm wandering off the deep end there
@CHM yeah, entering a biochem grad program this summer
 
CHM
@NickT I'll read that answer next.
 
2:14 AM
had my pchem II final today, figured I'd try to remember some of it by throwing it down :P
I don't know how really to handle the non-idealities of it (can a ever be >1?)
 
CHM
@NickT nice. What will you be working on?
Please don't talk about disorder when referring to entropy!
;)
 
I like structural biology (where this figure is from), so looking at joining some crystal labs
 
CHM
Thou shall consult JChemEd.
 
one of the ones I'm trying to set up a rotation with (unsure if it's a done deal right now) deals with active membrane pumps (ABC transporters) for things like drug resistance
 
CHM
@NickT so structural biology is like physchem applied to biology?
 
2:22 AM
certain aspects
@CHM what's wrong with using "disorder" to refer to entropy?
 
CHM
@NickT because no notion of order/disorder are used to define entropy.
 
don't hate on my layterms
 
CHM
it can be useful to think about it that way, but it is misleading.
A has greater entropy than B if there are more microstates that describe A's macrostate than B's.
But as mostly everybody else, I first thought about entropy as disorder. It's just that reading some JChemEd papers made me think a bit different about it.
Back soon.
 
F'x
2:55 AM
@NickT it's a nice answer, and the non-idealities are particularly highlighted by the Au-Ag alloy example I gave
 
CHM
My grandpa shared this with me : freedomflask.com
Funny.
 
@Fx Ag-Au seems like it would be an ideal mixture (in the sense that all the interactions are equal), is it probably just because the mixture (alloy) solidifies as one, not pure?
my prof didn't know much about alloys or other solid mixtures when we covered that
not his bag so to speak
 
CHM
@NickT @Fx both of your answers are nice.
But I still think the question is too vague. What do you think?
 
or should the question it's on just be tagged
 
F'x
@NickT acido-basicity and a synonym
or the other way around :)
@CHM I think the question is clear: it's a common chemistry textbook statement that you can characterize compound purity by measuring its melting point, because the melting point is lowered by impurities. He's asking why that is.
 
CHM
3:10 AM
What question are you talking about?
 
6
Q: Why do any impurities lower the melting point of an isolated substance?

LanceLafontaineIt is known that impurities in a desired isolated product lower the melting point of the mixture, even if the impurities melting point is much higher than the desired product. Why is that?

 
F'x
same as you, re. "I think the question is too vague"
 
CHM
@Fx uh?
 
F'x
and I probably wasn't very clear, cause my answer is totally generic and does not deal with metal mixtures; in fact, I used the metal alloy only as a counter-example
 
he pretty much summed up his rationale in the comment; it's something is lab prof said
 
CHM
3:12 AM
@Fx To me, that's the problem. The fact that there are textbooks devoted to the problem - questions should be more concices, imo. But it's not such a big deal.
 
which is like the 2nd thing you learn about melting points in orgo lab; if your melting point is protracted (or much lower than it should be) your product is likely impure
 
CHM
@NickT yes, I saw. But I think he should edit his question to reflect that, keeping things neat.
 
F'x
@NickT the first thing you learn about melting points is that racing crystals on a Koffler rail with a friend is fun :)
 
CHM
@Fx what's a koffler rail?
 
@Fx 1st thing for me was to not go so fast you had to repeat the experiment again...and again...and again...
and let the friggin thing cool between each go
 
F'x
3:15 AM
A Kofler bench or Kofler hot-stage microscope is a metal strip with a temperature gradient (range room temperature to 300°C). Any substance can be placed on a section of the strip revealing its thermal behaviour at the temperature at that point. This melting-point apparatus for use with a microscope was developed by the Austrian pharmacognosist Ludwig Kofler (30 November 1891 Dornbirn - 23 August 1951 Innsbruck) and his wife Adelheid Kofler. In 1936, the Koflers and Mayrhofer published their "Mikroskopische Methoden in der Mikrochemie" [Kofler, L., A. Kofler and Mayrhofer, A. (1936)], ...
apparently, it's a "bench" in English :)
and it's Kofler, one f
 
@Fx as opposed to what; Francois?
 
CHM
@Fx ah, ok.
@NickT Français.
 
F'x
@NickT yeah, I learnt that in French
 
CHM
@Fx The use of François is, funny.
I've never seen such an apparatus.
 
F'x
@CHM how do you measure melting points?
 
3:17 AM
1
Q: Chloroform and nitrile gloves

PatMany of us have experienced the failure of nitrile gloves when exposed to chloroform. What's going on at a mechanistic level when this occurs? I would guess that the chloroform dissolves some of the polymer into its constituent monomers, but I've never heard anything more definite than that. Is i...

 
CHM
We used microscopes with an oil bath and a thermocouple and a fan.
Pretty basic.
 
capillary tubes in a heating apparatus
 
F'x
@CHM well, the Kofler bench is much more basic that that
thought I don't know how they make sure the temperature gradient is linear
 
CHM
@NickT yes, very similar to that.
@Fx that's what surprised me - a temperature gradient on a continuous strip of metal.. hmm
 
F'x
@CHM well, I'll show you any frying pan handle, you'll see if it's not a gradient on a continuous strip of metal :)
 
CHM
3:22 AM
Still, I'm wondering how you can control that.
Could make way for a nice question.
 
F'x
anyway, gotta go, bye again!
 
I still don't get how the bench works; does it just have a temperature controlled heater on one side, then some huge heat sink on the other end?
 
CHM
Bye
@NickT that's good question material ;)
 
don't have any idea how you could get very precise with that though
@CHM never used one, probably won't :P
 
CHM
@NickT same.
I had ChemBioDraw Ultra before... now that I've renewed my (college) subscription, it has become ChemDraw Pro.
Lots of features are gone, it's a shame.
No more NMR predictions, no more structure to name/name to structure function
:(
 
F'x
3:34 AM
@NickT I took the liberty of retagging "buffers" into "acido-basicity" on my question :)
as I doesn't really have anything to do with buffers
 
@Fx can I at least call it acid-base? acido-basicity doesn't sound english
 
CHM
@Fx concerning your answer of the question about Woodward's synthesis, that one is also a case where I think the question is too broad.
 
F'x
@NickT go for acid-base, sure
but a buffer is a very specific type of solution, it's not a synonym of acid-base, that's my point
 
CHM
@Fx one couldn't provide a clear answer to his question. It would have to be a huge literature review, and a total re-thinking of the synthesis
 
I skimmed it and saw titration, equilbrium, pKa and figured buffer
:P
 
F'x
3:39 AM
@NickT titration in a buffer isn't a lot of fun :)
 
also seems a bit strange; maybe?
 
F'x
but it's not my first language, so retag if you feel it's better
 
CHM
I'd like more a question on a particular step, or series of steps, as I've written in the comment.
 
I'm not talking about it not being a word, it just doesn't seem like a category
 
CHM
@NickT @Fx why not just ionic?
Then one can use it for more than one thing.
ionic - character, interactions, compounds, etc.
 
F'x
3:42 AM
@CHM works for me
 
CHM
@Fx the tag, or the B12 question?
 
F'x
hum, I got downvoted without any comment
@CHM if you highlight my message, you can see which of yours I was replying to :)
 
@CHM but is one likely to be an expert on "ionic"?
 
F'x
the tag
 
CHM
o.O
I've never seen that
 
3:44 AM
@CHM it only works on messages with the arrow on them
 
F'x
the B12 question, as I said, I think is a bit broad but somewhat fine; it's like asking "what methods are available to do X"; it's a bit more open-ended, but as long as the OP has looked a bit into or is posting context, they are fine to me
@NickT well, it only works with replies, yes :)
 
CHM
@NickT no, obviously. But tags are meant to describe the content in the question, so that people who are interested in the topic can view them more easily?
Not sure...
 
F'x
8
Q: Is activated carbon classified as organic or inorganic?

F'xOrganic compounds are typically defined as “molecules containing carbon”. Wikipedia states that there for some historical (read: non-logical) reasons, a few types of carbon-containing compounds such as carbides, carbonates, simple oxides of carbon, and cyanides, as well as the allotropes of c...

it makes me so sad
 
CHM
@NickT how do I select why message I want to reply to?
 
@CHM highlight, hit the arrow on the right
 
F'x
3:45 AM
@CHM mouse over the message, they're a reply icon on the right
next to the star and flag icons
 
CHM
@NickT test
 
@Fx I don't quite get the point of that question; what does it matter what it's called
 
CHM
Wow!
Haha.
I used to type it manually.
Hence why none of my @'s had arrows.
 
F'x
@NickT well, nomenclature's a big part of chemistry
the reason is I'm preparing a presentation on porous materials as catalysts, and I didn't really know where to put it in a traditional organic/inorganic materials division :)
 
CHM
@Fx being able to unambiguously name a molecule is important. Classifying molecules in huge realms, as in biology, seems a bit less easy and useful to do, to me.
 
3:48 AM
yeah, but nomenclature for very specific things (a given drug) is totally different from saying something is organic vs. inorganic
 
F'x
@CHM well, categories are important, as is important to learn when and where they get blurry
anyway, I'd be fine with that kind of comment, but it's the lack of anything that annoys me
 
CHM
Gotta go.
 
yeah, but solving edge cases seems like a waste of time
 
F'x
@CHM ciao
 
CHM
Have fun, fellas. See you tomorrow maybe.
Oh, one last thing
 
F'x
3:49 AM
well, as I've repeatedly said already, it's time for me to go too :)
 
@Fx crying wolf
 
CHM
That question about d3s orbitals and color needs a bit more attention. I also think its not totally clear.
 
:P
 
CHM
The answer given doesn't answer the question, as well as being wrong.
Review it when you have time.
Good night.
 
 
3 hours later…
7:08 AM
0
Q: How does the choice of metal (oxide) catalyst affect the range of unsaturated compounds that can be hydrogenated?

J. M.In the hydrogenation of unsaturated compounds with hydrogen gas and a catalyst, the choice of palladium on carbon is able to hydrogenate alkenes and alkynes, but is unable to hydrogenate aromatic compounds. Using rhodium or Raney nickel, however, allows one to hydrogenate aromatics. How does the ...

0
Q: How is Teflon adhered to frying pans?

J. M.The most notable characteristic of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, DuPont's Teflon) is that nothing sticks to it. This complete inertness is attributed to the fluorine atoms completely shielding the carbon backbone of the polymer. If nothing indeed sticks to Teflon, how might one coat an object (...

0
Q: What can I do if I don't get a phase separation between my organic and water phases?

Mad ScientistSolvent extraction in a separation funnel is a very common method in preparative organic chemistry. But sometimes you don't get a nice phase separation between the organic and the water phase. What are the possible causes that can prevent the formation of two distinct phases, and how can you fo...

 
8:00 AM
Nick T has made a change to the feeds posted into this room
 
Think I'll just flip that depending on room volume
 
 
4 hours later…
11:32 AM
Good morning chemistry!
 
F'x
12:14 PM
@LordStryker and good morning to you
 
@Fx :)
We need a computational tag
like 'ab initio'
or modeling
 
F'x
12:29 PM
@LordStryker comp-chem?
with computational-chemistry synonym
also, I'd like it to be noted that this site was launched just the week I need to finish writing a sexy PRL manuscript… I consider it a conspiracy
 
@Fx sounds good. Whats PRL?
 
F'x
12:53 PM
@LordStryker Physical Review Letters
To enable MathJax in chat: meta.math.stackexchange.com/a/3297/3406
2
 
 
2 hours later…
2:46 PM
@NickT Still waiting for my 'best answer' checkmark :P
 
 
2 hours later…
4:37 PM
We chemists just don't act like this. chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/71/…
 
 
1 hour later…
5:41 PM
@LordStryker, not sure what you mean. I'm willing to modify the question accordingly.
 
6:01 PM
@bobthejoe I think he meant the reply, not your question. Your question seemed fine to me.
@LordStryker Were you still looking for answers to python questions?
 
@bobthejoe I was speaking of Georg's reply to my comment.
@Andrew I am except that I think my questions would result in a long, convoluted discussion and I don't think anyone would really have time for that. At the moment I've constructed a working SCF subroutine. Now I just need to have it give me the right answer. It really comes down to my lack of Python knowledge but I've been able to hash out a good majority of this stuff with the documentations.
 
@LordStryker Ok, if you have specific questions, feel free to contact me separately.
 
@Andrew Thank you very much. I may take you up on that offer here in the near future. :)
Though I'll be sure to keep my questions very focused if I do.
 
F'x
@Aarthi LADY LADY
 
hahaha
yay i'm so happy. Aaron is one of the smartest people I know, and he loves chemistry probably more than me.
 
F'x
@Aarthi weird, he looks nothing like you
 
@Fx the pink and the white triangles are misleading, I know.
 
F'x
@Aarthi you'd look beautiful in pink, though
 
6:21 PM
aww
 
lol
 
here is me and sibling at my graduation last year: p.twimg.com/AeOYSmzCQAASSqf.jpg:large
 
@Aarthi Where is this at?
 
@LordStryker Indiana University. :D My alma mater.
 
Ooooh, cold!
Lived in Ohio for 12 years. Never going back :P
 
6:22 PM
hahaha
that was in May; much warmer then
 
Florida for 10 years.
 
F'x
@LordStryker I'm going to Florida on Saturday, first time
 
@LordStryker hahaha nice.
 
@Fx Where at in Florida?
 
F'x
@LordStryker West Palm Beach
 
6:24 PM
@Fx I'm from Central Florida but went to UNF in Jacksonville for my Bachelors
ahhh those were the days
that was when my life was its biggest rollercoaster
 
2
A: Michael reaction or nucleophilic attack at the alpha carbon of an alpha-beta-unsaturated ketone?

user90It must first be understood that Michael Addition is a special type of conjugate (1,4) addition where the nucleophilic species is an enolate. This will undergo 1,4 addition to the A-B unsaturated carbonyl. Organocuprates add in a 1,4 fashion. The mechanism behind this is not fully understood, bu...

am i really biased or does that sound really smart? /soproudomg
sorry sorry! i'll stop
:D
 
F'x
@Aarthi it's a fine answer
 
@Fx i know, i'm being ridiculous and annoying and n00bish.
as a total neophyte to sciences, i can only appreciate the smart words
/me giggles
 
7:16 PM
@LordStryker it's like I should change my question to be "how do I calculate the strength of an interaction from a xtal structure" :P
 
F'x
@Aarthi I actually had upvoted it before I knew he was your brother :)
@Aarthi you should totally see how parents react when their son/daughter defends for a PhD
mine were "I didn't understand a word you said, but all these old professors said nice things about you, you must be the smartest boy on the planet"
 
7:41 PM
@NickT Ah. Well I'm not sure how to do that. But to model it on the computer is rather simple and straightforward enough. :P
 
Yeah...because you do that all day
:P
 
Someone should ask what the supramolecular approach is so I can put my relevant answer somewhere more proper :)
 
8:39 PM
Throw up a beta-mod meta post or wait till public beta?
seems a bit closed for now
 
F'x
@NickT too early, I'd say
maybe wait a few days after public beta opens?
 
yeah
 
8:57 PM
I wonder if I'll get nominated :P
 
Is there any way to add latex to tags?
or even just capitalization
 
@Andrew no
 
For TeX help?
That would go in the TeX community.
 
No I was more thinking "pH" should probably look like that instead of ph
 
9:00 PM
or for various compounds like H2SO4
it looks sloppy like that, but the tags don't really support anything other than lowercase and dashes
 
tags are all-lowercase and dashes, maximum of 25 characters. And it's unlikely that anything will be changed there.
 
@Fabian, the new MadScientist name keeps me on my toes :)
 
cute
 
F'x
9:22 PM
@Fabian no, unicode tags are planned for this year!
 
[tag:♥]
:(
 
9:55 PM
have a good night, see you later!
 
10:32 PM
@Andrew I just got my SCF code working!! :D :D
 
 
1 hour later…
F'x
11:40 PM
@LordStryker it just means you haven't found the bugs yet :)
 

« first day    last day (4383 days later) »