9:55 AM
@Sklivvz, I remember seeing (and being impressed) by that visualisation over a year ago, and it being much more populous. I guess the revisions that they have made have been to reduce the number of supplements? Surprises me.
Scratch that. When I look at static image, I get many many more supplements than when I look at the interactive image (Browser: Google Chrome).
And in different positions. Obviously some buggy code.
