It's good. It's good @Tan!

@TanMath many more people many people

@TanMath bad quality questions posts

@Tan one last nitpick: It would be great to conclude what you say in your post in one sentence, before your main question.

I would go like

> So chats have repeatedly proven to be beneficial to the site's quality and content, and a friendly, easy-to-use interface for scientific discussions. My question is -- Should we go about improving our chat, and how can we do this?

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. thanks.. do you know any more examples of use of chat, similar to TRE and TCE?

@TanMath Chat is what you want it to be. The main site isn't like that.

No point in my telling those.

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. sure, but want more examples, apart from TRE and TCEto have evidence for my point...

@TanMath You don't need examples. You can make chat what you want it to be.

Don't go too much into details and explaining.

ok.. then..

@Ϻ.Λ.Ʀ. shall I post it then?

Yes.

Great then.. I shall post soon!